lpellis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
September 30, 2018, 11:41:56 AM |
|
We check each pool manually and multiply the values if needed. Ahh, thats what I've been doing thought there was a better solution Some of the pools are wrongly setup, for example kmd on suprnova seems to be in H/s even though they specify MH/s, might be worth correcting that one: https://whattomine.com/coins/174-kmd-equihash
|
|
|
|
fredeq (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 30, 2018, 06:52:35 PM |
|
Ahh, thats what I've been doing thought there was a better solution Some of the pools are wrongly setup, for example kmd on suprnova seems to be in H/s even though they specify MH/s, might be worth correcting that one: https://whattomine.com/coins/174-kmd-equihashThanks will recheck all pools one more time
|
|
|
|
papampi_2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 3
Linux Forever... Resistance is futile!!!
|
|
September 30, 2018, 09:43:09 PM |
|
Are the ZHash values correct for 1060 and 1070 cards? It shows me 84 Sol/s for 1x1070+2x1060 but Z EWBF give me much more 01:11:41 GPU0: 179 Sol/s GPU1: 124 Sol/s GPU2: 124 Sol/s 01:11:41 Total speed: 427 Sol/s GPU0: 1070 GPU1 & 2: 1060 GPU0 Power Limit: 100 GPU1 Power Limit: 75 GPU2 Power Limit: 75 Core Over Clock: 150 Memory Over Clock: 150
|
https://github.com/papampi/nvOC_by_fullzero_Community_Release
|
|
|
fredeq (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 30, 2018, 09:50:54 PM |
|
Are the ZHash values correct for 1060 and 1070 cards? It shows me 84 Sol/s for 1x1070+2x1060 but Z EWBF give me much more 01:11:41 GPU0: 179 Sol/s GPU1: 124 Sol/s GPU2: 124 Sol/s 01:11:41 Total speed: 427 Sol/s GPU0: 1070 GPU1 & 2: 1060 Yes they are correct, maybe you start it for a different coin? Can you paste screenshot of starting miner + at least one value?
|
|
|
|
papampi_2
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 3
Linux Forever... Resistance is futile!!!
|
|
September 30, 2018, 09:53:01 PM |
|
Are the ZHash values correct for 1060 and 1070 cards? It shows me 84 Sol/s for 1x1070+2x1060 but Z EWBF give me much more 01:11:41 GPU0: 179 Sol/s GPU1: 124 Sol/s GPU2: 124 Sol/s 01:11:41 Total speed: 427 Sol/s GPU0: 1070 GPU1 & 2: 1060 Yes they are correct, maybe you start it for a different coin? Can you paste screenshot of starting miner + at least one value? I am mining AION with those results Does each algo on ZHash gives different values? Will check BTG and post results Edit: BTG gives almost same. 01:24:19 GPU0: 37 Sol/s GPU1: 24 Sol/s GPU2: 25 Sol/s 01:24:19 Total speed: 86 Sol/s
|
https://github.com/papampi/nvOC_by_fullzero_Community_Release
|
|
|
fredeq (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
September 30, 2018, 11:01:37 PM |
|
I am mining AION with those results Does each algo on ZHash gives different values? Will check BTG and post results Edit: BTG gives almost same. 01:24:19 GPU0: 37 Sol/s GPU1: 24 Sol/s GPU2: 25 Sol/s 01:24:19 Total speed: 86 Sol/s
BTG is zhash Aion is another variation of equihash, but not zhash
|
|
|
|
_ZET_
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 299
Merit: 100
Crypto mining company | Mining pools
|
|
October 05, 2018, 01:44:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
fredeq (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 05, 2018, 01:48:41 PM |
|
Is it still proceeding?[/left][/center]
Yes, still in the queue Best to stick to emails for pools and coins
|
|
|
|
Mikanoshi
|
|
October 10, 2018, 02:23:39 PM |
|
QRL lagging for pretty long...
|
|
|
|
fredeq (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 10, 2018, 02:31:28 PM |
|
QRL lagging for pretty long...
Low priority fix due to market absense As long as I know all qrl markets are still for the erc20 token.
|
|
|
|
Mikanoshi
|
|
October 10, 2018, 02:39:20 PM |
|
OK, XMN and PGN then
|
|
|
|
fredeq (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 14, 2018, 07:02:20 PM |
|
Added gtx2080 adapt values Updated all 10xx values for latest zenemy and dredge miners
|
|
|
|
PYREXCOIN
Copper Member
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 142
Merit: 1
https://g-pyx.com
|
|
October 21, 2018, 08:50:07 AM |
|
Added gtx2080 adapt values Updated all 10xx values for latest zenemy and dredge miners
Hi could you please add our coin into your awesome platform https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/pyrexcoin/We can provide all details just e-mail us admin@pyrexcoin.com or t.me/pyrexcoincom
and also we interested in orders.whattomine.com Personaly Thanks you guys doing great job! Let's keep in touch!
|
|
|
|
fredeq (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 21, 2018, 09:22:49 AM |
|
Added Lyra2rev2 to asic list. Added progpow to gpu list. Added cryptonightv8 to gpu list. Remember to reselect your cards to input updated values. @PYREXCOIN Please make a coin request via contact section - requirements are listed at the top. Same for orders. https://whattomine.com/contacts/new
|
|
|
|
Mikanoshi
|
|
October 21, 2018, 04:16:40 PM Last edit: October 21, 2018, 08:14:05 PM by Mikanoshi |
|
Aced profit is kinda crazy Coin is PoS now.
|
|
|
|
vovanius
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
October 27, 2018, 03:00:53 PM |
|
Check Bismuth (BIS) profitability calculations. Your default difficulty is always too low, profits too high.
|
|
|
|
fredeq (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 27, 2018, 07:04:51 PM |
|
Check Bismuth (BIS) profitability calculations. Your default difficulty is always too low, profits too high.
Actually the block_reward default was not updating properly. Difficulty fractional does not matter for current BIS calc status thats why we only store the integer part. Then for diff24 we can calculate average difficulty between different integer steps. 111.5 would be 50% time on 111 and 50% time on 112.
|
|
|
|
bob_lu
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
October 31, 2018, 03:23:12 AM |
|
Hello everyone, I would like to introduce TrustNote, a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) based ledger that supports mining! To encourage miners participating the alpha testing and beta testing on it's testnet, TrustNote will reward early miners with both $TTT tokens and $TFans tokens. Please check out this thread for all the information: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5059153.0
|
|
|
|
roarde
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
October 31, 2018, 07:13:31 PM |
|
Your reported block time for Myriad (XMY) has been incorrect since forever, resulting in wildly incorrect calculations. It's a five-algo coin. Either you'll need to get reporting for each algo separately, multiply by five, or use a fixed figure.
Separate reporting would be best; no idea how that would be retrieved. Mutliplying would be inaccurate because of natural block-rate differences, but vastly closer than what you're using now. Close enough, maybe. The fixed figure would be 300 seconds, the per-algo target, five times the overall target.
Note that the previously scheduled reward-halving coming in ~May has been replaced with a doubling of the target time. Then target will be 600 seconds per algo.
|
|
|
|
fredeq (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
November 01, 2018, 12:47:29 AM |
|
Your reported block time for Myriad (XMY) has been incorrect since forever, resulting in wildly incorrect calculations. It's a five-algo coin. Either you'll need to get reporting for each algo separately, multiply by five, or use a fixed figure.
Separate reporting would be best; no idea how that would be retrieved. Mutliplying would be inaccurate because of natural block-rate differences, but vastly closer than what you're using now. Close enough, maybe. The fixed figure would be 300 seconds, the per-algo target, five times the overall target.
Note that the previously scheduled reward-halving coming in ~May has been replaced with a doubling of the target time. Then target will be 600 seconds per algo.
Thanks for pointing this out, indeed block_time reporting for multi-algos is not trivial. Probably old value was saved when we switched from variable to static reporting for myriad. The best we could do is give static value per algo (300s) and thats how its gonna be from now on.
|
|
|
|
|