[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[synechist]

***The XC Daily Update***

    4 days until the finalised Rev 2!


- VC Fundamentals has added XC to its research platform! And they will be interviewing Dan.

  https://twitter.com/VCFundamentals/status/510118490993618946


- Teka continues work on the new UI.


- In addition to the finalised Rev 2, we'll have several announcements on Monday. It's gonna be a big day.

[wooder]

In the updated OP it now says 1000XC is the requirement for trustless mixing all the time. Is this final?

1000 XC for xnode do make sense because you will earn XC if run as a xnode.

Yup, it's 1000 XC.

This amount is still somewhat provisional.

Also, if XC's value increases, it's very likely that the required balance will decrease.

but why decrease the needed amount?

i think 1000 is a good amount and the number of needed coins should be fixed and not changed. i mean what happens when the price increases -> the number of needed coins is decreased.
but what happens when the price drops afterwards? will you increase the amount again? i think setting the number to a fixed value is the best solution and won't lead to confused users

[wooder]

btw: If you have coins on Bittrex .... withdraw if you do not plan to sell them shortterm! They stake large numbers

How do we know that?

The blockchain tells all, btw: thats why everybody in this crypto world needs a real anon coin, eg: XC;D
atm they have at least 75K coins (everybody can prove this) and are staking them!
For me ... as an XC believer i just hope a supporter gets those free coins iso a exchange that willl use them to dump at will.

Example: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XPousPv2VcrGg7n9VhhuST8fFGQPFYTcVb.htm

Before you ask: Yes, maybe cryptoid.info not label this address as bittrex but if you follow the currect fixed rules about combined inputs/change this is one of bittrex +3K addresses, sorry am still working of graphs to visualize stuff like this for the community.
Bittrex is stacking your coins,  Cryptsy is stacking your coins, why aren't you?

verifying which addresses are cryptsy and bittrex addresses would be a good idea. crytpsy is allready paying a share of the earned fees to users, at least for btc/ltc/usd if the user holds any of currencies. if you can verify which addresses belong to cryptsy i would contact the support and ask for a share for everyone but we have to verify that they stack ...

[synechist]

In the updated OP it now says 1000XC is the requirement for trustless mixing all the time. Is this final?

1000 XC for xnode do make sense because you will earn XC if run as a xnode.

Yup, it's 1000 XC.

This amount is still somewhat provisional.

Also, if XC's value increases, it's very likely that the required balance will decrease.

but why decrease the needed amount?

i think 1000 is a good amount and the number of needed coins should be fixed and not changed. i mean what happens when the price increases -> the number of needed coins is decreased.
but what happens when the price drops afterwards? will you increase the amount again? i think setting the number to a fixed value is the best solution and won't lead to confused users

Changes would not be made often. It would need to increase, say, 20 times its current value before we'd change it.

[wooder]

In the updated OP it now says 1000XC is the requirement for trustless mixing all the time. Is this final?

1000 XC for xnode do make sense because you will earn XC if run as a xnode.

Yup, it's 1000 XC.

This amount is still somewhat provisional.

Also, if XC's value increases, it's very likely that the required balance will decrease.

but why decrease the needed amount?

i think 1000 is a good amount and the number of needed coins should be fixed and not changed. i mean what happens when the price increases -> the number of needed coins is decreased.
but what happens when the price drops afterwards? will you increase the amount again? i think setting the number to a fixed value is the best solution and won't lead to confused users

Changes would not be made often. It would need to increase, say, 20 times its current value before we'd change it.

okay 20 times is a good value. let's hope that we decrease the amount soon, the sooner the better

[Mountaingoat]

***The XC Daily Update***

    4 days until the finalised Rev 2!


- VC Fundamentals has added XC to its research platform! And they will be interviewing Dan.

  https://twitter.com/VCFundamentals/status/510118490993618946


- Teka continues work on the new UI.


- In addition to the finalised Rev 2, we'll have several announcements on Monday. It's gonna be a big day.

What do you personally think it will do for the price?

[akula999]

***The XC Daily Update***

    4 days until the finalised Rev 2!


- VC Fundamentals has added XC to its research platform! And they will be interviewing Dan.

  https://twitter.com/VCFundamentals/status/510118490993618946


- Teka continues work on the new UI.


- In addition to the finalised Rev 2, we'll have several announcements on Monday. It's gonna be a big day.

What do you personally think it will do for the price?

i dont think really anything, just good PR - shows the team is doing something.

[Mountaingoat]

***The XC Daily Update***

    4 days until the finalised Rev 2!


- VC Fundamentals has added XC to its research platform! And they will be interviewing Dan.

  https://twitter.com/VCFundamentals/status/510118490993618946


- Teka continues work on the new UI.


- In addition to the finalised Rev 2, we'll have several announcements on Monday. It's gonna be a big day.

What do you personally think it will do for the price?

i dont think really anything, just good PR - shows the team is doing something.

I hope it will go up quite a bit, but so does everybody else I assume.

[mr_random]

***The XC Daily Update***

    4 days until the finalised Rev 2!


- VC Fundamentals has added XC to its research platform! And they will be interviewing Dan.

  https://twitter.com/VCFundamentals/status/510118490993618946


- Teka continues work on the new UI.


- In addition to the finalised Rev 2, we'll have several announcements on Monday. It's gonna be a big day.

What do you personally think it will do for the price?

i dont think really anything, just good PR - shows the team is doing something.

I hope it will go up quite a bit, but so does everybody else I assume.

It's notoriously difficult to predict short term price changes in crypto. All I know is, sometime in the coming months there is going to be a huge upwards spike in price for XC, relative to BTC. We have nothing but a continuous stream of development, news and projects to look forward to in the coming months and we are establishing ourselves as a true tech innovator.

Hold for the next few months and you'll be very happy.

[pookielax31]

***The XC Daily Update***

    4 days until the finalised Rev 2!


- VC Fundamentals has added XC to its research platform! And they will be interviewing Dan.

  https://twitter.com/VCFundamentals/status/510118490993618946


- Teka continues work on the new UI.


- In addition to the finalised Rev 2, we'll have several announcements on Monday. It's gonna be a big day.

[sugarboy321]

In the updated OP it now says 1000XC is the requirement for trustless mixing all the time. Is this final?

1000 XC for xnode do make sense because you will earn XC if run as a xnode.

Yup, it's 1000 XC.

This amount is still somewhat provisional.

Also, if XC's value increases, it's very likely that the required balance will decrease.

but why decrease the needed amount?

i think 1000 is a good amount and the number of needed coins should be fixed and not changed. i mean what happens when the price increases -> the number of needed coins is decreased.
but what happens when the price drops afterwards? will you increase the amount again? i think setting the number to a fixed value is the best solution and won't lead to confused users

Changes would not be made often. It would need to increase, say, 20 times its current value before we'd change it.

hmmm, I cannot wait to see 1 coin mixers. Gonna be hard to do when XC hits 1 M a coin.

[CryptoGretzky]

In the updated OP it now says 1000XC is the requirement for trustless mixing all the time. Is this final?

1000 XC for xnode do make sense because you will earn XC if run as a xnode.

Yup, it's 1000 XC.

This amount is still somewhat provisional.

Also, if XC's value increases, it's very likely that the required balance will decrease.

but why decrease the needed amount?

i think 1000 is a good amount and the number of needed coins should be fixed and not changed. i mean what happens when the price increases -> the number of needed coins is decreased.
but what happens when the price drops afterwards? will you increase the amount again? i think setting the number to a fixed value is the best solution and won't lead to confused users

Changes would not be made often. It would need to increase, say, 20 times its current value before we'd change it.

hmmm, I cannot wait to see 1 coin mixers. Gonna be hard to do when XC hits 1 M a coin.

If you want to have at least one XMixer... the time is running out.   At today's price, that's under $700 USD!!   3 months from now... whoever didn't get enough to run at least one XMixer is going to have so much regret.   Save this post for future reference.

[sugarboy321]

In the updated OP it now says 1000XC is the requirement for trustless mixing all the time. Is this final?

1000 XC for xnode do make sense because you will earn XC if run as a xnode.

Yup, it's 1000 XC.

This amount is still somewhat provisional.

Also, if XC's value increases, it's very likely that the required balance will decrease.

but why decrease the needed amount?

i think 1000 is a good amount and the number of needed coins should be fixed and not changed. i mean what happens when the price increases -> the number of needed coins is decreased.
but what happens when the price drops afterwards? will you increase the amount again? i think setting the number to a fixed value is the best solution and won't lead to confused users

Changes would not be made often. It would need to increase, say, 20 times its current value before we'd change it.

hmmm, I cannot wait to see 1 coin mixers. Gonna be hard to do when XC hits 1 M a coin.

If you want to have at least one XMixer... the time is running out.   At today's price, that's under $700 USD!!   3 months from now... whoever didn't get enough to run at least one XMixer is going to have so much regret.   Save this post for future reference.

+1

[Artoodeetoo]

3 days to go... Getting seriously excited now...

Large scale buying to initiate > 24 hours from now..

[CryptoGretzky]

3 days to go... Getting seriously excited now...

Large scale buying to initiate > 24 hours from now..

Can't wait till the team reveal the coinjoin killer tech...  Maybe a 2x jump on the innovation news?    

[f2pool]

Im wondering if chaeplin will claim the bounty

[leigh2k14]

Im wondering if chaeplin will claim the bounty

I doubt it if he couldn't crack the first mixer.

[CryptoGretzky]

Im wondering if chaeplin will claim the bounty

Trolls starting to show up?   Fee Fi Fo Fum... I smell fear.   That's usually a really good sign for the price movement.   

I really don't know how in the world anybody can claim anything...

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?8bd4b429c9f0651ebedab6b37ea2b1f7b64f4087e4a7dbd10e06c9af2122d8e6.htm

This is from a single transaction.   I can even tell you that 10 XC was moved... so what though... there are exactly 90 different possibilities even knowing that 10 XC was sent.   Now imagine if you don't know the amount, good luck with that....

[Dungor]

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/address.dws?XPmGJhoziauLbSDYML6ekJ4QQDALcr4eBm.htm

Is this person staking with 350k XC in one wallet address? Does the person use coin-control?

[Doublethink]

Hey guys. Is this coin really trustless?
I am thinking of buying some XC. Now is a good time to buy?