ElTomeko27
|
|
April 02, 2015, 04:59:36 PM |
|
GREAT CONVERSATION GUYS!!! 2300sat at cryptsy Now put your dick size here and we get below 2k...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
creuz
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
April 02, 2015, 06:46:35 PM |
|
125mm
|
|
|
|
karmala
|
|
April 03, 2015, 12:56:11 AM |
|
125mm
lol, now we reached the lowest level. Oh no, sorry that was mastermind's witch hunt. Nah, its history. Lets all move on dudes. On a more serious note: are there any developments with respect to custody chains going on? I found that this is an very interesting concept.
|
|
|
|
GooseNL
|
|
April 03, 2015, 09:58:51 AM |
|
are there any developments with respect to custody chains going on? I found that this is an very interesting concept.
I was wondering what is Chain of custody exactly and found a def at wiki. It shows details and fields where it could be applied. Wiki Chain of custody (CoC), in legal contexts, refers to the chronological documentation or paper trail, showing the seizure, custody, control, transfer, analysis, and disposition of physical or electronic evidence. Particularly important in criminal cases, the concept is also applied in civil litigation – and sometimes more broadly in drug testing of athletes, traceability of food products and to provide assurances that wood products originate from sustainably managed forests. The term is also sometimes used in the fields of history, art history, and archives as a synonym for provenance (meaning the chronology of the ownership, custody or location of a historical object, document or group of documents), which may be an important factor in determining authenticity.
|
|
|
|
GooseNL
|
|
April 03, 2015, 10:06:36 AM |
|
@petertoddbtc on Twitter: 'Quite seriously talking with a blockstream employee at the Stanford conf just reminded me of why I don't work for them.' Blockstream: Enabling Blockchain Innovations with Pegged Sidechains
|
|
|
|
XCH4Sale
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 03, 2015, 12:40:55 PM |
|
Selling 1.99 million XCH for 1 BTC
pm me
must use trusted escrow from BTCtalk
|
|
|
|
GooseNL
|
|
April 03, 2015, 03:06:49 PM |
|
Selling 1.99 million XCH for 1 BTC
This is in line with your March 10 post. Fair enough. Good to move on!
|
|
|
|
PilotofBTC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 03, 2015, 05:58:23 PM |
|
I wonder if anyone is interested in porting Factom to the Via coin blockchain. Seems like an interesting project, and I expect it wouldn't require much effort since Via is a fork of Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
ElTomeko27
|
|
April 03, 2015, 06:16:08 PM |
|
125mm
Well Asian probably...
|
|
|
|
GooseNL
|
|
April 03, 2015, 06:41:49 PM |
|
I wonder if anyone is interested in porting Factom to the Via coin blockchain. Seems like an interesting project, and I expect it wouldn't require much effort since Via is a fork of Bitcoin.
Factum is on the Omni layer, I thought? It has some common things with XCH? 'Factom is a data layer for the blockchain that allows users to permanently secure documents and even whole business processes.' http://blog.omni.foundation/2014/11/09/factom-simple-yet-critical-technology-on-master-protocol/
|
|
|
|
PilotofBTC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 03, 2015, 06:56:38 PM |
|
I wonder if anyone is interested in porting Factom to the Via coin blockchain. Seems like an interesting project, and I expect it wouldn't require much effort since Via is a fork of Bitcoin.
Factum is on the Omni layer, I thought? It has some common things with XCH? 'Factom is a data layer for the blockchain that allows users to permanently secure documents and even whole business processes.' http://blog.omni.foundation/2014/11/09/factom-simple-yet-critical-technology-on-master-protocol/Are we talking about the same thing? http://factom.org/
|
|
|
|
|
PilotofBTC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 03, 2015, 07:11:57 PM |
|
Ok thanks. I learned of Factom through konify and in all the information they didn't mention anything about Omni... it sounded like they themselves created this network layer that factom used to store factom txs. Frankly, factom, or at least, the use case of factom sounds pretty much like what the Clearning house notary service did. However, it was interesting when they talked about combining with storj to build a totally decentralized storage system for public records. Currently clearing house will give you a proof of existence (or notary document) but there is no storage layer for the document itself... a missing piece I always thought it would add value to have. I'm not sure if Drake has anything such as this in the pipeline. Perhaps then Via/XCH wouldn't even need this omni layer to implement something similar due to the 24 second block times on Via and the lack of political concerns with blockchain bloat which Drak has listed as a strong feature of the Via blockchain. Maybe I'll take a look at doing something like this myself and claiming some of the 1mm Via that's available for projects and bounties.
|
|
|
|
GooseNL
|
|
April 03, 2015, 08:01:34 PM Last edit: April 04, 2015, 06:30:02 PM by GooseNL |
|
I learned of Factom through konify and in all the information they didn't mention anything about Omni... it sounded like they themselves created this network layer that factom used to store factom txs.
Frankly, factom, or at least, the use case of factom sounds pretty much like what the Clearning house notary service did. However, it was interesting when they talked about combining with storj to build a totally decentralized storage system for public records. Currently clearing house will give you a proof of existence (or notary document) but there is no storage layer for the document itself... a missing piece I always thought it would add value to have. I'm not sure if Drake has anything such as this in the pipeline.
Perhaps then Via/XCH wouldn't even need this omni layer to implement something similar due to the 24 second block times on Via and the lack of political concerns with blockchain bloat which Drak has listed as a strong feature of the Via blockchain.
Maybe I'll take a look at doing something like this myself and claiming some of the 1mm Via that's available for projects and bounties.
http://blog.omni.foundation/page/3/ Posted Nov 3 'Factom Simple yet critical technology on Master Protocol'Sounds cool. It is something to discuss with Drak. I guess Drak knows about Factom and follows similar 2.0 initiatives. Yes, and maybe it is useful to make a kind of list of what are particulary strong features of the Via project: 'The lack of political concerns with blockchain bloat'.
|
|
|
|
XCH4Sale
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 06, 2015, 11:30:13 AM |
|
Last reminder for the 1.99 Million XCH sale.
Initial offer: 1 BTC for all 1.99 million XCH.
Proof:
address: VrcAQCrDNET1jwTUdC31TeipndQiKVDqoc
https://i.imgur.com/XkSzAQi.png
Offer ends 10 April in which coins will be sold to best offer (which currently is over 1 BTC).
Once again, the sale is going to be done via escrow. YOU can choose the escrow as long as it is a reputable escrow from Bitcointalk. Send PM for offers.
|
|
|
|
spacerman
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
Twitter: @clay_space
|
|
April 08, 2015, 01:20:10 AM |
|
I don't know about you guys, but I'm buying this shit. VIA at this price is a bargain.
|
--Clay Space, Creator of Back of Earth (@clay_space)
|
|
|
barabbas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 08, 2015, 01:26:11 AM |
|
I don't know about you guys, but I'm buying this shit. VIA at this price is a bargain.
There's no such a thing. The "value" of VIA, in significant amounts, is negligible actually in the regular market. Let's see what this "auction" values it at (in amounts around 1 BTC, which is, in no way whatsoever, representative of what you will get in the market if you have to cash in lets shay 20 BTC, whicj would bring the price probably to under 100 sat per 1 VIA... But one is free to delude himself any which way he wants, of course...
|
|
|
|
spacerman
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 209
Merit: 100
Twitter: @clay_space
|
|
April 08, 2015, 01:37:50 AM |
|
I don't know about you guys, but I'm buying this shit. VIA at this price is a bargain.
There's no such a thing. The "value" of VIA, in significant amounts, is negligible actually in the regular market. Let's see what this "auction" values it at (in amounts around 1 BTC, which is, in no way whatsoever, representative of what you will get in the market if you have to cash in lets shay 20 BTC, whicj would bring the price probably to under 100 sat per 1 VIA... But one is free to delude himself any which way he wants, of course... What auction are you talking about?
|
--Clay Space, Creator of Back of Earth (@clay_space)
|
|
|
barabbas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 08, 2015, 07:12:48 AM |
|
What auction are you talking about?
The one about the 1.99 million XCH, just above.
|
|
|
|
GooseNL
|
|
April 08, 2015, 07:38:19 AM |
|
I don't know about you guys, but I'm buying this shit. VIA at this price is a bargain.
Me too!
|
|
|
|
|