⭐⚽⭐ Sportsbet's Bitcointalk Sports Fanatics League (BSFL) – 10000$ rewards ⭐⚽⭐

[Igebotz]

just dropping this here, the neither option won!!!! as none of the team made up to 55% possession  https://www.uefa.com/european-qualifiers/match/2036294--italy-vs-england/statistics/


fuck........Rasmus Hojlnud 90+3 goal for Denmark ruined my third point for the day. Fortunately for you, Harkorede, that goal gave you a lifeline. You won't be so lucky tomorrow. I just need Neitherland to do the dirty work for me , This is getting exciting, and I'm just disappointed that I didn't back our women's team to defeat Lyon yesterday. Lyon, Barcelona, and Bayern women have been our problems in the champions league for the past three seasons. I've let my team down twice, and we're Chelsea, for god's sake!

[cryptofrka]

It would be great to avoid these mistakes in the future by providing questions for the competition in the required format, so I suggest if it is possible to provide backup questions that will be counted in case there is an invalid game. What do you think?

It isn't really a mistake, more of a misunderstanding of a sentence. Still - we'll make sure to avoid such things.
We feel it's better to give some context with the question - especially when something interesting is happening. We will continue to do that, we'll just do it better

_________________

Denmark question ruined me, I felt the point is here in the 93rd minute and then realized that there were 2 handicap options - and I picked the wrong one.

[CLS63]

The spreadsheet has been unlocked, answers from strongkored are hidden because vd309 hasn't submitted his answers yet.

Regarding the Haaland question - I was trying to be a sneaky bastard
I thought he'll play for 30 minutes or so if Norway will have an active result but unfortunately it looks like he won't play at all.
In that case the question will be voided.

Even though we don't have any logo yet we have decided to make our first objection to the Cro2 federation in this season. We are demanding to see the same decision to be made again in which Benzema couldn't play before in the World Cup.

To be honest, I wouldn't have objected to it if we had different answers with buwaytress. I like to play a little dirty lol.

[darxiaomi]

just dropping this here, the neither option won!!!! as none of the team made up to 55% possession   https://www.uefa.com/european-qualifiers/match/2036294--italy-vs-england/statistics/

Really strange stats, because in other pages its Italy over by far, and what i see in the game the second half was pure Italy.

Italy fucked me i back them and they lose agains england because of a really poor first half.

I hope to recover in the following questions.

[Igebotz]

The spreadsheet has been unlocked, answers from strongkored are hidden because vd309 hasn't submitted his answers yet.

Regarding the Haaland question - I was trying to be a sneaky bastard
I thought he'll play for 30 minutes or so if Norway will have an active result but unfortunately it looks like he won't play at all.
In that case the question will be voided.

Even though we don't have any logo yet we have decided to make our first objection to the Cro2 federation in this season. We are demanding to see the same decision to be made again in which Benzema couldn't play before in the World Cup.

To be honest, I wouldn't have objected to it if we had different answers with buwaytress. I like to play a little dirty lol.

The main goal of this competition is to do research before submitting our answers, and if anyone didn't do more research to find out that Halaand decided to fake an injury in order to have two weeks rest before the game against Liverpool, then that should be their lost point. Cro2 team need to be ruthless


The injury news came about 6-10 hrs after the questions went LIVE ( for the record I and my opponent put the same answer).

just dropping this here, the neither option won!!!! as none of the team made up to 55% possession  https://www.uefa.com/european-qualifiers/match/2036294--italy-vs-england/statistics/

Really strange stats, because in other pages its Italy over by far, and what i see in the game the second half was pure Italy.

Italy fucked me i back them and they lose agains england because of a really poor first half.

I hope to recover in the following questions.

The official stats from EURO page is the valid one. England could have won the possession game but the 80th mins red card to Shaw changed the game for England.

[arallmuus]

The official stats from EURO page is the valid one. England could have won the possession game but the 80th mins red card to Shaw changed the game for England.

I wished that happened though

What an unlucky day for me. I checked at around 50+ minutes or something then I saw England winning the possession and scored 2 goals as well as Denmark not covering the handicap. If only that stay until the end, I would have gotten 2 points from these 3 questions damn. Ended up getting 0 points because Denmark has to score that last minute goal 

[ralle14]

Really strange stats, because in other pages its Italy over by far, and what i see in the game the second half was pure Italy.

Italy fucked me i back them and they lose agains england because of a really poor first half.

I hope to recover in the following questions.

Same here, I was relying on Italy to push me ahead of the h2h but now they set me back by 2 points and it's back to chasing once more.  

The matches later today will be my best chance to catch up and if I don't come out on top I might be looking at my fourth loss.

[cryptofrka]

Even though we don't have any logo yet we have decided to make our first objection to the Cro2 federation in this season. We are demanding to see the same decision to be made again in which Benzema couldn't play before in the World Cup.

To be honest, I wouldn't have objected to it if we had different answers with buwaytress. I like to play a little dirty lol.

Heheh, not really. Similar but not the same rules apply.
The question with Benzema had him as one of the options (question was who will score the 1st goal for France), this whole question is only about Haaland so it has to be voided if he doesn't play.

That doesn't suit me as well (I had him under, I expected him to play for 30 mins or so) but this is the fairest way to solve it.

Therefore, regretfully, the Board has decided to reject your complaint

[slaman29]

Well done jeremypwr! I think we are now 4-2 and only 3 questions left that are different. If you win just 1 more you take 3 points, so now I have to win them all, stupid of me to pick clean sheet, Teemu Pukki pops up again as usual...

Hi to all!

I noticed one thing its wrong, in the second question its incorrect what you select to winners.
The serie who ends was the Lyon one, because they cant keep winning games in a row.

In my leg doesnt change anything because me and my oponent selected the same, but keep an eye on that.

Wow good catch, actually now I read it, this question is a trick, who ends their series, so Lyon lost, and the correct answer was Lyon

I would definitely agree the question/answer should be changed because I picked Lyon lol but I am not going to be a prick. Honestly I picked Lyon because I thought they would win, not because I thought they would lose their series!!

[notblox1]

The official stats from EURO page is the valid one. England could have won the possession game but the 80th mins red card to Shaw changed the game for England.

I hope this wont be my single mistake to make me lose this round of BSFL competition
There are five more matches from question number 6 to 10, and I am still hoping to strike a deadly blow and first defeat of Division 1 top two positions.

News for Dutch national team, there is virus outbreak and many players could miss important match against France tonight.
Odds are dropping on France and I think they can use this situation to win, this is maybe best bet of the day for me.

Therefore, regretfully, the Board has decided to reject your complaint

What happened with idea of introducing logos for each player in BSFL?
  

[cryptofrka]

What happened with idea of introducing logos for each player in BSFL?

I'd personally love to see it. However, it will depend on the participants consensus.
So far only a few logos have been created, and in formats that cannot be implemented.

joker_josue did mention how they need to look:

In order to look good in the table, the images will have to be in good quality with a height of 15px.
Therefore, when developing a logo, you have to check if it is perceptible in that dimension.

I'd add that they have to be in PNG format and in rectangular shape (meaning 15x15 px).

[Igebotz]

The official stats from EURO page is the valid one. England could have won the possession game but the 80th mins red card to Shaw changed the game for England.

I hope this wont be my single mistake to make me lose this round of BSFL competition
There are five more matches from question number 6 to 10, and I am still hoping to strike a deadly blow and first defeat of Division 1 top two positions.

News for Dutch national team, there is virus outbreak and many players could miss important match against France tonight.
Odds are dropping on France and I think they can use this situation to win, this is maybe best bet of the day for me. 

oh no! Just as I was hoping that they would at least score a goal against France to seal the round for me, there is a rumor circulating that the Chicken curry served in camp on Wednesday is the source of the viral virus outbreak. The international break is always filled with bad news and injury concerns. That was unprofessional behavior on the part of the chef, and he should be warned. All that matters is that the players are safe

_________________++++++++++++____________________

Cro2 team please the round is almost over, is the full fixtures for the season ready?

[slackovic]

The official stats from EURO page is the valid one. England could have won the possession game but the 80th mins red card to Shaw changed the game for England.

I hope this wont be my single mistake to make me lose this round of BSFL competition
There are five more matches from question number 6 to 10, and I am still hoping to strike a deadly blow and first defeat of Division 1 top two positions.

/snip

What did you expect when facing one of the luckiest bastards in the competition? I know that I'll probably regret saying this but I just can't help myself I'm leading 3-2 with 3 answers remaining that we answered differently. So there is still chance for you to beat me.

[darxiaomi]

Well i have again to come with this, i think we need to void the possesion question, the UEFA web sadly colleted porrly the statistic for possesion, i dont know why that happen but its clearly demostrable (more if you see the game). I know this its not pleasant but anyone has to say this.

Look at this.




Look at sofascore.



And more important look at the ammoun of pass, and you can find why its bugged the UEFA stats, they collect only the first half one. And you can check this in whatever page you like, really disapointed by a page like UEFA (official one) to have this error.

PS:
And i repeat i said this because its not a 1/2% percent difference between pages, this its a clear error and its clearly demostrable by the ammount of passes. And also if you see the game more.

Please check in other pages and you will see.

[Igebotz]

Well i have again to come with this, i think we need to void the possesion question, the UEFA web sadly colleted porrly the statistic for possesion, i dont know why that happen but its clearly demostrable (more if you see the game). I know this its not pleasant but anyone has to say this.

Look at this.

Give up man, sorry don't try to be smart   Even if it's a bug, there's no way to validate it; if UEFA says it's 49-51 ball possession, then that's what it is. As this is a UEFA competition question, whatever numbers they provided will be used by the bookmakers rather than some random sofacores site. passes attempted and passes completed are two different stats, Sofa score added both i guess.

edit

Now that I've looked at the spreadsheet, I can see why you want that question to be nullified.

[cryptofrka]

We checked also Livescore and Flashscore, only Sofascore has a different number.
I sent a question to my friend that does statistics for bet365 and I'll write here when he replies back.

I watched the game partially and am more inclined to believe that it was 50-50 than Italy dominating - but we'll make all the needed checks.

Just a note - number of passes is irrelevant for possession stats. If a player holds up the ball (slow building through defence) it goes into possession but not into passes, so a team can actually have more possession with less passes.

[darxiaomi]

Well i have again to come with this, i think we need to void the possesion question, the UEFA web sadly colleted porrly the statistic for possesion, i dont know why that happen but its clearly demostrable (more if you see the game). I know this its not pleasant but anyone has to say this.

Look at this.

Give up man, sorry don't try to be smart  Even if it's a bug, there's no way to validate it; if UEFA says it's 49-51 ball possession, then that's what it is. As this is a UEFA competition question, whatever numbers they provided will be used by the bookmakers rather than some random sofacores site. passes attempted and passes completed are two different stats, Sofa score added both i guess.

edit

Now that I've looked at the spreadsheet, I can see why you want that question to be nullified.

First to all i dont know why you attack me personally, and also you can see i see the other question was not clear and i come and i say that and that not benefit me, i only try to pursuit the true.
So what are you gonna say?. Even if im defending myself what have this wrong?.

About pass think i know that, but that show the UEFA page took only the stats for one half. I dont know what more can i do to prove the flawed are the stats for UEFA and it was a bug because the other stats are good, but possesion and passes are not good.

You can check , well everybody can check the normal ammount of passes in a game are 500 for england and italy.

In the second half also Italy have 70% of the possesion. And plus i dont know what game you see, first half was 50 50 the second half England didnt shoot and never cross the midfield.

[Trofo]

Well i have again to come with this, i think we need to void the possesion question, the UEFA web sadly colleted porrly the statistic for possesion, i dont know why that happen but its clearly demostrable (more if you see the game). I know this its not pleasant but anyone has to say this.

Look at this.

Give up man, sorry don't try to be smart  Even if it's a bug, there's no way to validate it; if UEFA says it's 49-51 ball possession, then that's what it is. As this is a UEFA competition question, whatever numbers they provided will be used by the bookmakers rather than some random sofacores site. passes attempted and passes completed are two different stats, Sofa score added both i guess.

edit

Now that I've looked at the spreadsheet, I can see why you want that question to be nullified.

First to all i dont know why you attack me personally, and also you can see i see the other question was not clear and i come and i say that and that not benefit me, i only try to pursuit the true.
So what are you gonna say?. Even if im defending myself what have this wrong?.

About pass think i know that, but that show the UEFA page took only the stats for one half. I dont know what more can i do to prove the flawed are the stats for UEFA and it was a bug because the other stats are good, but possesion and passes are not good.

You can check , well everybody can check the normal ammount of passes in a game are 500 for england and italy.

In the second half also Italy have 70% of the possesion. And plus i dont know what game you see, first half was 50 50 the second half England didnt shoot and never cross the midfield.

Don't be bothered by Igebotz, he has a rough way of making his points sometimes.

I will grant you that these screenshots you posted look suspicious and we will investigate the situation further. We will wait for that cryptofrka's friend to hear his opinion or try some other avenues to see what the bookies entered as correct numbers. There is no need to void the question, there is a recording of the game available for sure, if it comes to that I will watch it again and judge the question by myself. I did not watch the game but I was looking at the stats often and I had a feeling England had better possession in first half while Italy had better in second half.

We are using official sources but of course common sense must prevail, if above screen shot is true than UEFA has it wrong obviously and we will check other sources.

[buwaytress]

Re Italy England, I lost that point, but should have won it if not for Maguire curses on him and on CLS63 haha.

Malta saved me, though, thanks minnows.

I was watching most parts of the game in patches and following possession on Livescore -- England was as high as 63% at one stage and it felt fair as they took control offensively, but the second half was Italy's and then after the sending off, it all got eaten away as Italy grew into the game.

I would say it's fair, and we use official results, regardless of what the mind thinks.

But good to check, and make Cro2 work.

Oh and darxiaomi yes Igebotz is a silly boi, but it's okay, you can sling insults at him too, he likes the attention.

[Harkorede]

just dropping this here, the neither option won!!!! as none of the team made up to 55% possession  https://www.uefa.com/european-qualifiers/match/2036294--italy-vs-england/statistics/


fuck........Rasmus Hojlnud 90+3 goal for Denmark ruined my third point for the day. Fortunately for you, Harkorede, that goal gave you a lifeline. You won't be so lucky tomorrow. I just need Neitherland to do the dirty work for me , This is getting exciting, and I'm just disappointed that I didn't back our women's team to defeat Lyon yesterday. Lyon, Barcelona, and Bayern women have been our problems in the champions league for the past three seasons. I've let my team down twice, and we're Chelsea, for god's sake!

Lol. yes the goal gave me a life line but then if England hadn't been so dominant in the first and lost the dominance and being one man down, it would have been an entirely different story, it was you who got lucky with that question because we both could have missed it as well, the truth is I still have significant level of confidence, I danced to your tune, and some questions I answered was because of what I knew you'd settle for too, so for each I question I'm convinced about my answer I try to go for the easiest I think you'd likely go for too, but then the England question isn't one of them, I knew the clause attached to England dominating, If the score had remain goalless at halftime, or it was Italy with the lead, England would definitely have dominated both possession and the passes significantly.