ComputerGenie
|
|
April 20, 2017, 04:24:43 PM |
|
...stuff...
No one, much less the whole community, needs to spend that much time trying to convince an exchange to stay a delisting. The fact that they are delisting a "cause coin" is, in fact, representative of the fact that they have already made up their mind and pages of a forum thread aren't going to matter.
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
kopija
|
|
April 21, 2017, 03:56:53 AM |
|
...stuff...
No one, much less the whole community, needs to spend that much time trying to convince an exchange to stay a delisting. The fact that they are delisting a "cause coin" is, in fact, representative of the fact that they have already made up their mind and pages of a forum thread aren't going to matter. Not forum threads but "passionate pleas from community" might help: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.msg18666570#msg18666570So stop assuming and make a "passionate plea" instead!
|
we are nothing but a smart contracts on a cosmic blockchain
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
April 21, 2017, 04:17:31 AM |
|
...stuff...
No one, much less the whole community, needs to spend that much time trying to convince an exchange to stay a delisting. The fact that they are delisting a "cause coin" is, in fact, representative of the fact that they have already made up their mind and pages of a forum thread aren't going to matter. Not forum threads but "passionate pleas from community" might help: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.msg18666570#msg18666570So stop assuming and make a "passionate plea" instead! My bad, I should have said "pages of Twatter posts" and not "pages of a forum thread".
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
FifthGhostbuster
|
|
April 22, 2017, 10:34:51 PM Last edit: April 22, 2017, 10:50:20 PM by FifthGhostbuster |
|
where is cure 2.0
We are currently doing an internal beta test, trying to work out some bugs before the public beta. I can't say how long it will take, but we have made many improvements and we are getting closer.
|
Go CureCoin!
|
|
|
mamamae
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1188
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 22, 2017, 11:28:06 PM |
|
very good i hope poloniex will retrace the delisting decision
where is cure 2.0
We are currently doing an internal beta test, trying to work out some bugs before the public beta. I can't say how long it will take, but we have made many improvements and we are getting closer.
|
reality ? you fell to Scammers after being in an ICO , IPO (more like any other stock and index in the world ICO or not got your portfolio down 25 % or 85 %) Now SEC is helping you getting back up your lost money maybe....
|
|
|
FifthGhostbuster
|
|
April 22, 2017, 11:41:36 PM |
|
very good i hope poloniex will retrace the delisting decision
where is cure 2.0
We are currently doing an internal beta test, trying to work out some bugs before the public beta. I can't say how long it will take, but we have made many improvements and we are getting closer. I couldn't agree more.
|
Go CureCoin!
|
|
|
eXSn
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
April 23, 2017, 01:59:32 AM |
|
Is there a public facing Slack channel or Telegram group?
|
|
|
|
|
|
InsiderOfCrypto
|
|
April 25, 2017, 06:40:35 AM |
|
those delisting are shocking, lots of people lost fortunes
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
April 25, 2017, 07:09:09 AM |
|
those delisting are shocking, lots of people lost fortunes
If the value of a coin drops significantly because it's no longer on 1 specific exchange, then the value of the coin was small to begin with. In short, if CureCoin doesn't rebound, then the only value it had was tied to people buying it hoping they could find a sucker to pay them more than they paid for it.
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
FifthGhostbuster
|
|
April 25, 2017, 07:48:17 AM |
|
those delisting are shocking, lots of people lost fortunes
If the value of a coin drops significantly because it's no longer on 1 specific exchange, then the value of the coin was small to begin with. In short, if CureCoin doesn't rebound, then the only value it had was tied to people buying it hoping they could find a sucker to pay them more than they paid for it. so I take it you are referring to 95% of alt crypto then... If they got removed from their main exchange I believe the same would happen.
|
Go CureCoin!
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
April 25, 2017, 08:12:53 AM |
|
those delisting are shocking, lots of people lost fortunes
If the value of a coin drops significantly because it's no longer on 1 specific exchange, then the value of the coin was small to begin with. In short, if CureCoin doesn't rebound, then the only value it had was tied to people buying it hoping they could find a sucker to pay them more than they paid for it. so I take it you are referring to 95% of alt crypto then... If they got removed from their main exchange I believe the same would happen. true to an extent but this effect of a polo delisting is magnified with project with little or no development the devs here are not that active and the coding and provable work conducted is tiny compared to other projects. this should have been a hugely successful project and is not due to one reason....the devs treat it like a hobby coin whilst other teams work full time imagine folding coin being retained on polo and cure coin the original and first booted off.... what a joke the project has become of late. early adopters and investors have been losing money for years trying to prop it up
|
|
|
|
eXSn
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
April 25, 2017, 03:41:20 PM |
|
those delisting are shocking, lots of people lost fortunes
If the value of a coin drops significantly because it's no longer on 1 specific exchange, then the value of the coin was small to begin with. In short, if CureCoin doesn't rebound, then the only value it had was tied to people buying it hoping they could find a sucker to pay them more than they paid for it. so I take it you are referring to 95% of alt crypto then... If they got removed from their main exchange I believe the same would happen. true to an extent but this effect of a polo delisting is magnified with project with little or no development the devs here are not that active and the coding and provable work conducted is tiny compared to other projects. this should have been a hugely successful project and is not due to one reason....the devs treat it like a hobby coin whilst other teams work full time imagine folding coin being retained on polo and cure coin the original and first booted off.... what a joke the project has become of late. early adopters and investors have been losing money for years trying to prop it up It's the largest contributor to the Folding@Home project so the impact is definitely there. I think its more of a marketing issue (or lackthereof). I'd hate to see such an interesting project delisted. It's actually doing something good for society.
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
April 25, 2017, 03:50:38 PM |
|
It's the largest contributor to the Folding@Home project so the impact is definitely there...
That's kind of misleading. One can't honestly say that all of the team members would still be members if they could get paid CureCoin (aka more profits) while being any team of their choosing. While I can only personally speak for 1% of the team, I can assure you that if I could get paid in CURE and be on a different team, I would.
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
eXSn
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
April 25, 2017, 04:59:33 PM |
|
It's the largest contributor to the Folding@Home project so the impact is definitely there...
That's kind of misleading. One can't honestly say that all of the team members would still be members if they could get paid CureCoin (aka more profits) while being any team of their choosing. While I can only personally speak for 1% of the team, I can assure you that if I could get paid in CURE and be on a different team, I would. True, though a very solid portion wouldn't be doing it at all if they weren't getting paid. It's also a good gateway into crypto for that community.
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
April 25, 2017, 05:30:25 PM |
|
It's the largest contributor to the Folding@Home project so the impact is definitely there...
That's kind of misleading. One can't honestly say that all of the team members would still be members if they could get paid CureCoin (aka more profits) while being any team of their choosing. While I can only personally speak for 1% of the team, I can assure you that if I could get paid in CURE and be on a different team, I would. True, though a very solid portion wouldn't be doing it at all if they weren't getting paid. It's also a good gateway into crypto for that community. Right. While I admit that CURE is the "staying reason" for folding, what I mean is that if Joe Blow could fold on team "Cure4Diabetes" and get paid CURE for doing so, then it's likely he would be folding for team "Cure4Diabetes" and not team "Curecoin". The stats are basically "padded" in the favor of team "Curecoin", as being on the team is the only way to get CURE in return for folding. It's kind of like multiple car dealers having a sale on the same day and the guy handing out $5 bills bragging because he had the most visitors.
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
eXSn
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
April 25, 2017, 05:44:13 PM |
|
It's the largest contributor to the Folding@Home project so the impact is definitely there...
That's kind of misleading. One can't honestly say that all of the team members would still be members if they could get paid CureCoin (aka more profits) while being any team of their choosing. While I can only personally speak for 1% of the team, I can assure you that if I could get paid in CURE and be on a different team, I would. True, though a very solid portion wouldn't be doing it at all if they weren't getting paid. It's also a good gateway into crypto for that community. Right. While I admit that CURE is the "staying reason" for folding, what I mean is that if Joe Blow could fold on team "Cure4Diabetes" and get paid CURE for doing so, then it's likely he would be folding for team "Cure4Diabetes" and not team "Curecoin". The stats are basically "padded" in the favor of team "Curecoin", as being on the team is the only way to get CURE in return for folding. It's kind of like multiple car dealers having a sale on the same day and the guy handing out $5 bills bragging because he had the most visitors. He still sold the most cars
|
|
|
|
ComputerGenie
|
|
April 25, 2017, 06:02:56 PM |
|
...It's kind of like multiple car dealers having a sale on the same day and the guy handing out $5 bills bragging because he had the most visitors. He still sold the most cars True, but when they are all Ford dealerships, buying from the same supplier who is sponsoring the sale, and the object is to sell Fords, it doesn't matter because they were all Fords bought and sold through the same supplier. The analogy falls a little flat, but surely you can see the point, no?
|
If you have to ask "why?", you wouldn`t understand my answer. Always be on the look out, because you never know when you'll be stalked by hit-men that eat nothing but cream cheese....
|
|
|
eXSn
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
April 26, 2017, 01:25:03 AM |
|
...It's kind of like multiple car dealers having a sale on the same day and the guy handing out $5 bills bragging because he had the most visitors. He still sold the most cars True, but when they are all Ford dealerships, buying from the same supplier who is sponsoring the sale, and the object is to sell Fords, it doesn't matter because they were all Fords bought and sold through the same supplier. The analogy falls a little flat, but surely you can see the point, no? I know what you mean, but the daily difference between #1 and #2 is so large that I wouldn't discount the impact. http://folding.extremeoverclocking.com/team_list.php?s=&srt=3Back to the car example, if the dealership giving out $5 is bigger than the next two combined, that's still a big deal, perhaps a way to examine changing the model for the others to attract more users.
|
|
|
|
|