#1 RATINGS of BITCOIN SPORTSBOOKS since 2014 : KYC Rankings, Bonuses, Scam Accus

[slaman29]

What do you think about Nitrogensports cancelling a guy's winning parlay, and then not responding to him until he made a thread about it? And the response just said it was "an error"?

Like the responses there say, we all agree bookies have the right to cancel a bet, but in this case, this was no good reason for cancelling the line, just because they didn't like it. If we allow it once, will they continue to do it again? What if people didn't complain?

All they did was refund his wager, but in fact he WON 2 legs and pushed half of his 3rd leg (won the other half).

[1714842849]

1714842849

[1714842849]

1714842849

[1714842849]

1714842849

[Oilacris]

What do you think about Nitrogensports cancelling a guy's winning parlay, and then not responding to him until he made a thread about it? And the response just said it was "an error"?

Like the responses there say, we all agree bookies have the right to cancel a bet, but in this case, this was no good reason for cancelling the line, just because they didn't like it. If we allow it once, will they continue to do it again? What if people didn't complain?

All they did was refund his wager, but in fact he WON 2 legs and pushed half of his 3rd leg (won the other half).

I've seen the thread as well and same goes with that support reply to the user regarding on cancelling of bets because they don't like the line.It isn't actually a valid
reason for them to alter/cancel. What shady behavior of them and until now ive been following that thread on what would be the replies of Nitrogen forum representative on that matter.

[Rating Place]

What do you think about Nitrogensports cancelling a guy's winning parlay, and then not responding to him until he made a thread about it? And the response just said it was "an error"?

Like the responses there say, we all agree bookies have the right to cancel a bet, but in this case, this was no good reason for cancelling the line, just because they didn't like it. If we allow it once, will they continue to do it again? What if people didn't complain?

All they did was refund his wager, but in fact he WON 2 legs and pushed half of his 3rd leg (won the other half).

I need the player to shoot me a PM so that I can look in to it.

[slaman29]

I've seen the thread as well and same goes with that support reply to the user regarding on cancelling of bets because they don't like the line.It isn't actually a valid
reason for them to alter/cancel. What shady behavior of them and until now ive been following that thread on what would be the replies of Nitrogen forum representative on that matter.

They did reply, but only saying that it was an error, and that they would refund the full wager amount to his account. So in fact, before the player notified them, it seems they wouldn't have done anything about it. Plus it took them a while to do so. I wonder, how many people bet that type of game, and don't really understand how the odds work (half win half push), and how pushes work in parlays, and sportsbooks take advantage of that?

[raven7886]

Yeah, it is actually both a valid reason but also gamblers right. I mean they probably fix those Asian odds all the time and they probably get their odds from a provider and try to fix the asian odds as soon as they get it but sometimes they are a bit late and that is why people do bet there.

Now in the eyes of nitrogensports they are right because those are not the odds they will provide to us, they will provide a better odds for themselves at least. So the end result is not those odds that the gambler played and they probably have right to cancel the bet and just make them replay with the new odds. However from the gamblers perspective gambler just gambled on a game with the given odds from the sportsbook, its not his fault that sportsbook had a bad odd at that time. At least remove the game from parlay and give him his win.

[DarkStar_]

However from the gamblers perspective gambler just gambled on a game with the given odds from the sportsbook, its not his fault that sportsbook had a bad odd at that time.

Odds weren't even incorrect. Nitrogen is allergic to quarter point AH lines for whatever reason.

[slaman29]

However from the gamblers perspective gambler just gambled on a game with the given odds from the sportsbook, its not his fault that sportsbook had a bad odd at that time.

Odds weren't even incorrect. Nitrogen is allergic to quarter point AH lines for whatever reason.

Exactly, it wasn't anything to do with the odds, and remember, this is Nitro taking the odds that are already existing from Pinnacle, so it was simply the fact that they put it up there, and some unlucky guy took it and they decided not to honor the bet.

Now that this Asian Handicap complaint is coming up, it really makes me wonder, how many people actually got bitten but never realized it?

[Rating Place]

Cloudbet raised from "D-" to "D+".  The player claims that Cloudbet paid the 330 BTC that was owed. This was a highly publicized case on many forums.

[Rating Place]

"A" and "B" books are recommended.


"A" rated books
nitrogensports.eu A+ (2013)  
betcoin.ag A (2013)            

"B"rated books
bitcoinrush.io B+ (2013)        

"C" rated books
mBet.io C+ (2017)                
anonibet.com  C- (2011)      
jetwin.ps C- (2013)

"D" rated books  
cloudbet.com D+ (2013)        
coinbet24.com D+ (2015)        
1xbit.com D (2016)                      
sportsbet.io D- (2016)          

[Ipwich]

Cloudbet raised from "D-" to "D+".  The player claims that Cloudbet paid the 330 BTC that was owed. This was a highly publicized case on many forums.

That's right, but they are still in "D" rated books  which is not recommended.
I'll still go with Nitrogensports, they don't have big scam accusations and their odds are very competitive.

~snip~                    
sportsbet.io D- (2016)    

I was browsing all the link in the list, only sportsbet.io are no working, please fix the link.

[Rating Place]

Cloudbet raised from "D-" to "D+".  The player claims that Cloudbet paid the 330 BTC that was owed. This was a highly publicized case on many forums.

That's right, but they are still in "D" rated books  which is not recommended.
I'll still go with Nitrogensports, they don't have big scam accusations and their odds are very competitive.

~snip~                    
sportsbet.io D- (2016)    

I was browsing all the link in the list, only sportsbet.io are no working, please fix the link.

Thanks Ipwhich, fixed,

"A" and "B" books are recommended.

"A" rated books
nitrogensports.eu A+ (2013)  
betcoin.ag A (2013)            

"B"rated books
bitcoinrush.io B+ (2013)        

"C" rated books
mBet.io C+ (2017)                
anonibet.com  C- (2011)      
jetwin.ps C- (2013)

"D" rated books  
cloudbet.com D+ (2013)        
coinbet24.com D+ (2015)        
1xbit.com D (2016)                      
sportsbet.io D- (2016)          


email: support@nitrogensports.eu and support ticket........Reduced juice: Yes
email: contact@betcoin.ag and support ticket.................Reduced juice: Yes
email: admin@bitcoinrush.io..........................................Reduced juice: Yes.
email: customer_support@mbet.io................................. Reduced juice: No
email: info@anonibet.com.............................................Reduced juice: No
email: support@jetwin.ps Under maintenance....................Reduced juice: No
email: support-en@1x-bit.com ......................................Two sets of lines.
email: support@cloudbet.com .......................................Reduced juice:Yes
email: cs@sportsbet.io................................................ Reduced juice: No

[tokeweed]

However from the gamblers perspective gambler just gambled on a game with the given odds from the sportsbook, its not his fault that sportsbook had a bad odd at that time.

Odds weren't even incorrect. Nitrogen is allergic to quarter point AH lines for whatever reason.

There's an easy solution to that.  Bet half on +0 and the other half on -0.5 (or +0.5). 

[Rating Place]

[DarkStar_]

Made a 0.15BTC earlier today, will leave a review after I play a bit

An update for Betbit. Made a 0.15BTC deposit and took a bonus. I had issues with the bonus but their forum account was active in getting back to me and helping me out. Won about 0.15BTC, which I withdrew and I received the funds about 10 minutes after the withdraw request. Only complaint I really have is lack of 2FA.

[Rating Place]

Made a 0.15BTC earlier today, will leave a review after I play a bit

An update for Betbit. Made a 0.15BTC deposit and took a bonus. I had issues with the bonus but their forum account was active in getting back to me and helping me out. Won about 0.15BTC, which I withdrew and I received the funds about 10 minutes after the withdraw request. Only complaint I really have is lack of 2FA.

Thanks Darkstar.

[sana54210]

I had withdrawn some money from bitcoinrush and got it back fairly quickly (about 48 minutes if I am not calculating wrong because blockchain shows a different timezone than my own timezone so and I didn't really checked when they would send just got notified by my wallet that I have some money deposited and checked to see when it was on blockchain which was either 48 minutes or 1 hour 48 minutes but i suspect 48 minutes).

They have been legit for a long time offering a lot of good odds and yes they still can't send you money in 10-20 minute averages which nitrogen clearly can but I don't know if just because of that they are so much worse than nitrogen.

I am still in between if I should go with nitrogen or bitcoinrush when it comes to small stuff, I know it says a lot that when it comes to big bets like super bowl I prefer nitrogen but for daily regular weekend games bitcoinrush is as legit as anyone else to me.

[Rating Place]

I had withdrawn some money from bitcoinrush and got it back fairly quickly (about 48 minutes if I am not calculating wrong because blockchain shows a different timezone than my own timezone so and I didn't really checked when they would send just got notified by my wallet that I have some money deposited and checked to see when it was on blockchain which was either 48 minutes or 1 hour 48 minutes but i suspect 48 minutes).

They have been legit for a long time offering a lot of good odds and yes they still can't send you money in 10-20 minute averages which nitrogen clearly can but I don't know if just because of that they are so much worse than nitrogen.

I am still in between if I should go with nitrogen or bitcoinrush when it comes to small stuff, I know it says a lot that when it comes to big bets like super bowl I prefer nitrogen but for daily regular weekend games bitcoinrush is as legit as anyone else to me.

Thanks for the feedback sana.

[Rating Place]

Add 1bettor.com to NR. I don't know for sure but it looks like a poster using agent software to take bets.

edit- a thread from 2013 was bumped and the OP last posted in 2013 so the poster may not even take wagers. 1bettor will be deleted from the ratings if there isn't a reply to the bumped post.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=203263.0

[sana54210]

NR is not recommended ? Honestly you are doing way more than what people probably realize I just realized you did more than just the alphabetical stuff I was looking only at the A/B/C/D sportsbooks, I never realized you had exchanges, you had "F" rated which I had no idea it existed at all, prediction markets and of course one and only lovable onehash.

What is the difference between F and NR? I can see plenty of places that says "closed" there and dunno the reason why a closed sportsbook would be listed anyway, feel like could be removed but honestly doesn't bother anyone so could stay too.

I feel like those things are listed a bit too close to each other, the exchanges and prediction markets and onehash should be closer to A/B/C/D list than closer to NR things, it feels like you are warning people instead of suggesting anything. Maybe right under the list would be much better instead of way down there.

[Rating Place]

NR is not recommended ? Honestly you are doing way more than what people probably realize I just realized you did more than just the alphabetical stuff I was looking only at the A/B/C/D sportsbooks, I never realized you had exchanges, you had "F" rated which I had no idea it existed at all, prediction markets and of course one and only lovable onehash.

What is the difference between F and NR? I can see plenty of places that says "closed" there and dunno the reason why a closed sportsbook would be listed anyway, feel like could be removed but honestly doesn't bother anyone so could stay too.

I feel like those things are listed a bit too close to each other, the exchanges and prediction markets and onehash should be closer to A/B/C/D list than closer to NR things, it feels like you are warning people instead of suggesting anything. Maybe right under the list would be much better instead of way down there.

sana - thanks for the suggestions. I'll move some of it around based upon your suggestions in a day or two. "NR" stands for not rated. I will clarify that. If you or anyone else is playing at NR books, please post a review.