1XBIT.COM ᐉ 7 BTC WB ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC ᕗ Instant payouts

[1xbit_official]

hello 1xbit
why you dont answer me
id number: 13112599

Hello,

Just sent you a message.

[1714669338]

1714669338

[1714669338]

1714669338

[1714669338]

1714669338

[1714669338]

1714669338

[1714669338]

1714669338

[ScamViruS]

Unfortunately, anyone who joins the 1xbit signature campaign automatically receives a negative trust. I think that 1xbit campaign manager would be very happy to accept users with a positive or at least neutral trust to the campaign, but no one wants to risk make their rank worse.

Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds. So it seems to me that no good intentional forum member would support such a website, which has hundreds of complaints against it. 1xbit until they can avoid this scamming purpose and will be interested in increasing their own reputation until no reputed member joins their signature campaign.

[1xbit_official]

Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds.

We aim to grow up the quality of campaigns, all our managers are instructed not to accept negative trusted person.
The only exception is if a person has this rating for promoting 1xBit, but not for other things.

[Slow death]

Unfortunately, anyone who joins the 1xbit signature campaign automatically receives a negative trust. I think that 1xbit campaign manager would be very happy to accept users with a positive or at least neutral trust to the campaign, but no one wants to risk make their rank worse.

Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds. So it seems to me that no good intentional forum member would support such a website, which has hundreds of complaints against it. 1xbit until they can avoid this scamming purpose and will be interested in increasing their own reputation until no reputed member joins their signature campaign.

i hate to have to agree with @Erdogan, but really leaving negative feedback for everyone who participates in this scam site's signature campaign is something exaggerated, I would accept if they left neutral feedback for anyone who participated in their signature campaign, but this It also raises another question: what if the forum admin allows this scam site to pay for advertising on the forum, would they also leave negative feedback on the forum admin account? I think we should separate things, one thing is this site being a scam and another thing is their suignature campaign that it would be up to each person to participate or not according to the conscience that they would be promoting some scam

[1xbit_official]

We just added SOL to 1xBit, now there are 41 coins/tokens available!

[ScamViruS]

Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds.

We aim to grow up the quality of campaigns, all our managers are instructed not to accept negative trusted person.
The only exception is if a person has this rating for promoting 1xBit, but not for other things.

If you do not accept negative feedback accounts in your campaign, you will not be able to find new participants. Because if someone applies in your campaign only then that account will get negative feedback. So no reputed member would dare to apply considering this risk.

i hate to have to agree with @Erdogan, but really leaving negative feedback for everyone who participates in this scam site's signature campaign is something exaggerated, I would accept if they left neutral feedback for anyone who participated in their signature campaign, but this It also raises another question: what if the forum admin allows this scam site to pay for advertising on the forum, would they also leave negative feedback on the forum admin account? I think we should separate things, one thing is this site being a scam and another thing is their suignature campaign that it would be up to each person to participate or not according to the conscience that they would be promoting some scam

This is certainly a matter of concern. Even though DT members are giving negative feedback, members are joining this campaign at the risk of their own account. Since there are a lot of complaints against this website and more new players may be deceived because of this signature campaign, I think more effective steps should be taken to stop this campaign than randomly tagging the participants of 1xbit signature campaign.

[decodx]

Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds.

We aim to grow up the quality of campaigns, all our managers are instructed not to accept negative trusted person.
The only exception is if a person has this rating for promoting 1xBit, but not for other things.

If you are not accepting accounts with negative feedback in your campaign, then how do you explain this:

Trust summary for Erdogan

	nutildah		2019-08-02		Reference		Admits to running a bumping service. Got scammed after promoting a scam project. Don't you know that only scammers hire you in the first place?
	ibminer		2017-05-02		Reference		Multiple scam accusations against this user, likely hacked or sold account.
	yahoo62278		2017-05-02		Reference		open scam accusation against this user
	ibminer		2017-05-02		Reference		Likely scammer. See reference thread.

Trust summary for YinShuiSiYuan

	marlboroza		2020-03-20		Reference		Shill account. Don't trust.
	Lauda		2020-03-26		Reference		Shill account. Don't trust.

Trust summary for Cryptock

	Zepher		2017-03-16		Reference		2 open scam accusations in the thread referenced. Would exercise extreme caution when dealing with this user.
	bL4nkcode		2017-03-17		Reference		An open scam accusation against this user.

Trust summary for bitgov

Lauda

2018-02-04

Reference

Hacked/sold account.

Trust summary for Naficopa

marlboroza

2020-03-20

Reference

Shill account. Don't trust.

Trust summary for og kush420

	Timelord2067		2019-11-14		Reference		There is an active scam accusation against this user, please respond... http://archive.ph/Qy4sP
	Vod		2017-06-21		Reference		Scam accusation against this user.
	ibminer		2017-06-15		Reference		Scammer. And this account is likely hacked.

Trust summary for Theones

pcfli

2017-08-24

Reference

Open SCAM accusation.

Trust summary for herurist

	actmyname		2020-03-07		Reference		Linked to the compromised mbakruroh account.
	The Pharmacist		2021-11-06		Reference		Bounty cheater; see reference link.

Trust summary for terrorJR

	Stalker22		2021-11-07		Reference		Bounty cheater with multiple alts.
	The Pharmacist		2021-11-06		Reference		Still cheating bounties; see reference link.
	JollyGood		2021-09-18		Reference		BEWARE: this user cannot be trusted, posting for the sake of increasing post count and is a signature and bounty cheat with multiple accounts: boazsalosa, capcaypro, herdiansyahdanang, terrorJR, antoarwadi, panjiheriawan, hanifhadzar
	The Pharmacist		2018-04-28		Reference		Cheating bounty with alt accounts.

Trust summary for bekti3

	The Pharmacist		2021-11-06		Reference		Bounty cheater, see reference link.
	Stalker22		2021-11-07		Reference		Bounty cheater with multiple alts.

Trust summary for SmokerFace

	nutildah		2021-10-24		Reference		Though this account belongs to a cheater, they did remind me to lead by example in terms of being more civil on the forum.
	Timelord2067		2021-10-24				See previous trust feedback's concerning this user's unstable participation in the forum (including an unrepaid loan in 2018).
	COOLCRYPTOVATOR		2021-03-05		Reference		This account hasn't been controlling by the original owner, deal with caution.
	CryptopreneurBrainboss		2021-02-25		Reference		Abstain from associating your brand with this user or risk getting cheated upon. View reference for more details.

There is more to come ...



Continuation from the previous post...

Trust summary for Alanaz

	Stalker22		2021-11-07		Reference		Bounty cheater with multiple alts.
	The Pharmacist		2021-11-06		Reference		Bounty cheater; see reference link.

Trust summary for Tumanggor

	nutildah		2021-07-03		Reference		bounty cheater
	The Pharmacist		2018-04-16		Reference		Cheating bounty with alt accounts.
	Sylon		2018-05-13		Reference		Bounty campaigns abuser. Multiple accounts owner. Connected accounts: Odora, Tumanggor, Thymoty

Trust summary for Sirait

lovesmayfamilis

2021-01-29

Reference

2 accounts are breaking the company's bounty rules

Trust summary for S A KHAIR

	dkbit98		2020-01-14		Reference		Ban Evasion Cheater with multiple accounts
	coinlocket$		2019-04-01		Reference		Account connected farhansadik, Nilima-Temp, btcboss71, SAKHAIR, cryptosabbir120, rifatfor. Abusing bounties with alts.

Trust summary for CDC AP

actmyname

2018-01-22

Reference

Account trading activity.

Trust summary for galambo

	shasan		2019-01-31		Reference		Loan defaulted and the owner of the account is now is blackrabbit1 who is already marked as a scammer.
	Avirunes		2019-01-16		Reference		I am not sure regarding who possess this account but after this loan I am quite sure that either blackrabbit1(alt of a scammer) or Smarty14392(Merit begger and account buyer/seller) owns this account.

Trust summary for BitcoinAccepted

	LFC_Bitcoin		2021-04-06		Reference		Adkinsbet shill, bought account, troll.
	BitcoinGirl.Club		2021-03-25		Reference		Part of a group of liars.
	Royse777		2021-03-10		Reference		There are no doubt that this is a shill account which is defending the scams of Adkinsbet. Do not trust this user's statement about adkinsbet.
	TwitchySeal		2021-02-27		Reference		Overwhelming evidence shows that this is one of many accounts that have been purchased to shill for Adkins bet (which has many credible scam accusations) and attack other casinos. This feedback will not be removed.
	icopress		2021-02-17		Reference		I do not trust / Probably this account was bought for Adkinsbet, as there has been excessive spam activity lately in defense of the sportsbook, which was caught in the fraud.
	nutildah		2021-02-14		Reference		This account was purchased to shill for Adkinsbet, a sportsbook with multiple scam accusations against it. They have now taken to attacking rival sportsbooks and should never be trusted or taken seriously.
	JollyGood		2021-01-28		Reference		BEWARE: "BitcoinAccepted" cannot be trusted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5309454.0 The account changed hands (probably sold), it has AdkinsBET signature and is defending them without substance against serious scam allegations. Probably a sock-puppet operated by Adkinsbet

Trust summary for EdenHazard

blurryeyed

2019-12-26

Anyone who promotes scams should not be trusted - but especially those who prostitute their profile/signature for a few bucks to promote one of the biggest scams in crypto - Yobit. ITS TIME TO BAN THE YOBIT SCAM!!

Trust summary for watergold

	TalkStar		2020-03-03		Reference		Connected account > kolonel_x - Enrolling in the same campaign - Check reference.
	TheBeardedBaby		2020-03-02		Reference		Alts enrolling in the same campaign. The other connected account is > kolonel_x (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=942058)

Trust summary for muratsink

	lovesmayfamilis		2022-02-19		Reference		Ban evasion
	YOSHIE		2019-12-12		Reference		multi-account, maybe want to sell, jerk.

Trust summary for coinism

	CucakRowo		2020-09-11		Reference		Careful when invest in BFINE project. If you want to invest in this project, check ref link first. Cautious is numero uno.
	JeromeTash		2020-09-02		Reference		Created a self-moderated thread and deleted replies from anyone who questions the legitimacy of the project. Very suspicious.
	examplens		2020-09-02		Reference		Check reference, I'll remove this feedback if there is a reasonable explanation.
	Jawhead999		2020-09-02		Reference		Check reference (will delete if has been proven)

Trust summary for Roidz

The Pharmacist

2017-10-01

Reference

Accusation of account being hacked. Will remove if proven otherwise. This user is also an extreme shitposter and should not be a member here.

Trust summary for zidanw

BitcoinGirl.Club

2021-04-03

Reference

Part of a group of liars.

Trust summary for VanityWallets2015

JollyGood

2021-03-22

Reference

BEWARE: "VanityWallets2015" cannot be trusted - another Adkinsbet scammer sock-puppet This account probably changed hands in 2020 then operated by Adkinsbet scammers but did not display the Adkinsbet signature because he wants to pretend to be unconnected

Trust summary for ropyu1978

	JollyGood		2021-08-09		Reference		BEWARE: Serial scammer Dean Nolan is the owner/operator of betking.io All those participating or applying to join in the betking.io signature campaign are FULLY aware they are promoting a scam but continue to do it for the sake of pocketing some money - they cannot be trusted.
	asche		2019-10-09		Reference		Cheating bounty with alts

Trust summary for ipanks

actmyname

2018-04-23

Reference

Account trader.

Trust summary for perla

	Timelord2067		2021-09-12				There are multiple scam accusations against this user - please respond.
	FatFork		2021-06-29		Reference		This account cannot be trusted. Probably a sockpuppet purchased/operated by scam casinos. Connected accounts: toast, pungopete468, qory, perla, MI6, Cacingkemi (Delete)
	BitcoinGirl.Club		2021-03-25		Reference		Part of a group of liars.

Trust summary for mrongoz_imut

	JollyGood		2021-08-09		Reference		BEWARE: Serial scammer Dean Nolan is the owner/operator of betking.io All those participating or applying to join in the betking.io signature campaign are FULLY aware they are promoting a scam but continue to do it for the sake of pocketing some money - they cannot be trusted.
	marlboroza		2018-10-09		Reference		Cheater. Accounts connected: mrongoz_imut, BOAEDAN, bikers online, mrongoz22

Trust summary for ajochems

	AdolfinWolf		2018-08-17		Reference		Hacked by some 3rd world scumbag.
	Lutpin		2018-08-02		Reference		Account reported to be hacked, do not deal with this account until the situation is resolved and this tag is removed.
	DarkStar_		2018-08-02		Reference		Appears to be a hacked account

@1xbit_official, as you can see from the facts, these negative trusts have nothing to do with participating in a 1xbit campaign, and they were all from before these members were accepted into your campaign. So, not only do you hire negatively tagged accounts in your campaigns, but 1xbit is the only company on this forum that wants to associate its brand with proven liars, scammers, cheaters, bounty abusers, ban evaders, sock puppets, shill accounts, trolls,  manipulators & other pathetic bottom feeders – so shame on you for trying to sell another lie to the community. You are the ONLY company who has displayed this kind of behavior!


[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

[JeromeTash]

i hate to have to agree with @Erdogan, but really leaving negative feedback for everyone who participates in this scam site's signature campaign is something exaggerated, I would accept if they left neutral feedback for anyone who participated in their signature campaign, but this It also raises another question: what if the forum admin allows this scam site to pay for advertising on the forum, would they also leave negative feedback on the forum admin account? I think we should separate things, one thing is this site being a scam and another thing is their suignature campaign that it would be up to each person to participate or not according to the conscience that they would be promoting some scam

Check out all the accounts that have been participating... Lol
About 98% had negative feedback already prior to promoting 1xbit. And I fully support any DT member that red tags any account willing to advertise scam. Let's stop having double standards here because money is involved.

I think you have already seen accounts getting tagged in the past for promoting malicious links, either on their signatures or posts. In fact, these days, they even get instantly banned. What is the difference between promoting malicious links and promoting a scam like 1xbit?

They tried tricking Theymos once via a third party and admin was notified. He removed the ads Immediately and donated the money they had paid.

[Hamphser]

That would surely lift most of the complaints off, but back in 2015 our intentions were to make as anonymous casino as possible (when crypto and all that stuff appeared).
Ain't much changed since then - we added email KYC and that's all what have changed about anonymity.

Seriously? Who are you trying to fool? You guys are using KYC as a cover to justify your scamming tricks just like some other crypto casinos out there.

Anyone with a half-decent brain knows that your casino will always be anonymous in order to avoid getting screwed by lawsuits etc filed by victims. Just remember that no excuse can overturn the messed up reputation of your site.

They havent still stopped on selectively scamming out users? Its just sad this forum doesnt moderate and banned out scam sites including this one.They had lots of negative issues

and too deep negative feedbacks came from DT's and other users as well.It is just sad to those who had been able to register and doesnt know the true reputation that they had.
We've been keep on telling people but it seems that they are just doing their marketing without caring on what others been saying or do tell bad things about them.

there are no power in this forum to banned or act for scam sites though I believe that Yobit scam exchange had been banned here for advertising , hoping that this will be the next one as we already see multiple or if not hundreds of scam victims and yet no clear proofs from the team on how they being banned and what proofs for their cheating cases.

I was aware of that Yobit signature before on where there are some actions on which they do put out on those participants which they had banned it out  (for some) there are still some who do able to skip or been saved on that one though.

Just like on what they have done on cryptotalk which is basically owned by Yobit too.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5188200

Hope they would make out some the same action so that we do at least lessen up these kind of sites on this forum and to save up those innocent players/gamblers out there.

[yayayo]

What I don't understand is why everyone is ignoring the situation regarding cheating on this gambling site. Surely it is already known and proven that there are several players who use live stream cameras and as a result have an unfair advantage in certain matches? Table tennis is a good example. The moment they place a bet, they already know who made the point. Everyone is complaining about 1xbit, but think about it, all the people who are complaining here are 99% players who have bet on table tennis.

ya.ya.yo!

[FatFork]

<cut>

Hahahaha! Nice try shill!

Accounts Connected:

1. yayayo
2. BlackFor3st
3. gadado
4. wildan88
5. sempak

Reference

How many of your alt accounts have you used in 1xbit campaigns and for shilling this scam?

[Chato1977]

my account is locked 2 months already from January 23. 2022

We wrote you a reply in reputation topic, we should have an update soon.


To ensure that the agreements between 1xBit and a user are held, you might want to see our contest thread.

hello 1xbit

why you dont answer me

id number: 13112599

just read all the answer above because for sure your case will receive as the same to what others has even in  the past 

you are being scammed and that is the reality .

[Naficopa]

Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds.

We aim to grow up the quality of campaigns, all our managers are instructed not to accept negative trusted person.
The only exception is if a person has this rating for promoting 1xBit, but not for other things.

If you are not accepting accounts with negative feedback in your campaign, then how do you explain this:

~.~

The answer is quite simple, (I think that probably) everyone you were kind to mention was accepted in the first campaign where there was no such condition yet. Due to the fact that they took part in first campaign (me too), they all got a red trust. This condition was provided in the second and each subsequent campaign.

[decodx]

If you are not accepting accounts with negative feedback in your campaign, then how do you explain this:

~.~

The answer is quite simple, (I think that probably) everyone you were kind to mention was accepted in the first campaign where there was no such condition yet. Due to the fact that they took part in first campaign (me too), they all got a red trust. This condition was provided in the second and each subsequent campaign.

What a bunch of bullsh*t. At least check the facts before you make such stupid statements.

Most of these accounts received negative ratings long before 1xbit launched its campaigns here. Check the dates.
Furthermore, I specifically cited ratings that are not related to 1xbit. This is the exact opposite of what 1xbit_official said.

We aim to grow up the quality of campaigns, all our managers are instructed not to accept negative trusted person.
The only exception is if a person has this rating for promoting 1xBit, but not for other things.

What can we expect from a company that can't even follow its own rules?

And of course, 1xbit_official will again remain silent and rely on their paid shills to speak on their behalf. As usual.

[Haunebu]

Hahahaha! Nice try shill!

Accounts Connected:

1. yayayo
2. BlackFor3st
3. gadado
4. wildan88
5. sempak

Reference

How many of your alt accounts have you used in 1xbit campaigns and for shilling this scam?

Lol. So many shills are using alt accounts in this manner to scam the scammers themselves and 1xbit are so stupid that they haven't done anything about it despite being aware of these issues. Pathetic fools.

Most of these accounts received negative ratings long before 1xbit launched its campaigns here. Check the dates.
Furthermore, I specifically cited ratings that are not related to 1xbit. This is the exact opposite of what 1xbit_official said.

Agreed. @Erdogan and @Naficopa are two dumb shills whose nonsensical reasoning is quite similar which leads me to believe that they could be connected. Can't believe that these idiots are getting paid for writing garbage.

What else can you expect from spammers being employed by scammers?

[decodx]

Agreed. @Erdogan and @Naficopa are two dumb shills whose nonsensical reasoning is quite similar which leads me to believe that they could be connected. Can't believe that these idiots are getting paid for writing garbage.

Not "idiots", just an idiot. Singular.

Erdogan admitted running a bumping service and promoting scams on the forum. We don't need more evidence than that.

Guys from Kepler bought from me bumping service - check first 200 pages of ann thread and bounty.
Even after collecting over 1M USD they don't want pay.

What else can you expect from spammers being employed by scammers?

Nothing good, that's for sure. This clearly demonstrates 1xbit's attitude towards this community.

[ScamViruS]

Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds.

We aim to grow up the quality of campaigns, all our managers are instructed not to accept negative trusted person.
The only exception is if a person has this rating for promoting 1xBit, but not for other things.

If you are not accepting accounts with negative feedback in your campaign, then how do you explain this:

~.~

The answer is quite simple, (I think that probably) everyone you were kind to mention was accepted in the first campaign where there was no such condition yet. Due to the fact that they took part in first campaign (me too), they all got a red trust. This condition was provided in the second and each subsequent campaign.

Accounts that have joined 1xbit's signature campaign have already been tagged by various DT members. You should check your account carefully to see when you got the red tag. Since the beginning of this campaign, they have accepted accounts that were already tagged. So now neither your statement nor 1xbit's is seen as true. In this way, if they are constantly confused, then it becomes clear how professional they are!

[Erdogan]

Unfortunately, anyone who joins the 1xbit signature campaign automatically receives a negative trust. I think that 1xbit campaign manager would be very happy to accept users with a positive or at least neutral trust to the campaign, but no one wants to risk make their rank worse.

Members who have no history of scams in the past will never be interested in promoting a scam website like 1xbit. The accounts that are participating in the 1xbit er signature campaign have already been tagged for various bad deeds. So it seems to me that no good intentional forum member would support such a website, which has hundreds of complaints against it. 1xbit until they can avoid this scamming purpose and will be interested in increasing their own reputation until no reputed member joins their signature campaign.

I see you have closed the circuit in this discussion. My statement was a response to @Baskin198's offer to hire trusted members:

2- Like stake has hired some puppets, you need to hire some trusted members. Yes it costs money but look they defend you against all the victims and go as far as tagging the victim himself as one of the stake puppet does.

We can only guess who would like to join the 1xbit signature campaign. If everyone gets a red trust automatically, we won't find out, because no one wants to spoil their account and prefere make safe money from other campaigns.

[Marvelman]

We can only guess who would like to join the 1xbit signature campaign. If everyone gets a red trust automatically, we won't find out, because no one wants to spoil their account and prefere make safe money from other campaigns.

Why would anyone in their right mind want to promote a proven scam? Do you honestly believe that all people are this corrupt?

[Erdogan]

We can only guess who would like to join the 1xbit signature campaign. If everyone gets a red trust automatically, we won't find out, because no one wants to spoil their account and prefere make safe money from other campaigns.

Why would anyone in their right mind want to promote a proven scam? Do you honestly believe that all people are this corrupt?

The accusation of scam is based on complaints of users. 1xbit claims that accounts of this users have been blocked because of cheating. Unfortunately, this is a word against word and neither side gives conclusive evidence. Whether it is a scam or safety action of 1xbit security team depends only on who you believe more.