Whattomine - profitability website with basic json.

[lpellis]

Hey, awesome service

How do you manage to to pull the pool hashrate from the MPOS pools?  I'm trying to track it but MPOS seems to return random multipliers for the hashrate, for example https://zcl-api.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=api&action=public --> the value is in milli Sol/s, while it should actually be Sol/s.
Yet somehow you manage to get the correct value at https://whattomine.com/coins/167-zcl-equihash ?

We check each pool manually and multiply the values if needed.

Ahh, thats what I've been doing thought there was a better solution
Some of the pools are wrongly setup, for example kmd on suprnova seems to be in H/s even though they specify MH/s, might be worth correcting that one: https://whattomine.com/coins/174-kmd-equihash

[1713990110]

1713990110

[fredeq]

Ahh, thats what I've been doing thought there was a better solution
Some of the pools are wrongly setup, for example kmd on suprnova seems to be in H/s even though they specify MH/s, might be worth correcting that one: https://whattomine.com/coins/174-kmd-equihash

Thanks will recheck all pools one more time

[papampi_2]

Are the ZHash values correct for 1060 and 1070 cards?
It shows me 84 Sol/s for 1x1070+2x1060 but Z EWBF give me much more

Code:

01:11:41 GPU0: 179 Sol/s GPU1: 124 Sol/s GPU2: 124 Sol/s 
01:11:41 Total speed: 427 Sol/s  

GPU0: 1070
GPU1 & 2: 1060

Code:

GPU0 Power Limit: 100 
GPU1 Power Limit: 75 
GPU2 Power Limit: 75 
Core Over Clock: 150 
Memory Over Clock: 150 

[fredeq]

Are the ZHash values correct for 1060 and 1070 cards?
It shows me 84 Sol/s for 1x1070+2x1060 but Z EWBF give me much more

Code:

01:11:41 GPU0: 179 Sol/s GPU1: 124 Sol/s GPU2: 124 Sol/s 
01:11:41 Total speed: 427 Sol/s  

GPU0: 1070
GPU1 & 2: 1060

Yes they are correct, maybe you start it for a different coin?
Can you paste screenshot of starting miner + at least one value?

[papampi_2]

Are the ZHash values correct for 1060 and 1070 cards?
It shows me 84 Sol/s for 1x1070+2x1060 but Z EWBF give me much more

Code:

01:11:41 GPU0: 179 Sol/s GPU1: 124 Sol/s GPU2: 124 Sol/s 
01:11:41 Total speed: 427 Sol/s  

GPU0: 1070
GPU1 & 2: 1060

Yes they are correct, maybe you start it for a different coin?
Can you paste screenshot of starting miner + at least one value?

I am mining AION with those results
Does each algo on ZHash gives different values?
Will check BTG and post results


Edit:
BTG gives almost same.

Code:

01:24:19 GPU0: 37 Sol/s GPU1: 24 Sol/s GPU2: 25 Sol/s 
01:24:19 Total speed: 86 Sol/s

[fredeq]

I am mining AION with those results
Does each algo on ZHash gives different values?
Will check BTG and post results


Edit:
BTG gives almost same.

Code:

01:24:19 GPU0: 37 Sol/s GPU1: 24 Sol/s GPU2: 25 Sol/s 
01:24:19 Total speed: 86 Sol/s

BTG is zhash
Aion is another variation of equihash, but not zhash

[_ZET_]

Hello!


Great site, great work!


Can we be added at mining pools section?

About mining pool: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1759562.0



HOW TO JOIN:

https://pool.zet-tech.eu/

Stats:
https://pool.zet-tech.eu/#/stats


Ethereum Classic:
https://etc.zet-tech.eu/

Ethereum:
https://eth.zet-tech.eu/

Expanse:
https://exp.zet-tech.eu/#/

Ubiq:
https://ubq.zet-tech.eu/#/

MusicCoin:
https://mc.zet-tech.eu/#/

PIRL:
https://pirl.zet-tech.eu/#/

[/b]

Is it still proceeding?

[fredeq]

Is it still proceeding?[/left][/center]

Yes, still in the queue
Best to stick to emails for pools and coins

[Mikanoshi]

QRL lagging for pretty long...

[fredeq]

QRL lagging for pretty long...

Low priority fix due to market absense
As long as I know all qrl markets are still for the erc20 token.

[Mikanoshi]

OK, XMN and PGN then

[fredeq]

Added gtx2080 adapt values
Updated all 10xx values for latest zenemy and dredge miners

[PYREXCOIN]

Added gtx2080 adapt values
Updated all 10xx values for latest zenemy and dredge miners

Hi could you please add our coin into your awesome platform
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/pyrexcoin/
We can provide all details just e-mail us admin@pyrexcoin.com or t.me/pyrexcoincom


and also we interested in orders.whattomine.com

Personaly Thanks you guys doing great job!
Let's keep in touch!

[fredeq]

Added Lyra2rev2 to asic list.
Added progpow to gpu list.
Added cryptonightv8 to gpu list.

Remember to reselect your cards to input updated values.

@PYREXCOIN
Please make a coin request via contact section - requirements are listed at the top.
Same for orders.
https://whattomine.com/contacts/new

[Mikanoshi]

Aced profit is kinda crazy Coin is PoS now.

[vovanius]

Check Bismuth (BIS) profitability calculations. Your default difficulty is always too low, profits too high.

[fredeq]

Check Bismuth (BIS) profitability calculations. Your default difficulty is always too low, profits too high.

Actually the block_reward default was not updating properly.
Difficulty fractional does not matter for current BIS calc status thats why we only store the integer part.
Then for diff24 we can calculate average difficulty between different integer steps. 111.5 would be 50% time on 111 and 50% time on 112.

[bob_lu]

Hello everyone, I would like to introduce TrustNote, a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) based ledger that supports mining!
To encourage miners participating the alpha testing and beta testing on it's testnet, TrustNote will reward early miners with both $TTT tokens and $TFans tokens. Please check out this thread for all the information: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5059153.0

[roarde]

Your reported block time for Myriad (XMY) has been incorrect since forever, resulting in wildly incorrect calculations. It's a five-algo coin. Either you'll need to get reporting for each algo separately, multiply by five, or use a fixed figure.

Separate reporting would be best; no idea how that would be retrieved. Mutliplying would be inaccurate because of natural block-rate differences, but vastly closer than what you're using now. Close enough, maybe. The fixed figure would be 300 seconds, the per-algo target, five times the overall target.

Note that the previously scheduled reward-halving coming in  ~May has been replaced with a doubling of the target time. Then target will be 600 seconds per algo.

[fredeq]

Your reported block time for Myriad (XMY) has been incorrect since forever, resulting in wildly incorrect calculations. It's a five-algo coin. Either you'll need to get reporting for each algo separately, multiply by five, or use a fixed figure.

Separate reporting would be best; no idea how that would be retrieved. Mutliplying would be inaccurate because of natural block-rate differences, but vastly closer than what you're using now. Close enough, maybe. The fixed figure would be 300 seconds, the per-algo target, five times the overall target.

Note that the previously scheduled reward-halving coming in  ~May has been replaced with a doubling of the target time. Then target will be 600 seconds per algo.

Thanks for pointing this out, indeed block_time reporting for multi-algos is not trivial.

Probably old value was saved when we switched from variable to static reporting for myriad.
The best we could do is give static value per algo (300s) and thats how its gonna be from now on.