Will You Trust a Project Announce BY A Legendary Member

[RabbiTANK]

I will have better trust on a project that's introduced by legendary member than that from a junior member, let's say 70% trust on a project from a legendary member and a 40% trust on a project from a junior member, still I recommend doing research on the projects from anybody, legendary members aren't always perfect too.

How can you define if legendary account is used by its owner or it was bought to promote scam? Everyone has a price. I'm sure that if even reputed legendary, with generous offer, will sell his account without any doubt. Other example - take a look on cooper member/jr. member accounts that manage bounty and have same name as the project. Not always they are less trusted than legendary ranked bounty managers. Quick example - Oikos. Cooper member - bounty distributed everything on time and as promised.

True, I heard that some people buy accounts from members of this forum, meaning that not all legendary members are real legendary members, you can spot them through their manners of posting and topic creatings

[1714668998]

1714668998

[1714668998]

1714668998

[1714668998]

1714668998

[1714668998]

1714668998

[btcgolong]

I will have better trust on a project that's introduced by legendary member than that from a junior member, let's say 70% trust on a project from a legendary member and a 40% trust on a project from a junior member, still I recommend doing research on the projects from anybody, legendary members aren't always perfect too.

How can you define if legendary account is used by its owner or it was bought to promote scam? Everyone has a price. I'm sure that if even reputed legendary, with generous offer, will sell his account without any doubt. Other example - take a look on cooper member/jr. member accounts that manage bounty and have same name as the project. Not always they are less trusted than legendary ranked bounty managers. Quick example - Oikos. Cooper member - bounty distributed everything on time and as promised.

True, I heard that some people buy accounts from members of this forum, meaning that not all legendary members are real legendary members, you can spot them through their manners of posting and topic creatings

I wonder, if they have been active, they might be well known with many other high ranking members - so their identity could be verified through personal email, in person, etc

I would expect that all the members of the project post their Bio, their relationship with other project members; and also verify that they "are who they say they are" (if they bought the account - tell everyone when they bought the account).

I don't see why 4-5 legendary members start something or get behind something; and ask for supporters - i would support them if the project looked attractive.

[taufik0911]

Legendary members mean huge experience has from the all forum. At least you can't ignore any of the legendary members' projects announced. yahoo62278 and Hhampuz are more than legendary members. Actually often they announce BTC payment campaign. But we should apply our own theory before joining any campaign, we can't blame others for our wrong research.

yes we should not ignore them because they have their own experience to publish an ann project that will not reduce their trust
but maybe I will believe more if the project is published by a donated or admin account, what about you?

[riso2015]

Legendary members mean huge experience has from the all forum. At least you can't ignore any of the legendary members' projects announced. yahoo62278 and Hhampuz are more than legendary members. Actually often they announce BTC payment campaign. But we should apply our own theory before joining any campaign, we can't blame others for our wrong research.

yes we should not ignore them because they have their own experience to publish an ann project that will not reduce their trust
but maybe I will believe more if the project is published by a donated or admin account, what about you?

There are only a few Legendary ranks can be trusted when managing a Bounty project, many of them also manage Scam projects even though they are Legendary rank. What we are afraid is when a developer buys a Legendary rank to convince his project to us.

[fauzan123]

actually not a benchmark for project success if managed by a legendary member it all depends on how the project is if the project looks good even newbee member surely many investors will come

[mydona]

Legendary members mean huge experience has from the all forum. At least you can't ignore any of the legendary members' projects announced. yahoo62278 and Hhampuz are more than legendary members. Actually often they announce BTC payment campaign. But we should apply our own theory before joining any campaign, we can't blame others for our wrong research.

yes we should not ignore them because they have their own experience to publish an ann project that will not reduce their trust
but maybe I will believe more if the project is published by a donated or admin account, what about you?

There are only a few Legendary ranks can be trusted when managing a Bounty project, many of them also manage Scam projects even though they are Legendary rank. What we are afraid is when a developer buys a Legendary rank to convince his project to us.

exactly, there is no rule, it is all risky, with levels, yea legendary ANN is less scam risk but not 100% scam free or safe, that is the conclusion of all this discussion

[sfireman]

Legendary members mean huge experience has from the all forum. At least you can't ignore any of the legendary members' projects announced. yahoo62278 and Hhampuz are more than legendary members. Actually often they announce BTC payment campaign. But we should apply our own theory before joining any campaign, we can't blame others for our wrong research.

yes we should not ignore them because they have their own experience to publish an ann project that will not reduce their trust
but maybe I will believe more if the project is published by a donated or admin account, what about you?

I think the same as you dude! Legendary members have to maintain their reputation and they have joined the market for years to achieve that rank! Therefore, they can have enough experience and skills as well as knowledge to target a good project! I agree that maybe they get paid to promote for the project but why would they promote for a bad project that can reduce their reputation? I will not completely rely on their words, but I will consider it and do my own researches!

[yulchatar]

To rely only on the rank of the participant who announced the new project is, to say the least, unreasonable. In addition, the legendary may just be a manager and become the same victim if the project team suddenly turns out to be fraudulent.

[Alohadanc3]

It's matters a bit. I think when you get high ranking on bitcoitalk profile that means you are a bit trusted from other low ranks profile. But when it's comes to promotions it's all about money. The projects normally pay money for promotion so whoever do it do it for money. But there are  some manager those are very trusted. I think ranks doesn't matters that much

[sourish]

How does rank supercede the viability and authenticity of a project, specially when everyone, no matter the rank is at pretty much equal risk.

[HodlerKing101]

DYOR is still key, I never trust anyone in position that's promoting something. You have to check if the project is legit and has potential to go 100x.

[amos77978]

Will you trust a project that the one that announced it in the announcement thread is a legendary member even though the legendary has announced that he is not part of the team and was just part of the service he offered.

Let me know your thoughts here.

I dont see how this matters.. as long as the user making the announcement isnt a negative flag bearer.. I think it's fine..  most bounty managers have nothing to do with the project,  yet the conduct the campaign anywag

[pedpedped101]

Will you trust a project that the one that announced it in the announcement thread is a legendary member even though the legendary has announced that he is not part of the team and was just part of the service he offered.

Let me know your thoughts here.

I dont see how this matters.. as long as the user making the announcement isnt a negative flag bearer.. I think it's fine..  most bounty managers have nothing to do with the project,  yet the conduct the campaign anywag

I do not believe in I have nothing to do with the project, yet you took their job and you still collect the money they pay to you and still you renounce them. Projects are sometimes better handled by those that are ready to bear the risks peradventure anything happens, not withstanding the rank.

[bobyhodob]

Ranks do matter when it comes to advice and mentoring. Sometimes ranks may be considered when doing business but a higher rank, being legendary in this case does not indicate an authentic or successful project. To my understanding, project managers are usually hired, he the manager may be genuine or trustworthy but it takes the entire team to carry out what he the manager has said or posted.

well of course the developed project is more important than just the rank that the team has because some time ago in 2018-2019 there were many scam projects that collaborated with the big rankings in this forum and ended up with a scam case that eventually made the name cryptocurrency become bad.

[josgandosbro]

not all legendary accounts have good experience in determining projects so never trust projects published by legendary accounts., Legendary accounts that have a lot of experience in my opinion are only https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=355846

[atamism]

Yes I do, I still believe in some Campaign manager who handles a campaign. Some of them are very picky, they doesn’t accept project that seems fake and that I earn by the help of them. Today is it really hard to find a project that legit. I still look for them if they still handle project.

[Xanxus024]

Well it depends on the project most likely I always review the project before I join and invest it will helps a lot for me. When it comes who is in charge as a bounty manager well just check the trust rate and review the feedback for sure you will be decide for your self if you will join or not.

[GREENch]

I would say that we should be wary of projects where the Manager is one of the team representatives with a recently created account on the forum. As for bounty managers with a high rank, who were cited as an example in this topic, I haven't seen new campaigns from them for a long time. Maybe it stopped giving them the profit they expected, or maybe something else. But you need to move with the times - now there are "new wave managers" who have proven themselves and are trusted by hunters

[Restmand]

Will you trust a project that the one that announced it in the announcement thread is a legendary member even though the legendary has announced that he is not part of the team and was just part of the service he offered.

Let me know your thoughts here.

Having a high rank here plays a big role when promoting or managing a project but still aside from having a high rank we still get into a consideration about the project he promoted, we need to do a keen observation and analyze the project capability and the team behind the project.

[sangalangdavid]

I would comprehensively say that few out of every odd task reported by an amazing part are reliable. A portion of these declarations can be on a premise of inclination, or for childish purposes. In spite of the fact that we expect that amazing individuals should give dependable remarks consistently, it can't generally be the equivalent.