Scientific proof that God exists?

[Decksperiment]

It's a shame that bitcointalks most prolific scammer called vod, who scams using escrow, is allowed to ruin any thread he visits to hide his ploy of eventually trying to scam people using escrow, whatever that is..

Kinda ruins decent threads, wether these conversations are offensive to some or not, at least the thread was moderating itself quite fine until he comes along.. yes I say fuck alot, and probably offended once or twice, and that the english find the scottish language offensive, but at least whenever I have been a bit rude to people I knew when to quit, as I am not here to abuse other people for no reason what-so-ever, unlike vod who jumps in trying to scam using escrow at every opportunity. In my opinion, this scammer should be banned from the forum.. just to keep bitcointalk's good name.. but then bitcointalk is known as a haven for scammers.. like vod.

So I will give what is the definitive answer to the OP's question:

Scientific proof that God exists? There is NO answer.

Anything after this is hopefully just a good old bit of banter, cause it was a damn good question, and in my eye's, challenging at times, but for me, vod killed it with his pish arsed bullshit.. so there is the answer.. hopefully it does'nt spoil anything, but it is the actual answer to the question.


And if any decent moderators can delete vods comments I'm sure we'd all appreciate that he came here off topic, kept it off topic, and whilst it is clearly an off topic thread, it's a thread that has managed to stay ON topic in an off topic thread, that is, until he came along, I'm sure most other posters here will agree, that even after deleting my comments to get back ON topic, he is still here trying to fuck it up, despite knowing I have 'ignored' him. This shows clear intent that he is not here to take part.

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

[Vod]

It's a shame that bitcointalks most prolific scammer called vod, who scams using escrow, is allowed to ruin any thread he visits to hide his ploy of eventually trying to scam people using escrow, whatever that is..

Kinda ruins decent threads, wether these conversations are offensive to some or not, at least the thread was moderating itself quite fine until he comes along.. yes I say fuck alot, and probably offended once or twice, and that he english find the scottish language offensive, but at least whenever I have been a bit rude to people I knew when to quit, as I am not here to abuse other people for no reason what-so-ever, unlike vod who jumps in trying to scam using escrow at every opportunity. In my opinion, this scammer should be banned from the forum.. just to keep bitcointalk's good name.. but then bitcointalk is known as a haven for scammers..

So I will give what is the definitive answer to the OP's question:

Scientific proof that God exists? There is NO answer.

Anything after this is hopefully just a good old bit of banter, cause it was a damn good question, and in my eye's, challenging at times, but for me, vod killed it with his pish arsed bullshit.. so there is the answer.. hopefully it does'nt spoil anything, but it is the actual answer to the question.

Hey, is this why you have been going back and deleting all your posts in the last couple pages of this thread?   All the posts that I have already quoted?  

Scientific proof that God exists? There is NO answer.

Come on!  The answer is No.  Maybe you should offer 50btc to someone who can provide such proof?  It would be a safe bet - you would never lose your money.

[Vod]

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

AKA "I've been caught cheating and don't want to play anymore."

[BitChick]

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

The "ignore" button is always an option to avoid this. 

[Decksperiment]

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

The "ignore" button is always an option to avoid this. 

Yeah, I tried that, but if I had ignored him, I would not have been given external links that pointed out that I am not the only one that is raging that this guy is still attacking and scamming.. so un-ignoring, in my opinion, and pardon the pun, was a necessary evil.. Just a shame he made a mess of our lovely thread..

[username18333]

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

The "ignore" button is always an option to avoid this. 

Yeah, I tried that, but if I had ignored him, I would not have been given external links that pointed out that I am not the only one that is raging that this guy is still attacking and scamming.. so un-ignoring, in my opinion, and pardon the pun, was a necessary evil.. Just a shame he made a mess of our lovely thread..

What is your response to that scientific evidence I posed?

[cooldgamer]

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

The "ignore" button is always an option to avoid this. 

Yeah, I tried that, but if I had ignored him, I would not have been given external links that pointed out that I am not the only one that is raging that this guy is still attacking and scamming.. so un-ignoring, in my opinion, and pardon the pun, was a necessary evil.. Just a shame he made a mess of our lovely thread..

What is your response to that scientific evidence I posed?

That it is incorrect.  The second law of thermodynamics does not disprove evolution

[Decksperiment]

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

The "ignore" button is always an option to avoid this. 

Yeah, I tried that, but if I had ignored him, I would not have been given external links that pointed out that I am not the only one that is raging that this guy is still attacking and scamming.. so un-ignoring, in my opinion, and pardon the pun, was a necessary evil.. Just a shame he made a mess of our lovely thread..

What is your response to that scientific evidence I posed?

Um, I deleted my reply mistaking it for vods replies, note the mess he left?

I think it was something along the lines of make some sense?

[username18333]

Failing that, delete my account, for I'm not here to sit with losers.

The "ignore" button is always an option to avoid this. 

Yeah, I tried that, but if I had ignored him, I would not have been given external links that pointed out that I am not the only one that is raging that this guy is still attacking and scamming.. so un-ignoring, in my opinion, and pardon the pun, was a necessary evil.. Just a shame he made a mess of our lovely thread..

What is your response to that scientific evidence I posed?

Um, I deleted my reply mistaking it for vods replies, note the mess he left?

I think it was something along the lines of make some sense?

What didn't "make sense?"

[Decksperiment]

Post it again to remind me, in case you have'nt noticed, I been highlighting a scammer all day?

[username18333]

Post it again to remind me, in case you have'nt noticed, I been highlighting a scammer all day?

Here you are.

By thermodynamics, existence, which is an isolated system, would "spontaneously evolve towards thermodynamic equilibrium, the configuration with maximum entropy" (Wikipedia).

Nothing, then, is lost to everything.

[Decksperiment]

Yeah, I said something along the lines of:

A: stop plagarising wiki I think, and

B: could you please make more sense, in your own words?

[username18333]

Yeah, I said something along the lines of:

A: stop plagarising wiki I think, and

B: could you please make more sense, in your own words?

Here you are.

we now know things like light can be both a wave and a particle. No need for ether since particles can travel through vacuum.

And what is the explanation behind that?

If you dare to think about it (you're not really supposed to), you have to believe one of the following things:
A Lazy Layman's Guide to Quantum Physics

So... have we figured out what is the explanation behind all of that? Parallel universes to infinity?

Bonus QM links (maybe I post some more later!):
“orchestrated objective reduction” identifies discrete conscious moments, explains precognition
Electric permittivity is not constant but rather a function of the local zero point energy vacuum fluctuations
Your existence was predicated on an almost absurdly finely tuned universe
Actually, you don't exist--especially if you are an atheist

> "...an almost absurdly finely tuned universe"
You have no bases whereby you may make such relative determinations for your ignorance of everything else.

> "Actually, you don't exist"
Limakasidian entropism states, "For an absolute tendency to become less orderly, the sum of  existence is absolute entropy."

For that, it cannot be said that anything does not exist, nor that anything does not exist in any particular way.

[Decksperiment]

Look out the window.

That exists.

The rest is un-required, for it does not interest any other living thing, and in fact, is quite useless information.

However..

When you get drunk.

[username18333]

Look out the window.

That exists.

The rest is un-required, for it does not interest any other living thing, and in fact, is quite useless information.

However..

When you get drunk.

Has the OP received satisfactory "proof" (evidence beyond a reasonable doubt)?

[Decksperiment]

That there is NO answer, yes.

[username18333]

That there is NO answer, yes.

"There is no answer" is neither scientific nor evidence.

[Decksperiment]

This is the definitive answer to the question, mines not to question where I got that statement, for once known, it is true.

There is NO answer.

Edit: However, I'd also like to continue.. but that is the answer to the question

A hint: Notice no-one contradicts the answer?

Arguing the subject was more fun than finding the answer huh?

[username18333]

This is the definitive answer to the question, mines not to question where I got that statement, for once known, it is true.

There is NO answer.

Again, your reply is neither scientific nor evidence.

My "plagiarized" (these are not academic works, and, therefore, improper citation should not be held to constitute plagiarism) restatement of a fundamental determination within limakasidian entropism was based upon not only science but evidence thereof. (As well, it was an [implicit] answer.)

Explicitly stated, my answer is the following: "Yes, there is scientific evidence that God exists in that same way there is scientific evidence that everything exists - maximization of entropy."

[Decksperiment]

This is the definitive answer to the question, mines not to question where I got that statement, for once known, it is true.

There is NO answer.

Again, your reply is neither scientific nor evidence.

My "plagiarized" (these are not academic works, and, therefore, improper citation should not be held to constitute plagiarism) restatement of a fundamental determination within limakasidian entropism was based upon not only science but evidence thereof.

Ok, provide proof dude, scientific proof that can be measured, touched, seen, you name it.. all man will ever do is argue about it, this is WHY people question it in the first place, because GOD cannot be scientifically proven, just as we cannot prove what we dream. We know we do, but we cant.

37 = esoteric truth, that which we know, but cannot prove
27 = truth revealed, that which we know and can prove

Hence, there is NO answer

Barring this:

We can go round and round forever debating it using any means necessary to get a point across, but it is NOT the answer, for their is NONE.