Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 07, 2019, 11:32:26 AM |
|
I just broke the BSV Code. Follow my thinking ... CSW is currently teamed up with Calvin Ayre. Prior, CSW was supposed teamed up with David Kleiman. Minus a few letters, Kleiman = Klein. <Don't get ahead of me!> Wait for it ... BSV: For Boys Who Like Squeezing Their Junk
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 5237
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 08, 2019, 01:37:03 AM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM69nNMU.png&t=665&c=V7hmaQPzXCxfww) Is this bad? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 08, 2019, 10:07:47 AM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM69nNMU.png&t=665&c=V7hmaQPzXCxfww) Is this bad? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Not as bad as this: Less and less BSV nodes, and they're paying to be hosted: https://twitter.com/melikmanukyan/status/115778596501796454940% of the nodes are hosted by DigitalOcean LLC. Wiki: DigitalOcean, Inc. is an American cloud infrastructure provider headquartered in New York City with data centers worldwide. DigitalOcean provides developers cloud services that help to deploy and scale applications that run simultaneously on multiple computers. As of January 2018, DigitalOcean was the third-largest hosting company in the world in terms of web-facing computers. 2 node hosters represent barely under 50% of nodes (total nodes). IF (I don't have the info) these two hosters have 100% upgraded to the current build (for 2GB blocks), it means that they control the network, because around 350 nodes have updated to 2GB per blocks client.
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 5237
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 08, 2019, 05:59:42 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM69nNMU.png&t=665&c=V7hmaQPzXCxfww) Is this bad? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Not as bad as this: Less and less BSV nodes, and they're paying to be hosted: https://twitter.com/melikmanukyan/status/115778596501796454940% of the nodes are hosted by DigitalOcean LLC. Wiki: DigitalOcean, Inc. is an American cloud infrastructure provider headquartered in New York City with data centers worldwide. DigitalOcean provides developers cloud services that help to deploy and scale applications that run simultaneously on multiple computers. As of January 2018, DigitalOcean was the third-largest hosting company in the world in terms of web-facing computers. 2 node hosters represent barely under 50% of nodes (total nodes). IF (I don't have the info) these two hosters have 100% upgraded to the current build (for 2GB blocks), it means that they control the network, because around 350 nodes have updated to 2GB per blocks client. Lol, this shit ain't sustainable! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEBFIMfhU4AE4MZi.jpg%3Asmall&t=665&c=tELXjY2aExOUaQ)
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 08, 2019, 11:02:35 PM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM69nNMU.png&t=665&c=V7hmaQPzXCxfww) Is this bad? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Not as bad as this: Less and less BSV nodes, and they're paying to be hosted: https://twitter.com/melikmanukyan/status/115778596501796454940% of the nodes are hosted by DigitalOcean LLC. Wiki: DigitalOcean, Inc. is an American cloud infrastructure provider headquartered in New York City with data centers worldwide. DigitalOcean provides developers cloud services that help to deploy and scale applications that run simultaneously on multiple computers. As of January 2018, DigitalOcean was the third-largest hosting company in the world in terms of web-facing computers. 2 node hosters represent barely under 50% of nodes (total nodes). IF (I don't have the info) these two hosters have 100% upgraded to the current build (for 2GB blocks), it means that they control the network, because around 350 nodes have updated to 2GB per blocks client. Lol, this shit ain't sustainable! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEBFIMfhU4AE4MZi.jpg%3Asmall&t=665&c=tELXjY2aExOUaQ) "I've studied law. In fact, I AM THE LAW!!! As for that fuckin bullshit thread on BCT, I'm now suing all them fuckers who've dissed me or my venerable BSV brand, notwithstanding the recent multiple forks and the lack of nodes, dwindling as we speak due to exorbitant cost for maintaining said. That outta the way, a toast to halcyon days."
|
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2019, 05:42:37 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
hv_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2019, 08:27:16 AM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM69nNMU.png&t=665&c=V7hmaQPzXCxfww) Is this bad? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Not as bad as this: Less and less BSV nodes, and they're paying to be hosted: https://twitter.com/melikmanukyan/status/115778596501796454940% of the nodes are hosted by DigitalOcean LLC. Wiki: DigitalOcean, Inc. is an American cloud infrastructure provider headquartered in New York City with data centers worldwide. DigitalOcean provides developers cloud services that help to deploy and scale applications that run simultaneously on multiple computers. As of January 2018, DigitalOcean was the third-largest hosting company in the world in terms of web-facing computers. 2 node hosters represent barely under 50% of nodes (total nodes). IF (I don't have the info) these two hosters have 100% upgraded to the current build (for 2GB blocks), it means that they control the network, because around 350 nodes have updated to 2GB per blocks client. Lol, this shit ain't sustainable! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEBFIMfhU4AE4MZi.jpg%3Asmall&t=665&c=tELXjY2aExOUaQ) If it wouldn t be Sustainable it wouldn t attract all the Risk sensitive businesses and it could be attacked already all the Time. Instead this and other Forums and News sites are full of fear and fud Posts... Funny.
|
Carpe diem - understand the White Paper and mine honest. Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2019, 08:42:33 AM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM69nNMU.png&t=665&c=V7hmaQPzXCxfww) Is this bad? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Not as bad as this: Less and less BSV nodes, and they're paying to be hosted: https://twitter.com/melikmanukyan/status/115778596501796454940% of the nodes are hosted by DigitalOcean LLC. Wiki: DigitalOcean, Inc. is an American cloud infrastructure provider headquartered in New York City with data centers worldwide. DigitalOcean provides developers cloud services that help to deploy and scale applications that run simultaneously on multiple computers. As of January 2018, DigitalOcean was the third-largest hosting company in the world in terms of web-facing computers. 2 node hosters represent barely under 50% of nodes (total nodes). IF (I don't have the info) these two hosters have 100% upgraded to the current build (for 2GB blocks), it means that they control the network, because around 350 nodes have updated to 2GB per blocks client. Lol, this shit ain't sustainable! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEBFIMfhU4AE4MZi.jpg%3Asmall&t=665&c=tELXjY2aExOUaQ) If it wouldn t be Sustainable it wouldn t attract all the Risk sensitive businesses and it could be attacked already all the Time. Instead this and other Forums and News sites are full of fear and fud Posts... Funny. Why attack something while they're doing a perfect job destroying themselves?
|
|
|
|
hv_
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2520
Merit: 1055
Clean Code and Scale
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2019, 09:10:38 AM |
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FM69nNMU.png&t=665&c=V7hmaQPzXCxfww) Is this bad? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Not as bad as this: Less and less BSV nodes, and they're paying to be hosted: https://twitter.com/melikmanukyan/status/115778596501796454940% of the nodes are hosted by DigitalOcean LLC. Wiki: DigitalOcean, Inc. is an American cloud infrastructure provider headquartered in New York City with data centers worldwide. DigitalOcean provides developers cloud services that help to deploy and scale applications that run simultaneously on multiple computers. As of January 2018, DigitalOcean was the third-largest hosting company in the world in terms of web-facing computers. 2 node hosters represent barely under 50% of nodes (total nodes). IF (I don't have the info) these two hosters have 100% upgraded to the current build (for 2GB blocks), it means that they control the network, because around 350 nodes have updated to 2GB per blocks client. Lol, this shit ain't sustainable! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FEBFIMfhU4AE4MZi.jpg%3Asmall&t=665&c=tELXjY2aExOUaQ) If it wouldn t be Sustainable it wouldn t attract all the Risk sensitive businesses and it could be attacked already all the Time. Instead this and other Forums and News sites are full of fear and fud Posts... Funny. Why attack something while they're doing a perfect job destroying themselves? Sure. We will know a lot more in 6Months (or 18 when LN is ready? Lol)
|
Carpe diem - understand the White Paper and mine honest. Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
|
|
|
BitcoinNewsMagazine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1164
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 11, 2019, 12:50:56 AM |
|
Jason Smith gives up on BSV, sells for BTC and apologizes in My Conclusions regarding Craig Wright on Medium. My conclusions led me to divest completely from my BSV holdings, and put everything back in to BTC, where it will remain.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 10702
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 11, 2019, 01:10:04 AM |
|
Jason Smith gives up on BSV, sells for BTC and apologizes in My Conclusions regarding Craig Wright on Medium. My conclusions led me to divest completely from my BSV holdings, and put everything back in to BTC, where it will remain. I remember seeing the Jason Smith tweet in February, and he still comes off as lost as fuck, especially since his main reason for coming back to bitcoin seems to be based on dumbshit, such as craig wright is not really satoshi. So maybe Jason Smith will get his shit together in the coming months and be able to stay convicted in regards to the actual strengths of bitcoin instead of merely coming off as a kind of exaggerating and waffling attention whore.
|
1) Self-Custody is a right. There is no such thing as "non-custodial" or "un-hosted." 2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized. 3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 11, 2019, 06:32:23 AM |
|
Jason Smith gives up on BSV, sells for BTC and apologizes in My Conclusions regarding Craig Wright on Medium. My conclusions led me to divest completely from my BSV holdings, and put everything back in to BTC, where it will remain. I remember seeing the Jason Smith tweet in February, and he still comes off as lost as fuck, especially since his main reason for coming back to bitcoin seems to be based on dumbshit, such as craig wright is not really satoshi. So maybe Jason Smith will get his shit together in the coming months and be able to stay convicted in regards to the actual strengths of bitcoin instead of merely coming off as a kind of exaggerating and waffling attention whore. Never heard of the guy. His tweet storm makes no sense, wanting to use LN to pay his employees. On-chain transactions are perfectly fine for that. He can even use 1 sat/byte fees for that since payments like that don't need instant settlement.
|
|
|
|
nutildah (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 8285
Happy 10th Birthday to Dogeparty!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 11, 2019, 07:14:30 AM |
|
Jason Smith gives up on BSV, sells for BTC and apologizes in My Conclusions regarding Craig Wright on Medium. My conclusions led me to divest completely from my BSV holdings, and put everything back in to BTC, where it will remain. I remember seeing the Jason Smith tweet in February, and he still comes off as lost as fuck, especially since his main reason for coming back to bitcoin seems to be based on dumbshit, such as craig wright is not really satoshi. So maybe Jason Smith will get his shit together in the coming months and be able to stay convicted in regards to the actual strengths of bitcoin instead of merely coming off as a kind of exaggerating and waffling attention whore. Never heard of the guy. His tweet storm makes no sense, wanting to use LN to pay his employees. On-chain transactions are perfectly fine for that. He can even use 1 sat/byte fees for that since payments like that don't need instant settlement. The dude's a moron. He was taken in as Roger Ver's darling shortly after his anti-BTC tweet rant, who offered bitcoin.com as a platform to run several stories where he could offer is malformed viewpoints. Smith was too cheap to pay on-chain fees for his OFW's (overseas Filipino workers), and found Lightning perplexing (nevermind the fact that using LN would also require his workers to have their own LN wallets). It seems like he ditched BCH for BSV for BTC, so that part is nice.
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 11, 2019, 06:27:12 PM Last edit: August 11, 2019, 06:46:36 PM by Phinnaeus Gage |
|
Jason Smith gives up on BSV, sells for BTC and apologizes in My Conclusions regarding Craig Wright on Medium. My conclusions led me to divest completely from my BSV holdings, and put everything back in to BTC, where it will remain. I remember seeing the Jason Smith tweet in February, and he still comes off as lost as fuck, especially since his main reason for coming back to bitcoin seems to be based on dumbshit, such as craig wright is not really satoshi. So maybe Jason Smith will get his shit together in the coming months and be able to stay convicted in regards to the actual strengths of bitcoin instead of merely coming off as a kind of exaggerating and waffling attention whore. Never heard of the guy. His tweet storm makes no sense, wanting to use LN to pay his employees. On-chain transactions are perfectly fine for that. He can even use 1 sat/byte fees for that since payments like that don't need instant settlement. The dude's a moron. He was taken in as Roger Ver's darling shortly after his anti-BTC tweet rant, who offered bitcoin.com as a platform to run several stories where he could offer is malformed viewpoints. Smith was too cheap to pay on-chain fees for his OFW's (overseas Filipino workers), and found Lightning perplexing (nevermind the fact that using LN would also require his workers to have their own LN wallets). It seems like he ditched BCH for BSV for BTC, so that part is nice. To put all the above in context ... <in spirit of the sentiment, the below image is width=314> "Well fuck me in the ass! Today, Jason Smith's a Jehovah's Witness. Last week he was a Protestant and prior to that, a Mormon (Church of Jesus Christ in Solemn Assembly)." Meanwhile, how CSW snares Investardz into supporting his BSV ... Damn, GIF ain't working. Please follow link so to enjoy the humor: https://i.gifer.com/9Ph1.gif (it's safe for work). Or this one: https://i.imgur.com/VAi9MxH.mp4.
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2019, 08:59:06 PM |
|
CSW needs to team up Bleutech. Google it.
|
|
|
|
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1989
฿uy ฿itcoin
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2019, 06:05:25 AM |
|
CSW needs to team up Bleutech. Google it.
Don't give him any good ideas.
|
|
|
|
|
Iamtutut
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2019, 08:18:24 PM Last edit: August 13, 2019, 09:32:02 PM by Iamtutut Merited by malevolent (1), BitcoinFX (1) |
|
https://twitter.com/wizsecurity/status/1161338703710568448"WizSec Bitcoin Research @wizsecurity In a deposition, the creator of Bitmessage has confirmed that the supposed chat messages between Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright are forgeries." The defense tried to install doubt by claiming CSW could have had a pre release version or a hacked copy from the dark web, not sure the judge will buy it. That's quite a lot of forgeries that fraudtoshi would have been the victim of while sending his peices of evidence to the Court ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 13, 2019, 09:30:17 PM |
|
In a deposition, the creator of Bitmessage has confirmed that the supposed chat messages between Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright are forgeries."
Is there anything he has not lied about? It's quite astounding. I presume the people around him would pass out in surprise if a single element of any of his claimed history turned out to be true. 'Craig, are you feeling alright? Shall we call someone?'
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3906
Merit: 5237
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 14, 2019, 12:00:52 AM |
|
If it wouldn t be Sustainable it wouldn t attract all the Risk sensitive businesses and it could be attacked already all the Time.
Instead this and other Forums and News sites are full of fear and fud Posts...
Funny.
Why attack something while they're doing a perfect job destroying themselves? This. In a deposition, the creator of Bitmessage has confirmed that the supposed chat messages between Dave Kleiman and Craig Wright are forgeries."
Is there anything he has not lied about? It's quite astounding. I presume the people around him would pass out in surprise if a single element of any of his claimed history turned out to be true. 'Craig, are you feeling alright? Shall we call someone?' It's pretty bad when even your mother calls you a liar. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/6lnzs0/and_all_of_a_sudden_csws_mom_is_the_real_hero_of/
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
|