Scientific proof that God exists?

[Decksperiment]

He has no choice, he's brain dead now, all he can do is shit stir, and he know's it, hence the quoting VOD/OYO's photo, (the paedohero costume) Like he did with the joint, as admitted by him, a laugh is one thing, but the photo's are proving they are one and the same, look at oyo's photo, then look at VOD's trust, follow the paedo accusation, which incidently, has a photo.. proving they are one and the same as I thought..

BADecker, I know we like shaggin oop's, slaggin each utha, but to support a paedo is beyond even you I thought..

Clearly I thought wrong..

[Decksperiment]

Keep quoting paedo's, it shows your's and vodoyo's religion is one and the same.. why else would you even talk to them?

Forgive paedofeelya? you do as long as they feel ya eh?

[BADecker]

He has no choice, he's brain dead now, all he can do is shit stir, and he know's it, hence the quoting VOD/OYO's photo, (the paedohero costume) Like he did with the joint, as admitted by him, a laugh is one thing, but the photo's are proving they are one and the same, look at oyo's photo, then look at VOD's trust, follow the paedo accusation, which incidently, has a photo.. proving they are one and the same as I thought..

BADecker, I know we like shaggin oop's, slaggin each utha, but to support a paedo is beyond even you I thought..

Clearly I thought wrong..

I was waiting for your vote at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=993290.msg10797299#msg10797299.

[the joint]

<Annoying babble>

By extended vocabulary, do you mean misspelling every second word (even with spell check) and making up others altogether? I feel sorry for your kids, that is if you really have any. Did your parents have any kids that lived?

As far as my counter attacks on you goes, I've done so when you attack other people too, not just Vod. Is it my fault somehow that you have a hard on for him?

-------------------------------------------

DUH! I'M GOD!
<--- Dickexperiment

You and I certainly don't agree on everything... maybe on few things. But you said this soooo well^^.

You dont have the right to talk here until you disprove the sequoia

Thanks for permission to post here - do I need it? - since the proof for God found in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 obliterates any sequoia ideas, whatever they might be.

Yeah, that's not proof.  How many times do we need to tell you this?

That's called "really bad suggestive reasoning" with conclusions that in no way follow from the premises.

There cannot be conclusive, empirical evidence for something that is, by definition, non-empirical.  

It's impossible.  The end.  Talk less, listen more.

[Decksperiment]

Nah, you know I dont do externals.. you must truely be lost now, dya need a hug? Hug a tree, just no me lol..

[BADecker]

<Annoying babble>

By extended vocabulary, do you mean misspelling every second word (even with spell check) and making up others altogether? I feel sorry for your kids, that is if you really have any. Did your parents have any kids that lived?

As far as my counter attacks on you goes, I've done so when you attack other people too, not just Vod. Is it my fault somehow that you have a hard on for him?

-------------------------------------------

DUH! I'M GOD!
<--- Dickexperiment

You and I certainly don't agree on everything... maybe on few things. But you said this soooo well^^.

You dont have the right to talk here until you disprove the sequoia

Thanks for permission to post here - do I need it? - since the proof for God found in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 obliterates any sequoia ideas, whatever they might be.

Yeah, that's not proof.  How many times do we need to tell you this?

That's called "really bad suggestive reasoning" with conclusions that in no way follow from the premises.

There cannot be conclusive, empirical evidence for something that is, by definition, non-empirical.  

It's impossible.  The end.  Talk less, listen more.

In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence. When what is expressed at the link is examined in detail, then the evidence is brought out into the open in abundance just like the link states.

God is within the universe as well as without. Therefore universe-style evidence can be used, and extra-universe evidence can be alluded to.

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.



EDIT: Wow! Page 218 !

[Decksperiment]

BADecker, your still on ignore.. paedo lover, I have your boyfriend's here, and the reason I post them here, is because it is here I said vod and oyo are the same person, you now have the proof!!!! Did I do it again? Dear BADecker, I know why you wanna talk to me.. you KNOW I'm god!

Vod/oyo is one and the same!

I rest my case.. again...

[Decksperiment]

Cat got your tongue BADecker? Oh, sorry, did vodoyo call?

Ya gotta admit, your god is on my side right now, two proofs in the form of evidence within the last week?

Nah, I sacked your god, why dya think he's now playing paedohero?

They asked some poor bairn to take a photo, why dya think they're grinnin like that?

Did you think they're thinking of you?

With love in their heart's..?

Hahahahahahaaha

Why dya think paedo's are aloud to remain on this site?

Remember that house tune? $50 or more donation to bitcointalk, only plausible explanation.

[the joint]

<Annoying babble>

By extended vocabulary, do you mean misspelling every second word (even with spell check) and making up others altogether? I feel sorry for your kids, that is if you really have any. Did your parents have any kids that lived?

As far as my counter attacks on you goes, I've done so when you attack other people too, not just Vod. Is it my fault somehow that you have a hard on for him?

-------------------------------------------

DUH! I'M GOD!
<--- Dickexperiment

You and I certainly don't agree on everything... maybe on few things. But you said this soooo well^^.

You dont have the right to talk here until you disprove the sequoia

Thanks for permission to post here - do I need it? - since the proof for God found in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 obliterates any sequoia ideas, whatever they might be.

Yeah, that's not proof.  How many times do we need to tell you this?

That's called "really bad suggestive reasoning" with conclusions that in no way follow from the premises.

There cannot be conclusive, empirical evidence for something that is, by definition, non-empirical.  

It's impossible.  The end.  Talk less, listen more.

In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence. When what is expressed at the link is examined in detail, then the evidence is brought out into the open in abundance just like the link states.

God is within the universe as well as without. Therefore universe-style evidence can be used, and extra-universe evidence can be alluded to.

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.



EDIT: Wow! Page 218 !

1)  So, it "isn't really the evidence."  Well, I'm glad you finally agree it isn't proof.  It's evidence of evidence?  So, it's basically worthless on its own as far as reasoning about God.  Yep, that's about right.

2)  So, you're saying stuff in the Universe is evidence of stuff outside of the Universe.  Are you drunk?

3)  My end simply...what?  What the hell?

When you make up your own word meanings and (invalid) forms of reasoning, you just make meaningless statements.  None of what you say is relevant to anything and anyone.

[the joint]

God's existence doesn't need scientific proof.

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy
and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after
the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
Col 2:8 (KJV)

I've never referred to the Bible for support for anything.

That being said, your statement is actually true, because it is logically impossible for scientific proof of God to exist in the first place.  This is known 'a priori' based upon the limits of Empiricism.

[Decksperiment]

Hey you above me, would you show your face after the world found out vod and oyo are both one and the same, BADeckers boyfriend?

He's had two proofs of his god in less than a week, how much more do you think he can handle?

[Decksperiment]

BADecker, your still on ignore.. paedo lover, I have your boyfriend's here, and the reason I post them here, is because it is here I said vod and oyo are the same person, you now have the proof!!!! Did I do it again? Dear BADecker, I know why you wanna talk to me.. you KNOW I'm god!

Vod/oyo is one and the same!

I rest my case.. again...

His name is martin lawrence

And I would'nt be surprised if he was BADecker too.. Badecker sounds like he went to catholic school, SO DID VODOYO, hell, he might even be.. the JOINT, since they have the same trait's.. pyramid posting to insult folks who have them on ignore.. always come on within 15 minutes of my posting, always disappearing shortly after each other.. abusing the trust system.. wow, so much in common.. time to dig into BADecker's ip.. if only the admins knew my tracking technology, they'd gimme half of there btc just to get what I use..

I've been correct so far..

And no I dont think I'm god, I think I AM. For those with eye's to see..

[BADecker]

In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence. When what is expressed at the link is examined in detail, then the evidence is brought out into the open in abundance just like the link states.

God is within the universe as well as without. Therefore universe-style evidence can be used, and extra-universe evidence can be alluded to.

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.



EDIT: Wow! Page 218 !

1)  So, it "isn't really the evidence."  Well, I'm glad you finally agree it isn't proof.  It's evidence of evidence?  So, it's basically worthless on its own as far as reasoning about God.  Yep, that's about right.

2)  So, you're saying stuff in the Universe is evidence of stuff outside of the Universe.  Are you drunk?

3)  My end simply...what?  What the hell?

When you make up your own word meanings and (invalid) forms of reasoning, you just make meaningless statements.  None of what you say is relevant to anything and anyone.

Absolutely. You DO have a hard time figuring much of anything out, don't you? Especially the proofs listed at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, right?

[the joint]

In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence. When what is expressed at the link is examined in detail, then the evidence is brought out into the open in abundance just like the link states.

God is within the universe as well as without. Therefore universe-style evidence can be used, and extra-universe evidence can be alluded to.

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.



EDIT: Wow! Page 218 !

1)  So, it "isn't really the evidence."  Well, I'm glad you finally agree it isn't proof.  It's evidence of evidence?  So, it's basically worthless on its own as far as reasoning about God.  Yep, that's about right.

2)  So, you're saying stuff in the Universe is evidence of stuff outside of the Universe.  Are you drunk?

3)  My end simply...what?  What the hell?

When you make up your own word meanings and (invalid) forms of reasoning, you just make meaningless statements.  None of what you say is relevant to anything and anyone.

Absolutely. You DO have a hard time figuring much of anything out, don't you? Especially the proofs listed at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, right?

But you just told me they weren't proof(s).  You said they weren't even evidence.   You said that it was pointing to evidence.

That's about as equivalent as me pointing to a a road sign and asking you what it means -- "STOP!"   ...Please.

[BADecker]

In the first place, the stuff written at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 isn't really the evidence. It only points at the evidence. When what is expressed at the link is examined in detail, then the evidence is brought out into the open in abundance just like the link states.

God is within the universe as well as without. Therefore universe-style evidence can be used, and extra-universe evidence can be alluded to.

Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.



EDIT: Wow! Page 218 !

1)  So, it "isn't really the evidence."  Well, I'm glad you finally agree it isn't proof.  It's evidence of evidence?  So, it's basically worthless on its own as far as reasoning about God.  Yep, that's about right.

2)  So, you're saying stuff in the Universe is evidence of stuff outside of the Universe.  Are you drunk?

3)  My end simply...what?  What the hell?

When you make up your own word meanings and (invalid) forms of reasoning, you just make meaningless statements.  None of what you say is relevant to anything and anyone.

Absolutely. You DO have a hard time figuring much of anything out, don't you? Especially the proofs listed at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, right?

But you just told me they weren't proof(s).  You said they weren't even evidence.   You said that it was pointing to evidence.

That's about as equivalent as me pointing to a a road sign and asking you what it means -- "STOP!"   ...Please.

The point of the thread is proof for the existence of God (or not I expect). Anyone who takes a look at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, can find for himself/herself the proofs for God. And, that is what it is about.

Anyone who wants to deny the existence of God can do so, whether or not he/she looks at the stuff in the link above. How anyone wants to use or treat (or ignore) the info at the link is up to them.

[Decksperiment]

I now accuse the Joint of also being VODOYO, and possibly BADecker.. due to the fact they share same traits, same knowledge, same writing style, same pyramid quoting, and same way of attacking people, and mis-use of the trust system, deleting posts other's would use as evidence, but they cant delete screen grabbers.. speaking of NOTHING related to the scientific proof of god was discovered by deckperiment to be false thread, lol.. it was found, why prattle on?

[Decksperiment]

Is this BADecker?

Ya gotta admit, they have the same accent..

Went to same catholic toilet..

None of them do business here..

I'm here to try get back into it..

They just troll.

All of them share same god.

[Decksperiment]

Is this The Joint?

The most intelligent appearing form of multiple personality disorder.. pity they could'nt turn into god like I AM..

Keep in mind I make no claim to being god.. there is more than one jesus, more than one james, only one deckperiment, and yes, I AM him.

[bl4kjaguar]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

[BADecker]

Why would anyone want to read any of your stuff, since we already have the Bible that way more accurately explains all we need to know about salvation?

By what criteria is the Bible more accurate than Phoenix Journals?

I find Journals are more logical and explicit in meaning; every attempt is made to get at the Truth.

"I would not send lesser unto my children"--I am Aton. If you know not who IS Aton, I hope that you will do enough homework to find the answer.

As with typical mankind, you ones wish to begin at the end of the story and have others assume responsibility for YOUR education. No, that will not serve in this instance--we have purposely brought you over 40 books of insight, Truth and instructions beginning with your plight, your direction, your solutions and your divine reclamation through, and by, God. We have brought you full and detailed explanations of the working details of the Cosmos, Universe and what God is and how the cycles of perceived life and death "work". We have put it in a format which you, as man in trouble, can easily understand--the rest is up to you.

Does this mean that the JOURNALS are through? No indeed, we shall continue until the play is finished; however, it means that the eight most important books of your planet are now before you--as you use this one. I am sorry to disappoint ones who either feel "another" can explain it TO YOU and/or YOU who feel so wise as to explain and foist off your opinion of the material upon another in explanation. It is a time of self-opinion and discernment and understanding, for the transition will not be made except by those who have come within the KNOWING! This does not mean that you have to understand every working detail--but you MUST comprehend within that which is the overall.

If Journals have a more logical and explicit explanation of the Bible, then this makes them more accurate.

It was fun, all this off-topic talk about all kinds of things in this thread. But since the Title of the thread has been substantially covered by OP's initial post, and by the info here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395, what really is there more to discuss except for more points regarding proof for or against God's existence?