Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 10:21:07 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 486 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014  (Read 1210689 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
May 24, 2014, 01:21:41 PM
 #561

Dev hold 10% of coins?

No. The miners can chose to give 1% of the mined coins or not to the devs.

owners of
122.117.207.143
and
117.131.169.12

please PM me ASAP.


Did we find the two forkers ?

We found a bug i think. Just want to help with that, they wasting machine time.

Every time a block is mined, a certain amount of BTC (called the subsidy) is created out of thin air and given to the miner. The subsidy halves every four years and will reach 0 in about 130 years.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714213267
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714213267

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714213267
Reply with quote  #2

1714213267
Report to moderator
1714213267
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714213267

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714213267
Reply with quote  #2

1714213267
Report to moderator
1714213267
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714213267

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714213267
Reply with quote  #2

1714213267
Report to moderator
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
May 24, 2014, 01:22:35 PM
 #562

I want to figure out why it is not switching to main chain.


Maybe problem on firewall
I guess no since handshake is ok.

crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
May 24, 2014, 01:52:17 PM
 #563

I want to figure out why it is not switching to main chain.


Maybe problem on firewall
I guess no since handshake is ok.

GFW i mean, handshake failed here. I guess not since other are fine

Code:
11:19:52.675312 [P2P3]Connecting to 122.117.207.143:10101(white=0, last_seen: d0.h0.m17.s5)...
2014-May-24 11:19:54.158986 [P2P7]FOUND FUTURE peerlist for entry 107.170.97.197:10101 last_seen: 1400920311, local_time(on remote node):1179939823
2014-May-24 11:19:54.159209 [P2P7]ERROR /home/user/boolberry/src/p2p/net_node.inl:381[nodetool::node_server<t_payload_net_handler>::do_handshake_with_peer(nodetool::peerid_type&, nodetool::node_server<t_payload_net_handler>::p2p_connection_context&, bool) [with t_payload_net_handler = currency::t_currency_protocol_handler<currency::core>; nodetool::peerid_type = long unsigned int; nodetool::node_server<t_payload_net_handler>::p2p_connection_context = nodetool::p2p_connection_context_t<currency::currency_connection_context>; typename t_payload_net_handler::connection_context = currency::currency_connection_context]::__lambda12][122.117.207.143:10101 OUT]COMMAND_HANDSHAKE: failed to handle_remote_peerlist(...), closing connection.
2014-May-24 11:19:54.168713 [P2P3][122.117.207.143:10101 OUT]COMMAND_HANDSHAKE Failed
2014-May-24 11:19:54.169053 [P2P3][122.117.207.143:10101 OUT]Failed to HANDSHAKE with peer 122.117.207.143:10101

and by the way, a pool would be good. lots of orphans
It's another issue, someone have wrong time on machine and peerlist file saved on another machine, hotfix is coming.

Quote
Quote
2014-May-23 13:50:44.136797 [P2P7]----- BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 4422
id:   <47f6aded55a778981e9aac9a6d6144d3c96e7a768dfb133b6c0fa9ccc0072b26>
PoW:   <d06e0c56fbb6c97b3b0e27a2403c5d0f787a3b1e2762ebe291e4b50800000000>
difficulty:   72849110324

Quote
2014-May-23 16:56:15.409192 [P2P1]----- BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 4497
id:   <f81d0f76b25d9a9c70ad1d77ce4a5bf0f86dead0ee31af65546cb2453ceba1b1>
PoW:   <5dfda3898841fc6b1aceeb3ecb967e665f38445caa5d46df3827ce0b00000000>
difficulty:   71632303237

Quote
2014-May-23 17:00:40.297074 [P2P2]----- BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 4497
id:   <05b5fd439e31f6e0e24d05efa336178ac83ecea8e774909744f6d565c60e8d90>
PoW:   <4d5d849509c791dbf2b85d903586b912a6509d40973aa2bd56f9650300000000>
difficulty:   71632303237

Quote
2014-May-23 23:20:13.108967 [P2P9]----- BLOCK ADDED AS ALTERNATIVE ON HEIGHT 4694
id:   <52082e26a1aaea803b1ad733e36b278643e065cc3bb63a6f81aba38b4f8d787e>
PoW:   <fc921a6ab7936c8ab015382bf3e84574778f89a99e3ffd27b2e72a0500000000>
difficulty:   66653619141

dig for 3 days, i5 ~330kh, nothing
Agree, but my first concern is to be sure that network is ok.



Anotheranonlol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 504


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 01:58:30 PM
 #564

I want to figure out why it is not switching to main chain.


Maybe problem on firewall
I guess no since handshake is ok.

GFW i mean, handshake failed here. I guess not since other are fine

Code:
11:19:52.675312 [P2P3]Connecting to 122.117.207.143:10101(white=0, last_seen: d0.h0.m17.s5)...
2014-May-24 11:19:54.158986 [P2P7]FOUND FUTURE peerlist for entry 107.170.97.197:10101 last_seen: 1400920311, local_time(on remote node):1179939823
2014-May-24 11:19:54.159209 [P2P7]ERROR /home/user/boolberry/src/p2p/net_node.inl:381[nodetool::node_server<t_payload_net_handler>::do_handshake_with_peer(nodetool::peerid_type&, nodetool::node_server<t_payload_net_handler>::p2p_connection_context&, bool) [with t_payload_net_handler = currency::t_currency_protocol_handler<currency::core>; nodetool::peerid_type = long unsigned int; nodetool::node_server<t_payload_net_handler>::p2p_connection_context = nodetool::p2p_connection_context_t<currency::currency_connection_context>; typename t_payload_net_handler::connection_context = currency::currency_connection_context]::__lambda12][122.117.207.143:10101 OUT]COMMAND_HANDSHAKE: failed to handle_remote_peerlist(...), closing connection.
2014-May-24 11:19:54.168713 [P2P3][122.117.207.143:10101 OUT]COMMAND_HANDSHAKE Failed
2014-May-24 11:19:54.169053 [P2P3][122.117.207.143:10101 OUT]Failed to HANDSHAKE with peer 122.117.207.143:10101

and by the way, a pool would be good. lots of orphans
It's another issue, someone have wrong time on machine and peerlist file saved on another machine, hotfix is coming.

they need to fast forward 7 years  Grin
good job with the quick fix.

poochpocket
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 458
Merit: 265



View Profile
May 24, 2014, 02:48:58 PM
 #565

Hey guys,

What kind of CPUs do you use to mine BBR? i5, i7 ...? It looks like that core i5 is unable to solve blocks. My friend has a core i7. He solved 2 blocks at 200k for 3 days. My core i5 PCs yield 340k each but solves no block for 4 days.

I hear you, I haven't found a single block in 154 hours of mining! This coin needs a pool badly.

I really thought I was going to do well with this coin. I started mining from launch with 2 machines (450k hash total) and I found 3 blocks within the first 6 hours, but haven't found a single block since then.
zeetak
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 12


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 03:11:19 PM
 #566

Hey guys,

What kind of CPUs do you use to mine BBR? i5, i7 ...? It looks like that core i5 is unable to solve blocks. My friend has a core i7. He solved 2 blocks at 200k for 3 days. My core i5 PCs yield 340k each but solves no block for 4 days.

I hear you, I haven't found a single block in 154 hours of mining! This coin needs a pool badly.

I really thought I was going to do well with this coin. I started mining from launch with 2 machines (450k hash total) and I found 3 blocks within the first 6 hours, but haven't found a single block since then.

Don't give up hope, I found a block yesterday with my i7 3770 running at 250kh.
azhago
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 03:34:31 PM
 #567

I want to give try, but to know if it is worth with my cpus, please give me some infos :

How to know the diff ?
How to calcul how many blocs can be found by day ? ((hashrate * 3600 * 24)/diff ?)
How to know bloc reward ?

trankil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 539


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2014, 03:49:41 PM
 #568

i have change for ubuntu 14.04

boost its ok

here my first error

Quote
/root/boolberry/src/wallet/wallet2.h:309:16: error: ‘net_utils’ has not been declared


crypto_zoidberg (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 976
Merit: 646



View Profile WWW
May 24, 2014, 03:57:43 PM
 #569

i have change for ubuntu 14.04

boost its ok

here my first error

Quote
/root/boolberry/src/wallet/wallet2.h:309:16: error: ‘net_utils’ has not been declared

compiler version ?

superresistant
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1120



View Profile
May 24, 2014, 04:20:26 PM
 #570

I want to give try, but to know if it is worth with my cpus, please give me some infos :
How to know the diff ?
How to calcul how many blocs can be found by day ? ((hashrate * 3600 * 24)/diff ?)
How to know bloc reward ?

easier:
hashrate*86400/difficulty=blocks per day
how do you find out the diff? the "diff" command doesn't seem to be in the daemon...

On the website http://boolberry.com/state.html it say that the difficulty is 64G.
I never seen anyone using that G letter for numbers but according to calculation it should mean 64000000000.

So :

(24*60/2)*(your_hashrate)/(64000000000/120)= block per day


Now it's 65.65G

(24*60/2)*(your_hashrate)/(65500000000/120)= block per day

Exemple with one small CPU doing 140K hash per sec :

(24*60/2)*(140000)/(65500000000/120)=0.1846 block per day


azhago
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 05:43:04 PM
 #571

Merci a toi.
Thank you.


trankil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 539


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2014, 06:10:11 PM
 #572

i have change for ubuntu 14.04

boost its ok

here my first error

Quote
/root/boolberry/src/wallet/wallet2.h:309:16: error: ‘net_utils’ has not been declared

compiler version ?

cmake -> v 2.8.12
et gcc -> v 4.8.2
libboost 1.55.0-1
nxt123.cn
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 86
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 06:24:34 PM
 #573

so,where can i buy this coin?

eddywise
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 253
Merit: 250

Let's Boolberry


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 06:32:15 PM
 #574

so,where can i buy this coin?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=616391.0

Boolberry : @eddywise                                                                                                                                                                                                                       DRK:XqTbkj1hpCWBpBSvbWtzBRu5PxzJ2KoA3F                                                                                                                                                                                   BTC:1FZYvzY4cPLwwZmU8rGPM7xGYjfjiZUmuZ  Once desperately want, now desperate to forget
emontmon
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 06:36:29 PM
 #575

I see someone is mining alternative chain, bad idea because today i'll release checkpoints.
Or may be it happend because seed nodes was offline some time.

how can you tell someone is mining alternative chain.
i am worried that this is the case for me.
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Who cares?


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 07:43:30 PM
 #576

Zoidberg, is it just you working on boolberry at the moment or do you have other developers working on a wallet, one working on pool software etc?
azhago
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 09:19:24 PM
 #577

How many coin in a block actually?

surfer43
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 250


"Trading Platform of The Future!"


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 09:49:11 PM
 #578

Zoidberg, is it just you working on boolberry at the moment or do you have other developers working on a wallet, one working on pool software etc?
Doesn't answer if they are splitting the tasks or collaborating but part of your question has been answered here:
Could you answer these questions:
- How many developers are in the team?
- Are you looking for more developers (can people contribute on GitHub) and or other help (translations, etc.)?
- Can you announce the launch more than one day in advance? You want the launch to be perceived as open and honest as possible.
I agree, it is good to see a fork with active discussion before release and dev that listens to comments.
I too am interested in the answers to these questions.
1. To be honest - we are two developers who are familiar with CryptoNote code, as you could see by our commits.
2. At this moment we don't really need help with development, mostly because core changes have to be done very careful and focused. But later after network launch of course developers are wellcome especially expirienced developers - we have a lot of work todo! But what we really need - is technical writer, translations, designer, someone to help us to support this forum.
3. Two days befor launch is ok ?
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Who cares?


View Profile
May 24, 2014, 09:49:17 PM
 #579

How many coin in a block actually?

~17
KeyserSozeMC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


I'm dying.


View Profile WWW
May 24, 2014, 11:29:16 PM
 #580

Hi folks.


Is there any trading thread?


Hey, smexy. Don't waste your time. Time's precious.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 486 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!