|
CryptoGretzky
|
 |
August 31, 2014, 12:09:03 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2014, 01:01:04 PM by CryptoGretzky |
|
I've used the vanitygen many times with other coins...
but this time it conflicts with the public key...
I guess we could use cryptogretsky's way with the paper wallet gen.
Actually.... This works... vanitygen -X 75 XChat and it's blazing fast even without using the opencl version since it doesn't work for me (R9 290) Ok thanks, I need to try this. You should look for one that say XCTeka.... I am looking for one that is XCGretz... now  Also... use -t to increase the # of workers to make it go faster. I've used the software before (with -t 16 ) but never for altcoins. I tried -t 24 seems to work for me, then I tried 1024 and it kinda locked up for some reason when it gets to 50%.... I thought it was one per thread? Ya, the speed up only lasted for like a few seconds, then it slowed back down to normal speed... although my 3 VM is still running smoothly in the background. So, I am sure I can push it if I want. 48 billions addresses so far... no XCGretz address yet... grrrr |
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
August 31, 2014, 01:00:57 PM |
|
I've used the vanitygen many times with other coins...
but this time it conflicts with the public key...
I guess we could use cryptogretsky's way with the paper wallet gen.
Actually.... This works... vanitygen -X 75 XChat and it's blazing fast even without using the opencl version since it doesn't work for me (R9 290) Ok thanks, I need to try this. You should look for one that say XCTeka.... I am looking for one that is XCGretz... now Also... use -t to increase the # of workers to make it go faster. I've used the software before (with -t 16 ) but never for altcoins. I tried -t 24 seems to work for me, then I tried 1024 and it kinda locked up for some reason when it gets to 50%.... I thought it was one per thread? Ya, the speed up only lasted for like a few seconds, then it slowed back down to normal speed... although my 3 VM is still running smoothly in the background. So, I am sure I can push it if I want. 36 billions addresses so far... no XCGretz address yet... grrrr Inb4 all addresses have been generated and no new addresses can be made anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 31, 2014, 01:03:07 PM |
|
I've used the vanitygen many times with other coins...
but this time it conflicts with the public key...
I guess we could use cryptogretsky's way with the paper wallet gen.
Actually.... This works... vanitygen -X 75 XChat and it's blazing fast even without using the opencl version since it doesn't work for me (R9 290) Ok thanks, I need to try this. You should look for one that say XCTeka.... I am looking for one that is XCGretz... now Also... use -t to increase the # of workers to make it go faster. I've used the software before (with -t 16 ) but never for altcoins. I tried -t 24 seems to work for me, then I tried 1024 and it kinda locked up for some reason when it gets to 50%.... I thought it was one per thread? Ya, the speed up only lasted for like a few seconds, then it slowed back down to normal speed... although my 3 VM is still running smoothly in the background. So, I am sure I can push it if I want. 36 billions addresses so far... no XCGretz address yet... grrrr Inb4 all addresses have been generated and no new addresses can be made anymore. The amount of addresses that is possible is so large... so so large... 2 to the 160 power.... that's like ... 1,461,501,637,330,902,918,203,684,832,716,283,019,655,932,542,976 There are only 2^63 grains of sand on earth.... |
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
August 31, 2014, 01:15:08 PM |
|
I've used the vanitygen many times with other coins...
but this time it conflicts with the public key...
I guess we could use cryptogretsky's way with the paper wallet gen.
Actually.... This works... vanitygen -X 75 XChat and it's blazing fast even without using the opencl version since it doesn't work for me (R9 290) Ok thanks, I need to try this. You should look for one that say XCTeka.... I am looking for one that is XCGretz... now Also... use -t to increase the # of workers to make it go faster. I've used the software before (with -t 16 ) but never for altcoins. I tried -t 24 seems to work for me, then I tried 1024 and it kinda locked up for some reason when it gets to 50%.... I thought it was one per thread? Ya, the speed up only lasted for like a few seconds, then it slowed back down to normal speed... although my 3 VM is still running smoothly in the background. So, I am sure I can push it if I want. 36 billions addresses so far... no XCGretz address yet... grrrr Inb4 all addresses have been generated and no new addresses can be made anymore. The amount of addresses that is possible is so large... so so large... 2 to the 160 power.... that's like ... 1,461,501,637,330,902,918,203,684,832,716,283,019,655,932,542,976 There are only 2^63 grains of sand on earth.... I know, it was just a joke. |
|
|
|
|
|
braxx
|
|
August 31, 2014, 01:17:22 PM |
|
I've used the vanitygen many times with other coins...
but this time it conflicts with the public key...
I guess we could use cryptogretsky's way with the paper wallet gen.
Actually.... This works... vanitygen -X 75 XChat and it's blazing fast even without using the opencl version since it doesn't work for me (R9 290) yeah, of course it's fast... I generated my xchat adress this way, but when I imported this adres in my wallet and I asked my public key it gave me a public key witch was very long it was even you cryptogretzky who said it didn't work I would like to test something...
I made myself a vanity adress for xchat
would someone please try to contact me over xchat?
adress: XCHATsLztdvJxb2BkrgVuoq7uoC73u6ghj
pubkey: Ro4rYufnJy7RYFnuJBaD1iz5Rrr8o77fyKbcnkAbqC57JCS148WVMabshBjHd1JsZGoJ2JZtj6LYtfP e8bavoY51
(I've noticed that my pub key is really long, that's why I want to test this)
If it works I'll explain it in a tutorial
Said Invalid destination public key |
|
|
|
|
|
braxx
|
|
August 31, 2014, 01:23:51 PM |
|
the oclvanitygen works on a laptop with a intel HD graphic chip
If you have one, you could try and use that... it is speedwise times 30 faster (I thought) then a amd64 x4 640
|
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 31, 2014, 01:51:40 PM
Last edit: August 31, 2014, 02:04:56 PM by CryptoGretzky |
|
I've used the vanitygen many times with other coins...
but this time it conflicts with the public key...
I guess we could use cryptogretsky's way with the paper wallet gen.
Actually.... This works... vanitygen -X 75 XChat and it's blazing fast even without using the opencl version since it doesn't work for me (R9 290) yeah, of course it's fast... I generated my xchat adress this way, but when I imported this adres in my wallet and I asked my public key it gave me a public key witch was very long it was even you cryptogretzky who said it didn't work I would like to test something...
I made myself a vanity adress for xchat
would someone please try to contact me over xchat?
adress: XCHATsLztdvJxb2BkrgVuoq7uoC73u6ghj
pubkey: Ro4rYufnJy7RYFnuJBaD1iz5Rrr8o77fyKbcnkAbqC57JCS148WVMabshBjHd1JsZGoJ2JZtj6LYtfP e8bavoY51
(I've noticed that my pub key is really long, that's why I want to test this)
If it works I'll explain it in a tutorial
Said Invalid destination public key I do remember that test. Didn't know you use vanitygen before. The public key is extremely long too for me when I import the uncompressed private key. When I import the compressed private key though, the public key I get back is normal.... of course that defeat the purpose of the vanity address since the search is based on uncompressed address. So... ultimately, will need to modify the vanitygen to make it search based on compressed address instead of uncompressed address. eg. make the following changes in pattern.c len = EC_POINT_point2oct(pgroup, pubkey, POINT_CONVERSION_UNCOMPRESSED, eckey_buf, sizeof(eckey_buf), vxcp->vxc_bnctx); to make it use POINT_CONVERSION_COMPRESSED instead. Now... if only I can compile it.... |
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
August 31, 2014, 02:44:08 PM |
|
Something is going wrong on BTC-e, look at those volumes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
August 31, 2014, 03:00:37 PM |
|
I know, that is how I found out about it. The person who's bot is malfunctioning is going to have a bad time. |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
August 31, 2014, 03:05:36 PM |
|
I know, that is how I found out about it. The person who's bot is malfunctioning is going to have a bad time. I read about it, this morning and its quite interesting. I bet the admins of btc-e are having a great time today unlike the owner. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
August 31, 2014, 03:07:19 PM |
|
If BTC-e wants to get extremely popular, they should refund his losses or at least partially, that would probably help them more in the long run than this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
August 31, 2014, 03:17:30 PM |
|
If BTC-e wants to get extremely popular, they should refund his losses or at least partially, that would probably help them more in the long run than this.
Unless this is the bot that has been keeping the price of btc down. |
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
August 31, 2014, 03:18:09 PM |
|
If BTC-e wants to get extremely popular, they should refund his losses or at least partially, that would probably help them more in the long run than this.
But its not their fault and it sets a precedence. They will be flooded with requests from other bot traders. |
|
|
|
|
|
holyprofit
|
|
August 31, 2014, 03:40:54 PM |
|
If BTC-e wants to get extremely popular, they should refund his losses or at least partially, that would probably help them more in the long run than this.
But its not their fault and it sets a precedence. They will be flooded with requests from other bot traders. It's just a noob bot, making ultra-fast noob mistakes - you can see your first year's trading telescoped into a few minutes. |
|
|
|
|
|
popolite11
|
|
August 31, 2014, 03:46:01 PM |
|
If BTC-e wants to get extremely popular, they should refund his losses or at least partially, that would probably help them more in the long run than this.
But its not their fault and it sets a precedence. They will be flooded with requests from other bot traders. Its not btc-e's fault if someone screws up with his bots. |
|
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
August 31, 2014, 04:24:58 PM |
|
If BTC-e wants to get extremely popular, they should refund his losses or at least partially, that would probably help them more in the long run than this.
But its not their fault and it sets a precedence. They will be flooded with requests from other bot traders. It's just a noob bot, making ultra-fast noob mistakes - you can see your first year's trading telescoped into a few minutes. Like they say computers make mistakes like humans do, just faster... so fast you cant see it lol. |
|
|
|
|
kewlya
|
|
August 31, 2014, 04:45:19 PM |
|
we need rev2 final released or we going back to 110k
|
|
|
|
|
|
akula999
|
|
August 31, 2014, 04:56:12 PM |
|
we need rev2 final released or we going back to 110k
110k, i'm buying more. |
Bitcoin: 1FzZehkiwfeeUmfmBrym8VvXX7gUj3miHe
XMR: 4AqrzGPfEKeZrVXyPDNXUrNeKZZGNYiXMDoY49PvdffKNTRg6xp2Qz74SZ72gT5F9HH8Vaic99ndRg6 UBGcVijaNStQjwwf
|
|
|
|
