AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[AakZaki]

What's the verdict on Newbie bitehtbitehtminer?

Not long ago, crypto wallets served a single purpose — storing digital assets. Today, that role is rapidly expanding. As artificial intelligence enters the blockchain space, wallets are becoming strategic tools rather than passive storage solutions.

The shift toward intelligent wallets

Modern users expect more than just security. They want clarity, insights, and tools that help them navigate the market without spending hours analyzing charts and data.

AI-powered wallets aim to meet this demand by transforming raw blockchain data into meaningful information. This shift helps users make more informed decisions while maintaining full control over their assets.

A new user experience

Platforms like *SPAM* represent this emerging category by combining wallet infrastructure with intelligent features designed to support daily crypto management. Instead of overwhelming users, these tools focus on usability and clarity.

Looking ahead

As adoption grows, intelligent crypto wallets are likely to become standard rather than optional. The future of digital asset management lies not only in decentralization but also in making that decentralization easier to understand and use.

Even though I read slowly and tried to understand what he meant, I still didn't get the point.   

Originality: 100% Confident That's AI
Copyleaks: 100 AI
ZeroGPT: 87.06%
QuillBot: 100 AI
undetectable: 99% AI Probability
Sapling: 100% Fake

[memehunter]

Even though I read slowly and tried to understand what he meant, I still didn't get the point.   

I stopped right there at 'Em dash'   
Good to see @coinography8 got nuked by mods. I wonder if ban is more viable option for frequent offenders (3-4 times or more).   

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie BitadzZ?

That's a good question, and part of why using a QR code can help prevent clipboard hijacking malware. The address isn't being pulled off your clipboard. However, using a QR code will NOT ensure your safety if your phone was already infected. Sophisticated malware may still intercept your transaction or manipulate your wallet app.

Best practice is:

• Always  verify first and last characters of the address after scanning.
• Use a trusted wallet app and ensure that your operating system is updated.

If you definitely think that you are infected, do not use that particular device for your transaction. Scanning helps, but most importantly, security matters.

[AuchanX]

What's the verdict on Newbie BitadzZ?

That's a good question, and part of why using a QR code can help prevent clipboard hijacking malware. The address isn't being pulled off your clipboard. However, using a QR code will NOT ensure your safety if your phone was already infected. Sophisticated malware may still intercept your transaction or manipulate your wallet app.

Best practice is:

• Always  verify first and last characters of the address after scanning.
• Use a trusted wallet app and ensure that your operating system is updated.

If you definitely think that you are infected, do not use that particular device for your transaction. Scanning helps, but most importantly, security matters.

I checked his writing. But AI was not detected.

Copyleaks: No AI Detected
Sapling: 3% AI
Quillbot: No AI Detected
Zerogpt: No AI Detected
Originality: 99% Original

I am unable to use the Stealthwriter AI detector site. I am facing this problem when I try to check any text. Are you facing the same problem?

[HustleZ]

This user Tyatya is Using Ai Generated text and isn't even trying to hide it.

For the Ref 
Post1:

Bitcoin’s sitting around $92,300 right now still comfortably above the $70‑$75 k support zone that analysts cite as the floor for the current uptrend 

Short‑term outlook: Most forecasts see the price staying above $100 k through the rest of 2025, with a good chance of hitting $125 k‑$200 k before year‑end 
Mid‑term view: Grayscale’s latest research suggests the next major rally could extend into 2026, driven by institutional inflows that are reshaping the classic four‑year cycle 
Volatility check: Even with bullish sentiment, the market can pull back to the $70‑$75 k range if macro stress spikes, so “higher” might be more of a several‑month stretch rather than a permanent plateau.

In plain speak: Bitcoin could stay above $90 k for the next few months and possibly push toward $130 k‑$150 k by late 2025, with a chance the upward run continues into mid‑2026 if institutional demand keeps flowing. Keep an eye on the $70 k support—if that holds, the higher levels are likely to stick around for a while.
So start doing your analysis and get on the trend if you want to make money this coming year none stop join us let's analyze this together and create generational wealth.

GptZero: 98%Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident
ZeroGPT: 73.2% Ai Generated

Post 2

Let's talk about staying safe 😊. To prevent STIs and STDs
1. Use protection - condoms are your BFFs 😏
2. Get tested - know your status, and encourage your partner(s) to do the same
3. Communicate - talk openly with your partner(s) about sexual health
4. Limit partners - fewer partners, lower risk
5. Vaccinate - HPV and Hep B vaccines can help prevent certain STIs
6. PrEP - consider Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis if you're at high risk (consult a doctor)

Some common STIs/STD prevention methods:
- Condoms (male/female)
- Dental dams (for oral sex)
- Regular screenings (at least annually or with new partners)

GptZero: 100%Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident
ZeroGPT: 84.38% Ai Generated

Post 3:

Economic direction – Tinubu’s government has pushed a rapid overhaul: the fuel‑subsidy was scrapped, the naira was unified, and a broad tax‑simplification drive was launched  Buhari’s tenure, by contrast, kept the subsidy in place for most of his term, relied on multiple exchange‑rate windows and emphasized protectionist trade measures 

Fiscal stance – Under Tinubu the budget deficit has been trimmed to about 3 % of GDP, with the savings from subsidy removal earmarked for infrastructure and social programmes  Buhari’s fiscal balance stayed wider, and revenue‑sharing allocations to states grew only modestly 

Security & governance – Both presidents faced widespread insecurity, but Tinubu has promised a “whole‑of‑government” security reform and more funding for the military  Buhari’s 13‑year fight against Boko Haram and banditry saw mixed results, with violence spreading into the northwest and southeast during his last years 

Institutional reforms – Tinubu’s “Renewed Hope” agenda stresses youth empowerment, digital‑skills programmes (the 3MTT initiative) and a push for a $1 trillion economy  Buhari’s focus was more on anti‑corruption drives and maintaining the status quo in key ministries 

Public perception – Tinubu’s reforms have sparked sharp price hikes and protests, but supporters point to improved fuel availability and a more transparent forex market  Critics of Buhari highlight lingering fuel shortages, inflation and a perceived slow pace of economic diversification 

In short, Tinubu’s regime is characterised by aggressive market‑oriented reforms and a fresh security blueprint, while Buhari’s era was marked by continuity of existing subsidies, multiple exchange‑rate regimes and a longer‑term security campaign. Both approaches have their supporters and detractors, reflecting the complex trade‑offs Nigeria faces. 🌍

GptZero: 100%Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident
ZeroGPT: 76.02% Ai Generated

Ps: Stealthwriter isn't working so I used ZeroGPT

[memehunter]

coinography8 is trying very hard despite being reported many times and even after getting nuked.

Bitcoin miner capitulation happens when Bitcoin miners are forced to sell their coins because mining becomes too expensive or unprofitable. Miners earn Bitcoin by verifying transactions, but they also have big costs like electricity, machines, and maintenance. When the Bitcoin price drops or mining difficulty rises, some miners can’t cover their expenses. That is when they start selling their Bitcoin reserves to survive, or they shut down completely.

This heavy selling can push the market down even more for a short time. It may look scary, but it often becomes a turning point. The reason is simple. Once weak miners leave the market, the selling pressure starts to slow down. At the same time, stronger miners stay active and the network becomes healthier again. Many investors also watch miner capitulation closely because it has happened near major bottoms in the past.

After capitulation, Bitcoin can bounce because the market has already absorbed a lot of forced selling. When selling reduces and buyers step in, price can recover faster than expected. Of course, it is not a perfect signal every time, but it is a useful clue that the market may be near the end of a downtrend.

For more info visit the website Coinography.
https://coinography.com/

GPTzero 100%
Copyleaks 0%
Sapling AI 100%

Judging from the pattern of his past postings I think he is trying to humanize  a bit. Reported and tagged lets see if this one also got deleted.


Edit: Post deleted.

[ABCbits]

What's the verdict on Newbie BitadzZ?

--snip--

I checked his writing. But AI was not detected.

Copyleaks: No AI Detected
Sapling: 3% AI
Quillbot: No AI Detected
Zerogpt: No AI Detected
Originality: 99% Original
--snip--

This user actually use AI/chatbot. https://bitlist.co/post/66325599 show his post include link that contain ?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

[Welsh]

What's the verdict on Newbie BitadzZ?

I think its AI, and have removed the posts that were reported. Obviously, they have a history of using AI pointed out by ABCbits above. Although, that wasn't the only contributing factor. I find the AI tends to:

- Add a lot of 'fluff' without actually nailing the point. Which BitadzZ typically did a lot in those posts.
- Uses weird words at certain points, because it hallucinates. BitadzZ did do this quite a lot, so its either being word spinned or ran through a translator a few times
- AI is overly polite and follows a sort of standard I agree with you on these x,y,z but....then goes onto explain what you can do better etc. BitadzZ did that a lot in those posts.

I think they are trying to mask the fact they are using AI though. Adding certain imperfections, usually not through misspellings or anything like that, but rather changing words which results in less natural way of writing text sometimes it does hallucinate. AI usually is good at flow of a sentence, which humans aren't. Also, generally users have a sort of consistent way of speaking, but every post came across different.

Also, their posts were grammatically correct almost every single time without a single mistake. I don't know what you, but I tend to edit my posts a lot due to mistakes.

So, when combining all of these factors, plus their use of AI in the past which also demonstrated a little of the above points. Deleted posts, and will be keeping an eye on them.

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie BitadzZ?

I checked his writing. But AI was not detected.

Copyleaks: No AI Detected
Sapling: 3% AI
Quillbot: No AI Detected
Zerogpt: No AI Detected
Originality: 99% Original

I think this shows how "AI detectors" are failing.

This user actually use AI/chatbot. https://bitlist.co/post/66325599 show his post include contain that contain ?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

So he actually started by including a source, then went full plagiarism.

I find the AI tends to:

- Add a lot of 'fluff' without actually nailing the point.
- Uses weird words at certain points, because it hallucinates.
- AI is overly polite and follows a sort of standard I agree with you on these x,y,z but....then goes onto explain what you can do better etc.

Chatbot verbal diarrhae is designed to impress at first sight. When you look deeper, it just doesn't sound right. Or, as morvillz7z called it, is has this metallic taste:

I don't need tools to determine whether a text is AI-generated or not. It's fucking obvious. You can never get rid of that metallic taste of language that is so redundant, overly generalizing, and frequently lacking a personal touch...a text only AI can produce.

Deleted posts, and will be keeping an eye on them.

I'll just leave my "AI neutral tag", to stop people from wasting more time on this user. If only he would just get banned....

For reference: BitadzZ's archived posts.

[macson]

This user uses AI for their writing. From the two posts I shared, both are proven to use AI.

User: Sambitcoin01

One of the most interesting things about Bitcoin is that people can use it without depending on a bank or any central authority. why do people trust Bitcoin when there is no bank controlling it?

The main reason is that Bitcoin is built on blockchain technology. Every transaction is recorded on a public ledger that anyone can verify. Once a transaction is confirmed, it cannot be easily changed or deleted. This transparency helps build trust because the system does not rely on one organization but on thousands of computers around the world working together.

Another reason is decentralization. Unlike banks, which can freeze accounts, reverse transactions, or fail due to mismanagement, Bitcoin is controlled by a global network. No single person or government can easily manipulate the supply or the transaction history. This makes many people see Bitcoin as more independent.

Finally, people trust Bitcoin because it has been running in many years without being shut down, and it continues to grow in users, developers, and adoption. While it is not risk free, its open, transparent, and decentralized nature is why many people are willing to rust Bitcoin even without bank.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Originality.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%

As we are into 2026, the crypto space is active and divided than ever. Bitcoin still holds its crown as the most dominant and trusted cryptocurrency, especially as a store of value and safeguard against inflation. its institution backing and adoption as legal tender in some regions keep it's foundation strong.

However, altcoins have made huge progress. Ethereum continues to lead the smart contract space, while others blockchains like Solana, Avalanche, and Cardano are improving scalability, speed, and real-world use cases. New DeFi protocols, NFT utilities, and AI-integrated tokens are shifting investors attention.

My question is: Are we heading toward Bitcoin-only dominance, or a truly multi-chain future?

Some believe Bitcoin's simplicity and security will outlast all, while others argue that altcoins offer more innovation and practical use. What do you think?
Will altcoins eventually fade, or are they the real path forward for blockchain adoption? Let's discuss.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 99.7%
Originality.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%

[memehunter]

Now a days, people cant even properly abuse/express frustration without AI 

STFU MORON. Calling someone a kid and saying LOL doesn’t magically erase a 45+ day unresolved case.
I didn’t force anyone to step in, promise escalation, or give false reassurance  that was done voluntarily. When assurances are given publicly, accountability comes with it.


Saying He helped many people IS irrelevant to my unresolved issue. Past good deeds don’t excuse present failure or silence.
If you think mocking users who raise legitimate concerns makes you look smart or loyal, it doesn’t  AND FOR ME  it just shows you’re avoiding the real issue.


My feedback stands. The delay is real. The denial is real. And trying to shame users into silence won’t change the facts

YOU ARE AN IDIOT NOTHING ELSE

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTzero: 100%
 

[Welsh]

I'll just leave my "AI neutral tag", to stop people from wasting more time on this user. If only he would just get banned....

I changed my mind. It was pretty much his entire history. It seems his remaining post was deleted also, so looks like another staff users deleted that. I've nuked the account. I try to be lenient, but I also don't want to do a disservice to the existing community, because users are reporting these types of users, and while the reported posts might get dealt with, they might slip under the radar in the future and that's when the community starts losing faith in us moderators.

So, I revisited it, and nuked the account. They've been caught before, they got caught this time, and will likely continue in the future as none of their posts remained on their profile so at that point there's not a lot of benefit of the doubt to be given when they haven't contributed anything outside of AI or word spinning.

The last thing I want to see is users thinking they have to go out of their way to deal with it themselves, the community should ideally have faith in us moderators, and particularly for myself I need to be a little more eager to lay down the hammer in cases like this.

Thanks for everyone that does report these, as well as post here highlighting these types of users.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

User: guerrillamail123456789

The four posts he has written are AI-generated. All four score 100% AI on Copyleaks. At gptzero, one gives 99% AI generated and the rest 100%. On Quillbot, 100%, 87%, 74%, and 0% (lol).

Moderators, please nuke, I am not going to even bother tagging him.

[macson]

What this guy did, he kept spamming the forum with his AI posts even though some of his posts had been deleted and he had been tagged.

Let’s be honest, the fear of a crypto ban pops up every time the market gets shaky or a big headline hits the news. And if you’re holding coins or even just thinking about getting in, it’s normal to wonder, “Can they really ban this completely?”

A government can definitely make crypto difficult to use. They can block exchanges, stop banks from working with crypto platforms, and even make rules that scare businesses away. In some places, that already happens. But banning crypto fully is a different story, because crypto isn’t just one website or one company you can shut down. It’s a network. Bitcoin, for example, runs across the world on thousands of computers that don’t belong to one single owner.

So even if one country bans trading, the blockchain itself doesn’t stop. People can still hold their coins in a wallet, send them, or access crypto through other channels. It becomes less convenient, sure, but it doesn’t vanish.

That’s why most countries focus on regulation instead of trying to erase crypto. Regulation gives them a way to control how exchanges work, how taxes apply, and how scams can be reduced, which is something the crypto space honestly needs.

If you want a clearer idea of how crypto rules work in real life, check this simple guide on where we break it down without the confusing legal talk.

Want more straight answers like this? Visit Coinography and explore our latest crypto guides today.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%

[Vompola]

A full member who posts using AI.
BattleDog

Shamir backup is basically splitting your seed into pieces, then require a minimum number of pieces to rebuild it. So if you pick 5 shares with a threshold of 3, you can lose up to 2 shares and still recover, but a thief would need to steal 3 of them before they can do anything. It's not multisig and it doesn't change your wallet on-chain, it's just a fancier way of storing the same secret.

People use it when they want redundancy across locations or some light "steal one paper and you get nothing" protection.

The tradeoff is complexity: most losses I've seen over the years came from people getting cute with backups and then not being able to reconstruct them under stress. If you do try it, do a full recovery test once (on a fresh device, with no cameras around) and consider something boring like 2-of-3 with each share stored separately...... otherwise a well-protected standard seed (and maybe a passphrase if you understand it) is honestly fine for most folks.

Cheers

StealthWriter: 100% AI detected
undetectable: 60% AI detected
GPTZero AI: 100% AI detected

Shamir backup is basically splitting your seed into pieces, then require a minimum number of pieces to rebuild it. So if you pick 5 shares with a threshold of 3, you can lose up to 2 shares and still recover, but a thief would need to steal 3 of them before they can do anything. It's not multisig and it doesn't change your wallet on-chain, it's just a fancier way of storing the same secret.

People use it when they want redundancy across locations or some light "steal one paper and you get nothing" protection.

The tradeoff is complexity: most losses I've seen over the years came from people getting cute with backups and then not being able to reconstruct them under stress. If you do try it, do a full recovery test once (on a fresh device, with no cameras around) and consider something boring like 2-of-3 with each share stored separately...... otherwise a well-protected standard seed (and maybe a passphrase if you understand it) is honestly fine for most folks.

Cheers

First time hearing of this shamir backup but it seems like others have discussed about this before. Here are some threads about shamir backups.

Shamir backup sounds dumb to me
Single vs Shamir vs Multisig, which is easiest to hack statistically?

I have lost myself reading these threads and basically what I have concluded is that multisig is still the best method for security. Some even say they see no point in using shamir backups if you’re keeping it yourself. I have seen others say that with shamir backups they distribute the shares to trusted people. Most I’ve seen discourage the use of this though. Here’s an article about its shortcomings

Yeah I think the wires got crossed a bit here: Shamir isn't "security" in the same category as multisig, it's "backup hygiene." Multisig changes who can spend on-chain, Shamir doesn't. Shamir just changes how you store the one secret that already controls spending.

The "sounds dumb" takes come from watching folks overcomplicate it and then fail their own recovery. That's real. Shamir adds moving parts, and the failure mode is brutal: you think you're protected, then five years later you realize one share is missing and the threshold you chose was too aggressive, or you wrote one word wrong. That's why I always push the boring version: small share count, conservative threshold, and do an actual recovery drill on a fresh device when nobody's watching. If you can't recover calmly in a normal afternoon, you definitely won't recover during a house move, a breakup, or a "my laptop died and I'm sweating" moment.

Also, "distribute shares to trusted people" isn't the default, it's one option. A lot of people just distribute geographically to themselves: home safe, bank box, trusted relative's safe, etc. The point is that stealing one share should be useless, and losing one share shouldn't kill you.

StealthWriter: 90% AI detected

undetectable: 72% AI detected

GPTZero AI: 82% AI detected

Doing nothing is absolutely a position, and honestly it's one of the hardest ones to hold because it pays you in boredom while Twitter pays people in adrenaline. I've watched a bunch of folks survive 2018 and 2022 just fine, then blow themselves up the moment the chart went sideways because they couldn't stand the quiet. So I get the instinct. The only thing I'd poke at is the "park it all in stablecoins and wait" part: stables are still someone else's liability, and the risk isn't volatility, it's custody/issuer/exchange nonsense showing up on a random Tuesday. If you're going to sit out, at least make sure your "doing nothing" isn't secretly "taking counterparty risk and calling it cash."

Also, the four-year cycle is more like a four-year vibe than a law of physics. Sometimes it rhymes, sometimes it just coughs and changes the subject. If your DCA-RDCA run worked and you actually banked the gains instead of round-tripping them back into the market, that already puts you ahead of most people here, so respect. Just don't overfit your whole 2026 plan to the last season's pattern, because the market loves punishing the exact strategy that "worked perfectly" last time.

As for your questions, 2025 was fine for me mainly because I didn't try to be a hero. Core stack stays put, I'll nibble when things get sleepy, and I keep dry powder for the kind of dumb flush that always shows up when everyone's convinced "nothing happens anymore."

Am I patient enough to do nothing all year? Yeah. But I'm also stubborn enough to keep a tiny, boring routine in place, because the one time you swear you'll sit out is the exact week the market decides to sprint.

StealthWriter: 90% AI detected

undetectable: 72% AI detected

GPTZero AI: 82% AI detected

Yeah, that's basically the annoying truth of Lightning routing, nobody deduces the real directional liquidity in any clean, deterministic way, because the balances aren't gossiped. What you get from gossip is the channel's total capacity and the policy bits (fees, CLTV delta, HTLC limits, disabled flags, etc.). So Core Lightning (and the others) start with a map where every channel's capacity is only an upper bound, then they do pathfinding with heuristics.

The real learning happens the brutal way, like when you try a route, and when it fails you get a failure back that lets the sender update its view. A failure on a given hop at amount X effectively tells you "that edge probably can't push X right now", so the node will penalize it and retry with a different path (or a smaller split if you're using MPP). After enough attempts, you end up with a probabilistic "this edge tends to work up to about here" mental model inside the payer, but it's still frail because liquidity moves constantly and some failures are ambiguous by design.

StealthWriter: 100% AI detected

undetectable: 72% AI detected

GPTZero AI: 82% AI detected
All posts by this user were made using AI tools. I have only reported the first few posts here. If someone were to win a Nobel Prize for posting using AI tools, this brother's name would be the first to come up.

This user's posts were made using an AI tool, and he cleverly deleted all the posts I reported on his profile from his profile after reporting them. I think you should check his posts and his profile again.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I wanted to ask something here to the regulars of the thread that I don't know if it's been asked before.

We have had an influx of new accounts in the Spanish section that follow the same pattern. They usually post once a day, with short posts that, at least to me, sound canned. If I try to scan for AI-generated content, it usually doesn't let me because the texts are too short.

What I have done is combine the texts from several posts and then scan them. The first one I tried it with is VicenteVicenteMontague.

I have scanned all his posts together, and only originality.ai and gptzero give me 85% and 100% AI generated, the rest give me 0% apart from StealthWriter, that wasn’t working. Still, it would meet the criteria in the OP if joining various posts to scan them was an acceptable method.

What do you think?

I can see similar patterns in the following accounts, that I haven't scanned yet:

Danielleonrey

LucasSilverGold

josevargasganador

Gabrielfuerte

[lovesmayfamilis]

I wanted to ask something here to the regulars of the thread that I don't know if it's been asked before.

We have had an influx of new accounts in the Spanish section that follow the same pattern. They usually post once a day, with short posts that, at least to me, sound canned. If I try to scan for AI-generated content, it usually doesn't let me because the texts are too short.

What I have done is combine the texts from several posts and then scan them. The first one I tried it with is VicenteVicenteMontague.

I have scanned all his posts together, and only originality.ai and gptzero give me 85% and 100% AI generated, the rest give me 0% apart from StealthWriter, that wasn’t working. Still, it would meet the criteria in the OP if joining various posts to scan them was an acceptable method.

What do you think?

I can see similar patterns in the following accounts, that I haven't scanned yet:

Danielleonrey

LucasSilverGold

josevargasganador

Gabrielfuerte

I've done this before, and all the posts were deleted. It's even somewhere in this thread. If you combine all the posts into one and report them to the moderators, they are great at deleting everything.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

I've done this before, and all the posts were deleted. It's even somewhere in this thread. If you combine all the posts into one and report them to the moderators, they are great at deleting everything.

What do you think of the results of this particular user? Only 2 out of 6 scans give a high AI content whereas the rest give 0%.

[LoyceV]

We have had an influx of new accounts in the Spanish section that follow the same pattern.
~
What do you think?

I can't read the posts, but it reminds me of Spamming with 1 oneliner post per Newbie account:

If I'd have to guess, someone is testing which of his accounts are proxybanned and which are free to spam.

[ABCbits]

I wanted to ask something here to the regulars of the thread that I don't know if it's been asked before.

We have had an influx of new accounts in the Spanish section that follow the same pattern. They usually post once a day, with short posts that, at least to me, sound canned. If I try to scan for AI-generated content, it usually doesn't let me because the texts are too short.
--snip--

When i see such post on certain board, i simply report their post if it appear to be spam, generic or AI generated text without caring it remain "Unhandled". It's less time consuming than checking each of their post with AI checker.

If they don't stop, consider tagging them with reason many of their post has been deleted by moderator. I very rarely do it, but here's example account that i tagged for such reason https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3660776.