Trillium
|
|
April 20, 2014, 10:20:27 AM |
|
= 22680 boards (assuming 100% occupancy on all racks/rows as shown in close pics) So if each board is like the batch 3 product boards then they should be apparently 750 GH/s each So 22680 * 750 GH/s = 17010000 GH/s = 17010 TH/s = 17.0 PH/sThe current total network hashrate estimate is: 55.5 PH/s ( https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty) So following the assumptions I've made for these calculations, this room would accommodate 30.6% of the total network's hashrate. Please don't get shitty at KnC only based on my back of the napkin estimations.Hate to point out an error but as batch 3 products typically consist of 4boards each, every board has ~187 maximum potential hashrate. Thus total hashrate would be 22680 *187GH/s = 4252TH/s = 4,252PH/sThis would put them to a ~5.2MW power draw, assuming some minor improvements. This model is in line with the fact that their datacenter is, i think, a 10MW facility. Right well then their website images are entirely erroneous misleading, as they show 1.5 TH/s systems with 2 boards and 3 TH/s systems with 4 boards. Thank you for the clarification. I assume somewhere they state a disclaimer about their images not reflecting the actual product so they can be lazy and vary their product design without updating the site.
|
BTC:1AaaAAAAaAAE2L1PXM1x9VDNqvcrfa9He6
|
|
|
Collider
|
|
April 20, 2014, 10:24:42 AM |
|
= 22680 boards (assuming 100% occupancy on all racks/rows as shown in close pics) So if each board is like the batch 3 product boards then they should be apparently 750 GH/s each So 22680 * 750 GH/s = 17010000 GH/s = 17010 TH/s = 17.0 PH/sThe current total network hashrate estimate is: 55.5 PH/s ( https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty) So following the assumptions I've made for these calculations, this room would accommodate 30.6% of the total network's hashrate. Please don't get shitty at KnC only based on my back of the napkin estimations.Hate to point out an error but as batch 3 products typically consist of 4boards each, every board has ~187 maximum potential hashrate. Thus total hashrate would be 22680 *187GH/s = 4252TH/s = 4,252PH/sThis would put them to a ~5.2MW power draw, assuming some minor improvements. This model is in line with the fact that their datacenter is, i think, a 10MW facility. Right well then their website images are entirely erroneous misleading, as they show 1.5 TH/s systems with 2 boards and 3 TH/s systems with 4 boards. Thank you for the clarification. Ah I see where the source of the confusion lies. Those on the website right now are their new 20nm modules (aka Neptune, actually the same pics as the Jupiters in 2013) which are not yet in production (though tapeout was somewhere in march or late february i believe) The ones in the datacenter are old 28nm, essentially the same as in the Jupiters, upgrade boards like on the website now.
|
|
|
|
Equate
|
|
April 20, 2014, 12:04:57 PM |
|
KNC datacenter is mammoth. They got some strategy , first mine the shit out of miners and then send those miners to the customers for which they paid months in advance .
|
|
|
|
Collider
|
|
April 20, 2014, 12:20:25 PM |
|
KNC datacenter is mammoth. They got some strategy , first mine the shit out of miners and then send those miners to the customers for which they paid months in advance .
For what it´s worth they are planning on selling this as cloudhashing power, but first need to build their farm big enough to offer everyone of their Neptune customers compensation for any late delivery. Without a doubt these petahashes are hugely profitable, but my guestimation is they are only at 50% deployment yet, as their facility supports 10MW power draw and they are only at a bit over 5MW right now XD So yeah... atleast every Neptune customer is entitled to a refund if he spots cheaper hashpower anywhere... Cloudhashing per se is actually quite a good idea, as it lowers the entry level for miners to become involved with mining and bitcoin. This will eventually lower prices for cloudmining. I guess what i´m trying to say is, that maybe in the end everyone can get a bit of their datacenter and feel good about it. At this point is it sadly just a symbol of KNC´s greed.
|
|
|
|
tzortz
|
|
April 20, 2014, 01:08:19 PM |
|
Another thread got dirty with the shit of Knc.
|
All is Mine!
1H7LUdfx9AFTMSXPsCBror3RDk57zgnc2R
|
|
|
Taugeran
|
|
April 20, 2014, 05:25:16 PM |
|
REBIRTH FROM THE KnC S**TFEST.....
Loading
Edit: reduced font size to be slightly less *bam*
|
Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1 Come join Coinbase
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
April 20, 2014, 08:14:13 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
JakeGold
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
April 20, 2014, 10:27:29 PM |
|
KNC datacenter is mammoth. They got some strategy , first mine the shit out of miners and then send those miners to the customers for which they paid months in advance .
To give credit where credit is due, BFL did it first
|
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
|
April 20, 2014, 11:21:54 PM |
|
Cabinet with Antminer S1's, 2 KNC's, a few Nano Fury 2's and a new Antminer S2. Front Top Front Bottom Rear of Cabinet.
|
|
|
|
GordonBM
|
|
April 21, 2014, 06:49:48 AM |
|
Cabinet with Antminer S1's, 2 KNC's, a few Nano Fury 2's and a new Antminer S2.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/3O6d41x.jpg[/ img] Front Top
[img]https://i.imgur.com/CfkTFzb.jpg[ /img] Front Bottom
[img]https://i.imgur.com/Che3rp5.jpg[/ img] Rear of Cabinet.
So crowded. Is that a laptop next to the knc?
|
I got hacked by some Syrian faggot and now I have negative feedback.
|
|
|
Collider
|
|
April 21, 2014, 06:52:59 AM |
|
Cabinet with Antminer S1's, 2 KNC's, a few Nano Fury 2's and a new Antminer S2.
Rear of Cabinet.
So crowded. Is that a laptop next to the knc? Sure looks like it. Maybe for easy remote access.
|
|
|
|
|
Equate
|
|
April 21, 2014, 07:44:00 AM |
|
This is my Dodge/Mooncoin miner I build whit my good friend. a Easy 26.000 KH/S. Power drain is 35 times lower than a GPU RIG! Its Sickening if i start mining Mooncoins at a good pool. Cryptsy can`t handle the amount of moons YOU MIRIN BRAH [img ]http://www.bitcoinupdate.nl/uploads/3/3/0/6/330647/3117906_orig.jpg[/img] [img ]http://www.bitcoinupdate.nl/uploads/3/3/0/6/330647/1693674_orig.jpg[/img] Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uh6-97y-Vr4Thanks. what is the power draw of single scrypt blade and from which seller did you buy these ?
|
|
|
|
Zeta0S
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1031
|
|
April 21, 2014, 07:53:03 AM Last edit: April 21, 2014, 09:10:33 AM by Zeta0S |
|
This is my Dodge/Mooncoin miner I build whit my good friend. a Easy 26.000 KH/S. Power drain is 35 times lower than a GPU RIG! Its Sickening if i start mining Mooncoins at a good pool. Cryptsy can`t handle the amount of moons YOU MIRIN BRAH [img ]http://www.bitcoinupdate.nl/uploads/3/3/0/6/330647/3117906_orig.jpg[/img] [img ]http://www.bitcoinupdate.nl/uploads/3/3/0/6/330647/1693674_orig.jpg[/img] Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uh6-97y-Vr4Thanks. what is the power draw of single scrypt blade and from which seller did you buy these ? 130 Watt on my crappy Power meter (240volt) will get a brand new one wednesday, so that i am sure about the power-drain. I got them from Eyeboot.com
|
|
|
|
Kergekoin
|
|
April 21, 2014, 08:30:21 AM |
|
130w should be about accurate.
|
|
|
|
EasyQuest
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 198
Merit: 100
Brony Bitcoin, Litecoin Miner
|
|
April 21, 2014, 12:17:57 PM |
|
Strange on my ATX PSU 80 Plus Gold, before I added my blade the power draw was reading 218 to 230 watts with 40 Gridseed miners then when I added the blade the watts jump to 295 to 315 watts. So 295 - 218 = 77 watts Or 315 - 230 = 85 watts So on an 80 Plus gold PSU the blade is only pulling 77 to 85 watts.... Here is proof of wattage Also of the rig
|
|
|
|
Zeta0S
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1031
|
|
April 21, 2014, 06:42:40 PM |
|
Your PSU is more efficient whit higher output. Other thing can people forget is the 110 volt vs 240 volt difference people from Europe have. Thank can make a difference to. This will make
|
|
|
|
ipxtreme
|
|
April 21, 2014, 10:01:33 PM |
|
10 - S1 Antminers 2 - S2 Antminers Decided not to buy PCI-E cables and glad the connectors for 14 AWG was available to screw in the cables. 1 PSU powers 2 ANTs easily. Roswell case with Dell PSU powering both S1 Ant miners. Front of Roswell case. Have 5 of them going to fit into a server rack with 2 - S2 in the same farm.
|
BTC tips: 14PkHaJH5GexLG9P7MYxHRNvZeCq2t8DWX
|
|
|
tzortz
|
|
April 21, 2014, 11:43:45 PM |
|
10 - S1 Antminers 2 - S2 Antminers
Decided not to buy PCI-E cables and glad the connectors for 14 AWG was available to screw in the cables. 1 PSU powers 2 ANTs easily.
Roswell case with Dell PSU powering both S1
Front of Roswell case. Have 5 of them going to fit into a server rack with 2 - S2 in the
Nice job!
|
All is Mine!
1H7LUdfx9AFTMSXPsCBror3RDk57zgnc2R
|
|
|
Swimmer63
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1593
Merit: 1004
|
|
April 22, 2014, 02:16:39 AM |
|
Cabinet with Antminer S1's, 2 KNC's, a few Nano Fury 2's and a new Antminer S2.
Rear of Cabinet.
So crowded. Is that a laptop next to the knc? Sure looks like it. Maybe for easy remote access. Correct, its a small laptop. Originally it ran proxies but I have gotten rid of all those older miners. Now I use to remote in for troubleshooting and restarting when necessary. I also have 15 Nano Fury 2's in there using BFGMiner. Yes - it is crowded. But the airflow is good so it all works. There is a large AC unit right next to my locker. You can see it in the picture.
|
|
|
|
|