[ANN] [HVC] Heavycoin - Ultra-secure, Decentralized Block Reward Voting, Fast

[lagur]

At such difficulty, the price is too low compared to yesterday.

[1715407563]

1715407563

[1715407563]

1715407563

[1715407563]

1715407563

[zhpool]

Anybody is experiencing problems with zhpool? My miners are running at full speed (about 68 MH), but pool's dashboard shows 200-300 KH. What's going on lately? Pool owner didn't answer my email sent several hours ago... Hmm...

Hi realrover

To be friendly to CPU miners, we start from a very low diff, so you may observe your hashrate much low than your actual hashrate, minutes later, the web will show your hashrate correct.

Be comfortable with this, your profit will not be affected

Thanks
ZHpool

[bradmurmz]

Hi community!
 I would like you to spend just 1 minute and send Bter.com a request for adding HVC to their exchange. This would increase the exposure of Heavycoin and help us all

Here´s the link

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

yeah, everyone should write a nice quick note to them giving one reason why heavycoin is going to be big soon...

[zhpool]

Hi community!
 I would like you to spend just 1 minute and send Bter.com a request for adding HVC to their exchange. This would increase the exposure of Heavycoin and help us all

Here´s the link

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

yeah, everyone should write a nice quick note to them giving one reason why heavycoin is going to be big soon...

yeah, actually I wrote something to our miners about what we thought of HeavyCoin, on our homepage http://heavycoin.zhpool.com

[realrover]

Anybody is experiencing problems with zhpool? My miners are running at full speed (about 68 MH), but pool's dashboard shows 200-300 KH. What's going on lately? Pool owner didn't answer my email sent several hours ago... Hmm...

Hi realrover

To be friendly to CPU miners, we start from a very low diff, so you may observe your hashrate much low than your actual hashrate, minutes later, the web will show your hashrate correct.

Be comfortable with this, your profit will not be affected

Thanks
ZHpool

Being friendly to CPU miners you (certainly unintentionally) are unfriendly to GPU miners. I'm not sure that you will actually find many CPU miners out there nowadays, so this argument doesn't make much sense to me... Also, I noticed that my miners were losing connection to your pool0 server in a strange way without switching to backup server. They were kind of stuck. I didn't observe such problems with another pool.

[zhpool]

I'm not sure that you will actually find many CPU miners out there nowadays

We do have 43 workers connections now working at diff around 0.000626.
and we thought GPU miners can live the unstable diff within several minutes at start up.

Also, I noticed that my miners were losing connection to your pool0 server in a strange way without switching to backup server

yes, we got informed about the unstable state of pool0 about 3 hours ago, obviously we should keep our eyes on this new server. Sorry for inconvenience. anyway, the issue is fixed now

[dE_logics]

this is the next litecoin, you heard it here

Oh... yes really.

This's basically a coin which has no coin specs.

Voting is not a good choice; and it can be seen below (and above) that while voting people are seeing only profitability not it's usability as a crypto. That's why we only choose our leaders via democracy nothing more.

People are morons. That's the max liberty they should get.

[bradmurmz]

this is the next litecoin, you heard it here

Oh... yes really.

This's basically a coin which has no coin specs.

Voting is not a good choice; and it can be seen below (and above) that while voting people are seeing only profitability not it's usability as a crypto. That's why we only choose our leaders via democracy nothing more.

People are morons. That's the max liberty they should get.

This is probably not the best forum for fascists...

[wrok]

this is the next litecoin, you heard it here

Oh... yes really.

This's basically a coin which has no coin specs.

Voting is not a good choice; and it can be seen below (and above) that while voting people are seeing only profitability not it's usability as a crypto. That's why we only choose our leaders via democracy nothing more.

People are morons. That's the max liberty they should get.

This is probably not the best forum for fascists...

I agree. People are morons are they don't even understand how the system works.
As long as there are no markets/stores/services that accept HVC, this is another shitcoin. The current price is based only on speculation/manipulation.

[jakiman]

I agree. People are morons are they don't even understand how the system works.
As long as there are no markets/stores/services that accept HVC, this is another shitcoin. The current price is based only on speculation/manipulation.

To me, LTC is just the same as any other altcoin.

I can't spend it anywhere that I want to spend and I can't cash it out either.
But as much more money has gone into LTC over a longer time, it's worth more.
Everyone not part of crypto who just heard of "bitcoin" has never heard of "litecoin".
(well, it's the case for hundreds of people around me at least. "What's Litecoin?")

For a coin to succeed, it's not just about its technical superiority.
It's about which coin has more money & people supporting it IMO.

[Vanderi]

Hi community!
 I would like you to spend just 1 minute and send Bter.com a request for adding HVC to their exchange. This would increase the exposure of Heavycoin and help us all

Here´s the link

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

yeah, everyone should write a nice quick note to them giving one reason why heavycoin is going to be big soon...

Done,

[zhpool]

Hi community!
 I would like you to spend just 1 minute and send Bter.com a request for adding HVC to their exchange. This would increase the exposure of Heavycoin and help us all

Here´s the link

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

yeah, everyone should write a nice quick note to them giving one reason why heavycoin is going to be big soon...

Done,

Done +1

[gpools]

Hi community!
 I would like you to spend just 1 minute and send Bter.com a request for adding HVC to their exchange. This would increase the exposure of Heavycoin and help us all

Here´s the link

http://support.bter.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

yeah, everyone should write a nice quick note to them giving one reason why heavycoin is going to be big soon...

Done,

Done +1

+1 I love HVC

[kqpahv]

Man this coin is hard to get   Mining it has a very low profitability at the moment and buying it isnt much easier as there just arent many sell orders for decent quantities.
took a lot of work to get 3btc worth without doubling the going rate. Seems to be really undervalued though lookinng at only 128M coins, low mining profitability, and a market cap on par with total pump and dump shitcoins

[TheRealSteve]

Pool hash rates and miners

pool	rate (Mh/s)*	delta***	% of network	miners**	rate/miner	fee (%)	payout
http://hvc.1gh.com/	30,252.55	456.77	99.65			1	RBPPS
http://heavycoin.zhpool.com/	6,342.68	5,367.91	20.89	299.4	21.18	1	PPLNS
https://heavycoinpool.com/	1,509.97	-1,179.59	4.97	190.4	7.93	0	PROP
http://heavycoin.miningpoolhub.com/	1,439.38	45.81	4.74	26	55.36
http://hvc.nonce-pool.com/	578.85	485.75	1.91	66.4	8.72	1	PPLNS
http://heavy.stablehash.com/	6.30	0.00	0.02	0.3	21	1	PROP
https://hvc.crunchharder.net/	0.00	0.00	0	0	0	2	PPLNS
total	40,129.73	5,176.65
network rate	30,360	-11,630

* due to rate variability displayed through pool statistics pages, rates are based on average of 10 samples over the past hour
** miner count for 1gh unavailable
*** Delta since last update

1gh Top stats

___Top_100___		___Top_10___
Total:	23,198.20 Mhash/s	Total:	7,605.93 Mhash/s
% of pool:	76.7%	% of pool:	25.1%
% of network:	57.8%	% of network:	19%
Mean rate:	231.98 Mhash/s	Mean rate:	760.59 Mhash/s
Median rate:	128.56 Mhash/s	Median rate:	557.88 Mhash/s
Mode(10) rate:	70 Mhash/s	Mode(100) rate:	400 Mhash/s

Block progression

	1gh	hvcpool	noncepool	zhpool	poolhub	other	total
Blocks	1984	105	177	220	11	2	2499
Percent	79.4	4.2	7.1	8.8	0.4	0.1	100
hash rate	24738	1705	2043	2765	252	24	30360
Percent	81.5	5.6	6.7	9.1	0.8	0.1	103.8

[TheRealSteve]

Ok i kinda figured you might be just pulling the reported hashes from all the pools. Logically couldn't the network hash be reverse calculated from the block time and difficulty (clearly would be skewed a bit)?

Unfortunately, that 'bit' is fairly big.  heavychain.info does this for its estimation of the network hash speed, and in my post above you can see how much that differs from summing the pools (and that doesn't even include any other pools I don't check / solo miners).  As long as miners don't actually report their fairly accurate hash speed to the network, hash rate estimations will always be that - estimations.  Of course if they did, there would be people inserting fake values into it which creates its own problems

[miningpoolhub]

Pool hash rates and miners

pool	rate (Mh/s)*	delta***	% of network	miners**	rate/miner	fee (%)	payout
http://hvc.1gh.com/	30,252.55	456.77	99.65			1	RBPPS
http://heavycoin.zhpool.com/	6,342.68	5,367.91	20.89	299.4	21.18	1	PPLNS
https://heavycoinpool.com/	1,509.97	-1,179.59	4.97	190.4	7.93	0	PROP
http://hvc.nonce-pool.com/	578.85	-814.71	1.91	66.4	8.72	1	PPLNS
http://heavy.stablehash.com/	6.30	-86.80	0.02	0.3	21	1	PROP
http://heavycoin.miningpoolhub.com/	1.44	-4.86	0	26	0.06
https://hvc.crunchharder.net/	0.00	0.00	0	0	0	2	PPLNS
total	38,691.79	3,738.72
network rate	30,360	-11,630

* due to rate variability displayed through pool statistics pages, rates are based on average of 10 samples over the past hour
** miner count for 1gh unavailable
*** Delta since last update

1gh Top stats

___Top_100___		___Top_10___
Total:	23,198.20 Mhash/s	Total:	7,605.93 Mhash/s
% of pool:	76.7%	% of pool:	25.1%
% of network:	60%	% of network:	19.7%
Mean rate:	231.98 Mhash/s	Mean rate:	760.59 Mhash/s
Median rate:	128.56 Mhash/s	Median rate:	557.88 Mhash/s
Mode(10) rate:	70 Mhash/s	Mode(100) rate:	400 Mhash/s

Block progression

	1gh	hvcpool	noncepool	zhpool	poolhub	other	total
Blocks	1984	105	177	220	11	2	2499
Percent	79.4	4.2	7.1	8.8	0.4	0.1	100
hash rate	24738	1705	2043	2765	171	24	30360
Percent	81.5	5.6	6.7	9.1	0.6	0.1	103.6

I think this table data is a bit out dated.

Our Mining Pool Hub is running at 1.36GH/s, 2.5% of total net hash for last 24 hours.

http://heavycoin.miningpoolhub.com is running very well, finding many blocks now.

[TheRealSteve]

Oi, wish people would only quote the relevant parts

I think this table data is a bit out dated.  Our Mining Pool Hub is running at 1.36GH/s, 2.5% of total net hash for last 24 hours.

Yep, terribly sorry about that - parser error  Will have to review MPOS's output - for now, manually fixed.  Updated table and graphs in post (might want to zap the ones from your quote).
Edit: fixed for all pools, though miningpoolhub was the only 'odd one out' at this time

[miningpoolhub]

Oi, wish people would only quote the relevant parts

I think this table data is a bit out dated.  Our Mining Pool Hub is running at 1.36GH/s, 2.5% of total net hash for last 24 hours.

Yep, terribly sorry about that - parser error  Will have to review MPOS's output - for now, manually fixed.  Updated table and graphs in post (might want to zap the ones from your quote).
Edit: fixed for all pools, though miningpoolhub was the only 'odd one out' at this time

Thanks!

[massiveman]

haha, the sell orders have stacked, will take 10BTC of buying to get us to 5600. but to be honest the buyers do seem to be coming out of the woodwork.