BC.Game 🔥 Champions League Pool | ⚽️ Discussion Thread | 80mbtc prize fund

[Joca97]

That feeling when you realize that PSG paid 500 million dollars for these three for a reason.

First of all, a lot more than 500 million, one Mbappe cost 180 million the first time he was bought + contract extension was accompanied by a signing bonus of 300 million. Secondly, if this victory happened in the Champions League final, then it would make at least some sense, but this is just a group stage ...

Well its normal for Paris to spend a lot we are used to seeing it from them. Im surprised that their team isnt worth a billion with how many superstars they have and how many young talents they have. Also this might be the year Paris finally gets their champions league title. They invested a lot and still hasnt paid off for them.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Manchester City going down unexpectedly and fighting back from a goal down to win 2-1.

Few weeks ago I was saying no matter what, City are over 2 goals down against any team then I will bet on City to win or draw. When they were 1 down I was wishing them to to concede another goal so that I can prepare myself to start gambling again LOL. Considering this pattern City are making the bookies broke. In the recent days there were so many matches where City won matches after conceding even two goals. I missed another opportunity to reopen my gambling accounts 😉

Also this might be the year Paris finally gets their champions league title. They invested a lot and still hasnt paid off for them.

PSG always are the rich kid but I do not see they have a record of winning the title yet.

[cryptofrka]

RE the whole PSG money discussion - it is not their money and it is not legal.
They are just smart businessmen with huge amounts of money and FFP is a joke anyway so it doesn't stop them from playing the system.

PSG did not buy Neymar. Neymar was given 200 mil euros to buy his release clause out - and he received the money from other sources, given to him as 'ambassador for the Qatar World Cup'. Of course that money came from the PSG owners, but they could not have done it through the club because it would break the rules.

Then he signed for PSG on a free transfer, at least that is what their books say - because they were not the ones that triggered the release clause.

[buwaytress]

No need to discuss much my position in the pool as well, especially when I'm 3rd from bottom in EPL (I still refuse to think I'm that bad in a league I follow the majority of my time).

But as a wise player above says, when you're bottom, nowhere to go but up. I do wish I had more balls to support Benfica again, they play really attractive football while Juve seem to be confused about their identities.

Same as BVB... team that can't defend trying to defend a lead against Manchesteamroller City. They were generally outplaying City until they decided to stop trying to score.

Oh and on big spenders since it's a hot topic here. Hard to blame anyone anymore these days but I feel like we're not doing Chelski and Abramovich justice if we're blaming Real/Barca/PSG (and hey don't forget Monaco). Who cares about fines anyway? City laughed and paid their settlement. Big banks actually budget for fines (meaning they knowingly commit financial violations because it's profitable). I detest all this nonsense, but also enjoy football and live in the real world and enjoy seeing all the giants with money losing.

But for a lighthearted attempt to find the root of all problems? Read this little nugget so we can blame Middlesborough for everything.

[KTChampions]

RE the whole PSG money discussion - it is not their money and it is not legal.
They are just smart businessmen with huge amounts of money and FFP is a joke anyway so it doesn't stop them from playing the system.

PSG did not buy Neymar. Neymar was given 200 mil euros to buy his release clause out - and he received the money from other sources, given to him as 'ambassador for the Qatar World Cup'. Of course that money came from the PSG owners, but they could not have done it through the club because it would break the rules.

Then he signed for PSG on a free transfer, at least that is what their books say - because they were not the ones that triggered the release clause.

I'm glad that at least someone is in the know and understands what PSG is doing 

PSG scammers violated the FFP and escaped serious punishment only because they took advantage of legal loopholes (with the help of corrupt officials from UEFA). PSG are scammers and violated the FFP, this is a fact - even they do not deny it, they only disputed the timing of the investigation, not its results. Any other club (except City) would have been destroyed for the scams that PSG are doing (fake advertising contracts with multiple inflated prices).

[darxiaomi]

The PSG needs to be banned also all the teams with the petrodollars behind them, they are damaging so much the football with inflated prices, making a huge inflation in football market, as you can see a lot of players now cost much than Cristiano Ronaldo when he pass from Man Utd to Real Madrid, and we know they are shit player side by side to the young CR.

Like KTC say they are scammers, and the justice only see to another side, its so obvius how they make this its like they show to all their figurehead and all know this but its not problem with that..... come on.

In addition we can say, the karma its making a lot of things, they keep being ashamed, and cant win the UCL.

[swogerino]

The PSG needs to be banned also all the teams with the petrodollars behind them, they are damaging so much the football with inflated prices, making a huge inflation in football market, as you can see a lot of players now cost much than Cristiano Ronaldo when he pass from Man Utd to Real Madrid, and we know they are shit player side by side to the young CR.

Like KTC say they are scammers, and the justice only see to another side, its so obvius how they make this its like they show to all their figurehead and all know this but its not problem with that..... come on.

In addition we can say, the karma its making a lot of things, they keep being ashamed, and cant win the UCL.

Unfortunately this will not change as this is a fiscal paradise for the petrodollars to clean some of the not so clean money they make.They are bringing good only to the city and the team they get,in this case PSG as Psg before in France was not some really great team like Juventus has been for many years in Italy,in France we had Marseille as the most well known one and then Lyon lately together with Saint Ettiene.

As I said this is not changing and maybe even more teams will be bought by these petrodollars,they maybe will not win the UCL but they bring great joy to the citizens of the city they buy the team.

[slaman29]

The PSG needs to be banned also all the teams with the petrodollars behind them, they are damaging so much the football with inflated prices, making a huge inflation in football market, as you can see a lot of players now cost much than Cristiano Ronaldo when he pass from Man Utd to Real Madrid, and we know they are shit player side by side to the young CR.

Like KTC say they are scammers, and the justice only see to another side, its so obvius how they make this its like they show to all their figurehead and all know this but its not problem with that..... come on.

In addition we can say, the karma its making a lot of things, they keep being ashamed, and cant win the UCL.

It makes me sad to admit it but even my own club are probably guilty of financial fraud, just that they have not yet been found out. It's terrible enough that the club owners do it, but to hear sometimes that even players themselves like in Neymar's case help the clubs pass around the restrictions. He was one of my fav players during the MSN era.

Messi himself my all time fav guy, and yet he was also involved with tax evasion (though that's more his father I cannot ignore it is his name). And then now playing at PSG, it makes me sick sometimes.

Let's put it this way. We all know how dirty football business and politics is. And when they get caught, like banks, they get fined. Remember Manchester City, they laugh at the amount of fines it's like a tickle on their butt. Nobody gets banned, nobody goes to jail. Why not break the law?

But like banking we are all forced to use criminals. Boycotting them is pointless if we want a good life. I want my football so I have to watch it and enjoy my players.

[Trofo]

The PSG needs to be banned also all the teams with the petrodollars behind them, they are damaging so much the football with inflated prices, making a huge inflation in football market, as you can see a lot of players now cost much than Cristiano Ronaldo when he pass from Man Utd to Real Madrid, and we know they are shit player side by side to the young CR.

Like KTC say they are scammers, and the justice only see to another side, its so obvius how they make this its like they show to all their figurehead and all know this but its not problem with that..... come on.

In addition we can say, the karma its making a lot of things, they keep being ashamed, and cant win the UCL.

It makes me sad to admit it but even my own club are probably guilty of financial fraud, just that they have not yet been found out. It's terrible enough that the club owners do it, but to hear sometimes that even players themselves like in Neymar's case help the clubs pass around the restrictions. He was one of my fav players during the MSN era.

Messi himself my all time fav guy, and yet he was also involved with tax evasion (though that's more his father I cannot ignore it is his name). And then now playing at PSG, it makes me sick sometimes.

Let's put it this way. We all know how dirty football business and politics is. And when they get caught, like banks, they get fined. Remember Manchester City, they laugh at the amount of fines it's like a tickle on their butt. Nobody gets banned, nobody goes to jail. Why not break the law?

But like banking we are all forced to use criminals. Boycotting them is pointless if we want a good life. I want my football so I have to watch it and enjoy my players.

Problem is they don't even need to break the low and still they make mockery of financial fair play.

Example transfer between Barca and Juve for Arthur/Pjanić. I didn't get it why they paid full amounts instead of just exchanging players.

Answer is of course financial fair play. When you sell player you get whole amount in the account but when you buy the player you are amortising the cost over years of contract. Meaning you sell one player for 100M and buy another for that same 100M and you give him 5 year contract. That makes instant plus of cool 80M on account for other transfers and problem down the yaers for next management  But who cares about that.

[swogerino]

The PSG needs to be banned also all the teams with the petrodollars behind them, they are damaging so much the football with inflated prices, making a huge inflation in football market, as you can see a lot of players now cost much than Cristiano Ronaldo when he pass from Man Utd to Real Madrid, and we know they are shit player side by side to the young CR.

Like KTC say they are scammers, and the justice only see to another side, its so obvius how they make this its like they show to all their figurehead and all know this but its not problem with that..... come on.

In addition we can say, the karma its making a lot of things, they keep being ashamed, and cant win the UCL.

It makes me sad to admit it but even my own club are probably guilty of financial fraud, just that they have not yet been found out. It's terrible enough that the club owners do it, but to hear sometimes that even players themselves like in Neymar's case help the clubs pass around the restrictions. He was one of my fav players during the MSN era.

Messi himself my all time fav guy, and yet he was also involved with tax evasion (though that's more his father I cannot ignore it is his name). And then now playing at PSG, it makes me sick sometimes.

Let's put it this way. We all know how dirty football business and politics is. And when they get caught, like banks, they get fined. Remember Manchester City, they laugh at the amount of fines it's like a tickle on their butt. Nobody gets banned, nobody goes to jail. Why not break the law?

But like banking we are all forced to use criminals. Boycotting them is pointless if we want a good life. I want my football so I have to watch it and enjoy my players.

Problem is they don't even need to break the low and still they make mockery of financial fair play.

Example transfer between Barca and Juve for Arthur/Pjanić. I didn't get it why they paid full amounts instead of just exchanging players.

Answer is of course financial fair play. When you sell player you get whole amount in the account but when you buy the player you are amortising the cost over years of contract. Meaning you sell one player for 100M and buy another for that same 100M and you give him 5 year contract. That makes instant plus of cool 80M on account for other transfers and problem down the yaers for next management  But who cares about that.

Exactly this,the football industry has so much inflated the price of a player that this is becoming a paradise even for people who do not care at all about football but they want to have somewhere to clean their dirty money.I think it should be mandatory to request from FIFA/UEFA to all clubs their source of income,in detail because I know they do something like this but it is standard procedure,they need to go thoroughly just like centralized exchanges are hitting on us normal ordinary users of cryptocurrencies.That would solve the problem or at least a major part of the problem.

[cryptofrka]

Problem is they don't even need to break the low and still they make mockery of financial fair play.

Example transfer between Barca and Juve for Arthur/Pjanić. I didn't get it why they paid full amounts instead of just exchanging players.

Answer is of course financial fair play. When you sell player you get whole amount in the account but when you buy the player you are amortising the cost over years of contract. Meaning you sell one player for 100M and buy another for that same 100M and you give him 5 year contract. That makes instant plus of cool 80M on account for other transfers and problem down the yaers for next management   But who cares about that.

Yup, this is why there's more and more talk of a salary cap of some sort. With FFP there will always be clubs that are actively searching for ways to break the rules, and the majority of these clubs succeed.

The penalties, even when caught, are far from being substantial so the clubs basically don't care. Now with Covid it's even worse and although I was against the salary cap at first, I can see why it's suddenly being considered as a valid option.

[notblox1]

Example transfer between Barca and Juve for Arthur/Pjanić. I didn't get it why they paid full amounts instead of just exchanging players.

I think that some clubs are doing dirty deals with managers and players, so you never know real amount of money someone payed.
Sometimes this could be to avoid paying high taxes, and sometimes to trick players so that other people could earn extra money.
Just look what boxing promoter Don King did with Mike Tyson and other boxers, I am sure there are people like that in football, if not worse.

[Igebotz]

Example transfer between Barca and Juve for Arthur/Pjanić. I didn't get it why they paid full amounts instead of just exchanging players.

I think that some clubs are doing dirty deals with managers and players, so you never know real amount of money someone payed.
Sometimes this could be to avoid paying high taxes, and sometimes to trick players so that other people could earn extra money.
Just look what boxing promoter Don King did with Mike Tyson and other boxers, I am sure there are people like that in football, if not worse.

It's been 9 years and Barcelona and Santos have yet to reveal how much Nermay's real transfer fees were. Barcelona claimed it was around £45 million, while Brazilian and Spanish sources claimed it was around £80 million. How long will we have to wait before they tell us the truth? It's the most serious attempt to avoid FFP I've seen since it began.

Griezmann deal is another deal that needs to be investigated.

[Harkorede]

Problem is they don't even need to break the low and still they make mockery of financial fair play.

Example transfer between Barca and Juve for Arthur/Pjanić. I didn't get it why they paid full amounts instead of just exchanging players.

Answer is of course financial fair play. When you sell player you get whole amount in the account but when you buy the player you are amortising the cost over years of contract. Meaning you sell one player for 100M and buy another for that same 100M and you give him 5 year contract. That makes instant plus of cool 80M on account for other transfers and problem down the yaers for next management   But who cares about that.

That's why there is the saying that most rules are for the common man, these big guys pay millions of dollars to find loopholes within almost every existence laws, if not why is Curacao about almost the country gambling sites can get their License from ? And then get to operate in other countries to avoid huge taxes and whatnot.

Another example is the deal that brought Mbappe to PSG for 180m the same window 220m was splashed on Neymar, on paper it was a loan deal, but even the dumbest guy from FIFA FFP team knows it was a permanent deal in disguise, but they made the rules and if both clubs agrees it's a loan deal with all those mandatory purchase clauses already being included, then there is nothing FIFA can do, right ?

[darxiaomi]

The main problem for me its the overprice this generate and this make even bigger the gap between huge teams and small teams.

But i think the football now its experiencing a new era,  because you can only put a 11 players in the pitch, so you have to forgot some players and this player can be really good and for dont have the space they can play in smaller teams and do really great.


Asides of the money laundry thing. Im the only one who miss the UCL/footbal clubs? I really hate the nations teams stop, the week its not the same, not matter how much match we have its not the same.

We have to wait until 4/10. can be a quite long.

[slaman29]

Problem is they don't even need to break the low and still they make mockery of financial fair play.

Example transfer between Barca and Juve for Arthur/Pjanić. I didn't get it why they paid full amounts instead of just exchanging players.

Answer is of course financial fair play. When you sell player you get whole amount in the account but when you buy the player you are amortising the cost over years of contract. Meaning you sell one player for 100M and buy another for that same 100M and you give him 5 year contract. That makes instant plus of cool 80M on account for other transfers and problem down the yaers for next management   But who cares about that.

Yes, I read about that also, and countless articles about how Barca is buying up players, selling off their future permanently just so they can include some other player. It's going to be a huge problem next season already since they can't be selling more and more of their tv rights, just very sad to read, since nobody is going to pay for the consequence except the club itself.

FFP is a joke, I totally understand why some lifelong fans of clubs like Barca and Man United have given up watching the love of their lives. I just don't have any option for now.

[notblox1]

It's been 9 years and Barcelona and Santos have yet to reveal how much Nermay's real transfer fees were. Barcelona claimed it was around £45 million, while Brazilian and Spanish sources claimed it was around £80 million. How long will we have to wait before they tell us the truth? It's the most serious attempt to avoid FFP I've seen since it began.

Don't you know that majority of taxes are meant for general population, while rich and royals don't pay almost any tax at all, that is why new king Charles didn't pay any inheritance tax, and genpop needs to pay 40%
This big clubs like Barcelona, and I know small clubs are doing the same, are using double contracts many times so you will never know the real amount of money, unless someone leaks insider information.
That is why some criminals like to be involved in football clubs, it's easier to wash the money than in other businesses.

[Igebotz]

It's been 9 years and Barcelona and Santos have yet to reveal how much Nermay's real transfer fees were. Barcelona claimed it was around £45 million, while Brazilian and Spanish sources claimed it was around £80 million. How long will we have to wait before they tell us the truth? It's the most serious attempt to avoid FFP I've seen since it began.

Don't you know that majority of taxes are meant for general population, while rich and royals don't pay almost any tax at all, that is why new king Charles didn't pay any inheritance tax, and genpop needs to pay 40%

The laws are written by the rich for the sole purpose of protecting themselves from the poor; I've seen the world go this way from the 1980s to the 1990s and now to the 2000s, so I've given up on the world of equity.

This big clubs like Barcelona, and I know small clubs are doing the same, are using double contracts many times so you will never know the real amount of money, unless someone leaks insider information.
That is why some criminals like to be involved in football clubs, it's easier to wash the money than in other businesses.

Benzema has been at Real Madrid for over a decade and has only signed one contract extensions. Don't you think something is wrong? For decades, the Spanish league has used football as a form of money laundering, with most transfers involving undisclosed fees in order to keep FFP in the dark.

[logfiles]

Benzema has been at Real Madrid for over a decade and has only signed one contract extensions. Don't you think something is wrong? For decades, the Spanish league has used football as a form of money laundering, with most transfers involving undisclosed fees in order to keep FFP in the dark.

Benzema signed only one contract extension in a decade? That's impossible, can you prove this?
Even if it had happened, how will have Benzema and Madrid pulled it off which out causing any legal issues? You know information about such contracts is usually available including their expiry dates

Premier League also used to do undisclosed fees. Maybe right now it's not a thing, but it was back then. But just because the fees are undisclosed to the public does not mean the tax man knows nothing about them.

[Trofo]

Benzema has been at Real Madrid for over a decade and has only signed one contract extensions. Don't you think something is wrong? For decades, the Spanish league has used football as a form of money laundering, with most transfers involving undisclosed fees in order to keep FFP in the dark.

Benzema signed only one contract extension in a decade? That's impossible, can you prove this?
Even if it had happened, how will have Benzema and Madrid pulled it off which out causing any legal issues? You know information about such contracts is usually available including their expiry dates

Premier League also used to do undisclosed fees. Maybe right now it's not a thing, but it was back then. But just because the fees are undisclosed to the public does not mean the tax man knows nothing about them.

That information is just not true. I remembered several talks about his contract extensions and even went googling a little to prove myself that memory still works. So here is the info, mostly taken from Wikipedia:
2009 - Benzema signed 6 year deal
2014 - New 5 year deal
2020 - 2 year deal
2021 - 2 year deal

I am quite sure I am missing info for 2018 or somewhere around that for one more extension. Did not have the will to spend more then 2 minutes searching Pattern is clear, he gets new contract every time he gets in the last year of previous one, as it should be.