AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[memehunter]

User: DeeppRockk
Almost all of his recent posts are showing 100% AI detection with GPTzero.
He posted so many posts within 1:30 hours interval today which solidifies the sus. I tried to comprehend some of his recent posts, but I failed. Seems like a classic case of shit poster, what is your opinion?

Did a fun experiment with claude AI: https://claude.ai/share/762de91e-f3e2-43ae-b5a1-29cbd60d0280

[DeeppRockk]

User: DeeppRockk
Almost all of his recent posts are showing 100% AI detection with GPTzero.
He posted so many posts within 1:30 hours interval today which solidifies the sus. I tried to comprehend some of his recent posts, but I failed. Seems like a classic case of shit poster, what is your opinion?

Did a fun experiment with claude AI: https://claude.ai/share/762de91e-f3e2-43ae-b5a1-29cbd60d0280

I don't see any 100% there, on ZeroGPT, for example, but, sure, on some resources, the posts may be more AI-generated than on others, especially where there is more terminology / sense put into them, from me or anyone else. You would need multiple sources to claim such a thing, yet, you based everything on one source.

Thank you for your input.

[Ultegra134]

I don't see any 100% there, on ZeroGPT, for example, but, sure, on some resources, the posts may be more AI-generated than on others, especially where there is more terminology / sense put into them, from me or anyone else. You would need multiple sources to claim such a thing, yet, you based everything on one source.

Thank you for your input.

ZeroGPT is crap and no-one ever uses it on this thread. I simply checked two of your posts and both came 100% AI on the most commonly used scanners here, GPTZero and Stealthwriter. I didn't bother checking more of your posts, just a couple, but all showed the same result. If it was simply one, I'd skip it, but all three of those I checked is suspicious; don't you think?

Edit: I just checked a handful more and guess what, all of them show the exact same thing, can't be a coincidence, don't you think?

Edit 2: Gemini Pro also suggested what @memehunter's Claude.ai said, "designed to accumulate forum rank rapidly through high-volume, confident-sounding replies that mimic seasoned-user behavior. "

[DeeppRockk]

I don't see any 100% there, on ZeroGPT, for example, but, sure, on some resources, the posts may be more AI-generated than on others, especially where there is more terminology / sense put into them, from me or anyone else. You would need multiple sources to claim such a thing, yet, you based everything on one source.

Thank you for your input.

ZeroGPT is crap and no-one ever uses it on this thread. I simply checked two of your posts and both came 100% AI on the most commonly used scanners here, GPTZero and Stealthwriter. I didn't bother checking more of your posts, just a couple, but all showed the same result. If it was simply one, I'd skip it, but all three of those I checked is suspicious; don't you think?

Edit: I just checked a handful more and guess what, all of them show the exact same thing, can't be a coincidence, don't you think?

Edit 2: Gemini Pro also suggested what @memehunter's Claude.ai said, "designed to accumulate forum rank rapidly through high-volume, confident-sounding replies that mimic seasoned-user behavior. "

if you ask AI about it being something you asked (is this activity is done for X target), the AI will search for said X. It won't tell no in most of the cases, it's the nuance of it being a chat-helper instead of giving you unbiased stuff. But, okay, I got you

[Ultegra134]

if you ask AI about it being something you asked (is this activity is done for X target), the AI will search for said X. It won't tell no in most of the cases, it's the nuance of it being a chat-helper instead of giving you unbiased stuff. But, okay, I got you

Two detectors I mentioned here show your posts as AI, I checked more than 10 of your posts and every single one is the same. In the meantime, I tried testing mine and not a single one came out positive. Is it a coincidence? I highly doubt it, so in your position I wouldn't be as ironic as you.

[nutildah]

if you ask AI about it being something you asked (is this activity is done for X target), the AI will search for said X. It won't tell no in most of the cases, it's the nuance of it being a chat-helper instead of giving you unbiased stuff. But, okay, I got you

Two detectors I mentioned here show your posts as AI, I checked more than 10 of your posts and every single one is the same. In the meantime, I tried testing mine and not a single one came out positive. Is it a coincidence? I highly doubt it, so in your position I wouldn't be as ironic as you.

Despite his protests (which admittedly I don't really understand), clearly some of his posts are AI, I flipped to a page at random and found one right off the bat:

You make a solid point about short-term noise masking real trends. Even with ETFs pushing **$97k** earlier, the drop to **$92k** shows how quickly sentiment can shift.
Institutional players aren't just chasing pumps-they're analyzing liquidity cycles and volume.
If we see sustained volume above **$30B** daily, that could confirm confidence. Are you watching those ETF inflows as a leading indicator?

Both Sapling & Copyleaks return 100% AI. It looks like he just managed to fly under the radar for a long time, and there are many such cases out there.

Pretty much all of their posts in January were AI spam. Here's a few more examples that come back as 100% AI in Sapling & Cpoyleaks:

#1

You  make a solid point about the regime's track record, but let's pump the brakes on calling Bitcoin some miracle solution here. I get the appeal-decentralization, escaping hyperinflation, all that jazz-but where's the proof Iranians are actually flocking to it? 

Between internet blackouts, banking restrictions, and just... daily survival, how many ordinary people realistically have the bandwidth or resources to dive into crypto? Even if they did, the volatility's brutal. Bitcoin's sitting at $94k now, which feels more like a "meh" market than a panic rush. Remember how Venezuela's crisis barely moved the needle for crypto adoption? Or how El Salvador's Bitcoin push fizzled? 

History shows that in real-world crises, crypto's rarely the first resort. Most folks need basics like food and cash, not speculative assets. Plus, with $94k buy-ins, it's not exactly accessible to the average person scraping by. Show me the on-chain spikes, the peer-to-peer volume, or the grassroots adoption-then we'll talk. Until then? It's just hype.

#2

The core issue isn't just technical feasibility; it's about power dynamics.

Governments resist Bitcoin because it threatens their monopoly on money creation and financial control.
While centralized exchanges with KYC can be regulated, the underlying protocol's decentralization remains a challenge.

This isn't merely about money laundering fears - it's a fundamental clash between traditional financial systems and a permissionless network.

Even if some countries adopt it, others will likely push back to maintain their economic authority.

#3

You're right that DCA makes investing accessible, and thats awesome for people starting out. But I totally get how the opportunity cost feels brutal when you're living paycheck to paycheck - every spare dollar needs to cover essentials, not just *hope* for future gains. Even small, regular contributions can compound powerfully over decades, it's true, but that initial outlay stings when rent is due tomorrow.

Remember how brutal the 2018 correction was?

[lovesmayfamilis]

A fool is claiming to be @lovesmayfamilis. That too is a post generated by AI. Probably some gentleman tagged by @lovesmayfamilis is introducing himself like this. What is @lovesmayfamilis sir's opinion on this?

An opinion? My opinion is that there are those on the forum who think I often "step on the tail," because this is the second account that does not accept the fact that it cannot harm me in any way. But I want to reassure these "well-wishers": you can write in the PM how it was invented by you; maybe someone is really ready to become a better person. I continue to stand by the recently quoted opinion.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5574736.msg66417838#msg66417838
However, I also accept all these "fake nicknames" as jokes that are possible on the part of figures on this topic, although they look pretty stupid.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5574797.msg66420578#msg66420578

[lovesmayfamilis]

The account of a newbie who recently woke up and started writing posts in the Spanish local section. However, AI detectors detect every time that posts are written using AI.
In addition, there are suspicions that his alternative account, which is marked with a negative tag, and is a fraudster, whose reputation was discussed in this topic.


KNOWN SCAMMER: Francisco Carvajal (CasinoExpert, DavidXXXX, GoldenBuzzers...)

GokuSan

Two accounts woke up at the same time, and one account gave merit for the post to the AI.

FoxyGhosty   https://bpip.org/Profile?id=2550423  2/18/2026 1:48:31 AM   woke up
GokuSan       https://bpip.org/Profile?p=GokuSan  2/18/2026 1:58:31 AM   woke up

When you compare the 1980 Reagan–Bush debate on immigration with today’s rhetoric, the shift in tone is striking. In 1980, even within a Republican primary, the conversation focused on practicality, economic realities, and treating immigrants with a degree of dignity. There was recognition that migrant labor plays a role in the economy and that the system itself needed reform.

Fast forward to 2024, and much of the debate has become emotionally charged and sensationalized. Claims like migrants “eating pets” dominate headlines instead of serious policy discussions. Whether someone is conservative, liberal, or independent, that kind of rhetoric doesn’t help solve real problems.

For me, this isn’t about open borders. I don’t support open borders. I support better processes. If we rely on migrant labor in agriculture, construction, and service industries, then we should have functional, legal pathways for people to work here. That reduces exploitation, weakens cartels, and strengthens the rule of law.

At the same time, due process matters. Federal agents operating with masks and detaining people without transparency or clear accountability raises serious constitutional concerns. Enforcement should exist, but it should follow clear legal standards and respect civil liberties.

More broadly, I think part of why our politics has become so extreme is structural. Money dominates campaigns, which rewards outrage over solutions. Reforms like removing big money from politics and implementing Ranked Choice Voting could incentivize more serious, policy-focused candidates instead of those who thrive on division.

We can have secure borders and humane processes at the same time. Those goals are not mutually exclusive. The real difference between 1980 and 2024 isn’t just policy it’s the tone and incentives driving the conversation.

quillbot 69%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected

La decisión de El Salvador de adoptar Bitcoin como moneda de curso legal en 2021 marcó un hito histórico en la economía mundial, al convertirse en el primer país en dar ese paso. Más allá del impacto mediático, la medida impulsada por el presidente Nayib Bukele abrió un debate profundo sobre soberanía monetaria, innovación financiera y riesgo económico.

Por un lado, la iniciativa buscó promover la inclusión financiera y reducir los costos de las remesas, que representan una parte importante del PIB salvadoreño. También posicionó al país como referente global en adopción cripto, atrayendo atención internacional e inversión tecnológica. Para muchos, fue una apuesta estratégica para romper con modelos financieros tradicionales y depender menos de intermediarios.

Por otro lado, la volatilidad del bitcoin, la limitada adopción cotidiana y las preocupaciones de organismos internacionales generaron críticas y dudas sobre su sostenibilidad a largo plazo. El experimento salvadoreño sigue siendo observado por economistas y gobiernos de todo el mundo como un caso único que puede redefinir el papel de las criptomonedas en los sistemas financieros nacionales.

quillbot 100%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected

Tu reflexión plantea una defensa firme de la privacidad como derecho humano fundamental en la era digital, entendida no solo como protección legal sino como condición esencial para la libertad y la dignidad individual. Este principio encuentra respaldo en el Artículo 12 de la Naciones Unidas, que prohíbe las injerencias arbitrarias en la vida privada, la familia, el domicilio y la correspondencia. En un contexto donde la vigilancia digital, la recopilación masiva de datos y la censura se han normalizado, reivindicar la privacidad implica afirmar la soberanía del individuo frente a Estados y corporaciones. En este marco, Bitcoin aparece como una herramienta dentro de un “ecosistema” más amplio orientado a la autonomía digital: no solo como medio de intercambio descentralizado, sino como parte de un conjunto de técnicas y herramientas destinadas a preservar la libertad económica, la protección de la información y la expresión sin interferencias indebidas. Así, el concepto de “ecosistema” que propones trasciende lo financiero y se proyecta como una arquitectura integral de defensa de la autonomía personal en internet, donde privacidad, seguridad y libertad se articulan como pilares inseparables de una sociedad verdaderamente abierta.

quillbot 100%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected

The situation in Nigeria is truly heartbreaking. No one should be killed or forced to flee their homes because of their faith. Freedom of religion is a fundamental human right, and every Nigerian  whether Christian, Muslim, or of any other belief  deserves safety and protection.

At the same time, the violence in Nigeria is very complex. Different armed groups such as extremist organizations, bandits, and militant factions have targeted civilians in various regions. While many Christians have suffered greatly, there have also been Muslim communities attacked in different areas. The crisis involves religious tensions, but also political instability, ethnic conflicts, poverty, land disputes, and weak security structures.

It is important that the Nigerian government takes stronger and more effective action to protect *all* citizens, ensure justice for victims, and hold perpetrators accountable. The international community should also continue to pay attention and support efforts toward peace and stability.

Violence against any religious group must stop. People should be free to worship  or not worship — without fear. We should stand against persecution everywhere and promote dialogue, justice, and peace rather than division.

Praying for peace and safety for everyone affected in Nigeria.

quillbot 77%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected

[macson]

After registering on the forum for two years, this newbie account finally became active and began spamming the forum with AI posts. The four posts I checked were all AI-generated.

User: Noobguy

In my opinion, preventing child abuse starts with awareness, because many times the biggest weakness is silence. Nowadays, people avoid talking about this topic because it feels uncomfortable. But the problem is, when we don’t talk about it, children remain unprepared and vulnerable.

One weak point is the lack of education. Many children don’t even know what is right and what is wrong when an adult behaves inappropriately. In simple words, they don’t understand their own boundaries. This makes it easier for abusers to manipulate them. Parents should teach children basic safety rules, like no one has the right to touch their private parts, and they should always tell a trusted adult if something feels wrong.

Another weak point is too much blind trust. Sometimes families trust relatives, neighbors, teachers, or family friends without question. In reality, abuse often comes from someone the child already knows, not a stranger. This is why parents must stay observant and not ignore sudden changes in a child’s behavior, like fear, silence, or avoiding certain people.

The internet has also become a risk. Nowadays, many predators use social media, games, and chat platforms to contact children. Parents should monitor online activity and teach children not to talk to strangers online or share personal information.

Prevention also depends on listening. Children should feel safe to speak without fear of punishment or blame. If a child believes they will be ignored or scolded, they may stay silent. That silence becomes the abuser’s advantage.

From what I understand, our biggest weak points are a lack of awareness, blind trust, and poor communication. If families stay alert, educate children, and take their words seriously, many cases can be prevented before they even happen.

Including all, if I talk about my own country or political parties, most are related to crime, and when any criminal occurs, any problem with the use of political leaders' power,r somehow they are able to manage police, laws, and others.

So this thing builds trust in criminals that whatever we do, we will be able to manage somehow!

This way, the crime increases, and the complete liability for this is the government.

You can also see the Epstein file if you don't know about it.

GPTZero.me: Mixed
Sapling.ai: 91%
Originality.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%

Bitcoin is digital money. It is not controlled by any bank or government. You keep it in something called a wallet. This wallet gives you an address, and that address is like your account number. You can receive Bitcoin there, and you can also send it to others.

The technical side is a little bit difficult, especially things like private keys and transactions. The most important thing you must protect is your private key.

Managing Bitcoin is mostly about using a good wallet and being careful. Nowadays, many wallets are easy to use, like Trust Wallet, Electrum, or hardware wallets. You can check your balance, send, and receive Bitcoin without much difficulty once you get used to it.

Selling Bitcoin is also simple. You can use an exchange like Binance or other trusted platforms. You send your Bitcoin from your wallet to the exchange, then sell it and receive money in your bank or mobile wallet.

Don't worry, everyone thinks difficult in begining. Try to learn more, read articles in this Bitcointalk you will see many valueable post, try to read, take tim,e and if you face any problem, just ask or start a new topic in Beggingers and help or in Bitcoin discussion section.

GPTZero.me: 81%
Sapling.ai: 91%
Originality.ai: 100%

Yes, this is a very interesting situation, and I will explain it clearly.

First, it is completely normal that older Bitcoin addresses look different from newer ones. In the early days of Bitcoin (2009–2012), most addresses were what we call **Legacy addresses**, and they usually start with the number **"1"**. For example, something like:

`1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa`

These addresses are longer and have a different format compared to modern addresses like SegWit (starting with **3**) or Bech32 (starting with **bc1**).

But the important thing is this: old addresses are still valid today. Bitcoin is designed to be backward compatible, so you can still receive Bitcoin on that old address without any problem.

However, there is something you need to understand. You don’t really “use” the address itself. What matters is whether you still have access to the private key or the wallet that created that address. The address is just the public identifier. The private key is what gives you control over the Bitcoin.

So here are the possible situations:

If you still have the wallet file (for example, wallet.dat) or the private key, you can import it into a modern wallet like Electrum, and you will be able to access and use your Bitcoin normally.

If you only have the address but do NOT have the private key or wallet, then unfortunately, you cannot access or spend the Bitcoin. The address alone is not enough.

Also, old legacy addresses can still receive Bitcoin, but transaction fees may be slightly higher compared to newer formats like bc1 addresses. That’s why many people move their funds to modern wallets for better efficiency.

In simple words, your old address is still usable and valid. The only thing that matters is whether you have the private key or wallet access. If you have that, you are safe. If not, the address cannot be controlled.

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 99%
Originality.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%

Hello, welcome. This is actually a very good question. I will explain it in simple words.

A public key and a Bitcoin address are connected, but they are not the same thing.

The public key is the original cryptographic key that is created from your private key. It is a long string of letters and numbers, and it is used as part of the process to receive Bitcoin. But in most cases, people don’t use the public key directly.

The Bitcoin address is created from the public key. You can think of it like a shortened and safer version of the public key. It is what you normally share with others when you want to receive Bitcoin. For example, when someone sends you BTC, they send it to your Bitcoin address, not directly to your public key.

In simple words, the public key is the source, and the Bitcoin address is derived from it.

The reason Bitcoin uses addresses instead of public keys directly is mainly for security and convenience. The address is hashed from the public key, which adds an extra layer of protection. Also, addresses are shorter and easier to use.

One important thing to know is that your private key creates your public key, and your public key creates your Bitcoin address. So the private key is the most important one and must always be kept secret. The public key and address can be shared safely.

So the simple chain is like this:

Private key → Public key → Bitcoin address

I hope this makes it clear. This confusion is very normal when starting, so don’t worry.

If you want to know more, you can ask,and  I will try my best to help. Even in this forum, you can start a new topic. Anyone who have good idea or knowledge about that topic will try to solve or help.

GPTZero.me: 99%
Sapling.ai: 99%
Originality.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%

[lovesmayfamilis]

payagold

Hi everyone,
I’ve been reading a lot of discussions here about security, and I noticed that small habits often matter more than complicated setups. Sometimes just slowing down and double-checking things can prevent problems.
I’m interested in hearing from others — especially people who have been around crypto for a while.
What simple security habit has helped you avoid mistakes or risky situations?
Was there a moment where one small action made a real difference for you?
I think practical, everyday examples are really helpful for people who are still learning and trying to build better habits.
Thanks in advance for sharing your experiences.

quillbot 100%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
gptzero  100%

Hi,
I haven’t used Goblin Cards personally, but I’d be cautious with any crypto debit card that claims no KYC and high limits. Usually, cards without a clear issuing bank, card network, or jurisdiction can be risky — they might work for a while but could get shut down or freeze balances.
I’d suggest checking if anyone on other forums or crypto communities has verified long-term experiences. Also, small test amounts first are usually safer.
Curious to hear if anyone here actually used it and how reliable it was.

quillbot 75%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
gptzero  100%

Hi everyone,

I’ve been thinking about this for a while and wanted to get some real user opinions.

When choosing a crypto platform or service, what matters more to you personally — strong security or ease of use?

Some platforms focus heavily on security, but can feel complicated to use. Others are very simple and user-friendly, but some people may question how secure they really are.

From your experience:
- Which factor has had more impact on your long-term decisions?
- Have you ever switched platforms just because of poor security or a confusing interface?

I’d love to hear your thoughts and experiences.

quillbot 78%
Copyleaks AI Content Detected
gptzero  100%

[AuchanX]

A Hero member who wakes up repeatedly. He is creating posts using AI.

User: alexandr1115

You're absolutely right — Bitcoin’s resilience over time is remarkable, especially given the global regulatory challenges it has faced. Its decentralized nature is precisely what makes it so resistant to manipulation and outside control. The skepticism only proves that Bitcoin continues to challenge traditional financial systems and provoke meaningful debate about the future of money!

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Quillbot: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

Calling Bitcoin a cryptocurrency just makes things easier to understand. It helps people see where it fits among other digital money. But Bitcoin still stands out — it was the first, it’s the most secure, and it’s truly decentralized. Saying it’s part of “crypto” doesn’t take away its value. What really matters isn’t the label, but how well it works for real things like keeping your money safe and free from control.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 99% AI
Quillbot: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

Another point is that Bitcoin’s value doesn’t only come from market price movements — it’s built on its independence, transparency, and limited supply. Unlike traditional currencies, no government or central bank can print more of it. This makes Bitcoin a hedge against inflation and financial manipulation. So while short-term traders react to price swings, those who understand its long-term design see Bitcoin as digital gold — something that keeps its worth because it’s based on math and trustless technology, not political decisions.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Quillbot: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

I totally agree with you. Bitcoin really stands apart from all the other coins out there - it’s the original, the most secure, and it doesn’t need fancy branding or marketing slogans to prove its value. All those rival coins have come and gone, but Bitcoin keeps doing its thing steadily. Calling it “digital gold” might sound cool, but honestly, just calling it Bitcoin is enough - that name already means something. Still, to be fair, I’ve got to give some credit to those Bitcoin forks - they actually helped me make some profit, and I’m grateful for that!

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Quillbot: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

Every time the “Bitcoin doesn’t scale” narrative resurfaces, it feels like someone discovered fire again - only to sell lighter fluid. The truth is, Bitcoin scales through layers, and the Lightning Network is a perfect example of that. It’s not an altcoin or a side project - it’s a layer built on Bitcoin itself, using smart contracts to enable instant and low-fee transactions. The first transaction opens a payment channel, and everything after that happens off-chain with full Bitcoin security. Funny enough, while critics keep talking, Lightning just keeps routing sats at the speed of light.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 99% AI
Quillbot: 100% AI
Gptzero: 100% AI

[macson]

This newbie account finally became active again after being offline for so long, and then spammed the forum with its AI posts.

User: JackWinston

Yes, realistically, most crypto traders are losing money, even if they do not openly admit it.

Exchange data over the years has shown that a large percentage of retail traders, especially those using leverage, end up in losses. The crypto market is highly volatile and runs 24/7, which often leads to emotional decisions, overtrading, and liquidations. Many traders enter without a proper strategy or risk management plan.

The reason we rarely see losses discussed is simple. People post winning trades, not blown accounts. This creates a false image that everyone is profitable. In reality, consistent profitability requires discipline, strict risk control, and long-term patience. Those who treat trading like a business survive. Those who treat it like gambling usually do not.

I believe AI has the potential to improve Bitcoin trading strategies by analyzing large amounts of data much faster than humans. It can process price action, order book data, on chain metrics, and even social sentiment in real time to identify patterns and trading signals.

But here is the real question. Is AI truly predicting Bitcoin movements, or just reacting faster than manual traders?

Bitcoin is highly volatile and influenced by unexpected news and whale activity. Can AI really handle that unpredictability?

Have you tried AI powered trading bots or prediction tools? Did they actually improve your results?

Curious to hear real experiences from the community.

Crypto trading bots can be profitable for Bitcoin trading in 2026, but only with the right strategy and solid risk management.

It is estimated that 60 to 80 percent of total crypto trading volume is now driven by algorithmic or automated trading, showing how dominant bots have become. In traditional markets, algorithmic trading accounts for over 70 percent of volume, so automation is clearly shaping modern trading.

However, bots are not guaranteed profit machines. They simply execute strategies faster and without emotion. Profitability still depends on market conditions, proper backtesting, and disciplined risk control.

What’s your experience with Bitcoin trading bots?
Are they giving traders a real edge, or is the market becoming too competitive for simple automation?

GPTZero.me: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
Originality.ai: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%