The W.H.O.'s pandemic treaty is a fraud. It exists to take over the world. What else is there to say? Check out the following... and the article at the bottom.
The Pandemic Treaty is a Fraud
https://activistpost.com/2024/11/the-pandemic-treaty-is-a-fraud.htmlIf the INB decides to call for a special session of the World Health Assembly on December 18-20, 2024, the "Pandemic Agreement" could go into legally binding effect 30 days later, just days before Trump's inauguration.
Once signed, the details of the "Pandemic Agreement" require signatory nations to remain obligated to the terms of the agreement for a total of three years!!
It is up to "We the People" around the world to let our government officials know that we do NOT consent to their attempt to ram the "Pandemic Agreement" through before the end of the year.
Why have these negotiations been conducted in secret over the past 6 months?
Why is the latest version of the proposed "Pandemic Agreement" available to the public nearly 6 months old? LINK
Why has there been no opportunity for public comment?
Why do the global elite believe that the centralization of power into the hands of self-annointed, unelected, unaccountable and largely unknown bureaucrats who would meet year after year at a Conference of the Parties as part of a freely expandable Framework Convention?
Because it serves their interest increase their wealth and truly does nothing to improve your health or the overall health of people across the world.
The needs and wishes of the people of the world have been ignored for far too long.
The proposed "Pandemic Treaty" is NOT designed to prevent the next pandemic.
The World Health Organization has failed to address the obvious fact that regulatory agencies around the world have been captured by pharmaceutical interests. In fact, they are profiting from it.
>LINK<...
Woman Fired For Refusing COVID Vaccine Wins Record $12 Million From Rogue Employer
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/woman-fired-refusing-covid-vaccine-wins-record-12/Lisa Domski, who worked at the insurance company Blue Cross Blue as an IT specialist for over three decades, was fired from her position for refusing to take the jab, which has since been proven to have been neither safe nor effective.
After suing the company for religious discirmination against her Catholic faith, Domski was awarded significant damages by a federal jury in Detroit, according to the Associated Press.
The ruling included $10 million in punitive damages against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, as well as $1.7 million in lost wages and $1 million in noneconomic damages.
Her lawyer, Jon Marko, pointed out that during the so-called pandemic, Domski always worked remotely. Even before the virus broke out, the vast majority of her work was carried out remotely.
"Our forefathers fought and died for the freedom for each American to practice his or her own religion. Neither the government nor a corporation has a right to force an individual to choose between his or her career and conscience," Marko said in a statement after the verdict was confirmed.
"Lisa refused to renounce her faith and beliefs and was wrongfully terminated from the only job she had ever known," he continued.
"The jury's verdict today tells BCBSM that religious discrimination has no place in America and affirms each person's right to religious freedom."
Meanwhile, the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan sought to defend its actions and refused to apologize for its discrimination.
The company said in a statement:
Throughout the pandemic, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, together with its employees, worked to promote the health and safety of our colleagues, stakeholders, and communities.
As part of that shared work, in October 2021, Blue Cross, and its subsidiaries, enacted a vaccine policy requiring all of its employees to be fully vaccinated for Covid-19 or obtain a religious or medical accommodation.
In implementing the vaccine policy, Blue Cross designed an accommodation process that complied with state and federal law and respected the sincerely held religious beliefs of its employees.
...
