AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Ultegra134]

Any feedback on this specific user? Some posts are strangely suspicious, half of them appear AI, others appear paraphrased, but I'm pretty sure something fishy is going on.

User: durg0319

Post 1.

I think the bigger issue here is not which mNAV formula is correct, but what investors are trying to measure. If you want to value Strategy as a Bitcoin proxy, market cap comparison feels more honest. If you want to judge how aggressive the balance sheet is, enterprise value matters more. Mixing the two can confuse people. Recent performance shows leverage cuts both ways, so mNAV alone should not be used to justify bullish or bearish views without looking at risk, debt timing, and Bitcoin price sensitivity.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 75% AI
Undetectable: 63% AI
Sapling.ai: 99% AI

Post 2.

Yeah, you are right. Bitcoin is a smart choice to invest in, because it gives people to safe guard their assets outside unstable fiat currencies that keeps devaluing. Like you said, it is not a quick money making scheme, but in other to be successful through it one needs to be patience, have the right mindset and also quite accumulation to build your holdings regardless of the price at which Bitcoin is. Real freedom is having wealth that can be enjoyed safely, and Bitcoin helps achieve that in ways traditional systems can’t.

GPTZero: 75% AI (Possible paraphrasing detected)
Stealthwriter: 33% AI
Undetectable: 25% AI
Sapling.ai: 54% AI

Post 3.

I myself don’t like the idea of borrowing money to invest in Bitcoin. Money that is borrowed always comes with a deadline, and Bitcoin moves on its own time. So if a person has no other means to pay back, they will have to sell too early. That takes away patience and turns a long-term idea into a forced decision. Bitcoin rewards those who can wait, not those chasing quick returns just to clear debt. Using personal income gives freedom, better judgment, and room to grow slowly.

GPTZero: 97% AI (Possible paraphrasing detected)
Stealthwriter: 50% AI
Undetectable: 51% AI
Sapling.ai: 100% AI

Post 4.

I myself don’t like the idea of borrowing money to invest in Bitcoin. Money that is borrowed always comes with a deadline, and Bitcoin moves on its own time. So if a person has no other means to pay back, they will have to sell too early. That takes away patience and turns a long-term idea into a forced decision. Bitcoin rewards those who can wait, not those chasing quick returns just to clear debt. Using personal income gives freedom, better judgment, and room to grow slowly.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Undetectable: 88% AI
Sapling.ai: 100% AI

[d5000]

A legendary story writer. Writes huge, informative stories. No one would suspect that he is using AI. Yet he is a legend and is posting using AI. Most of his posts are created by AI. I have checked three of his posts.

User:abhiseshakana

His content on economics topics is very good to be really "fully AI worded", i.e. I think at least the ideas come from himself, or he really knows what he does and writes really good prompts. In my opinion, it's also possible that this user translates posts from another language via AI. But I admit I have had my suspicions too. I think I remember however that I made a test with one of his longer posts when I first saw him, and it was negative (at least with the AI checker I used).

This post gives 28% AI probability on Grammarly, but the first part gets 100% AI on Copyleaks, the second part however 0%. Don't know. His language is a bit "schematic" to say it that way.

It is also interesting that he has had several trades with other forum users according to his Trust entry.

[Ultegra134]

His content on economics topics is very good to be really "fully AI worded", i.e. I think at least the ideas come from himself, or he really knows what he does and writes really good prompts. In my opinion, it's also possible that this user translates posts from another language via AI. But I admit I have had my suspicions too. I think I remember however that I made a test with one of his longer posts when I first saw him, and it was negative (at least with the AI checker I used).

This post gives 28% AI probability on Grammarly, but the first part gets 100% AI on Copyleaks, the second part however 0%. Don't know. His language is a bit "schematic" to say it that way.

It is also interesting that he has had several trades with other forum users according to his Trust entry.

I personally have my doubts; his posts are "too" well-structured, full punctuation marks, and wording that's often used in AI, such as "Historically, I agree with your points about:" or "Some points I think we need to discuss are:". It's not the choice of words someone would make in a forum, this isn't Financial Times.

This sentence for instance is way too suspicious to not say that it's AI. "From your explanation, it seems like you're complaining that your financial strategy worked in the past, but it no longer fits today. You might want to review and apply these points:"

This is straight up copied from ChatGPT; this isn't a way a human writes on the average forum.

[SatoPrincess]

User: Aloysius01

‎     Stopping corruption in Nigeria is difficult,  but it is possible if it is tackled from multiple angles at the same time, No single solution works on its own, Here are practical, realistic ways Nigeria can reduce corruption
‎Strengthen Institutions, Not Individuals
‎Nigeria should focus on strong systems, not  strong men
‎Anti corruption agencies (EFCC and ICC must be independent of political influence
‎Appointments should be based on merit, not loyalty, court must handle corruption case quickly and transparently
‎True Rule of Law
‎Nobody should be above the law  politicians, judges, security officials, remove selective justice (prosecuting opponents while protecting allies, it publish judgments and asset recoveries openly
‎Transparency in Government Spendingy
‎Make all government budgets, contracts, and payments publicly accessible online
‎Use cashless systems to reduce human interference, Track recovered funds and show citizens how they are reused
‎ Political Reforms
‎Reduce the cost of politics (campaign limits, strict funding rules
‎Enforce penalties for vote buying and election rigging should be check properly
‎End immunity abuse immunity should not mean impunity
‎Whistleblower Protection
‎Protect citizens who expose corruption, provide financial rewards and guaranteed safety
‎Education & Value Reorientation
‎Teach ethics, civic duty, and anti corruption values from primary school
‎Religious and traditional leaders must practice what they preach
‎Stop glorifying stolen wealth in society
‎Economic Security for Citizens
‎Corruption thrives where people are desperate, creat jobs opportunity and improve wages, Ensure social safety networks, reduced poverty to reduce every day bribery
‎Citizen Responsibility
‎Corruption survives when people participate in it, refuse to give or take bribe, report corrupt even at small levels, vote wisely,not along ethnic or monetary lines
‎Technology & Digital Governance
‎Digitize public services (licenses, tax, passports) it reduces human contact where bribery happens, use data systems to detect fraud automatically
‎Consistency Over Time
‎corruption won’t disappear in one administration, policies must continue regardless of who is in power longterm national commitment is key in summary, policies must continue regardless of who is in power.
‎Corruption in Nigeria is not just a government problem it is a systemic and societal issue, Real change will happen when leaders, institutions and citizens all act together, consistently and honestly.

Copyleaks - 100%
Gptzero- 99%

You are making a fair and important point. A nation grows because all it is ethnic groups contribute in different ways economically, culturally, and socially. Agriculture, industry, commerce, arts, education, each group adds a piece to the larger picture. When a government decides to support only one tribe financially, it naturally raises questions of fairness, equity, and national unity. Here are a few balanced thoughts, why selective financial support is problematic. It creates a balance because national resources should benefit all citizens, not only a specific group. It can fuel tension favoring one group may make others feel marginalized or undervalued. It weakens national identity when citizens see bias, it becomes harder for them to feel a shared sense of belonging.

What good governance ideally looks like. Policies should target needs, not tribes. For example, support should go to farmers because they are farmers, not because they belong to a certain ethnicity. Development should be inclusive. Programs that uplift underdeveloped regions or disadvantaged communities should be based on objective criteria.Unity and fairness strengthen the whole country.

 

Copyleaks - 100%
Gptzero- 100%

[FinneysTrueVision]

His content on economics topics is very good to be really "fully AI worded", i.e. I think at least the ideas come from himself, or he really knows what he does and writes really good prompts. In my opinion, it's also possible that this user translates posts from another language via AI. But I admit I have had my suspicions too. I think I remember however that I made a test with one of his longer posts when I first saw him, and it was negative (at least with the AI checker I used).

It is probably a combination of several of those things. He has over 1,000 posts in the Economics section starting from 2019, according to Ninjastic. It is a subject he seems to have genuine interest in and has good knowledge about, assuming his older posts are authentic and weren't created by a paraphrasing tool or whatever was being used by cheaters back then. Oddly, they don’t have any posts in that section from December 2021 to July 2025. When they became active there again earlier this year, their AI usage was apparent enough that I reported them in this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg65918791#msg65918791

[memehunter]

His content on economics topics is very good to be really "fully AI worded", i.e. I think at least the ideas come from himself, or he really knows what he does and writes really good prompts. In my opinion, it's also possible that this user translates posts from another language via AI. But I admit I have had my suspicions too.

The test is simple if your post is detected by multiple detectors as AI, it will be considered as AI, unless you come here and explain it here. We (as a genuine reader who is seeking knowledge/genuine discourse) have a bias for quality words/arguments (which is reflected here).
The user in question must answer the concerns for greater good and let us see the spark of his brilliance here also, may be he can help us level up our AI detection game.
BTW, great post (if you wrote it yourself): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5522234.msg66199210#msg66199210

EDIT
I have sent a PM to him regarding this, incase, he is not aware.

[SatoPrincess]

User: Tyatya

Economic direction – Tinubu’s government has pushed a rapid overhaul: the fuel‑subsidy was scrapped, the naira was unified, and a broad tax‑simplification drive was launched  Buhari’s tenure, by contrast, kept the subsidy in place for most of his term, relied on multiple exchange‑rate windows and emphasized protectionist trade measures 

Fiscal stance – Under Tinubu the budget deficit has been trimmed to about 3 % of GDP, with the savings from subsidy removal earmarked for infrastructure and social programmes  Buhari’s fiscal balance stayed wider, and revenue‑sharing allocations to states grew only modestly 

Security & governance – Both presidents faced widespread insecurity, but Tinubu has promised a “whole‑of‑government” security reform and more funding for the military  Buhari’s 13‑year fight against Boko Haram and banditry saw mixed results, with violence spreading into the northwest and southeast during his last years 

Institutional reforms – Tinubu’s “Renewed Hope” agenda stresses youth empowerment, digital‑skills programmes (the 3MTT initiative) and a push for a $1 trillion economy  Buhari’s focus was more on anti‑corruption drives and maintaining the status quo in key ministries 

Public perception – Tinubu’s reforms have sparked sharp price hikes and protests, but supporters point to improved fuel availability and a more transparent forex market  Critics of Buhari highlight lingering fuel shortages, inflation and a perceived slow pace of economic diversification 

In short, Tinubu’s regime is characterised by aggressive market‑oriented reforms and a fresh security blueprint, while Buhari’s era was marked by continuity of existing subsidies, multiple exchange‑rate regimes and a longer‑term security campaign. Both approaches have their supporters and detractors, reflecting the complex trade‑offs Nigeria faces. 🌍

Copy leaks - 100%
Gptzero- 100%

Sudan’s the big one on the radar right now – it tops the Emergency Watchlist as the world’s largest humanitarian crisis, with millions displaced and a famine declared in several areas 

That said, a handful of other places are also in deep trouble: Gaza is still under a devastating war, Myanmar’s conflict is flaring, and countries like Haiti, Mali and Burkina Faso are grappling with severe violence and food shortages 

Even with most of this things going on the world is still not giving them the right energy for them to face this fight I pray nobody is put in a position where you can't proudly mention were you coming from.

Copy leaks - 100%
Gptzero- 70%

[Cypra]

User - PepeLapiu

Topic - Why spam is so dangerous?

Undetectable AI -  89% Probability
Gpt zeero - 100% AI

This dumbhead guy not only posted AI garbage but he also challneged forum member and moderators to see his response. I'm wondering why he is so deperate about this, he received quite few merit from development and technical discussion

Let's see how long before the mods either delete this thread, move the thread to somewhere with fewer eyeballs, lock the thread, or suspend me.

He is basically asking for a suspend/ban for himself

[abhiseshakana]

A legendary story writer. Writes huge, informative stories. No one would suspect that he is using AI. Yet he is a legend and is posting using AI. Most of his posts are created by AI. I have checked three of his posts.

User:abhiseshakana

His content on economics topics is very good to be really "fully AI worded", i.e. I think at least the ideas come from himself, or he really knows what he does and writes really good prompts. In my opinion, it's also possible that this user translates posts from another language via AI. But I admit I have had my suspicions too. I think I remember however that I made a test with one of his longer posts when I first saw him, and it was negative (at least with the AI checker I used).

This post gives 28% AI probability on Grammarly, but the first part gets 100% AI on Copyleaks, the second part however 0%. Don't know. His language is a bit "schematic" to say it that way.

It is also interesting that he has had several trades with other forum users according to his Trust entry.

It is probably a combination of several of those things. He has over 1,000 posts in the Economics section starting from 2019, according to Ninjastic. It is a subject he seems to have genuine interest in and has good knowledge about, assuming his older posts are authentic and weren't created by a paraphrasing tool or whatever was being used by cheaters back then. Oddly, they don’t have any posts in that section from December 2021 to July 2025. When they became active there again earlier this year, their AI usage was apparent enough that I reported them in this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg65918791#msg65918791

Thank you for your feedback and report. To be honest, English isn't my daily language. I do use Google Translate, as economics sometimes has specialized vocabulary (English for economics). Since this is a formal discussion, I double-checked using Google Translate before posting my answer.

However, I don't use GPT Chat to answer a topic, let alone copy and paste from GPT Chat, as that would be highly inappropriate.

I use GPT Chat to:
- Look up bibliographical references/reliable references
- Look up the meaning or significance of satire that uses ironic language that I'm unfamiliar with
- Double-check the chronology of events

The reason I prefer to search for references in GPT Chat is because it's more efficient and more comprehensive than asking on Google.

Frankly, I'm very interested in economics, and coincidentally, I have a bachelor's degree in International Relations and I am majoring in International Politics. So Geopolitics, Geostrategy, and Geoeconomics are interesting topics for me.

I took a break from posting on (global) economics from 2022 to 2024 because the signature camp I attended allowed me to post locally. So I preferred posting about economics on my local board.


@memehunter Thank you for your message, which made me aware of this report.

[memehunter]

...

Please post the screenshots of prompt/s you gave to AI chatbots (with date and time). It seems that you are clearly over representing your posting abilities. Is this post also followed the same route? You have been writing good English for quite a long time and I don't think you need a translator. Are you using any third party grammar correction tools as well?
As of now a lot will depend on the screenshots, you will provide.
     

[nutildah]

User - PepeLapiu

Topic - Why spam is so dangerous?

Undetectable AI -  89% Probability
Gpt zeero - 100% AI

This dumbhead guy not only posted AI garbage but he also challneged forum member and moderators to see his response. I'm wondering why he is so deperate about this, he received quite few merit from development and technical discussion

You read the results incorrectly. Undetectable says "89% Likely Human" and GPTZero says 100% Human". None of the other detectors I tried said this was AI.

He is basically asking for a suspend/ban for himself

That much is true.

Please post the screenshots of prompt/s you gave to AI chatbots (with date and time).

I don't think asking people for stuff like this will accomplish anything. First, we're not in a position to demand anything from anybody. Second of all, it would be trivial to fake said screenshots. But it doesn't matter anyway b/c he said he was using Google Translate and not an AI chatbot, which makes sense to me as his posts sometimes incorporate personal elements and there's not a single emdash to be found, lol. I agree with d5000's assessment.

Its a croassroads that we've come to at least a couple of times: what is the best approach for handling translations that get flagged as AI? There has to be a clear standard or we'll have a bunch of shitposters complaining that they were just using Google Translate.

abhiseshakana doesn't strike me as a shitposter but its obvious they are getting machine assistance. IMO (I should say that before everything I say as a reminder), if someone needs to leave a tag for this I would just say "they claim to use Google Translate for their English posts", or something like it. Am of course open to other opinions.

[memehunter]

I don't think asking people for stuff like this will accomplish anything.

I disagree, it helps a lot. Specially in this situation. Infact this is the only way to find out how much AI assistance he is using.

First, we're not in a position to demand anything from anybody.

I want to see it, I don't know about anybody else. IMO, it is really needed in this case. OFC he can deny it but I cant see any reasons to do it. I am not saying to public entire chatbot prompt history. Only the prompts for posts in questions will do.

Second of all, it would be trivial to fake said screenshots.

It is not that easy but I will not reveal the verification method now.

But it doesn't matter anyway b/c he said he was using Google Translate and not an AI chatbot,

And we believe the words?

I agree with d5000's assessment.

I have a slightly different interpretation of his assessment. Ofc he can clarify.

There has to be a clear standard or we'll have a bunch of shitposters complaining that they were just using Google Translate.

And how do we know this is not the case. I agree with the principle though 100%.

[AuchanX]

User:  Tinubu

😅It's funny how your expensive server, loaded with power, can't keep up with LLMs tailored for GPUs that handle parallel tasks better. A mid-range gaming GPU would likely outperform those Xeon chips for inference.

Your BBS download speed comparison is comical—360,000 times faster is mind-blowing! We’ve gone from grabbing a floppy disk an hour to downloading an entire small library in just a minute.

Thanks for sharing the guide! It’s definitely worth a shot on a machine with a GPU. The experience difference between using your CPU and even a 3060 would be huge!

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 83% AI
StealthWriter: 83% AI

Yes, this is essentially "payment probing" for balance verification; however, your concerns are valid.
Atomicity Problem..You're right: simple HTLCs are insufficient....To succeed/fail together, atomic swaps or dual-funded HTLCs are required, with both payments cryptographically linked. The preimage alone does not guarantee atomicity; both HTLCs must share the same timeout constraints, and PTLCs may be used for increased privacy and atomicity.
Protocol Support: Lightning does not natively support this "circular proof" pattern. However, submarine swaps and loop operations follow similar mechanics. The closest existing technique is "proofs of payment" via invoice preimages, which is unidirectional.
You could also consider Zero-knowledge proofs: Instead of actual payment attempts, A could use ZK-proofs to demonstrate channel capacity without disclosing channel states

Copyleaks: 100% AI
StealthWriter: 86% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Yes, you are entirely correct; we are dealing with a serious problem where rising expenses frequently surpass income growth, and lifestyle inflation makes it even more difficult to achieve financial success.
To elaborate on what you said:
Funds for emergencies are essential...The paycheck-to-paycheck cycle can be broken by saving three to six months' worth of expenses.
The 50/30/20 rule may also be useful...20% savings and debt repayment, 30% wants, and 50% needs
Many people are shocked when they actually keep an eye on their spending because it frequently shows where money disappears.
When everything seems pricey, it becomes crucial to distinguish needs from wants.
You've discovered something crucial....It is true that spending tends to increase in tandem with income (lifestyle inflation), but acknowledging this tendency is the first step. Even seemingly insignificant deliberate decisions, such as postponing purchases, comparing costs, or asking "do I really need this?"

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI
StealthWriter: 43% AI

[Ultegra134]

Can someone shed some light about this user? Quite a few of his short posts show up as AI in GPTZero and Stealthwriter, he's wearing a Rainbet signature but he's not in their spreadsheet (I only looked at the last week though). Sooo, what is he trying to do? He's posting as much as 60 posts per day, with 61 of them being gibberish nonsense. His posts are starting from early in the morning till evening, he's either a bot or on his computer 24/7. He's going to post 70 or even 80 by the end of the day.

User: aysha9853

Post 1.

To accept Bitcoin you’ll need a payment processor or API, or a developer who can set it up for you It’s not that hard once it’s running.
Since you already buy gold monthly, adding a small Bitcoin DCA could work without changing your plan too much.
For business payments though, be careful.BTC is volatile and cash flow matters.

GPTZero: 75% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI

Post 2.

Shill bidding usually hurts the seller more than it helps, you might squeeze a higher price once, but reputation here matters more than any single sale, people watch, connect dots, and remember usernames, once trust is gone, even fair listings get ignored, that’s why the community reacts strongly to it and honestly that pressure is what keeps things relatively clean.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI

[SatoPrincess]

Can someone shed some light about this user? Quite a few of his short posts show up as AI in GPTZero and Stealthwriter, he's wearing a Rainbet signature but he's not in their spreadsheet (I only looked at the last week though). Sooo, what is he trying to do? He's posting as much as 60 posts per day, with 61 of them being gibberish nonsense. His posts are starting from early in the morning till evening, he's either a bot or on his computer 24/7. He's going to post 70 or even 80 by the end of the day.

User: aysha9853

They are behaving the same way as Lornadane account. That account made 81 posts in a day using AI. I suspect these account are controlled by the same person. I don’t know what their obsession is with the Rainbet campaign tho.

User: aysha9853

Another account that has woke and started posting AI garbage. The account post history reveals that the riginal account owner is a bounty hunter from Indonesia but the new owner make posts in the Nigerian local board

In my opinion, economic freedom and control is a really important point. No government or bank can freeze or block your funds, and that’s huge for people living in struggling economies. Self-custody means real ownership, no capital controls, and no need to ask for permission.
This kind of freedom also pushes people to learn about wallets, security, and basic tech skills, so digital literacy grows naturally. Over time, that leads to innovation and the rise of new local crypto economies.

Copyleaks- 100%
Gptzero - 100%
Sapling- 97.7%

Short answer: there’s no perfect time to sell, only a plan that makes sense for you.
Most solid holders don’t try to time the top. They sell based on rules and targets, not emotions. For example:
Sell in chunks (DCA out), not all at once.
Set price levels where you start taking profit.
If you’re long-term, daily moves don’t matter, zoom out BTC moves in cycles.

If you need cash or you hit your goal, that’s already a valid reason to sell.

Trying to catch the exact top is how people get rekt. Market will always pump after you sell or dump when you hold, stick to your plan, not vibes.

Copyleaks- 100%
Gptzero - 100%
Sapling- 97.7%



aysha9853 sent merits to Ethan_Crypto, an account that was reported here for AI spam by ABCbits a couple of months ago.

I just realized I made a report couple days ago. Should have given a neutral tag then.

[Ultegra134]

They are behaving the same way as Lornadane account. That account made 81 posts in a day using AI. I suspect these account are controlled by the same person. I don’t know what their obsession is with the Rainbet campaign tho.

Good catch, I hadn't seen that account before, and neither this one till today. It can't be a coincidence that both of them are impersonating being in the Rainbet campaign. Perhaps it's an attempt to hurt Rainbet's image and Hhampuz's as a campaign manager for "hiring" these spamming idiots, even though he hasn't and has no control over them and who? Perhaps this scenario is too far-fetched  , but I honestly can't think of any valid reason for this behaviour, there might be more accounts involved, but I haven't seen another one creating so many posts in a day.

[JayJuanGee]

I don't think asking people for stuff like this will accomplish anything.

I disagree, it helps a lot. Specially in this situation. Infact this is the only way to find out how much AI assistance he is using.

First, we're not in a position to demand anything from anybody.

I want to see it, I don't know about anybody else. IMO, it is really needed in this case. OFC he can deny it but I cant see any reasons to do it. I am not saying to public entire chatbot prompt history. Only the prompts for posts in questions will do.

Second of all, it would be trivial to fake said screenshots.

It is not that easy but I will not reveal the verification method now.

But it doesn't matter anyway b/c he said he was using Google Translate and not an AI chatbot,

And we believe the words?

I agree with d5000's assessment.

I have a slightly different interpretation of his assessment. Ofc he can clarify.

There has to be a clear standard or we'll have a bunch of shitposters complaining that they were just using Google Translate.

And how do we know this is not the case. I agree with the principle though 100%.

I might not be saying anything much different from nutildah, yet I have a bit of a problem with the idea of punishing members for their choice to cooperate, and it seems that abhiseshakana is mostly cooperating, even though sure, he could be lying about specifics ....  and maybe he is also overly relying on AI tools... yet at the same time, the lines get more and more blurry.. .. and sure, I suppose it is discretionary if some members might consider some kind of a tag (even a neutral one) if they are not comfortable with how it seems a member is using AI tools...

In the end, sure it is not black and white, so it is not like I have strong feelings on the matter, even though of course, I watch this thread since I share the view of several members that it is quite irritating to be interacting with so many bots in recent times...and many times, even if I might not agree with some of the tags, from my viewpoint, it tends to take quite a bit of work to suss out some of the problematic posts, so it becomes difficult to say that neutral tags are not warranted merely based on suspicions that patterns of AI usage is being overly relied upon.

[Ultegra134]

I might not be saying anything much different from nutildah, yet I have a bit of a problem with the idea of punishing members for their choice to cooperate, and it seems that abhiseshakana is mostly cooperating, even though sure, he could be lying about specifics ....  and maybe he is also overly relying on AI tools... yet at the same time, the lines get more and more blurry.. .. and sure, I suppose it is discretionary if some members might consider some kind of a tag (even a neutral one) if they are not comfortable with how it seems a member is using AI tools...

In the end, sure it is not black and white, so it is not like I have strong feelings on the matter, even though of course, I watch this thread since I share the view of several members that it is quite irritating to be interacting with so many bots in recent times...and many times, even if I might not agree with some of the tags, from my viewpoint, it tends to take quite a bit of work to suss out some of the problematic posts, so it becomes difficult to say that neutral tags are not warranted merely based on suspicions that patterns of AI usage is being overly relied upon.

I believe I understand what you're trying to say. Where do we draw the line on "acceptable" AI usage, and how can we take their word for it because they're "cooperating".  I'm not talking about @abhiseshakana specifically, but in general, we've seen quite a few arguments the past few months claiming that they're using it for translation, or for sources, or to correct mistakes and so on; all these lines are exactly what you mentioned, blurry. How do we know what's true or not? Why rely on AI to write posts in a forum? Why aren't the sources available in your posts, if that's what you're using them for? Personally, I believe that the posts are copied straight from ChatGPT, but has been influenced by abhiseshakana, so it's not 100% AI, but still, an alarming usage.

[JayJuanGee]

I might not be saying anything much different from nutildah, yet I have a bit of a problem with the idea of punishing members for their choice to cooperate, and it seems that abhiseshakana is mostly cooperating, even though sure, he could be lying about specifics ....  and maybe he is also overly relying on AI tools... yet at the same time, the lines get more and more blurry.. .. and sure, I suppose it is discretionary if some members might consider some kind of a tag (even a neutral one) if they are not comfortable with how it seems a member is using AI tools...

In the end, sure it is not black and white, so it is not like I have strong feelings on the matter, even though of course, I watch this thread since I share the view of several members that it is quite irritating to be interacting with so many bots in recent times...and many times, even if I might not agree with some of the tags, from my viewpoint, it tends to take quite a bit of work to suss out some of the problematic posts, so it becomes difficult to say that neutral tags are not warranted merely based on suspicions that patterns of AI usage is being overly relied upon.

I believe I understand what you're trying to say. Where do we draw the line on "acceptable" AI usage, and how can we take their word for it because they're "cooperating".  I'm not talking about @abhiseshakana specifically, but in general, we've seen quite a few arguments the past few months claiming that they're using it for translation, or for sources, or to correct mistakes and so on; all these lines are exactly what you mentioned, blurry. How do we know what's true or not? Why rely on AI to write posts in a forum? Why aren't the sources available in your posts, if that's what you're using them for? Personally, I believe that the posts are copied straight from ChatGPT, but has been influenced by abhiseshakana, so it's not 100% AI, but still, an alarming usage.

Probably it would help to have some disclosure from members when there is a decent amount of reliance on AI, yet mere disclosure still might not resolve the issue of over-reliance and many times the desires of post readers to see the thoughts of actual humans rather than reading from a bot, just like I find it very problematic for some members to be ongoingly quoting from articles (sure the articles might be interesting), and they cite the article as a source, yet they cannot spend a few minutes to just provide a sentence or two from their own thinking.... and most of the time, no one tags them with negative trust or neutrally trusts them for that kind of superficial low-effort behavior even though the level of egregiousness might well be argued to be similar to those members who are overly relying on AI.

[ABCbits]

Could anyone check these users? Some of them either recently joined or woke up and create short generic post (few of those on technical board). All of them never receive tag related to spam with AI/chatbot, so it's possible i simply being too skeptical.

Roberto888 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3706715
SanZoldyck - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1045517
Hodlpreneur - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3727957
Abelly - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3731248
devhazard - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3729723
Eze BTC - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3740293

edit: it may be related with LoyceV past finding Spamming with 1 oneliner post per Newbie account