Oh boy. I guess it was that obvious that your interest was mainly on the trademark. I tried to see beyond that but i guess others were right. You cared mostly to secure them so you could continue with your own projects. Not so much interested in karma as a coin. needed the Karma trademark so you could advance with Strength in numbers.
That's not true. At all. Strength in Numbers has been supporting Clean Water Coin and offered the same level of support to Karma!
I don't blame you for going after what you wanted but you did rattled up our members here. Always one sentence pointing how karma is not working and 5 sentences how well your doing something for 2give and the other. It was so annoying to see that.
I have apologized to anyone who respectfully engages in dialogue and not personal attacks. If I have said anything that people do not want to hear, that's not my role. Karma today is "broken" because it only focuses on the "pump and dump" interaction between miners and investors. Everyone outside of this community recognizes that and that is why you are having a hard time inviting more people to use the coin.
Here is a content from the link you posted. :
It's very early but here is what we are thinking:
1. 2Give would have a larger POS base of coins than Givecoin 1.0
2. Strength in Numbers Foundation (SNF) would offer an equitable exchange (example 2:1 or 3:1 depending on the new total supply) to all current Givecoin 1.0 holders -- those coins would be held in visible provable address for a period of time and then likely destroyed at the end of the exchange period (expected to be open for at least 90 days)
3. SNF could use additional blocks of coins to attract other coinbase holders to exchange their coins for 2Give -- for example, we could invite Karma holders to switch to 2Give since that is also recently changed to X11 based.
4. The plan to do the "2Give2Get" program where we would reward people for SENDING coins to new users means having a cache of coins to reward the senders.
Please do not do this. I hope your not going to stick around to keep gloating over your coins and ask people here to exchange coins. We do not need you to do that. I allowed you to talk about your other coins because it seems like you wanted to help out around here and i thought you were using them as reference.
I have no intention of trying to "steal" anything from the Karma community. If people want to voluntarily join us, that is their choice. I am a very humble person and do not GLOAT -- it serves no one's purpose. Pride can be an ugly sin.
We appreciate your concern with our coin but we can handle it. there is no need for you to come over here and help us out by doing nothing but downtalk karma and gloat on your projects.
Good luck with your services and projects.
ps: i have a feeling you misinterpret Kosmost trademarks. You probably are not fully on the clear. But please when you figure out that.pm kosmost. don't come back here pretending you want to help all over.
I'm not downtalking Karma -- I have been trying very hard to help you understand that Karma needs a PURPOSE and a UTILITY in order to generate VALUE. Nothing has changed with that position.
Thank you for your encouraging words of support -- please let me know what you want me to do with the 1M Karma you sent to
https://doabitofgood.com -- I am happy to make the donation to the #bit4bit fund in your name or return them, your choice.
And to be 100% clear -- 2Give is not meant to be the utility coin envisioned in our Trademark application. That is a part of the IDCoins project for Reputation.
And speaking of the Trademark -- we hired a law firm to do the work -- something no one here seems willing to do, so I'm quite confident in the value of ours versus the "Service Mark" for financial services that Kosmost owns. If you don't believe me please, go hire one yourself.
Like it or not, so long as Do a Bit of Good accepts and holds Karma, we are "Stakeholders" and have every right to represent our interests.
So let's keep this conversation peaceful out of respect please.
-dvd
