Shifty1down5up
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 11, 2017, 08:30:37 PM |
|
FYI When was the last time you checked the reddit? I have added Rules, given 24hr's notice for you and any others to remove your SPAM, that 24hr period has now since passed and all your spam removed. The only reason it was there for a period was during the swap over of Mods. As for Fluffypony, pay no attention to him he's been hanging about the trollbox recently for one reason and one reason only. He likes to poke his nose in a lot of things he don't know much about, that's why I was laughing at him on trollbox. Just to set the record straight his words on trollbox "BBR was a good project, with only a couple of weird/bad decisions, that was abandoned and has now been picked up by scampumpers". He was then asked something relating to how good of a coder Crypto_Zoidberg was and his reply to that "We have tons of contributors that are significantly more skilled than him, including moneromooo, hyc, vtnerd, etc" When I mentioned his timing on popping up on trollbox he then started to insult me with things like yeah ask your mum, and calling me a turd. So I just decided to laugh at him rather than give him any more attention, he seems to thrive on it. Maybe he has forgot where a lot of there code came from, and some of his comments about how good a coder CZ actually is back in 2014. People can make there own minds on that, but for someone in his posistion that feels the need to go on Trollbox and throw mud at other projects, doesn't say much for him. Maybe he should take a leaf out of Charles Hoskinsons or 1Blockologists book, all i hear coming from these guys is about collaboration and improving the whole Blockchain tech. [/quote] I've been there everyday. Those junk post you said would be deleted are still there. As u know at Reddit whoever has the sub can pretty much go full censor and rid anything they deems negative which in it itself not bad that negative things are there but it feels abandoned. Fair enough I'm not on Slack and not in the know on that front. The negative things you have heard form Fluff were worse than I got. I simply asked about A and BBR and he simply said was victim of scampump and nothing negative about the project. Good for you on taking the high road. And I saw you give the "Dr Monero" shill way more patience and latitude than deserved, given that he has deleted his user name since. My user name here and on Reddit is the same as is yours. Mind I ask your name over in the troll box? Thanks for replying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Big Naturals
|
 |
February 11, 2017, 09:15:01 PM |
|
Does BBR have any bootstrap download to speed up sync time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jansaa
|
 |
February 12, 2017, 04:23:29 AM |
|
Does BBR have any bootstrap download to speed up sync time?
BBR not Synchronous unstable at this time
|
|
|
|
|
|
losoya
|
 |
February 12, 2017, 11:19:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Big Naturals
|
 |
February 13, 2017, 02:14:44 AM |
|
Does BBR have any bootstrap download to speed up sync time?
BBR not Synchronous unstable at this time Ok, it would really help adoption if the dev team could organise Lite wallet Remote node to connect to Bootstrap download I bought some bbr, but moving them around is very difficult, I don't have good internet access
|
|
|
|
|
|
crypto_zoidberg (OP)
|
 |
February 13, 2017, 10:53:11 AM |
|
ABOUT CHANGING TOKEN NAME: I never initiated/accepted changing it from original BBR to anything else, this project will be developed by original name, whatever else is not related to this project.
I guess we don't need "BBR-classic" here at the moment
Peace! Zoidberg
|
|
|
|
|
bitpotter
|
 |
February 13, 2017, 11:06:12 AM |
|
ABOUT CHANGING TOKEN NAME: I never initiated/accepted changing it from original BBR to anything else, this project will be developed by original name, whatever else is not related to this project.
I guess we don't need "BBR-classic" here at the moment
Peace! Zoidberg
I do not expect there will be a "classic" in boolberry, do not like cryptocoin others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wesiematic
|
 |
February 13, 2017, 11:58:29 AM |
|
And Boolberry is really a nice name, classy and unique.
|
there is always a light at the end of the tunnel...
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
 |
February 13, 2017, 01:53:40 PM |
|
And Boolberry is really a nice name, classy and unique.
I like Boolberry too. I know there was a lot of people wanting to change it. At first I was not overly keen however after a while the name kind of grabs you and does stand out against the other names. I hope we retain the name. Reading what other have posted here that some xmr coders have been saying about bbr coders I hope that inspires some kind of passion to shut them up and bring them down a peg or two. Sure they have a good coin but no need for saying all of that stuff. I didn't have much xmr but I'm no way getting more of it now. If you're already at the top why feel the need to spout all that about projects that are apparently insignificant. If CZ, block, and ghosts team all worked on BBR why could it not start to rival xmr over a period of time. If we can allLget along why not build this coin back to be a real competitor? Why not expand the dev tax to a decent level like other coins 5-10% and split it to the dev teams for milestones completed? Be good if we knew the devs wallets addresses so we can see what's going on and who is dumping what. I mean reasonable selling to fund is good but mass dumps especially from huge dev wallets is damaging
|
|
|
|
|
myxamop
|
 |
February 15, 2017, 10:31:34 AM |
|
Got this 2017-Feb-15 13:30:11.482038 [P2P7]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds 2017-Feb-15 13:30:13.493096 [P2P2]Connecting to 107.170.228.11:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:18.501810 [P2P2]Connect failed to 107.170.228.11:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:18.509959 [P2P2]Connecting to 107.170.97.197:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:19.893200 [P2P2]Connect failed to 107.170.97.197:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:19.899714 [P2P2]Connecting to 188.226.215.102:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:21.029640 [P2P2]Connect failed to 188.226.215.102:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:21.035445 [P2P2]Connecting to 128.199.196.65:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:23.034797 [P2P2]Connect failed to 128.199.196.65:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:23.045237 [P2P2]Connecting to 107.170.228.11:10101(white=1, last_seen: never).. can't sync 
|
|
|
|
|
7R01
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
February 15, 2017, 04:50:13 PM |
|
When is the next bi-weekly coming out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
clintar2
|
 |
February 16, 2017, 03:40:20 AM |
|
Got this 2017-Feb-15 13:30:11.482038 [P2P7]Failed to connect to any of seed peers, continuing without seeds 2017-Feb-15 13:30:13.493096 [P2P2]Connecting to 107.170.228.11:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:18.501810 [P2P2]Connect failed to 107.170.228.11:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:18.509959 [P2P2]Connecting to 107.170.97.197:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:19.893200 [P2P2]Connect failed to 107.170.97.197:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:19.899714 [P2P2]Connecting to 188.226.215.102:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:21.029640 [P2P2]Connect failed to 188.226.215.102:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:21.035445 [P2P2]Connecting to 128.199.196.65:10101(white=1, last_seen: never)... 2017-Feb-15 13:30:23.034797 [P2P2]Connect failed to 128.199.196.65:10101 2017-Feb-15 13:30:23.045237 [P2P2]Connecting to 107.170.228.11:10101(white=1, last_seen: never).. can't sync  try this https://www.reddit.com/r/boolberry/comments/5rhvq3/connecting_to_bbr_peers_for_the_first_time/
|
|
|
|
|
|
1blockologist
|
 |
February 16, 2017, 03:55:16 AM |
|
cross posting from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1611499.msg17867770#msg17867770Boolberry Network Address February 15, 2017DonationsThe donations have allowed us to bring more developers on, alongside our servers. Any criticism about how much code we’ve pushed since November is completely accurate and we are working on it. The structure of the donations is still in the process of being modified. The structure will be a 3-of-4 multisig bitcoin address. A 3-of-4 multisig bitcoin address will allow for transparent holding of the funds, as well as the inability for any one person to move funds. For accounting purposes, an HD wallet is being pursued, as this will allow the community to fund individual projects by address without adding administrative burdens to the multisig key holders. I attempted to use Bitpay’s CoPay app for this, where some community members were invited to hold the keys. Unfortunately, upon further inspection it turns out that CoPay is missing a crucial feature for being able to control addresses within the wallet. So we will be switching to Electrum. The bitpay project was notified and this can be followed here: https://github.com/bitpay/copay/issues/5568Please don’t donate to the prior donation addresses, as I would like to provide more transparency to the community. RebrandingAll of the exchanges are aware of the XBB ticker symbol, and poloniex already redirects the URL for the BTC_XBB market to Boolberry. The ticker symbol has nothing to do with the name of the asset. This is just preparation for including Boolberry in more larger and more liquid markets. CommunityThe real Crypto_zoidberg clarified that there were people masquerading as him and that he has his own slack channel. Investors should understand that Crypto_zoidberg is not collaborating with us in any way. Investors should also understand that this is good for the network whether we collaborate or not. The vision is clear, and Crpyto_zoidberg either helps us with it, or randomly releases an improved Boolberry client that also accomplishes the vision. All nodes on the network will be able to sign transactions with the wild keccak algorithm and accept the same blocks. There is zero disagreement on anybody’s roadmap. Also note, that I will pull from more advanced open source code if it exists. The reddit page is again administered by myself, alongside javajared and crypjunkie and sebsebastion. Twitter and other social outreach/management is in progress and will administered by several people with access controls. MarketsA lot of Boolberry changed hands during the past two weeks, and the volume and liquidity in the secondary market stays improved. Newcomers should be aware of the vision, and why larger holders are buying Boolberry. These are still the very early days of the network, and people are willing to accumulate at prices 100% above the last person because of that.
|
|
|
|
forzendiablo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000
the grandpa of cryptos
|
 |
February 16, 2017, 04:47:00 AM |
|
this was scam pump, grats who made money of it
|
yolo
|
|
|
|
1blockologist
|
 |
February 16, 2017, 04:03:55 PM Last edit: February 16, 2017, 04:19:28 PM by 1blockologist |
|
this was scam pump, grats who made money of it
It was at least a few people buying  I've routinely bought at prices 100% above what the prior market price was in order to accumulate a position due to lack of liquidity. I assume other people do as well. It is fine to ignore the speculators that jump on an asset just because the chart printed a higher number or percent. None of the trollbox analysts have ever been correct about the reasoning for price action in Boolberry, I've read most of it.
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1119
|
 |
February 16, 2017, 04:19:57 PM |
|
...
All nodes on the network will be able to sign transactions with the wild keccak algorithm and accept the same blocks.
...
Look, I'm not trying to troll (OK maybe a little bit). I don't have any BBR anymore and don't plan to grab any. I turned over the subreddit to you guys and don't post here or there anymore. But based on the above sentence it would appear you have no idea how the Cryptonote/Boolberry protocol works, and I can't understand how anyone with a modicum of technical knowledge would have any confidence in your "Blockchain Development Company". Wild Keccak is the proof-of-work hashing algorithm - you don't sign a transaction with the proof-of-work, not in Bitcoin and not in Cryptonotes. You sign transactions with your private key, in Bitcoin using ECDSA, and in Cryptonotes using EdDSA. And although it might be technically correct in Bitcoin to say that nodes sign transactions, since the node and wallet software are bundled up in one program, that's not the case with Cryptonotes. I mean, I'm not even that technically proficient with this stuff, but cmon man. Hopefully zoidberg can randomly release some software that accomplishes "the vision".
|
|
|
|
|
|
1blockologist
|
 |
February 16, 2017, 06:29:33 PM Last edit: February 16, 2017, 06:42:52 PM by 1blockologist |
|
...
All nodes on the network will be able to sign transactions with the wild keccak algorithm and accept the same blocks.
...
Look, I'm not trying to troll (OK maybe a little bit). I don't have any BBR anymore and don't plan to grab any. I turned over the subreddit to you guys and don't post here or there anymore. But based on the above sentence it would appear you have no idea how the Cryptonote/Boolberry protocol works, and I can't understand how anyone with a modicum of technical knowledge would have any confidence in your "Blockchain Development Company". Wild Keccak is the proof-of-work hashing algorithm - you don't sign a transaction with the proof-of-work, not in Bitcoin and not in Cryptonotes. You sign transactions with your private key, in Bitcoin using ECDSA, and in Cryptonotes using EdDSA. And although it might be technically correct in Bitcoin to say that nodes sign transactions, since the node and wallet software are bundled up in one program, that's not the case with Cryptonotes. I mean, I'm not even that technically proficient with this stuff, but cmon man. Hopefully zoidberg can randomly release some software that accomplishes "the vision". good catch, you're right I worded that wrong! the point is that the nodes are compatible and this is merely intended to be a more featured client on the network. Analogous to how there is BitcoinJ - a java implementation of bitcoin which all of the mobile apps use. If the other client doesn't get updated and people don't want the miners tax then people won't use it, but it won't be incompatible. There is a protocol that it follows.
|
|
|
|
|
crypto jerk
|
 |
February 17, 2017, 06:14:51 PM |
|
ABOUT CHANGING TOKEN NAME: I never initiated/accepted changing it from original BBR to anything else, this project will be developed by original name, whatever else is not related to this project.
I guess we don't need "BBR-classic" here at the moment
Peace! Zoidberg
Your music is bad, and you should feel bad.  Why argue with a space crab throwing a temper tantrum?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
versprichnix
|
 |
February 18, 2017, 12:30:23 AM |
|
The XBB rename did not work as expected: no pump, no stupid greeds left to dump on.
|
|
|
|
|
|