[∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 283 blocks solved!

[mikeywith]

Ok, I thought there might be another way to operate hash-rentals without pooling miners through their proxy which I don't know about. Cheers

I suppose these are your orders

USA Market

Code:

645a2554  0.0103   2.50

EU Market

Code:

4f08a0c5 0.0103 2.50

I think in the next run try to put half the pot on Asicboost, it is cheaper like most of the time.




Good luck, hope you guys manage to hit block 257.

[1714922894]

1714922894

[1714922894]

1714922894

[ailikun]

Sorry guys, but no luck this time .
hope we will crack this 257 block next time.

[hotwired007]

just pulled a couple of S3s out of the garage to test them lol - what sort of share size should i be looing at getting to solve a block... its been a while since i mined anything - had a few S1s running pencil mods a few years back on here!

[chasaamm]

Hi
I think solo.ckpool.org user statistics are not working

"The requested URL was not found on this server."

[rasmukri]

just pulled a couple of S3s out of the garage to test them lol - what sort of share size should i be looing at getting to solve a block... its been a while since i mined anything - had a few S1s running pencil mods a few years back on here!

You need a share that is higher than the current difficulty. So the current diff is 19.28 trillion so you need a share that is that or higher for a solve
Check out solochance.com and put in your current speed for an estimate of how long it may take to solve a block.

[mikeywith]

Hi
I think solo.ckpool.org user statistics are not working

"The requested URL was not found on this server."

Use this link > https://solo.ckpool.org/users/1PKN98VN2z5gwSGZvGKS2bj8aADZBkyhkZ, replace the bitcoin address with your own.

[jimjam123]

just pulled a couple of S3s out of the garage to test them lol - what sort of share size should i be looing at getting to solve a block... its been a while since i mined anything - had a few S1s running pencil mods a few years back on here!

A few CKCOLO blocks back, someone hit it with average of 500gh...
Likely from an S3, probably the luckiest block I have seen in a long while.
Good luck and happy mining!

[Moeter81]

Hello everybody,
I plan to run some miners at Ckpool.

Are these settings that I made right?
Can I optimize other settings?
Is it better to use the original firmware?




greeting
Moeter.

[favebook]

Hello everybody,
I plan to run some miners at Ckpool.

Are these settings that I made right?
Can I optimize other settings?
Is it better to use the original firmware?




greeting
Moeter.

̶A̶s̶ ̶k̶i̶d̶s̶ ̶w̶o̶u̶l̶d̶ ̶s̶a̶y̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶s̶e̶ ̶d̶a̶y̶s̶,̶ ̶B̶I̶G̶ ̶O̶O̶O̶O̶F̶ ̶i̶n̶c̶o̶m̶i̶n̶g̶.̶
̶C̶u̶s̶t̶o̶m̶ ̶f̶i̶r̶m̶w̶a̶r̶e̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶C̶k̶ ̶h̶a̶v̶e̶ ̶a̶ ̶r̶o̶c̶k̶y̶ ̶r̶e̶l̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶h̶i̶p̶.̶

[mikeywith]

Use the "Insert Image" function isntead of posting the url.

You settings look right to me, I can't tell if you have any leading/trailing spaces, so the best way to know for sure is by looking at the status page, if the pool shows "Alive" then your settings are correct.

As kids would say these days, BIG OOOOF incoming.
Custom firmware and Ck have a rocky relationship.

Crazy Mining is a rebranded Vnish, Cksolo pool works just fine with Vnish (Asic.to and AwoesomeMiner) so I would assume this would work as well, and might as well hit a block or two. 

[favebook]

Crazy Mining is a rebranded Vnish, Cksolo pool works just fine with Vnish (Asic.to and AwoesomeMiner) so I would assume this would work as well, and might as well hit a block or two. 

Since when does CK support Vnish but not chipless and other smaller ones?

[mikeywith]

Since when does CK support Vnish but not chipless and other smaller ones?

Since ever i guess.

Maybe you are confusing Kano pool with Cksolo pool. Have you actually tried to mine on solo.ckpool.org using Vnish and were not able to connect?

[favebook]

Since when does CK support Vnish but not chipless and other smaller ones?

Since ever i guess.

Maybe you are confusing Kano pool with Cksolo pool. Have you actually tried to mine on solo.ckpool.org using Vnish and were not able to connect?

Yeah, just ignore me. Tested now. Works fine.

[NotFuzzyWarm]

Use the "Insert Image" function isntead of posting the url.

You settings look right to me, I can't tell if you have any leading/trailing spaces, so the best way to know for sure is by looking at the status page, if the pool shows "Alive" then your settings are correct.

As kids would say these days, BIG OOOOF incoming.
Custom firmware and Ck have a rocky relationship.

Crazy Mining is a rebranded Vnish, Cksolo pool works just fine with Vnish (Asic.to and AwoesomeMiner) so I would assume this would work as well, and might as well hit a block or two.  

Um, didn't -ck kill off the Germany node? He's not only pointed there but at the now defunct 'normal' pool ta boot. Not the solo...

[mikeywith]

NFW, that is a neat observation, he indeed is pointed to the other "long gone" pool, he should add the solo part in the pool url. the settings are correct, these two URLs belong to the solo pool, however port 443 is down, so only port 3333 works now.

stratum+tcp://de.ckpool.org:443  > will not work
stratum+tcp://de.ckpool.org:3333 > works fine

As for the .de, i think Ck stopped using the server in Germany but de. Url still directs you to the main server located in the U.S, so it should connect just fine.

[philipma1957]

Since when does CK support Vnish but not chipless and other smaller ones?

Since ever i guess.

Maybe you are confusing Kano pool with Cksolo pool. Have you actually tried to mine on solo.ckpool.org using Vnish and were not able to connect?

hmm could not get it to work. i will re test

[mikeywith]

hmm could not get it to work. i will re test

Which firmware are you using? I am pretty positive that any miner with Vnish firmware will work with solo.ckpool.org without an issue, please double-check the URL and worker details, they can get a bit tricky especially with missing the "solo" part in the pool URL>

[Artemis3]

As far as i know, there are only two valid URLs:

stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333
stratum+tcp://rfpool.org:3334

There was a "denode" uri but seems to have gone down.

The Worker field is just the bitcoin address in case you hit the jackpot, you could optionally add the .workername if you want to distinguish the rigs by name, eg:

1PKN98VN2z5gwSGZvGKS2bj8aADZBkyhkZ.MyAsicName

Well according to https://solo.ckpool.org/ there are also IPv4/6 domains solo4.ckpool.org solo6.ckpool.org which i guess may be useful to force one over the other in case of a dual stack situation (or have both in case? but solo.ckpool.org should be enough i think).

[mikeywith]

As far as i know, there are only two valid URLs:

stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333
stratum+tcp://rfpool.org:3334

Actually there is one more, the previous Europe URL still works.

Code:

stratum+tcp://de.ckpool.org:3333

And this takes me back to my reply on NFW's comment which I need to modify, Moeter81 has the right pool settings in the picture, and those de. URLs are for the solo pool despite not having the word "solo" in them.

[Moeter81]

Port: 443 and 3335 does not work with me. 3333 works fine.




how does that work with inserting the picture?)