AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[seoincorporation]

Hello guys, as some of you know i have been developing the AI Spam Tool.

Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577337.0

and I know some people don't like the idea of using AI to chase AI, but in the end, this is the only way to prove that a post has been created with AI.

Right now the tool can verify a thread page (20 post) directly from the link, and users porfiles on the same way. But if any of you have some new ideas about the tool behavior or something to add, please let me know, and I will vibe code it.

[nutildah]

Hello guys, as some of you know i have been developing the AI Spam Tool.

Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577337.0

I saw this and I appreciate the time you put into creating it. I haven't been able to use it yet b/c of this:

To use the AI tools, you will have to pay with your own tokens.

I know a bit about API but never tried to get tokens. I imagine its not that hard. I've just been able to do what I want quick enough on my own so far. But your tool could certainly be used to scan posts en masse and flag posters for manual review. Actually it could probably used in the process theymos started to outline a few months back.

[seoincorporation]

Hello guys, as some of you know i have been developing the AI Spam Tool.

Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577337.0

I saw this and I appreciate the time you put into creating it. I haven't been able to use it yet b/c of this:

To use the AI tools, you will have to pay with your own tokens.

I know a bit about API but never tried to get tokens. I imagine its not that hard. I've just been able to do what I want quick enough on my own so far. But your tool could certainly be used to scan posts en masse and flag posters for manual review. Actually it could probably used in the process theymos started to outline a few months back.

Hey nutildah, I will send you a GPT API Key, the consumption of the tool is really low. it would be hard to spend more than $1 because i'm using gpt 4.1 mini model. The other tools aren't cheap at all, but it's good to have them optional if other users already have a Key for them. I will also share the Key with Loycev because I really want this tool to become useful for the community.

I know we could build a better process or a better prompt for the detection, but i need a brainstorm with the community about how to make it better.

[Satofan44]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1612959

Trust summary for koplakremponk

This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.

Bitcoin 2026: Balancing Layer-1 Security with Layer-2 Scalability

As we move further into 2026, the debate between maintaining Bitcoin's core decentralization and achieving mass adoption through scalability is more relevant than ever. With Layer-1 fees occasionally spiking, the reliance on Layer-2 solutions has shifted from "optional" to "essential."

I've put together a small comparison to highlight why the L1/L2 synergy is the only sustainable path forward for the network:

The L1 vs. L2 Dynamic:

Code:

+-------------------+----------------------+-----------------------+
| Feature           | Layer-1 (Settlement) | Layer-2 (Execution)   |
+-------------------+----------------------+-----------------------+
| Finality          | ~10-60 Minutes       | Near-Instant          |
| Cost/Throughput   | Higher / 7 TPS       | Minimal / 10,000+ TPS |
| Security Model    | Pure PoW             | Inherited from L1     |
| Main Use-Case     | Wealth Storage       | Daily Payments/DeFi   |
+-------------------+----------------------+-----------------------+

Key Trends to Watch in 2026:

• BitVM & Programmability: The ability to bring complex smart contracts to Bitcoin without a soft fork is a game-changer for DeFi on BTC.
• Institutional Lightning Adoption: We are seeing more exchanges integrating Lightning for instant, low-cost withdrawals.
• Privacy on L2: New developments in Discreet Log Contracts (DLCs) are making private, trustless betting and oracles a reality on Bitcoin.

My Question to the Community:
Do you believe that Bitcoin’s "purity" is at risk as we push more activity to L2, or is this the natural evolution required for Bitcoin to become a global reserve asset?

I personally believe that L1 should remain the "Digital Gold" vault, while L2 handles the "Digital Cash" velocity. I’m curious to hear your thoughts on where we stand in this cycle.

Looking forward to a productive discussion!

I don't need to waste any time scanning, this is how ChatGPT creates those kind of tables for overview. 6 year gap in post history.

[AakZaki]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1612959

Trust summary for koplakremponk

This user recently woke up from a long period of inactivity.

-snip-

I checked in the Indonesian he wrote the result like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5578373.msg66545128#msg66545128

Copyleaks = 100% AI
Quillbot = 89% AI
GPTZero = 100% AI

He instead translated into English as you mentioned it.

I already suspected that when he was just active in Lokal Indonesia, even in a 15-minute time gap he could create two good-looking Threads, which even Legendary members almost never do. But after checking the results as I mentioned above.

Here is another thread in Indonesian that I checked

[EDUKASI] Mengapa Seed Phrase Saja Tidak Cukup di 2026: Mengenal Social Recovery & MPC

Halo teman-teman Bitcointalk Indonesia,

Seiring dengan semakin canggihnya metode phishing dan malware saat ini, mengandalkan selembar kertas berisi 12-24 kata (seed phrase) mulai terasa berisiko bagi sebagian orang. Jika kertas itu hilang atau rusak, akses ke aset kita bisa tamat selamanya.

Saya ingin berbagi sedikit rangkuman tentang evolusi penyimpanan aset yang mungkin bisa membantu teman-teman mengamankan portofolionya lebih baik lagi di tahun 2026 ini:

1. Multi-Party Computation (MPC)
Berbeda dengan dompet tradisional, MPC memecah "kunci" menjadi beberapa bagian (shards) yang disimpan di perangkat berbeda. Tidak ada satu entitas pun yang memegang kunci utuh secara tunggal.

• Kelebihan: Menghilangkan risiko Single Point of Failure.
• Cocok untuk: Pengguna yang aktif bertransaksi di ekosistem DeFi.

2. Social Recovery Wallets
Konsep yang dipopulerkan oleh Vitalik Buterin ini memungkinkan pemulihan akun tanpa seed phrase. Jika Anda kehilangan akses, Anda bisa menentukan beberapa "Guardian" (bisa teman terpercaya atau perangkat hardware lain) untuk menyetujui pemulihan akun Anda.

3. Tips Tambahan Keamanan di 2026:

• Check Allowance secara rutin: Pastikan Anda mencabut izin (revoke) smart contract yang sudah tidak digunakan lagi untuk menghindari drainer.
• Hardware Wallet Is Still King: Jangan pernah mengetik seed phrase di perangkat yang terkoneksi internet dalam kondisi apa pun.

Semoga ringkasan kecil ini bermanfaat untuk menjaga aset kita tetap aman. Bagaimana menurut teman-teman, apakah kalian masih setia dengan metode kertas fisik atau sudah mulai beralih ke solusi smart contract wallet yang lebih modern?

Ditunggu diskusinya!

Originality = 95% Confident That's AI
GPTZero = 100% AI
Copyleaks = 100% AI
Quillbot = 55% AI
ZeroGPT = 34.96% AI GPT

[Ultegra134]

User who has previously been reported by lovemayfamilies is still flooding the forum with AI garbage. User tagged (again) and posts reported.

User: xbetz.io

Post 1.

I think the bigger “political trap” isn’t about Bitcoin being controlled, it’s about how governments choose to interact with it. Bitcoin itself doesn’t change, but regulation, taxation and narratives around it do. That’s where the real impact comes from. For example: Governments can’t stop Bitcoin but they can restrict access (exchanges, banks, on/off ramps). They can heavily tax profits, making it less attractive for average users. Or they can embrace it, which usually drives adoption and price. So it’s less about a single event crashing Bitcoin and more about long-term pressure from regulation and policy decisions. In the end, Bitcoin adapts but users are the ones who feel the effects first.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Undetectable: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% Ai

Post 2.

Good breakdown. One thing a lot of people still underestimate is how advanced tracking has become over the years. It’s not just about IP anymore. Casinos combine device fingerprinting, behavioral patterns and timing analysis to connect accounts. Even if someone uses different IPs or wallets, repeating the same betting patterns, wager sizes or login schedules can easily flag accounts. In many cases it’s actually the consistency between accounts that gives it away, not a single factor. I’ve seen situations where accounts looked ‘clean’ individually, but once analyzed together, the patterns were obvious.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Undetectable: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% Ai

[macson]

This newbie user just spammed the forum with his AI posts. Of the three posts I included, all were AI-generated.

User:Herold

The level of sophistication in these phishing campaigns is getting alarming. Sending physical letters to home addresses is a massive red flag, as it implies a database leak that includes shipping info (names and physical addresses), similar to what happened with Ledger years ago.

For anyone reading this, especially those new to Coldcard or other hardware wallets:
1. **No firmware update requires your seed phrase.** If a "tool" or "website" asks for those 12/24 words, it's 100% a scam.
2. **Quantum attacks are the new "boogeyman".** While research is ongoing, any email or letter claiming you need an urgent "quantum-proof" update right now is just using fear-mongering (FUD) to make you act without thinking.
3. **Verify through official channels.** Always check the official X (Twitter) account or the official site (coinkite.com) before clicking any links or following instructions from an unsolicited letter.

If Coinkite denies a leak, it’s possible the data came from a third-party reseller or a compromised shipping database. Stay vigilant, everyone.

This is a wild experiment, but it feels like we’re entering the "Dead Theory" territory for online poker. If Realbet is advertising AI agents as a feature, they are essentially turning poker into a battle of prompts and compute power rather than a game of human psychology.

The big question for me is the "hallucination" factor. LLMs like GPT-4 are great at logic, but they can be unpredictable under pressure or when faced with "irrational" human betting patterns. If I knew half the table was AI, I’d probably change my strategy to exploit the known biases of these models.

However, for the average player, this sounds like a nightmare. Poker is a social game of "reading the person," and you can't read a server rack in a data center. If the AI doesn't "care" about losing $500, then the emotional pressure — which is a core part of poker — is completely gone. It’s no longer poker; it’s a high-stakes simulation. I’d be curious to see if they implement any "Human-Only" tables to keep the original spirit alive.

This is a fresh concept for the forum! Usually, we see signature campaigns or simple giveaways, but a performance-based swap competition actually adds some real utility.

Quick question regarding the "Versatility King" category: does the ranking account for the direction of the pair? For example, does a BTC -> ETH swap count as a different pair than ETH -> BTC, or are they treated as the same asset corridor? Also, it's great to see icopress as the escrow for the prizes — that definitely adds the necessary layer of trust for a 3-month event. Looking forward to seeing the first leaderboard updates!

Copyleaks: 100%
GPTZero.me: 100%
Originality.ai: 100%

[nutildah]

Hey nutildah, I will send you a GPT API Key, the consumption of the tool is really low. it would be hard to spend more than $1 because i'm using gpt 4.1 mini model. The other tools aren't cheap at all, but it's good to have them optional if other users already have a Key for them. I will also share the Key with Loycev because I really want this tool to become useful for the community.

I know we could build a better process or a better prompt for the detection, but i need a brainstorm with the community about how to make it better.

Alright thanks. Let's give it a test:

So I plugged the API key in 4 of the 5 detectors, and gave it this link:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5577202.msg66505941#msg66505941

I couldn't quite figure out how to select only 1 post, so it analyzed all 20 posts on the page. Unfortunately, it appears only the OpenAI detector is working at the moment... The other ones return a message of "ERR".

I also used the by Profile option and this is what the results look like for the most recent posts by xbetz.io:

Post#	Message ID	OAI %
1	msg66543101	35%
2	msg66539774	25%
3	msg66536145	35%
4	msg66520059	30%
5	msg66509356	30%
6	msg66505941	20%
7	msg66502366	30%
8	msg66502320	30%
9	msg66498745	35%
10	msg66495187	30%
11	msg66472426	30%
12	msg66470133	30%
13	msg66470027	30%
14	msg66466132	55%
15	msg66461845	30%
16	msg66461833	35%
17	msg66457248	45%
18	msg66455622	55%
19	msg66452110	20%
20	msg66448096	40%

I'm willing to bet a lot of these would show up higher in the other detectors.

Anyway, its a good start.

[Ultegra134]

Another new user, another spammer. He seems overly worried about Bitcoin's price and keeps creating new topics about it. He's so worried that his mind is completely toast and has to use AI to express himself. Posts reported and user tagged.

User: Paul Bennett

Post 1.

Been watching Bitcoin closely these past weeks. Price has been bouncing between $62K-$75K during the US-Iran tensions, and despite all the headlines, the market feels strangely calm. Yet, long-term holders are quietly scooping coins - over 33K $BTC added in the past month - and exchange balances hit a record low. That tells me accumulation is real, but buying pressure isn’t strong enough to push above $75K yet 

On the flip side, mining costs have dropped below $60K, and historically, that’s often where floors form. Combine that with potential Fed moves and geopolitical risk, and we might be looking at a subtle tug-of-war: shorts, inflows, and profit-taking all colliding.

I’m not convinced $50K is guaranteed, but it’s looking like a likely magnet if momentum fades. Anyone else seeing these signals or reading the market differently?

GPTZero: 100% AI
Undetectable: 99% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI

Post 2.

$14 billion in options expiring Friday. Just… let that sink in. That’s almost 40% of open positions in the whole market, sitting there like a giant weight on BTC. You start thinking about how that much notional moves through the hands of a few big players, how gamma squeezes could twitch prices by tiny fractions, and suddenly $71k doesn’t feel so calm anymore.

With numbers this big, every small nudge can echo. Makes you wonder: how many of these $14B are actually going to change hands before anyone notices, and which parts of the market will feel it first?

GPTZero: 100% AI
Undetectable: 99% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI

Post 3.

Been watching BTC around $70k while US bond yields creep up. Kinda wild - if yields pass 5%, could Bitcoin dip under $50k? Maybe, maybe not. Feels like BTC is just following the chaos. Some days it’s chill, some days it’s nervous. I don’t know, makes me wonder - are we overthinking it, or is this really just the start of something bigger?

Curious what everyone else thinks.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Undetectable: 99% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI

[BitMaxz]

I just want to bring this guy below for AI spam; with a 6-minutes gap in his posts, it looks like an AI or a bot that automates the post and spams the mining section.

This guy: marsel56235

I reported it already to moderators. I also reported it here because it looks like a spammy AI guy just born to spam the mining section. This account must be banned or at least give a temporary ban to learn about the forum rules.

[Lucius]

Another new user, another spammer. He seems overly worried about Bitcoin's price and keeps creating new topics about it. He's so worried that his mind is completely toast and has to use AI to express himself. Posts reported and user tagged.
User: Paul Bennett
~snip~

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66528943#msg66528943

He's been doing this for a while now, and I hope it won't be much longer considering the additional posts you've reported. Mods are too tolerant of AI spammers, I guess even more so after the AI ​​guidelines the admin recently released.