Scientific proof that God exists?

[Decksperiment]

Just look at how the internet HAS become the new tower of babble.. where's everything being saved? In the cloud.. what's that single language? English. Just look at that user 'the JOINT' - a junkie, who probably came from the tower of babble the way he speaks, I mean, Only god can prove the flood happened or not. Lol.. When sol sends a solar flare to kill all electronics, the only thing the people will be able to talk is shit, because they wont have any clue what to say to folks to their face, since they lost all communication skills before the light's went out..

Their keyboards dont work..

Notice even though we will soon all be speaking english, we still make word's up as we go along? This is the creative process, and it come's 'accented', meaning we view word's differently.. Again, I think the user 'The Joint' is a serious drug user, where as someone else may consider his name to mean we eat him..

[1714951627]

1714951627

[1714951627]

1714951627

[1714951627]

1714951627

[BADecker]

See? It's just as I have said at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and in other posts. People and scientists and engineers pattern their machines off the more advanced machines found in nature.

----------

OSU researchers create fast robot modeled after birds.

http://www.kgw.com/story/news/local/technology/2015/03/12/osu-researchers-create-fast-robot-modeled-after-birds/70245626/

[Bardman]

See? It's just as I have said at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and in other posts. People and scientists and engineers pattern their machines off the more advanced machines found in nature.

----------

OSU researchers create fast robot modeled after birds.

http://www.kgw.com/story/news/local/technology/2015/03/12/osu-researchers-create-fast-robot-modeled-after-birds/70245626/

Yeah yeah ignore all the posts talking about the biblical nonsense because you cant say anything to defend it, even you realize that the flood its stupid and pretty much all the stories in the bible

[Bardman]

See? It's just as I have said at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and in other posts. People and scientists and engineers pattern their machines off the more advanced machines found in nature.

----------

OSU researchers create fast robot modeled after birds.

http://www.kgw.com/story/news/local/technology/2015/03/12/osu-researchers-create-fast-robot-modeled-after-birds/70245626/

So by your logic God patterned us off something more advanced found in nature?

[notbatman]

The science is settled, I don't know what y'all are arguing about. 


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson

[Decksperiment]

I'd love to see them get that side effect of the hydron collector, which they call the 'god' particle, to speak, since they cant physically record the third 'particle', due to only appearing when no recording device is powered on.. yes they can see it, but when they try to record it, they cant.. but then you'd have to do a shit lot of studying what I'm talking about before you come up with the same answer as me..

When two become three for no other reason than no-one's looking, perhap's god's particle is made of the same kinda shit BADecker is, ya know, embarrassed to show his face every other day..

[BADecker]

See? It's just as I have said at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and in other posts. People and scientists and engineers pattern their machines off the more advanced machines found in nature.

----------

OSU researchers create fast robot modeled after birds.

http://www.kgw.com/story/news/local/technology/2015/03/12/osu-researchers-create-fast-robot-modeled-after-birds/70245626/

So by your logic God patterned us off something more advanced found in nature?

Hadn't thought of it that way. The example of "my logic" in my previous post (quoted above) is designed to reinforce the machine-like quality of nature and the universe as explained in my post linked above.

If someone wants to discuss whether or not God used a pattern to make people, and/or what that pattern might have been, shouldn't he/she start a thread about it? This thread has been entirely beat up with way off topic stuff, not to say anything about the stupid ramblings of Dorksperiment.

[Decksperiment]

I wish I knew what ignored above was saying lol.. Someone pray tell him, it's me doing the saving..

Edit; My next exercise will test his ability to translate belief, into ACTION.

[Buffer Overflow]

This thread has been entirely beat up with way off topic stuff, not to say anything about the stupid ramblings of Dorksperiment.

Decksperiment cannot save you if you are too frightened to open your eyes.

[Prelude]

This thread has been entirely beat up with way off topic stuff, not to say anything about the stupid ramblings of Dorksperiment.

You're certainly one to talk about stupid ramblings. 

[Decksperiment]

Meet Decksperiment, loud and proud
Poor BADecker, left in the crowd
For Decksperiment, the truth shall prevail
Poor BADecker, Epic Fuckin Fail..

Edit: Just noticed.. Page 216!

Did you know there are 216 digit's to the 72 names of god?

I need to ask a question again:

Science, no matter what people say, is not quite correct, in that there is no air in space. If there is no air/oxygen in space, how come the flames of the sun exist?

Answer: Take a DEEEEEP breath..

Now think about it.

The sun might be up there, but since everything is contained in your mind, body, and soul..

[Decksperiment]

This thread has been entirely beat up with way off topic stuff, not to say anything about the stupid ramblings of Dorksperiment.

You're certainly one to talk about stupid ramblings.  

I'm actually quoting what you quoted.. What beat this thread up was BADecker's endless irelevant bible quoting, which in the end, detracted from the point of the OP's question. As for me, I turned that shit into reality for BADecker, this is what I get paid for in reality, BADecker, tis on the house (MUSIC)

BADecker.. listen to the word's in this tune:

House of God

Here was me thinking the bible was free..

[BADecker]

This thread has been entirely beat up with way off topic stuff, not to say anything about the stupid ramblings of Dorksperiment.

You're certainly one to talk about stupid ramblings. 

And so I am talking about stupid ramblings, even though it is off topic.

Consider, everyone talks off topic now and again. Mostly, my off topic posts have been to answer other off topic posts. So now, in an effort to get on point and get some real, good info, let's do just that.

The point of scientific proof for God is found throughout the whole universe in the science used to examine everything. It works through what is found in my post at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. In addition, there are other scientific and non-scientific proofs for God.

Since the topic title has a question mark in it, and since OP has shown the pattern by listing one of the scientific evidences, it would follow that OP is asking for more examples of, at least, scientific evidence.

I'm sure OP understands that there is going to be all kinds of discussion about whether or not certain points should be considered evidence this way or that. But we have gotten into a bashing contest rather than a proof finding contest.

If you don't have at least evidence for God, then why not continue with your evidence that God doesn't exist? I think Decky is simply frustrated that he can't refute, scientifically. And so he wants to cover up the strong evidence I have shown. That however, as off topic as it might be, is simply silly. Why not accept the evidence/proof, especially in the light of the posts that suggest that God cannot be proven to not exist?

[Buffer Overflow]

Why not accept the evidence/proof, especially in the light of the posts that suggest that God cannot be proven to not exist?

No, because that would be a logical fallacy. Just because there is no proof of god cannot exist, it would be a fallacy to automatically assume yours is true.

[Decksperiment]

The real problem is christianity claiming THEIR god is THE god, no-one's interested in a religion that claims god as it's own.

badeckers problem is he does not know the rules of the inner lodge.. oh, and the inner lodge is not masonic either although they did pinch the word lodge for now obvious reason's.. at least they dont claim their god is THE god..

And please BADecker, if you want un-ignored, start accepting the evidence provided youself before asking others to accept yours. Even if it is someone else's work..

[Vod]

...proof...

[BADecker]

Why not accept the evidence/proof, especially in the light of the posts that suggest that God cannot be proven to not exist?

No, because that would be a logical fallacy. Just because there is no proof of god cannot exist, it would be a fallacy to automatically assume yours is true.

From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/proof?s=t:

proof
[proof]


noun
1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.

...

Tremendous amounts of evidence for the existence of God are found at my post here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. An additional piece of evidence is found at OP's original post in this thread.

There is no requirement that anyone accept any amount of evidence as proof. However, when the evidence is connected to great pain or great joy, almost everyone will accept it as proof.

And for Decky... Proving that the real God is or is not the One spoken about in the Christian religion is a side something that should be part of a different thread. Even if it were part of this thread, why attempt to prove which attributes belong to the true God when people still have question about whether or not God exists? In any event, it isn't really part of this thread.

[Decksperiment]

Neither is your bible.. yeah I had to peek, like I say, I do actually like you, but hate your bible bashing, you do your society more damage than good just by ignoring evidence, as more than me KEEP pointing out.. keep reposting stuff others will tell me is the same old nonsense.. if I could make a suggestion, pay attention:

Answer evidence other people produce. Answer other people's questions.. just dont use the bible, use the same sense others do, by offering their opinions from their culture, whilst refraining from FORCING their view of their religion, or it's teachings on you. By ignoring this, we ignore you, no matter what you say..

For instance.. deal with the tree evidence? That may just get folks to actually talk to you again..?

Keep in mind you do yourself no justice speaking of god as YOUR god, (your's may be your's, but your's is not our's) in your horribly patronising way.. you are aware this is your ACTUAL problem?

When you figure out most and more people hate christianity's god than every other religion's god'(s) combined..

What does the majority know of the many other religion's and their god's? Nothing, give or take the basic's.. what do we know of your's? EVERYTHING, because we've been FORCE fed it since birth, and want NO MORE. Hence the hate of christianity's religion, and it's god.

The only reason I posted the names of god, was to piss christianity off big time, call it revenge.. all I did was prove christianity is jewish.

And that there are tree's that are still alive longer than the bible has existed..

[BADecker]

Good. Now that we have cleared up that all this talk about Bible ad trees is off-topic, lets get on with on-topic stuff, like showing evidence for or against the existence of God, so that we can start to prove that God exists or doesn't. Oh wait, I have posted a universe full of evidence that God exists, at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, and the OP at his initial post top of page 1. Therefore, it should, now be evident to everyone that God exists.

[Decksperiment]

Back to ignored, since the tree's are evidence god does not exist, the tree's do, since your assuming god is god of the bible.

The FACT the tree's (ok, certain tree's, not all) are older than everyone in the bible, and have been alive for LONGER than your books timeline, proves that if god existed, he exist's thanks to a book. A book younger than the oldest living greenery in existance.. a book that claims EVERYTHING was killed in the flood.. the tree's prove otherwise.

So I guess in reality, I have proven god NOT to exist.. let the other members decide.. maybe the op should add a poll to see if I have answered his question.. you know if he did, I'd win.

Thanks to the tree's.

Go on, hug a tree.. you know you want to..