[BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014

[clintar2]

Here are some peers if anyone needs them.

Code:

--add-priority-node 52.15.111.162:10101 --add-priority-node 78.47.186.74:10101 --add-priority-node 5.9.44.154:10101 --add-priority-node 213.186.170.110:10101 --add-priority-node 218.58.75.24:10101

[1713613760]

1713613760

[1713613760]

1713613760

[1713613760]

1713613760

[1713613760]

1713613760

[1713613760]

1713613760

[PGPpfKkx]

so boolberry went up 100% cause devs appeard on slack? haha what will happen when they will actually make an announcement did I miss something? were is the best place to get news?

[tyz]

That's are really good news. However, I would wait some more time until a real progress in code is confirmed. From my experience, the return of main developers is not enough for a 100%+ price increase.

return of CZ?

he was on slack yesterday for first time

The BBR community is back! Looking like BBR may try and take lead in Cryptonote development again.

Don't wait to load up, we could see $1 very soon 😉

[Coinopoly]

That's are really good news. However, I would wait some more time until a real progress in code is confirmed. From my experience, the return of main developers is not enough for a 100%+ price increase.

Fortune favours the bold. We've covered the full opportunity of what a potential game changer crypto_zoidberg's return can mean for the currency and the cryptonote vertical.
https://coinopoly.xyz/monero-boolberry-and-the-return-of-crypto_zoidberg/

If a potential investor factors in the developmental efforts already happening with 1blockology and co.. Then combine that with efforts to improve other aspects of the project from within the community i.e. instructional videos, graphics, GUI etc., then there has never been a better time to take up a position in Boolberry. The success of a project shouldn't wrest on the shoulders of one person but instead upon the entirety of a proactive community.

On a related note, we've covered the latest Boolberry price action: https://coinopoly.xyz/boolberry-price-analysis-bbrbtc-bullish/

[btc-mike]

On a related note, we've covered the latest Boolberry price action: https://coinopoly.xyz/boolberry-price-analysis-bbrbtc-bullish/

Article is fairly accurate.

[MofoMF]

 ./minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://bbr.poolto.be:21005 -u  -p x
[2017-02-02 13:33:56] Using JSON-RPC 2.0
[2017-02-02 13:33:56] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://bbr.poolto.be:21005
[2017-02-02 13:33:56] 23 miner threads started, using 'cryptonight' algorithm.
[2017-02-02 13:33:57] Requested work before work was received
[2017-02-02 13:35:50] Requested work before work was received


Does nothing

[MofoMF]

I dont understand why we have to struggle in order to help u and mine ur stupid coin,why in the hell ure not offering a bounty for a coder to compile a miner for every linux os,do u have an ideea on how hard is to compile on different linux systems ? like redhat centos and so on ? Do ur fucking job,i`m sick of stupid developers that dosent help people in order to make us easyier to mine ur fking coin!

[MofoMF]

I allways have to install tons of libraries,to change the gcc version from 4.7 to 4.9 then to change ur mom with ur dad and so on,useless morons

[1blockologist]

Bi-weekly update crossposted here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1611499.msg17703869#msg17703869

Boolberry Network Address February 1, 2017

Rebranding
Coinopoly and their team has finalized marketing and rebranding direction for the Boolberry project. The announcement post has been updated with the graphics and the ticker symbol XBB has been submitted to several exchanges, including Poloniex.

At one point, XBR was floated but this was relegated for several reasons:
1) Brent Crude Oil trades under the XBR symbol
2) Apparently some traders type 'bb' into autocomplete text fields on exchanges to get to the boolberry symbol.\

XBB represents an international standard bringing it Boolberry markets in line with Gold (XAU), as well as Bitcoin (XBT) as well as other cryptonote networks such as Monero (XMR) and XDN (DigitalNote).

Although the price appreciation limits the necessity to let people understand that Boolberry has a team and direction, with the free advertising it provides, the depth of this push is made more apparent.

The acronym is merely a ticker symbol.



Donation Process

I will be engaging active members of the community to hold keys to multisignature BITCOIN addresses, to help decentralize the funding process.

CryptoZoidberg and additional developers

Cryptozoidberg appeared in the slack channel! Not much was said, and a confirmation on bitcointalk would be interesting to members. Clintar, a former contributor and current boolberry mining pool operator, also simultaneously joined, and gave much needed tech support to new boolberry network miners contributors.

Seed Nodes

This is still a work in progress, and will be released alongside:

BINARIES!

Boolberry will be easy to install across platforms as binaries will be released with the latest updates and autoconnecting to seed nodes.

Interest

Blockchain Development Company gets the attention of financial professionals outside of the cryptocurrency world for a variety of reasons. And this in turn gets people interested in Boolberry.

Silicon Valley Bank's compliance department has been circulating the research paper for months. Yes, the meme paper. The paper wasn't written for cryptocurrency analysts that take themselves too seriously, it was written for people that wouldn't be interested enough to read 19 pages. And it does pretty well.

I met with a CME Group representative as well.

This should give some insight into the flows seen coming into Boolberry and where they come from.

Community

With the marketing updates and branding pattern, a bigger push will be done to secure outreach vessels, such as a site and twitter.

As the most public person on the project, I'll accept all criticism, but make sure to also direct accolades at the contributors

[1blockologist]

I dont understand why we have to struggle in order to help u and mine ur stupid coin,why in the hell ure not offering a bounty for a coder to compile a miner for every linux os,do u have an ideea on how hard is to compile on different linux systems ? like redhat centos and so on ? Do ur fucking job,i`m sick of stupid developers that dosent help people in order to make us easyier to mine ur fking coin!

yes, I'm aware

You can contribute by making note of exactly what problems you encounter and I can update the readme on the github project. (You can also submit pull requests to the readme as well).

Binaries also in the works

[MofoMF]

 make -j
mkdir -p build/release
cd build/release && cmake -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ../..
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindBoost.cmake:1138 (message):
  Unable to find the requested Boost libraries.

  Boost version: 1.41.0

  Boost include path: /usr/include

  Detected version of Boost is too old.  Requested version was 1.53 (or
  newer).
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  CMakeLists.txt:120 (find_package)


-- Found Git: /usr/bin/git
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
See also "/tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".
make: *** [cmake-release] Error 1


Its too hard and takes too long to keep fixing every single library,i waisted over 4 hours trying to compile it on centos and redhat,i dont want to upgrade my os,resolved this boost problem but i forgot how,anyway after keeps getting me other error from other library and so on,its easyier to be compiled static by ur guys and just paste the link.
Compile it for Centons 5* and RedHat static ..

 cmake -D STATIC=ON -D ARCH="x86-64" -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ../..
-- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.4.7
-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.4.7
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- works
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done
-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++
-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- works
-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info
-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done
-- Looking for include file pthread.h
-- Looking for include file pthread.h - found
-- Looking for pthread_create
-- Looking for pthread_create - not found
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthreads
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthreads - not found
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthread
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found
-- Found Threads: TRUE
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindBoost.cmake:1138 (message):
  Unable to find the requested Boost libraries.

  Boost version: 1.41.0

  Boost include path: /usr/include

  Detected version of Boost is too old.  Requested version was 1.53 (or
  newer).
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  CMakeLists.txt:120 (find_package)


-- Found Git: /usr/bin/git
-- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python (found version "2.6.6")
-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
See also "/tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".





-----
cmake -D STATIC=ON -D ARCH="x86-64" -D CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release ../..
-- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.4.7
-- The CXX compiler identification is unknown
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc
-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- works
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info
-- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done
-- Detecting C compile features
-- Detecting C compile features - done
-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++
-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- broken
CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-3.7/Modules/CMakeTestCXXCompiler.cmake:44 (message):
  The C++ compiler "/usr/bin/c++" is not able to compile a simple test
  program.

  It fails with the following output:

   Change Dir: /tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp



  Run Build Command:"/usr/bin/gmake" "cmTC_e5f49/fast"

  /usr/bin/gmake -f CMakeFiles/cmTC_e5f49.dir/build.make
  CMakeFiles/cmTC_e5f49.dir/build

  gmake[1]: Entering directory
  `/tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp'

  Building CXX object CMakeFiles/cmTC_e5f49.dir/testCXXCompiler.cxx.o

  /usr/bin/c++ -o CMakeFiles/cmTC_e5f49.dir/testCXXCompiler.cxx.o -c
  /tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/testCXXCompiler.cxx

  c++: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No such file or directory

  gmake[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/cmTC_e5f49.dir/testCXXCompiler.cxx.o] Error 1

  gmake[1]: Leaving directory
  `/tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp'

  gmake: *** [cmTC_e5f49/fast] Error 2





  CMake will not be able to correctly generate this project.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  CMakeLists.txt:3 (PROJECT)


-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!
See also "/tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log".
See also "/tmp/boolberry/build/release/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log".

[MofoMF]

No its not,its bullshit,last miners that people made are for ubuntu,guess what,me and other thousands people dont use ubuntu

[MofoMF]

I`ll be start mining this shit when i`ll receive an link with compiled miner that works on every linux

[dga]

I`ll be start mining this shit when i`ll receive an link with compiled miner that works on every linux

You're running a version of Boost that was released in 2009.  Centos 5 hits support EOL in two months.

The crypto software might be trying to tell you something important.

[RXTRR]

any particular reason for the persistant price increases? will we have a new roadmap for this year? i'm holding quite a large amount for long term, not fussed with short term play.

[@bb]

I`ll be start mining this shit when i`ll receive an link with compiled miner that works on every linux

Cool down bro, check this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781961.0

Instead of modifying your system why don't use a thumb drive, so you can make as many thumb drive as many coin system you have, I mean one thumb drive for one coin including wallet and miners.

So your precious data and system is completely seperated from coin system.

For gpu miners thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=693118.0

[equipoise]

None of the old nodes I found are still available or their ports 10101 are not open.

Code:

boolbd --data-dir "D:\BBR_Data" --seed-node 5.255.90.216:10101 --seed-node 66.228.33.249:10101 --seed-node 59.120.166.36:10101 --seed-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --seed-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --seed-node 107.170.97.197:10101 --seed-node 52.15.111.162:10101 --seed-node 78.47.186.74:10101 --seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101 --seed-node 213.186.170.110:10101 --seed-node 218.58.75.24:10101 --seed-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --seed-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --seed-node 107.170.97.197:10101 --seed-node 62.201.213.25:10101 --seed-node 95.85.21.33:10101 --seed-node 107.170.97.197:10101 --seed-node 95.134.54.226:10101 --seed-node 5.9.44.154:10101

After 5 hours:

Code:

2017-Feb-02 18:11:59.411055 [P2P1]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds

[clintar2]

I allways have to install tons of libraries,to change the gcc version from 4.7 to 4.9 then to change ur mom with ur dad and so on,useless morons

Maybe mining isn't for you. which distro and version are you running with that old of boost?

[jwinterm]

Hi folk

I am all out of BBR, sold the remainder of what I had on recent little pump. I am currently the top mod on /r/Boolberry though. I messaged /u/boolberry who is second a couple of days ago to see if he wanted absolute control in anticipation, but he hasn't replied.

At the moment, if I remove /u/boolberry and myself, then shadowcoin guy Sebastian will be top on mod list. So, I just wanted to see if clintar or any other folks that have been around since beginning want control, or I should just let /u/boolberry or sebsebastian have it. clintar? dga? Space lobster? Shojayxt?

[clintar2]

Hi folk

I am all out of BBR, sold the remainder of what I had on recent little pump. I am currently the top mod on /r/Boolberry though. I messaged /u/boolberry who is second a couple of days ago to see if he wanted absolute control in anticipation, but he hasn't replied.

At the moment, if I remove /u/boolberry and myself, then shadowcoin guy Sebastian will be top on mod list. So, I just wanted to see if clintar or any other folks that have been around since beginning want control, or I should just let /u/boolberry or sebsebastian have it. clintar? dga? Space lobster? Shojayxt?

I don't want it. I don't even reddit...