TrueCryptonaire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 23, 2016, 03:02:36 AM |
|
btw to connect to the bankers discussion:
I only know 2 two bank managers and both predict and new crash of the system. When we look to the US its Clinton/Trump. Look to the EU, its falling apart due to refugee crisis and missleading (Merkel). Asia also have trouble. The poor and middle class is going to be left behind around the globe.
Reconsider than what happend in the financial crisis 2011. A lot of money streamed into cryptos and gold.
I see a solid future.
Chances are Tronald Dump is just anohter con artist from Poloniex trollbox. The refugee crisis potentially could be (but very unlikely will be) a good thing for EU. Why it could be? A lot of skilled workers are coming which could boost their hosting countries GDP nicely. However, the policy makers and institutions are not willing to increase the rate of free markets in labor markets controlled by labor union who basically say "NO WAY!" to everything. At least this is the situation in Finland. Kinda sad that the public sector tend to waste every opportunity, and thus creating angry citizens which will feed all kind of extreme right wing people.
|
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
September 23, 2016, 03:24:24 AM Last edit: September 23, 2016, 03:39:16 AM by vokain |
|
Chances are Tronald Dump is just anohter con artist from Poloniex trollbox.
Yeah, con artist, but I wouldn't say "just another" Donald Trump is a con man. He’s also a fraud, a liar, a snake-oil salesman, and a carnival barker. Clearly he is running a scam on the country.
Trump calls himself a “deal-maker.”
I call Trump a Master Persuader.
It’s all the same thing. Either way, blocking remittances to Mexico may be bullish for crypto and end up building that wall anyway. /topicrelevancy
|
|
|
|
TrueCryptonaire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 23, 2016, 03:37:17 AM |
|
Chances are Tronald Dump is just anohter con artist from Poloniex trollbox.
You're not wrong Donald Trump is a con man. He’s also a fraud, a liar, a snake-oil salesman, and a carnival barker. Clearly he is running a scam on the country.
Trump calls himself a “deal-maker.”
I call Trump a Master Persuader.
It’s all the same thing. Either way, blocking remittances to Mexico may be bullish for crypto and end up building that wall /topicrelevancy Politicians tend to be master liars, unfortunately. I remember very well when there was a huge hype around Obama. Everybody thought he is the Messiah but nothing happened (except the Iranian rulers are now able to blow the entire world with their nuclear bombs). The hype even went to far that Obama got a Nobel prize for peace (before he had any merits besides creating the of "yes we can" -BS).
|
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
September 23, 2016, 03:40:24 AM Last edit: September 23, 2016, 04:51:14 AM by vokain |
|
Chances are Tronald Dump is just anohter con artist from Poloniex trollbox.
Yeah, con artist, but I wouldn't say "just another" Donald Trump is a con man. He’s also a fraud, a liar, a snake-oil salesman, and a carnival barker. Clearly he is running a scam on the country.
Trump calls himself a “deal-maker.”
I call Trump a Master Persuader.
It’s all the same thing. Either way, blocking remittances to Mexico may be bullish for crypto and end up building that wall /topicrelevancy Politicians tend to be master liars, unfortunately. I remember very well when there was a huge hype around Obama. Everybody thought he is the Messiah but nothing happened (except the Iranian rulers are now able to blow the entire world with their nuclear bombs). The hype even went to far that Obama got a Nobel prize for peace (before he had any merits besides creating the of "yes we can" -BS). Lying in business doesn't get one far. It's either everlasting legacy or bust for Trump. What would he prefer?
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
September 23, 2016, 04:57:39 AM |
|
Skilled workers my ass, the immigrants you're getting are riff-raff their home countries are happy to get rid of. The whole thing is transparently engineered to break down national borders and social bonds to pave the way for global Managerialism under the most corrupt and venal bunch of assholes who ever hoisted a cocktail weiner. The extreme right wing people are responding rationally, if predictably, and if you're so mercenary that you can't see any value beyond the economic I feel sorry for you. That said, I not really with the nationalist right because I think technology makes globalism in some form inevitable in any case. I'm here because I hope that crypto can change the dynamic from a top down Mandarin model to a bottom up model that empowers regular people to organize their affairs as they see fit. In other words: Gas the Davos cunts; Anarcho-Localism now!
Wow. Just wow. Someones got a damn decent head on their shoulders. Also take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panarchism
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
nanobrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Dumb broad
|
|
September 23, 2016, 05:03:32 AM |
|
Soooo, anyway.
(hoping to change the topic before things get overheated)
Is anyone else getting bored with this endless channel trading? Its almost as dull as BTC.
And have you noticed how since the BigLegUpTM, the number of bots on Polo seems to have increased tenfold (completeWAG btw); sometimes the order book is simply a blur of rubbish, lowball bids. Does anyone here trade with a bot?
|
|
|
|
nanobrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Dumb broad
|
|
September 23, 2016, 06:58:13 AM |
|
Ahhh...thank you whoever just added some volume...perhaps we'll get some French weekend action
|
|
|
|
needmoney90
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
|
|
September 23, 2016, 08:17:04 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptimus prime
|
|
September 23, 2016, 08:40:52 AM |
|
I am not sure if XMR is fully bullish now, but for sure there is no reason to be bearish with all the recent attention XMR got and which will attract more investors, contributors and perhaps exchanges too.
|
|
|
|
TrueCryptonaire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 23, 2016, 09:05:40 AM |
|
I am not sure if XMR is fully bullish now, but for sure there is no reason to be bearish with all the recent attention XMR got and which will attract more investors, contributors and perhaps exchanges too.
Nobody knows about crypto. Something drastic might happen overnight. If the trendline shows high probability of bull market, the traders and speculants will open heavy long positions and build longs upon longs which creates sudden surge in the price. On the other hand, the traders might want to short Monero and build short positions upon short positions (weak hands are probably shaken already) which will push the price down. However, there is not that much room to go down from here unless the project fails completely and the price goes back to sub 1 usd. The upside is infinity because a lot of coins are stored in cold storages. The faster the rise, the less there will be coins for sale because the bagholders do not need to sell that many coins to satisfy their desire to acquire castles from Estonia. Therefore I am speculating the next bubble will be in Estonian castles, ruins and manors.
|
|
|
|
Quicken
|
|
September 23, 2016, 09:25:22 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
nanobrain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Dumb broad
|
|
September 23, 2016, 11:34:10 AM |
|
@Quicken, Nice, thanks.
The moonchild will be here soon speaking of higher highers, higher lows and an impending weekend of fun, inevitably followed by bouncing between 180 and 166.
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
September 23, 2016, 11:39:25 AM |
|
Maybe you are a clam. I'm assuming you are not referring to the shellfish....could you explain the meaning and usage of the term 'clam'? I was being purposely obtuse and used a simple/silly 2 step association. clam>shellfish>selfish When N-rG stated "I see a solid future." after listing a few world wide problems that could cause chaos and pain, I assumed he was not being sarcastic and was looking forward to personal gain steaming from chaos and pain. Big assumptions to be sure and based in part on his prior posts. Maybe some see chaos and pain as inevitable but I would rather see crypto adoption and personal gain without it. Don't rely on bad, do good.
|
|
|
|
explorer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2016
Merit: 1259
|
|
September 23, 2016, 12:05:59 PM |
|
@Quicken, Nice, thanks.
The moonchild will be here soon speaking of higher highers, higher lows and an impending weekend of fun, inevitably followed by bouncing between 180 and 166.
Ever the party pooper
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
September 23, 2016, 12:49:36 PM |
|
It may be boring, but the bouncing is nice for my favored style. And we're chewing up all the loosely held coins during this base-building, so it is a bullish mode.
Highers/lowers is how you can easily and unequivocally recognize that momentum is forming. Momentum always fails eventually.
TA is the intersection of three factor categories: Aggregate agent statistics, pattern recognition (aka feature engineering), and structural constraints. Structural constraints may be categorized as a priori, deterministic, and stochastic. Market structure factors cross-cut these categories.
But TA is not a value-neutral, purely observational discipline, it is goal-oriented, so optimal control theory plays a role in determining the analytic style, and one of the most useful decision-theoretical frameworks is the partially-ordered Markov decision process, POMDP.
The easiest way to make a nearly optimal bot is to parameterize a POMDP. The state-of-the-art outcomes, however derive from use of structured variational autoencoders for feature engineering in a deep LSTM network, because these open up a much larger dynamical model space, and can extract much more subtle signals.
I keep meaning to make a bot, but the day job, and my manual trading, and my family life have conspired against it. Also: loss aversion.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
CryptoSporidium
|
|
September 23, 2016, 12:50:59 PM |
|
Is the biggest risk to xmr a community launched zcash clone without the premine and founder tax, like how xmr began?
|
|
|
|
TrueCryptonaire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 23, 2016, 01:06:20 PM |
|
Is the biggest risk to xmr a community launched zcash clone without the premine and founder tax, like how xmr began?
If I am honest, not many here are interested into Zcash so I do not see it even competing with XMR. Bear in mind, in order to succeed a coin needs network effect which is created by the community willing to buy and hodl - tech is not sufficient enough (we saw this from btc's first generation shitcoin alternatives). So far Monero has a community that is willing to buy and hodl, and if the community keeps buying and holding, more people will join into the party and that will accelerate the network effect and price surge to the Moon TM.
|
|
|
|
N-rG
|
|
September 23, 2016, 01:23:51 PM |
|
Interesting, buy and sell walls disappeared. When N-rG stated "I see a solid future." after listing a few world wide problems that could cause chaos and pain, I assumed he was not being sarcastic U assumend correct.
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
|
September 23, 2016, 01:26:09 PM Last edit: September 23, 2016, 01:45:25 PM by aminorex |
|
Is the biggest risk to xmr a community launched zcash clone without the premine and founder tax, like how xmr began?
That is interesting. It doesn't eliminate the risks inherent in zcash, but it does eliminate most of the smell, so it could see some up-take. The implied risk to XMR price (not to the utility, project, security, community or economy) is that capital will be attracted from XMR to community-zcash, which I will call snarkero, or XZK. Here's how I see it: We know what value XMR had before DNM adoption was mooted, and it was about mcap $10mm. In the current initial stage of adoption, the value is about 10x. Thus, without adoption, the leading crypto in the fungible monetary domain is only worth a small fraction of the value of XMR today, and can only draw a small fraction of the capital away from XMR. The implied price risk amounts to about $1 per XMR, in the long run, as XZK gets the level of adoption seen by XMR before June (when AB insiders started accumulating in earnest). On the other hand, there may be synergies which increase the value of both coins. Mcap may be mostly linear zero-sum, but building a monetary economy certainly is not. XZK may attract new money into anonymity, which, seeing the living economy and leading liquidity of XMR, then diversifies into XMR. In fact, I tend to think that until and unless XZK is adopted at similar scale, its introduction is likely to help XMR to grow. The credibility of the team would largely determine the success or failure of XZK. Barring crypto vulnerabilities emerging in the moon math, if the fundamental trust issues could be managed to the satisfaction of the market, I could definitely see DNMs adding snarkero, once it reached a certainly liquidity. If so, they should be early buyers, attempting to front-run the possibility. If they use BTC they can be traced, and subjected to extortion. Therefore, they will need to use XMR to buy their XZK. Bullish. Indeed I think the ideal outcome might be a zksnark branch in the XMR network. If the two were made transparently interoperable, it would provide immediate boostrap liquidity to the XZK, and mean XZK was already DNM-accepted. When N-rG stated "I see a solid future." after listing a few world wide problems that could cause chaos and pain, I assumed he was not being sarcastic U assumend correct. Yes, XMR is the ultimate in anti-fragile ( pace Taleb). Chaos and pain only makes counterparty-free and seizure-immune more attractive. Truly Nietzschean, Monero is.
|
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
|
|
|
N-rG
|
|
September 23, 2016, 02:07:39 PM |
|
Zcash has caused a lot of controversy for its method of distributing the crypto currency. The organisation is not set up as an opensource community but as a Company. This is the first major difference to Bitcoin
With Zcash they have taken a different approach and have taken money from investors in the company to create the crypto currency before releasing it. But here comes the catch - for every unit of Z currency you mine during the first 4%, the Company that runs Zcash gets 20%, which will amount to 10% of the total supply. To some people this has been causing concern and ire as they feel that the investors are using the network to unfairly enrich themselves by the power that they control. The backers include Pantera Capital and various Bitcoin celebrities such as Roger Ver and Barry Seibert.
Zcash is for ordinary people who wants to get cheated of their money. Lets make a coin, put some $ in marketing, say it can the coolest things of every other coin and be one of the main sellers and take some % of every mining. Sounds awesome
|
|
|
|
|