|
coda
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:03:17 PM Last edit: August 29, 2014, 04:34:34 PM by coda |
|
hi guys
been away from a while, i have 7950's and get this:
X11:3.5Mh X13:2.65Mh X15:2.31Mh Nist5:10.45Mh
what speed do you have with your 7950's ??
thanks for sharing your infos it'll help me to know if i'm out of date ...
|
BTC:18oLLFcxwwzfQt4F2YF7QzKyFeksq3dqsQ
|
|
|
chadwickx16
|
|
August 29, 2014, 04:26:50 PM |
|
hi guys
i've been away from a while i have 7950's and get this:
X11:3.5Mh X13:2.65Mh X15:2.31Mh Nist5:10.45Mh
what speed do you have for your 7950's ?? thanks for your sharing it'll help me to know if i'm out of date ...
Here's mine. X11:3.63MH X13:2.40MH I can't max out this Algo. X15:Don't Use Nist5:13.42MH
|
|
|
|
ebliever
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1035
|
|
August 29, 2014, 05:24:32 PM |
|
hi guys
been away from a while, i have 7950's and get this:
X11:3.5Mh X13:2.65Mh X15:2.31Mh Nist5:10.45Mh
what speed do you have with your 7950's ??
thanks for sharing your infos it'll help me to know if i'm out of date ...
Just a comment, I have 290X's but have almost identical ratios between X11/13/15.
|
Luke 12:15-21
Ephesians 2:8-9
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
August 29, 2014, 06:18:41 PM |
|
Just update your driver with 14.6 above , so the version of sgminer takes matter too...
|
|
|
|
coda
|
|
August 30, 2014, 12:44:02 PM |
|
hi guys
i've been away from a while i have 7950's and get this:
X11:3.5Mh X13:2.65Mh X15:2.31Mh Nist5:10.45Mh
what speed do you have for your 7950's ?? thanks for your sharing it'll help me to know if i'm out of date ...
Here's mine. X11:3.63MH X13:2.40MH I can't max out this Algo. X15:Don't Use Nist5:13.42MH thanks chadwickx16 you've got a great improvement especially on Nist 5, what is your conf for it ? what combo of cgminer/drivers you use ?
|
BTC:18oLLFcxwwzfQt4F2YF7QzKyFeksq3dqsQ
|
|
|
chadwickx16
|
|
August 30, 2014, 09:10:15 PM |
|
hi guys
i've been away from a while i have 7950's and get this:
X11:3.5Mh X13:2.65Mh X15:2.31Mh Nist5:10.45Mh
what speed do you have for your 7950's ?? thanks for your sharing it'll help me to know if i'm out of date ...
Here's mine. X11:3.63MH X13:2.40MH I can't max out this Algo. X15:Don't Use Nist5:13.42MH thanks chadwickx16 you've got a great improvement especially on Nist 5, what is your conf for it ? what combo of cgminer/drivers you use ? I'm running 14.6 Beta on BAMT 1.6.2 with the sgminer 8-4 daily from nicehash. Conf is nothing special... "auto-fan": true, "temp-cutoff": "95", "temp-overheat": "85", "temp-target": "75",
"worksize": "256", "intensity" : "20,20,20,20,17", "gpu-engine" : "1075", "gpu-fan" : "80-100", "gpu-memclock" : "1375", "gpu-threads" : "2,2,2,2,1",
"api-port": "4028", "api-listen": true, "api-allow": "W:127.0.0.1", "failover-only" : true, "failover-switch-delay" : "180", "no-pool-disable": true, "kernel-path": "/usr/local/bin"
The 5th card gets hot and has issues with 2 threads that's the only difference. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
August 31, 2014, 06:09:17 PM |
|
Hi I am using sph sgminer 4 with X11 mod on win 7 but only getting 2.5 MH/s with my R9 290
so i need to update to this sg miner 5 ,,,,,
which AMD drivers work stable with win 7 using X11 kernel ?
cheers
|
|
|
|
patrike
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1094
|
|
August 31, 2014, 06:11:45 PM |
|
Hi I am using sph sgminer 4 with X11 mod on win 7 but only getting 2.5 MH/s with my R9 290
so i need to update to this sg miner 5 ,,,,,
which AMD drivers work stable with win 7 using X11 kernel ?
cheers
I would recommend using the latest AMD drivers (14.7) for X11-mining. The older drivers (13.12) was a little faster for Scrypt-mining, but for the X-algorithms, the 14.7 drivers are faster.
|
Awesome Miner - Complete solution to manage and monitor mining operations of ASIC, GPU and CPU miners Optimized Antminer firmware - Increased hashrate, improved power efficiency and more features. For S9, S9i, S9j, T9+, L3+, S17, S17 Pro, S17+, T17, T17+, S19, S19 Pro, S19j, S19j Pro, T19 Up to 200,000 miners | Notifications | Native overclocking | Profit switching | Customizable rules | API | Windows application | Mobile web
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
August 31, 2014, 07:20:04 PM Last edit: August 31, 2014, 07:49:52 PM by semajjames |
|
Hi I am using sph sgminer 4 with X11 mod on win 7 but only getting 2.5 MH/s with my R9 290
so i need to update to this sg miner 5 ,,,,,
which AMD drivers work stable with win 7 using X11 kernel ?
cheers
I would recommend using the latest AMD drivers (14.7) for X11-mining. The older drivers (13.12) was a little faster for Scrypt-mining, but for the X-algorithms, the 14.7 drivers are faster. Thanks I have just updated the miner but it is saying that the P2P node i am trying to connect to is "dead" and so connecting to a backup pool instead ,,, the node is not dead because i have other sph sgminers connected to it why could this be do I have to change my config file ?? cheers
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
August 31, 2014, 08:11:55 PM |
|
I have just updated the miner but it is saying that the P2P node i am trying to connect to is "dead" and so connecting to a backup pool instead ,,, the node is not dead because i have other sph sgminers connected to it why could this be do I have to change my config file ?? cheers --no-extranonce read OP Thanks but i have already tryed that:- { "pools" : [ { "name" : "darkcoin.fr:7903", "url" : "stratum+tcp://darkcoin.fr:7903", "no-extranonce" : true, "user" : "XeSaKmKmrhZ3728gPkcJSYsdRTgnZwFht8", "pass" : "j", "pool-priority" : "0" }, { "name" : "eu.wafflepool.", "url" : "stratum+tcp://eu.wafflepool.com:3331", "no-extranonce" : true, "user" : "15jo2oECvdftue4osZQ6jkqbFKAhsZdLp3", "pass" : "j", "pool-priority" : "1" } ], "api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1", HOWEVER when i copy and paste the conf text here the ("no-extranonce" : true,) line shows out of place ,,, WHY ?
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
August 31, 2014, 09:20:14 PM |
|
HOWEVER when i copy and paste the conf text here the ("no-extranonce" : true,) line shows out of place ,,, WHY ?
make your hands straight and clean conf file. i've checked your pool, it requires --no-extranonce, no other magic thanks i am connected now the problem seems to be something to do with cgwatcher or cgremote ,,, i can connect and monitor if i start the miner manualy but if i try to start using cgwatcher or cgremote the then i cannot connect to the pool maybe cgremote and cgwatcher do not understand --no-extranonce yet ,,,, thanks for your help
|
|
|
|
reza_abay
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
September 01, 2014, 03:56:34 AM Last edit: September 01, 2014, 04:13:28 AM by reza_abay |
|
my hashrate in NIST5 with driver 14.7rc3 and sgminer nicehash 2014/08/04.
280x card:15.95 mh 290 card : 14.12 mh
why my 290 card hash lower than 280x card. clock 290 :1050/1500 clock 280x : 1100/1500
wiht other algorithm x11-x13-x15 thats fine just my problem with NIST5 i want get 18 mh with my 290 card.i try with 14.16 beta 14.6RC1&2 and 14.7RC1&2 but same hash with this card plz help.
my 290 hashrate with other algo: x11:5.3 mh x13:4.2 mh x15:3.8 mh
|
|
|
|
badman74
|
|
September 01, 2014, 05:24:13 AM |
|
my hashrate in NIST5 with driver 14.7rc3 and sgminer nicehash 2014/08/04.
280x card:15.95 mh 290 card : 14.12 mh
why my 290 card hash lower than 280x card. clock 290 :1050/1500 clock 280x : 1100/1500
wiht other algorithm x11-x13-x15 thats fine just my problem with NIST5 i want get 18 mh with my 290 card.i try with 14.16 beta 14.6RC1&2 and 14.7RC1&2 but same hash with this card plz help.
my 290 hashrate with other algo: x11:5.3 mh x13:4.2 mh x15:3.8 mh
try the mod binaries in my sig, i can't say if it will fix it but i think most algo's are a little faster on my mod
|
|
|
|
reza_abay
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
September 01, 2014, 09:34:31 AM |
|
my hashrate in NIST5 with driver 14.7rc3 and sgminer nicehash 2014/08/04.
280x card:15.95 mh 290 card : 14.12 mh
why my 290 card hash lower than 280x card. clock 290 :1050/1500 clock 280x : 1100/1500
wiht other algorithm x11-x13-x15 thats fine just my problem with NIST5 i want get 18 mh with my 290 card.i try with 14.16 beta 14.6RC1&2 and 14.7RC1&2 but same hash with this card plz help.
my 290 hashrate with other algo: x11:5.3 mh x13:4.2 mh x15:3.8 mh
try the mod binaries in my sig, i can't say if it will fix it but i think most algo's are a little faster on my mod thanks i try with your sgminer V5mod and now my hashrate 20mh with 290 card.
|
|
|
|
lpedretti
|
|
September 01, 2014, 06:18:09 PM |
|
I have been messing around trying to mine yacoin using kernel ckolivas or zuikkis with nfactor 15 but no luck, the shares are rejected as low difficulty share, anybody with any suggestion as where to start? 790 gives me around 1kh so it's being similar to yacminer on the speed, however i would like to get more from it.
Best regards!
|
AC: ANuRoFPkCjZSxsw2S41djrrA1D4xMMmwhs
|
|
|
donPedro11
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
September 02, 2014, 10:23:41 PM |
|
my hashrate in NIST5 with driver 14.7rc3 and sgminer nicehash 2014/08/04.
280x card:15.95 mh 290 card : 14.12 mh
why my 290 card hash lower than 280x card. clock 290 :1050/1500 clock 280x : 1100/1500
wiht other algorithm x11-x13-x15 thats fine just my problem with NIST5 i want get 18 mh with my 290 card.i try with 14.16 beta 14.6RC1&2 and 14.7RC1&2 but same hash with this card plz help.
my 290 hashrate with other algo: x11:5.3 mh x13:4.2 mh x15:3.8 mh
try the mod binaries in my sig, i can't say if it will fix it but i think most algo's are a little faster on my mod thanks i try with your sgminer V5mod and now my hashrate 20mh with 290 card. Funny i have the same problem, and i cant make my 3 290 to pass 14Mh +-, i have 5 cards: 2x 280x and 3x290 in the same mobo. X algos are ok. I have tryed different miners and couple settings too, no luck till now.
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
September 03, 2014, 04:04:00 PM |
|
Hi can someone get me straight here with my learning of this miner
My understanding is :- If I list nice hash pools as shown on this thread and place an "X" the the password line then connect nice hash will change my miners algo and pool according to nice hashes most profitable code ,,,
is this correct ??
|
|
|
|
chadwickx16
|
|
September 03, 2014, 04:44:23 PM |
|
Hi can someone get me straight here with my learning of this miner My understanding is :- If I list nice hash pools as shown on this thread and place an "X" the the password line then connect nice hash will change my miners algo and pool according to nice hashes most profitable code ,,, is this correct ??
In theory, yes. However there was a Person a few posts back that had the "x" and it wasn't working for them. I would put in the multiplier if possible.
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
September 03, 2014, 05:05:12 PM |
|
Hi can someone get me straight here with my learning of this miner My understanding is :- If I list nice hash pools as shown on this thread and place an "X" the the password line then connect nice hash will change my miners algo and pool according to nice hashes most profitable code ,,, is this correct ??
In theory, yes. However there was a Person a few posts back that had the "x" and it wasn't working for them. I would put in the multiplier if possible. Ok Thanks So the multiplier the f=code,,, I understand that when fx=0 then the algo is not used, does this mean that in order for the algo to be used i must make fx=1 ?
|
|
|
|
|