Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2026, 11:28:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 32.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 [218] 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 ... 2132 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency  (Read 4678017 times)
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 12:36:02 PM
 #4341

I see a hash rate increase on my machine - try running with number of threads = number of physical cores. Maybe even one less. It's counterintuitive but I guess taking advantage of hyperthreading negates the impact of the hardware optimisations?

the increase is not significant +30H/s (regardless of processor intel)(Win x64)
AMD-error

Thats significant if your running a few 100 processors...
DemocraticRepublicOfDave
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 12:44:07 PM
 #4342

Hi All,

I'm new to monero and have just upgraded my pc to 14.04 and got simplewallet going with a receiving address.

I have just done my first test transfer of a small amount of MNO from poloniex to my wallet.  Poloniex gave me a transaction id that can look up in the block explorer. However in simple wallet I get :

Code:
[wallet xxxxx]: balance
balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
[wallet xxxxx]: incoming_transfers
No incoming transfers
[wallet xxxxx]: bc_height
61756

NOTE: transaction lookup on poloniex refers to a block hight less than 61756, so my wallet is in sync.

Q. How long does it take for a transaction to be logged in the receiving wallet?

I am wondering whether this wait is normal, or something has already gone wrong.

Cheers

Dave
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 12:49:46 PM
 #4343

Hi All,

I'm new to monero and have just upgraded my pc to 14.04 and got simplewallet going with a receiving address.

I have just done my first test transfer of a small amount of MNO from poloniex to my wallet.  Poloniex gave me a transaction id that can look up in the block explorer. However in simple wallet I get :

Code:
[wallet xxxxx]: balance
balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
[wallet xxxxx]: incoming_transfers
No incoming transfers
[wallet xxxxx]: bc_height
61756

NOTE: transaction lookup on poloniex refers to a block hight less than 61756, so my wallet is in sync.

Q. How long does it take for a transaction to be logged in the receiving wallet?

I am wondering whether this wait is normal, or something has already gone wrong.

Cheers

Dave

Withdrawals and deposits to Poloniex are ropey at best. If it doesn't appear in an hour or so I'd jump in the troll box and get a mod to sort it.
equipoise
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 794
Merit: 1000


Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable


View Profile WWW
May 29, 2014, 01:03:47 PM
 #4344

Hi All,

I'm new to monero and have just upgraded my pc to 14.04 and got simplewallet going with a receiving address.

I have just done my first test transfer of a small amount of MNO from poloniex to my wallet.  Poloniex gave me a transaction id that can look up in the block explorer. However in simple wallet I get :

Code:
[wallet xxxxx]: balance
balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
[wallet xxxxx]: incoming_transfers
No incoming transfers
[wallet xxxxx]: bc_height
61756

NOTE: transaction lookup on poloniex refers to a block hight less than 61756, so my wallet is in sync.

Q. How long does it take for a transaction to be logged in the receiving wallet?

I am wondering whether this wait is normal, or something has already gone wrong.

Cheers

Dave
Enter "refresh" in the wallet.

About me | zRMicroArray - phase 2 - Gene Expression Analysis software | [Weed Like to Talk - Bulgaria] Start a wave of cannabis seminars in Europe | Monero weighted average price stats: moneroprice.i2p
BTC: 1KoCX7TWKVGwqmmFw3CKyUSrKRSStueZar | NMC: NKhYEYpe1Le9MwHrwKsdSm5617J4toVar9 | XMR (Tip me a beer OpenAlias Monero address): tip.changetheworldwork.com
[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency: 4AyRmUcxzefB5quumzK3HNE4zmCiGc8vhG6fE1oJpGVyVZF7fvDgSpt3MzgLfQ6Q1719xQhmfkM9Z2u NXgDMqYhjJVmc6KX
Zer0Sum
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 01:09:12 PM
 #4345

Hi All,

I'm new to monero and have just upgraded my pc to 14.04 and got simplewallet going with a receiving address.

I have just done my first test transfer of a small amount of MNO from poloniex to my wallet.  Poloniex gave me a transaction id that can look up in the block explorer. However in simple wallet I get :

Code:
[wallet xxxxx]: balance
balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
[wallet xxxxx]: incoming_transfers
No incoming transfers
[wallet xxxxx]: bc_height
61756

NOTE: transaction lookup on poloniex refers to a block hight less than 61756, so my wallet is in sync.

Q. How long does it take for a transaction to be logged in the receiving wallet?

I am wondering whether this wait is normal, or something has already gone wrong.

Cheers

Dave

Withdrawals and deposits to Poloniex are ropey at best. If it doesn't appear in an hour or so I'd jump in the troll box and get a mod to sort it.

I've had 20 poloniex withdrawals that completed in about 1 minute...
And 2 that resulted in the "COMPLETE:ERROR" thing in the log (but none in 2-3 days).

They check the logs and fix it... I've never had to write a Trouble Ticket.
DemocraticRepublicOfDave
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 77
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 01:10:51 PM
 #4346

Hi All,

I'm new to monero and have just upgraded my pc to 14.04 and got simplewallet going with a receiving address.

I have just done my first test transfer of a small amount of MNO from poloniex to my wallet.  Poloniex gave me a transaction id that can look up in the block explorer. However in simple wallet I get :

Code:
[wallet xxxxx]: balance
balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000
[wallet xxxxx]: incoming_transfers
No incoming transfers
[wallet xxxxx]: bc_height
61756

NOTE: transaction lookup on poloniex refers to a block hight less than 61756, so my wallet is in sync.

Q. How long does it take for a transaction to be logged in the receiving wallet?

I am wondering whether this wait is normal, or something has already gone wrong.

Cheers

Dave
Enter "refresh" in the wallet.

Hi,

Aha - that did it.  So it's manual sync between bitmonerod and simplewallet at the moment.  Got it.

Many thanks.

This coin holds some promise I think.

Cheers

Dave
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 01:58:48 PM
 #4347

If you're getting an error - your CPU doesn't have AES-NI. I detect it at build time rather than run time because it cuts down on branching.
Works on the newer FX-8320 Smiley
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 02:12:11 PM
 #4348

All right, people. You asked for Win64 binaries of the optimized miner, and finally, they're here. You want Win64 flavor - this thread is where you want to be: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=619373
There is no increase in hash rate with this Windows release compared to bitmonerod.exe
Did you compiled it with the intel compiler or it's mingw/cygwin? I hope when those changes are merged to the bitmonerod / simpleminer / simplewallet and it's compilled with the intel compiler there will be a real increase in hash rate so I could continue to solo mine.

I see a hash rate increase on my machine - try running with number of threads = number of physical cores. Maybe even one less. It's counterintuitive but I guess taking advantage of hyperthreading negates the impact of the hardware optimisations?

I get 30H/s more running 7 threads instead of 8. Guess that works lol. Still kind of weird. I'll gladly take it though. Less cpu load (it seems), lower temps, I'm able to use my computer more easily while mining and chrome remote desktop doesn't lag to hell.
xxnirvana69xx
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 52
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 02:48:52 PM
 #4349

Make that over 80H/s, but I also was running 8 threads on the last version instead of trying one less.
18602981897
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 151
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 03:28:06 PM
 #4350

Voting on Mintpal

BTC:14NxNcYM5WFG7N9NmcQioT5JxZjh5dbTET
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 04:18:55 PM
 #4351

There's a bug inherited by all CryptoNote coins where a transaction gets stuck in the tx_pool because of disagreements between the wallet and daemon. When this happens, your tx fails and doesn't show up on the blockchain, but you start seeing spent key image errors when trying to spend again. This will be fixed in the next release, but for now if you want to send large amounts, do it in batches less than 100 MRO.
GreekBitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001


getmonero.org


View Profile WWW
May 29, 2014, 04:20:06 PM
 #4352

There's a bug inherited by all CryptoNote coins where a transaction gets stuck in the tx_pool because of disagreements between the wallet and daemon. When this happens, your tx fails and doesn't show up on the blockchain, but you start seeing spent key image errors when trying to spend again. This will be fixed in the next release, but for now if you want to send large amounts, do it in batches less than 100 MRO.

Do you think lost coins can be found in the future?
huhliki.k
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 04:30:09 PM
 #4353

For those of you on Win 64, I think I managed to get your hashrate closer to that of the *nix implementation. Haven't tested it, I don't use Windows.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-experimental.zip

Less (=) H/s, try somebody else.
eizh
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 29, 2014, 04:34:04 PM
 #4354

There's a bug inherited by all CryptoNote coins where a transaction gets stuck in the tx_pool because of disagreements between the wallet and daemon. When this happens, your tx fails and doesn't show up on the blockchain, but you start seeing spent key image errors when trying to spend again. This will be fixed in the next release, but for now if you want to send large amounts, do it in batches less than 100 MRO.

Do you think lost coins can be found in the future?

They're not lost. A transaction can only spend a limited amount of time stuck in tx_pool. You should be able to send successfully after some time with a fixed wallet.
hashnine
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 04:55:30 PM
 #4355

For those of you on Win 64, I think I managed to get your hashrate closer to that of the *nix implementation. Haven't tested it, I don't use Windows.

https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-experimental.zip

+6 H/s on i5

Careful XC anonymous coin is a scam
huhliki.k
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 04:59:56 PM
 #4356

 -9 h/s i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30 GHz
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Who cares?


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 05:01:11 PM
 #4357

+30 Hash on fx-8320
huhliki.k
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 05:03:29 PM
 #4358

+30 Hash on fx-8320
compared to what? https://ottrbutt.com/cpuminer-multi/cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014.zip   ?
huhliki.k
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 05:10:03 PM
Last edit: May 29, 2014, 05:21:23 PM by huhliki.k
 #4359

Xeon x5690 =
Xeon x5687 =
blaaaaacksuit
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Who cares?


View Profile
May 29, 2014, 05:10:14 PM
 #4360


230h/s ---> 260-270H/s
Pages: « 1 ... 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 [218] 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 ... 2132 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!