Bitcoin Forum
November 22, 2017, 05:00:53 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 ... 347 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][CRYPT] CryptCoin x11 + PoS | P2P Anonymity | 0% Premine | Commander  (Read 506463 times)
tylerderden
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938


Pundi X- Any store can buy, sell & accept Crypto!


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 03:23:10 PM
 #3921

I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

▄██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀███▀███▄
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▀▄█████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▄█▄▀████

███▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▀▀▀████████▀▀▀██▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████████▀▀▀█████
███          ▀███   ████████   ██    ▀█████████   ██           ▀████   █████
███   █████▄   ██   ████████   ██      ▀███████   ██   ██████▄   ███   █████
███   ██████   ██   ████████   ██   █▄   ▀█████   ██   ████████   ██   █████
███   █████▀   ██   ████████   ██   ███▄   ▀███   ██   ████████   ██   █████
███          ▄███   ▀██████▀   ██   █████▄   ▀█   ██   ███████▀   ██   █████
███   ▄▄▄▄▄███████   ▀▀▀▀▀▀   ███   ███████▄      ██   ▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▄███   █████
███   █████████████▄        ▄████   █████████▄    ██        ▄▄▄█████   █████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀
  BUY
  SELL
ACCEPT
   ███████████████████████████
  .CRYPTOCURRENCY..
███████████████████████████
.
1511370053
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511370053

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511370053
Reply with quote  #2

1511370053
Report to moderator
1511370053
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511370053

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511370053
Reply with quote  #2

1511370053
Report to moderator
1511370053
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511370053

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511370053
Reply with quote  #2

1511370053
Report to moderator
Join ICO Now Coinlancer is Disrupting the Freelance marketplace!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1511370053
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511370053

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511370053
Reply with quote  #2

1511370053
Report to moderator
1511370053
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1511370053

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1511370053
Reply with quote  #2

1511370053
Report to moderator
WheresMyWallet
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 03:27:02 PM
 #3922

I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

Welcome back! I thought you had left, guess you missed us too much.
pbremen01
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 03:27:22 PM
 #3923

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

I don't know what WC is and what technology it uses.

How can you check "addresses vs confirmations"? Confirmation is a number associated with one transaction. Address doesn't have any such number. Exchanges track confirmations.

It is not the job of an exchange to prevent double spends. They can't prevent or resolve any double spends at all. The network itself (protocol and/or blockchain and/or miners) needs to "resolve" double spends.

If CryptoNick's example is valid, then this actually means that CryptCoin network may actually allow double spends (but I seriously doubt this).

First CryptoNick spent 10 CRYPT for donation, but this probably didn't decrease amount of coins on his address (maybe it decreased number of coins on another address, but we don't know that). So that means that these 10 CRYPT coins may be sent second time to another addess. Voila - double spend.






WheresMyWallet
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 03:32:07 PM
 #3924

You'll have to ask him pbremen01.
He is probably one of the longest serving FUDders here who was always willing to voice his concern.
A U-turn from him was a surprise out of the blue.
benthach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


--- I AM LEGEND --- i scam no one --- like ARK


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2014, 03:37:54 PM
 #3925

Any new and update with CRYPT? i see lot and lot of people mining CRYPT like crazy but the price is low.

ethereum platform references ---- nick szabo - the father of smart contracts - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Szabo
gav wood - the father and creator/coder of piece of shzit etherieum platform - http://gavwood.com
butterin vitalic - the little freak scammer left to take care of broken shzit platform which he is forking nonstop - he don't even believe in crypto so is gav wood before he made millions. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1979233.80
WheresMyWallet
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 03:41:39 PM
 #3926

Any new and update with CRYPT? i see lot and lot of people mining CRYPT like crazy but the price is low.

Nothing concrete it seems atm, but people seem to have been accumulating coin all day today.
pbremen01
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 04:05:39 PM
 #3927

i support

Excellent! What do you support? This coin? competing coin? pumpers and whales? the devs? your wife?
damiano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 04:10:06 PM
 #3928

Looks like someone doesn't want the price to go up just yet.
My guess is a bit of accumulation going on here before some news.

I'm doing a little accumulating myself... I feel the news is coming, and the current prices @ under 60K is great

The fact that this coin does have a chance to get on btc-e is huge. 

tylerderden
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938


Pundi X- Any store can buy, sell & accept Crypto!


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 04:10:43 PM
 #3929

I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

Welcome back! I thought you had left, guess you missed us too much.

Nah man just out making some btc to buy back in eventually but i dont see the point in letting money sit idle or going down do you?

▄██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀███▀███▄
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▀▄█████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▄█▄▀████

███▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██████▀▀▀████████▀▀▀██▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀████████▀▀▀█████
███          ▀███   ████████   ██    ▀█████████   ██           ▀████   █████
███   █████▄   ██   ████████   ██      ▀███████   ██   ██████▄   ███   █████
███   ██████   ██   ████████   ██   █▄   ▀█████   ██   ████████   ██   █████
███   █████▀   ██   ████████   ██   ███▄   ▀███   ██   ████████   ██   █████
███          ▄███   ▀██████▀   ██   █████▄   ▀█   ██   ███████▀   ██   █████
███   ▄▄▄▄▄███████   ▀▀▀▀▀▀   ███   ███████▄      ██   ▀▀▀▀▀▀   ▄███   █████
███   █████████████▄        ▄████   █████████▄    ██        ▄▄▄█████   █████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀
  BUY
  SELL
ACCEPT
   ███████████████████████████
  .CRYPTOCURRENCY..
███████████████████████████
.
WheresMyWallet
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 04:16:02 PM
 #3930

I'm guessing human error or payed shill or poor attempt to create something to fud about. 1 of the 3 or something else?

Welcome back! I thought you had left, guess you missed us too much.

Nah man just out making some btc to buy back in eventually but i dont see the point in letting money sit idle or going down do you?

Nope idle money doesn't work for you
cozk
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 05:05:08 PM
 #3931

If the anon feature and the BTC-e rumors are true this coin will be the next thing.

Devs are relatively credible but there is alot a lot of FUD, lets say chances are 50/50 that the rumors are true.

It has half the coin cap than DRK and DRK is valued at 10$. Crypt could go between 5$-25$ ea.

Looking at it that way its worth a 5-15% of your portfolio investment.

If you win you win big and if you lose you lose little.

/protip
Waldozaur12
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1149


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 05:43:44 PM
 #3932

Crypt have so much potential and this is main reason for massive FUD. But Crypt is strong. There no is bad coins there is only bad people.
googs84
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216



View Profile
June 27, 2014, 06:27:01 PM
 #3933

Even Cinni is trying to take Mindfox onto their team by offering him 0.25 and raising money.... Why would a competing coin offer a developer of another coin money to join their team... Because they know he is on to something big!

tristartek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 06:30:26 PM
 #3934

Done, i'm out. going to ride super. good luck.

roll on the floor laughing, super is an obvious shit coin, crypt anon feature is already being implemented and soon to be officially released.

daydreamer.

Better play Lotto.

Hitler said the same thing.

BTC: 1KTg6RkiHjovXqVfVB1a74NPPXLnoL1HNf
tristartek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 06:32:53 PM
 #3935

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



Super has anon onw.  Why dont you go fud their thread jackass.  Or wait..is it your goal to only fud crypt, that has nothing yet and its in the works still?  Dont bash work that hasnt been created yet paulsnoker.  We should release your phone# so everyone can call you to ask questions.

BTC: 1KTg6RkiHjovXqVfVB1a74NPPXLnoL1HNf
tristartek
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 06:33:48 PM
 #3936

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

^^^ 100% true.  Obviously the math genius doesnt know how things work. He only knows how to quote lame reddit posts because he is from VRC.

BTC: 1KTg6RkiHjovXqVfVB1a74NPPXLnoL1HNf
CryptoNick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 932


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 07:16:52 PM
 #3937

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

I don't know what WC is and what technology it uses.

How can you check "addresses vs confirmations"? Confirmation is a number associated with one transaction. Address doesn't have any such number. Exchanges track confirmations.

It is not the job of an exchange to prevent double spends. They can't prevent or resolve any double spends at all. The network itself (protocol and/or blockchain and/or miners) needs to "resolve" double spends.

If CryptoNick's example is valid, then this actually means that CryptCoin network may actually allow double spends (but I seriously doubt this).

First CryptoNick spent 10 CRYPT for donation, but this probably didn't decrease amount of coins on his address (maybe it decreased number of coins on another address, but we don't know that). So that means that these 10 CRYPT coins may be sent second time to another addess. Voila - double spend.








Nope no double spend! I verified that there are ways to do this and you would need to program it which is what is going to happen, I am sure this is what they are working on since it is so simple. I expect there to be a new tab in commander with this functionality embedded into it. Such a simple idea! You only see positives correct but I could make it look like zero if I wanted. The blockchain is fully in tact too all of the transaction info is there on the block. I am amazed it was this easy!

I don't know if Crypt Dev's would want me to divulge their plans. That is my $10 donation which is truly not showing my total amount of coin. Not a joke, not trying to be funny here at all.  They will implement 2FA and all kinds of good stuff since this is why they created Commander. Makes so much sense now and with an SSL Commander is locked down.
Wasda
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504

Smile if you're not wearing any underwear


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 07:21:07 PM
 #3938

Or another option - there is something seriously wrong with cryptcoin protocol and/or blockchain (because it adds 10 CRYPT to one address but it doesn't subtract 10 CRYPT from the address from where it was (supposedly) sent).

The exchanges would have picked up on this instantly, so that isn't the answer.

Exchanges don't care or check from which addresses the coins come. They are only interested in that they get coins on the address that they control (they have private key).

I guess that there was human error (or multiple errors). You can't expect that the existing wallet will create "anonymous" transactions if this functionality hasn't been finished yet (and of course it cannot even theoretically be compiled in the executable file of the current wallet).



The exchanges do care very much, they check the addresses vs confirmations all the time for double spends
That's how WC was caught out.

I don't know what WC is and what technology it uses.

How can you check "addresses vs confirmations"? Confirmation is a number associated with one transaction. Address doesn't have any such number. Exchanges track confirmations.

It is not the job of an exchange to prevent double spends. They can't prevent or resolve any double spends at all. The network itself (protocol and/or blockchain and/or miners) needs to "resolve" double spends.

If CryptoNick's example is valid, then this actually means that CryptCoin network may actually allow double spends (but I seriously doubt this).

First CryptoNick spent 10 CRYPT for donation, but this probably didn't decrease amount of coins on his address (maybe it decreased number of coins on another address, but we don't know that). So that means that these 10 CRYPT coins may be sent second time to another addess. Voila - double spend.








Nope no double spend! I verified that there are ways to do this and you would need to program it which is what is going to happen, I am sure this is what they are working on since it is so simple. I expect there to be a new tab in commander with this functionality embedded into it. Such a simple idea! You only see positives correct but I could make it look like zero if I wanted. The blockchain is fully in tact too all of the transaction info is there on the block. I am amazed it was this easy!

I don't know if Crypt Dev's would want me to divulge their plans. That is my $10 donation which is truly not showing my total amount of coin. Not a joke, not trying to be funny here at all.  They will implement 2FA and all kinds of good stuff since this is why they created Commander. Makes so much sense now and with an SSL Commander is locked down.

So do you think I should invest more on CRYPT than what I already invested ? do you see and your thoughs on the future of CRYPT ?

.
.
.
▬◇
▬◇▬◆
▬◇▬◇▬◆
.
.







███
███░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
██████░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██████
██░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███░██░░░
██░░░░█░░███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███░░░███░░░
███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███
██████░░░░░░░░░███░░░███░░░░░░░░░██████
██░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░██
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███░░█░░░░██
███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░███░░░███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░░░░░░░███
███░░░███
███
.
.
.
◇▬
◆▬◇▬
◆▬◇▬◇▬
.
.
YourMother
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924



View Profile WWW
June 27, 2014, 07:31:43 PM
 #3939

Hi, bagholders! I just came in here to say Hi!

Will be back in a few days when it will be at 40k. Salute!

The absolute worst people in history, ranked by the wisdom of the crowd: "Vlad the Impaler", "Mihnea the Evil", "Ivan the Terrible" and "Evan the Instaminer".
Dr. Sekxy
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 51


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 07:35:21 PM
 #3940

If the anon feature and the BTC-e rumors are true this coin will be the next thing.

Devs are relatively credible but there is alot a lot of FUD, lets say chances are 50/50 that the rumors are true.

It has half the coin cap than DRK and DRK is valued at 10$. Crypt could go between 5$-25$ ea.

Looking at it that way its worth a 5-15% of your portfolio investment.

If you win you win big and if you lose you lose little.

/protip

0.0005 says otherwise
Pages: « 1 ... 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 [197] 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 ... 347 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!