|
rapture333
|
 |
January 24, 2015, 04:30:26 AM |
|
@SecretsOfCrypto
Rapture has always been my online alias; in the beginning anonymity was important to me, just like many in the crypto word, but it is much less so now that I am doing professional work for Ultracoin and using my full name all the time. I am not a hard target to dox either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
volyova
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 24, 2015, 07:01:50 AM |
|
@SecretsOfCrypto
Rapture has always been my online alias; in the beginning anonymity was important to me, just like many in the crypto word, but it is much less so now that I am doing professional work for Ultracoin and using my full name all the time. I am not a hard target to dox either.
Is it a religious rapture, or just a normal rapture?  |
|
|
|
|
|
dan_and_shan
|
|
January 24, 2015, 08:09:00 AM |
|
Gday just a question is there anyway to limit "generated but not accepted".  Regards Dan |
Don't take life too serious, No one gets out alive  |
|
|
|
wtfc360
|
|
January 24, 2015, 09:38:59 AM |
|
I'm not sure I'm answering your question, but you can clear the orphans in the transaction tab by rightclick on any transaction and a new window will appear, choose "clear orphans" and the orphans will disappear... Gday just a question is there anyway to limit "generated but not accepted". Regards Dan |
|
|
|
|
|
king_pin
|
|
January 24, 2015, 10:49:45 AM |
|
Someone found good settings for NVIDIA 970 cards? Autotune makes my rig crash  |
|
|
|
|
barbados-fs
|
|
January 24, 2015, 11:22:25 AM |
|
Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be. Thank U. |
"Coздaть ceнcopнyю ceть гopoдa - этo нe дopoгo, нe cлoжнo и пo cooтнoшeнию зaтpaты / эффeкт для гopoдa - нeoцeнимo! He нyжнo ждaть пoкa кopпopaции и гocyдapcтвa cдeлaют тaкиe ceнcopныe ceти и бyдyт иx oбcлyживaть - этo бyдeт дopoгo и бyдeт coбиpaть бoльшe дaнныx o нac c вaми, чeм мы бы этoгo xoтeли!" (c)Aira.life
|
|
|
|
wtfc360
|
|
January 24, 2015, 01:33:21 PM |
|
I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs: C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 From that I get different results for every rig: 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards? Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...? Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be. Thank U. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wirly
|
|
January 24, 2015, 01:54:40 PM
Last edit: January 24, 2015, 02:12:30 PM by Wirly |
|
I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs: C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 From that I get different results for every rig: 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards? Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...? Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be. Thank U. Try slowing down the engine speed of the gpu going sick, example --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 or turn down the raw intensity by using individual -R values for each, example -R 2560,2560,2560,2432,2432 (decreased in increments of the work size setting of 128) or if using windows try increasing the amount of virtual memory your hard drive is using Any combination of this worked for my rigs when that happens |
|
|
|
|
|
wtfc360
|
|
January 24, 2015, 02:08:14 PM |
|
Ok, I'll try that. If it says GPU 0 is sick would that be automatically the first engine to slow down, in your example: --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 and slow that from 1040 to lets say 1000? I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs: C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 From that I get different results for every rig: 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards? Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...? Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be. Thank U. Try slowing down the engine speed of the gpu going sick, example --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 or turn down the raw intensity by using individual -R values for each, example -R 2560,2560,2560,2432,2432 (decreased in increments of the work size setting of 128) or if using windows try increasing the amount of virtual memory your hard drive is using |
|
|
|
|
|
Wirly
|
|
January 24, 2015, 02:13:01 PM |
|
Yes Ok, I'll try that. If it says GPU 0 is sick would that be automatically the first engine to slow down, in your example: --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 and slow that from 1040 to lets say 1000? I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs: C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 From that I get different results for every rig: 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards? Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...? Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be. Thank U. Try slowing down the engine speed of the gpu going sick, example --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 or turn down the raw intensity by using individual -R values for each, example -R 2560,2560,2560,2432,2432 (decreased in increments of the work size setting of 128) or if using windows try increasing the amount of virtual memory your hard drive is using |
|
|
|
|
|
wtfc360
|
|
January 24, 2015, 02:23:25 PM |
|
So tried --gpu-engine 1031, 1031, 1031, 1031, 1031 and get : 0 (Sick/dead), 1,009 Kh/s, 1,009Kh/s, 490h/s, 134h/s. Then I try --gpu-engine 900, 1031, 1031, 900, 900 and get: 0 (Sick/dead), 881h/s, 881h/s, 489h/s, 130h/s Why is GPU 1 and 2 affected by the GPU 0 engine set? Yes Ok, I'll try that. If it says GPU 0 is sick would that be automatically the first engine to slow down, in your example: --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 and slow that from 1040 to lets say 1000? I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs: C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 From that I get different results for every rig: 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards? Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...? Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be. Thank U. Try slowing down the engine speed of the gpu going sick, example --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 or turn down the raw intensity by using individual -R values for each, example -R 2560,2560,2560,2432,2432 (decreased in increments of the work size setting of 128) or if using windows try increasing the amount of virtual memory your hard drive is using |
|
|
|
|
|
rapture333
|
|
January 24, 2015, 02:26:57 PM |
|
@SecretsOfCrypto
Rapture has always been my online alias; in the beginning anonymity was important to me, just like many in the crypto word, but it is much less so now that I am doing professional work for Ultracoin and using my full name all the time. I am not a hard target to dox either.
Is it a religious rapture, or just a normal rapture? Non-religious definition, Rapture 1. "a feeling of intense pleasure or joy." Also the name of my motorcycle  |
|
|
|
|
Wirly
|
|
January 24, 2015, 02:44:24 PM |
|
You are having memory issues, to much engine speed not enough memory. You can see that your gpu 0, 1 and 2 are affecting each other and 3 and 4 are proly sharing. Depending on the design of your MOB your GPU may be sharing a data bus. Example, my 6 gpu rigs are the same and gpu1 and 4 share a bus and changing anything on 1 affects 4, but only when there are 6 gpu's running. try gpu-engine 1000 and gpu-memclock of 1250 for start. So tried --gpu-engine 1031, 1031, 1031, 1031, 1031 and get : 0 (Sick/dead), 1,009 Kh/s, 1,009Kh/s, 490h/s, 134h/s. Then I try --gpu-engine 900, 1031, 1031, 900, 900 and get: 0 (Sick/dead), 881h/s, 881h/s, 489h/s, 130h/s Why is GPU 1 and 2 affected by the GPU 0 engine set?
|
|
|
|
|
volyova
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 24, 2015, 02:49:02 PM |
|
I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs: C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 From that I get different results for every rig: 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards? Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...? Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be. Thank U. Coz MSI iz teh best! |
|
|
|
|
|
wtfc360
|
|
January 24, 2015, 02:50:19 PM |
|
So this is the batfile: C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --gpu-engine 1000 --gpu-memclock 1250 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 gives me: 0 (Sick), 978,978, 450, 130 You are having memory issues, to much engine speed not enough memory. You can see that your gpu 0, 3 and 4 are affecting each other. Depending on the design of your MOB your GPU may be sharing a data bus. Example, my 6 gpu rigs are the same and gpu1 and 4 share a bus and changing anything on 1 affects 4, but only when there are 6 gpu's running. try gpu-engine 1000 and gpu-memclock of 1250 for start. So tried --gpu-engine 1031, 1031, 1031, 1031, 1031 and get : 0 (Sick/dead), 1,009 Kh/s, 1,009Kh/s, 490h/s, 134h/s. Then I try --gpu-engine 900, 1031, 1031, 900, 900 and get: 0 (Sick/dead), 881h/s, 881h/s, 489h/s, 130h/s Why is GPU 1 and 2 affected by the GPU 0 engine set? Yes Ok, I'll try that. If it says GPU 0 is sick would that be automatically the first engine to slow down, in your example: --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 and slow that from 1040 to lets say 1000? I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs: C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 From that I get different results for every rig: 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards? Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...? Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be. Thank U. Try slowing down the engine speed of the gpu going sick, example --gpu-engine 1040,1040,1040,1000,1000 or turn down the raw intensity by using individual -R values for each, example -R 2560,2560,2560,2432,2432 (decreased in increments of the work size setting of 128) or if using windows try increasing the amount of virtual memory your hard drive is using |
|
|
|
|
volyova
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 24, 2015, 02:52:22 PM |
|
I use the data from configgen and have this setup for all my rigs: C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600 From that I get different results for every rig: 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 362h/s & one DEAD 5 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 490h/s ,139h/s & one SICK 4 x Sapphire Dual-x R9 280x 3GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 4 x ASUS Radeon R9 280x 3GB: 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s, 1,047Kh/s & one DEAD 5 x MSI Radeon R9 3 GB: 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s, 998h/s Anyone got any idea why one card is always dead in each rig from Sapphire/ASUS but not from the MSI-cards? Before mininig at N14 they didn't go DEAD/Sick...? Friends share settings for R9 28x 0and R9 270x. Just not here - http://cfg.ultracoin.net/ the result is less than it should be. Thank U. Coz MSI iz teh best! Srsly noobz, dnt buy Sapphire. |
|
|
|
|
|
Wirly
|
|
January 24, 2015, 02:55:22 PM |
|
Reboot the rigs. Do not just restart the miners when you make these changes. So this is the batfile:
C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --gpu-engine 1000 --gpu-memclock 1250 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600
gives me: 0 (Sick), 978,978, 450, 130
|
|
|
|
|
|
wtfc360
|
|
January 24, 2015, 03:06:18 PM
Last edit: January 24, 2015, 03:19:19 PM by wtfc360 |
|
FAAK, the rig died when rebooting through TW, HAHAHA, have to go and restart it manually tomorrow, that's what you get for being to greedy  @ Wirly Thanks for trying to help! Might be back again when its up again tomorrow... Reboot the rigs. Do not just restart the miners when you make these changes. So this is the batfile:
C:\Users\Mining1\Desktop\Yacminer-3.5.0-yac2-x86\yacminer.exe --scrypt-chacha -o stratum+tcp://stratum2.tumblingblock.com:5555 -u worker.1 -p password -R 2560 -g 1 -w 128 --buffer-size 2590 --lookup-gap 8 --gpu-engine 1000 --gpu-memclock 1250 --temp-cutoff 85 --nfmin 4 --nfmax 30 --starttime 1388361600
gives me: 0 (Sick), 978,978, 450, 130
|
|
|
|
|
|
tex81
|
|
January 24, 2015, 03:48:06 PM |
|
Gettin` 1188 h/s on 280X @ 1200/1500
Now 4 (cards) x 20-25 accepts without HW.
Config from configgen.
|
Russia
|
|
|
|
wtfc360
|
|
January 24, 2015, 04:04:55 PM |
|
Yes, @ 1200/1500 seem to be working, getting the same 1174h/s for 4 out of 5 GPUs the sick one gets around 445h/s then goes sick again. config from configgen Gettin` 1188 h/s on 280X @ 1200/1500
Now 4 (cards) x 20-25 accepts without HW.
Config from configgen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
