|
lx001
|
 |
March 13, 2015, 04:41:51 PM |
|
is it possible to launch the wallet on Win 7 32bit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
greentea
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1418
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 13, 2015, 04:47:09 PM |
|
just upvoted ... BTW Ive reached out to iruniclee, hope he gets in touch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
xtester
|
|
March 13, 2015, 08:36:23 PM |
|
NXT AE Redemption Update and Official Announcement: Click here!
|
|
|
|
|
lordoliver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1020
expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()
|
|
March 13, 2015, 09:29:15 PM |
|
NXT AE Redemption Update and Official Announcement: Click here! seems fair, but for my taste you are changing the rules too often... maybe you should discuss with the community about it before, instead of changing after... And I also doubt that stakeholders, that sold their stake already, are the stakeholders we are searching for... |
|
|
|
|
|
xtester
|
|
March 13, 2015, 09:52:44 PM |
|
seems fair, but for my taste you are changing the rules too often... maybe you should discuss with the community about it before, instead of changing after...
Thanks for the feedback. As you can see we are adapting and striving to find a better way to do just that. |
|
|
|
|
|
xtester
|
|
March 13, 2015, 09:54:11 PM
Last edit: March 13, 2015, 10:16:59 PM by xtester |
|
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with: The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers. You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matterWhatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work. |
|
|
|
|
|
Simakki
|
|
March 13, 2015, 11:05:57 PM |
|
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with: The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers. You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matterWhatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work. Co-sign And Regular customers and avarage joes are those that can turn cryptos into real gold mine  |
|
|
|
fudbuster
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
March 14, 2015, 02:15:01 AM |
|
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with: The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers. You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matterWhatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work. Co-sign And Regular customers and avarage joes are those that can turn cryptos into real gold mine Great analogy, except comparing NEM to Apple is like comparing diarrhoea to gold.  |
|
|
|
|
|
xtester
|
|
March 14, 2015, 05:46:05 AM |
|
Great analogy, except comparing NEM to Apple is like ...
Please note my point:
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
|
|
|
|
|
jabo38
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
mining is so 2012-2013
|
|
March 14, 2015, 05:58:42 AM |
|
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with: The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers. You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matterWhatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work. In tech all first generations give way to second generations. It is basically something that can be counted. And then all second generations give way to third gens. People can hate on us, but it won't stop it. |
|
|
|
jabo38
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
mining is so 2012-2013
|
|
March 14, 2015, 06:01:18 AM |
|
And I also doubt that stakeholders, that sold their stake already, are the stakeholders we are searching for...
yep, clearly dumpers |
|
|
|
makoto1337
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
I am not Dorian Nakamoto.
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:20:23 AM |
|
So will NEM launch all of a sudden without any countdown?
Ninja launch might be in the works |
|
|
|
makoto1337
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
I am not Dorian Nakamoto.
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:22:28 AM |
|
just upvoted ... BTW Ive reached out to iruniclee, hope he gets in touch Taumuon used to be in charge of /nemcoin, but he hasn't been around in ages. I want to make greentea our reddit admin, but it's hard to get in touch with people  |
|
|
|
makoto1337
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
I am not Dorian Nakamoto.
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:26:35 AM |
|
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with: The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers. You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matterWhatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work. Quality and a great user experience is what really counts. There are admittedly still some rough edges, but we have some amazing things planned for the near future that will help out a lot. |
|
|
|
microbial
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:27:32 AM |
|
these are very exciting times!
|
|
|
|
Hauberg81
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:46:01 AM |
|
No exiting !!! I have problems to download the NEM Client!! I have already JAVA but there is a problem!!! What is the standalone Version and where i can get it?  ? NO Launch please with this problems! |
|
|
|
|
|
patmast3r
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:51:16 AM |
|
No exiting !!! I have problems to download the NEM Client!! I have already JAVA but there is a problem!!! What is the standalone Version and where i can get it? ? NO Launch please with this problems! standalone. If you were a little more specific than, "there is a problem" then someone might be able to help you  First guess...You installed the 32bit version of Java instead of the 64bit. |
|
|
|
Hauberg81
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:53:55 AM |
|
No exiting !!! I have problems to download the NEM Client!! I have already JAVA but there is a problem!!! What is the standalone Version and where i can get it? ? NO Launch please with this problems! could you explain the issue please? there is an error window : There is been an error the installer could not find a valid java (tm) on this machine. but i have the current version download it many times... |
|
|
|
|
Hauberg81
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
March 14, 2015, 11:55:47 AM |
|
No exiting !!! I have problems to download the NEM Client!! I have already JAVA but there is a problem!!! What is the standalone Version and where i can get it? ? NO Launch please with this problems! standalone. If you were a little more specific than, "there is a problem" then someone might be able to help you First guess...You installed the 32bit version of Java instead of the 64bit. can you give me the link to the 64bit version? Must i deinstall the older version first? Edit: I installed the version from ninja and i think this is automatically the 64 bit version? |
|
|
|
|
|
