Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2018, 02:46:54 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 [154] 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] ccminer 2.2.5 - opensource - GPL (tpruvot)  (Read 468542 times)
gregfromo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 123
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 05:13:46 PM
 #3061

After finding out that ccminer-alexis-hsr doesn't support >10 GPUs I'm trying to switch over to ccminer 2.2.3 tpruvot which does.

The problem is the hashing rate on X17 is 21% less on ccminer 2.2.3

Any recommendations?  Both tests done using same cards on the same rig with -i 20.

See: https://imgur.com/a/z4Qtw

This image shows the screenshot of alexis-hsr vs tpruvot 2.2.3, there is a significant difference.


https://github.com/alexis78/ccminer

but the MAX_GPUS is set to 16 in the source on github in cuda_helper.h and miner.h (I compared to the KlausT commit source, having no knowlegde in programming myself)

maybe something different isn't working?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1527346014
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527346014

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527346014
Reply with quote  #2

1527346014
Report to moderator
1527346014
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527346014

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527346014
Reply with quote  #2

1527346014
Report to moderator
1527346014
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527346014

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527346014
Reply with quote  #2

1527346014
Report to moderator
millsys
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 06:44:50 PM
 #3062

After finding out that ccminer-alexis-hsr doesn't support >10 GPUs I'm trying to switch over to ccminer 2.2.3 tpruvot which does.

The problem is the hashing rate on X17 is 21% less on ccminer 2.2.3

Any recommendations?  Both tests done using same cards on the same rig with -i 20.

See: https://imgur.com/a/z4Qtw

This image shows the screenshot of alexis-hsr vs tpruvot 2.2.3, there is a significant difference.


https://github.com/alexis78/ccminer

but the MAX_GPUS is set to 16 in the source on github in cuda_helper.h and miner.h (I compared to the KlausT commit source, having no knowlegde in programming myself)

maybe something different isn't working?


Yea it a) won't accept -d 10,11 and b) doesn't utilize cards when -d omitted properly.  Maybe an issue with older cuda

FARM #1 : 60 GPUs spread across 6 rigs (1080ti/1080/1070ti/1070)
FARM #2 : 72 GPUs spread across 12 rigs (1070ti x 6)
FARM #3 : 16 GPUs spread across 4 rigs (1080ti x 4)
AntMiner S9 13.5TH / AntMiner L3+ x 2
gaalx01
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 05, 2018, 11:53:02 PM
 #3063

540 Mh for 1070 - is this normal for skein?
rmis7170
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 05:23:46 AM
 #3064

Quote
you should not downgrade the system default gcc, see the INSTALL file, Fedora Step 4

On compiling gcc 5.4 , i am getting below error;
Code:
ar  rc libgcov.a $objects
ranlib libgcov.a
/home/rishabh/Repo/fedora_temp/gcc-5.4.0/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/xgcc -B/home/rishabh/Repo/fedora_temp/gcc-5.4.0/host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include    -g -O2 -O2  -g -O2 -DIN_GCC    -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition  -isystem ./include   -fpic -mlong-double-80 -g -DIN_LIBGCC2 -fbuilding-libgcc -fno-stack-protector   -fpic -mlong-double-80 -I. -I. -I../../host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc -I../.././libgcc -I../.././libgcc/. -I../.././libgcc/../gcc -I../.././libgcc/../include -I../.././libgcc/config/libbid -DENABLE_DECIMAL_BID_FORMAT -DHAVE_CC_TLS  -DUSE_TLS -o unwind-dw2.o -MT unwind-dw2.o -MD -MP -MF unwind-dw2.dep -fexceptions -c ../.././libgcc/unwind-dw2.c -fvisibility=hidden -DHIDE_EXPORTS
In file included from ../.././libgcc/unwind-dw2.c:401:0:
./md-unwind-support.h: In function ‘x86_64_fallback_frame_state’:
./md-unwind-support.h:65:47: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ‘struct ucontext’
       sc = (struct sigcontext *) (void *) &uc_->uc_mcontext;
                                               ^
make[3]: *** [../.././libgcc/shared-object.mk:14: unwind-dw2.o] Error 1


This is when i followed step 4.
Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1075


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
January 06, 2018, 10:08:40 AM
 #3065

https://negativo17.org/ may help

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
crypto4pizza
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 08:18:26 AM
 #3066

Needing some help on the massive hash difference i'm seeing between mining on Windows 10 (tpruvot 2.2.3) vs Simplemining OS (tpruvot 2.1).

Windows is hashing at almost double what SMOS is mining at.  Mining w/LBRY algo : Windows 10 @ 500Mh vs SMOS @ 250-300Mh.

OC is the same on both OS's.  Would the difference in tpruvot versions cause such a drastic difference in hash?   

Script used on both : ccminer-x64 -q -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.suprnova.cc:6256 -u  -p

SnowGem.org - Improve upon great ideas of other cryptocurrencies
Equihash - No Premine - No ICO - Masternodes soon
Manojdaran
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 1

Its never too late


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 11:17:13 AM
 #3067

Why isnt my total hashrate hit the maximum at all? Its like increasing by 2-4 KHashes every 2 seconds. Version: 2.2.x [Same with 2.2.4 too]. But with ccminer/8.17-KlausT version, the hashrate hit the max in no time. I never see the full hashrate in the latest version, no matter how long I have waited. It keeps increasing and increasing but never closes to the maximum. What did I miss?

Config: 9x1070
Total Hashrate: 8700-8900KHs
Version: ccminer/8.17-KlausT

Config: 9x1070
Total Hashrate: 6000 and increasing forever [Even after 5 minutes of waiting it didnt move to the 8000s]
Version: ccminer 2.2.x

Make hay while the sun shines
Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1075


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
January 07, 2018, 01:44:30 PM
 #3068

  -N, --statsavg        number of samples used to compute hashrate (default: 30)

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
ShowMeCoins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 09, 2018, 07:50:21 AM
 #3069

Mining Skein (NMS) on a 8GPU, 1080ti (Gigabyte Aorus), RIG:
Code:
[2018-01-09 08:43:25] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 822.21 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:26] GPU #7: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 540.74 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:27] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 829.26 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:27] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 814.99 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:27] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 829.01 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:28] GPU #5: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 796.66 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:28] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 817.42 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:29] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 829.35 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:29] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 830.06 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:30] GPU #7: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 538.59 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:30] GPU #3: 1948 MHz 3213.15 kH/W 257W 54C FAN 80%
[2018-01-09 08:43:31] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 825.22 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:31] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 809.14 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:31] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 814.39 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:31] accepted: 19582/19591 (diff 5.516), 6277.25 MH/s yes!
[2018-01-09 08:43:32] GPU #5: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 800.12 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:32] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 809.49 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:33] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 832.50 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:33] accepted: 19583/19592 (diff 7.522), 6276.70 MH/s yes!
[2018-01-09 08:43:33] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 821.11 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:34] GPU #7: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 541.94 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:35] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 808.11 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:35] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 828.73 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:35] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 831.86 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:35] accepted: 19584/19593 (diff 5.165), 6284.99 MH/s yes!
[2018-01-09 08:43:36] accepted: 19585/19594 (diff 4.690), 6285.63 MH/s yes!
[2018-01-09 08:43:36] GPU #5: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 797.18 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:36] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 820.37 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:37] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 830.47 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:37] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 830.60 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:38] GPU #7: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 538.07 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:39] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 811.61 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:39] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 830.39 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:39] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 829.54 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:40] GPU #5: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 796.88 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:40] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 816.00 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:41] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 835.27 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:41] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 825.18 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:43] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 817.56 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:43] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 812.48 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:43] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 829.67 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:43] GPU #7: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 541.50 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:44] GPU #5: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 793.39 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:44] accepted: 19586/19595 (diff 214.320), 6285.98 MH/s yes!
[2018-01-09 08:43:44] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 817.53 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:45] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 831.20 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:45] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 833.11 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:46] accepted: 19587/19596 (diff 14.019), 6286.47 MH/s yes!
[2018-01-09 08:43:47] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 829.59 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:47] accepted: 19588/19597 (diff 4.851), 6286.14 MH/s yes!
[2018-01-09 08:43:47] GPU #4: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 814.26 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:47] GPU #3: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 831.35 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:47] GPU #7: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 541.87 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:48] GPU #5: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 794.58 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:48] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 816.72 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:49] GPU #6: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 832.66 MH/s
[2018-01-09 08:43:49] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1080 Ti, 817.54 MH/s

Hashrate of card number #7 is always below average. I only see this with skein.
Replaced riser, PCI position...... to no evail

cmd-line: --algo=skein -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:4933 -u ADDRESS.RIG1 -p c=NMS,d=4 --submit-stale --max-temp=65 --intensity=28 --api-bind=0.0.0.0:4068 --api-remote

░░░█▀▀▀█░█▀▀▀█░█░░░░░░▄▀▄░░█▀▀▀█░█░█▀▀▀█░░░█▀  FAIRLY DISTRIBUTED & DECENTRALIZED NATURE OF CRYPTOCURRENCY      ▀█▀  Telegram  ▀█
░░░▀▀█▄▄░█░░░█░█░░░▄░█▄▄▄█░█░▄▀░░█░▀▀█▄▄░░░       SOLARIS XLR▬▬▬▬▬ LAUNCHED 17 MARCH ▬▬▬▬▬SOLARIS XLR                   Slack     
░░░█▄▄▄█░░▀▄▄█░░▀▄▄█░█░░░█░█░░▀▄░█░█▄▄▄█░░░█▄ ASIC RESISTANT, Xevan (LESS ENERGY/STRONGER SECURITY) GPU MINING ▄█▄    Twitter   ▄█
Quake4
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 0

MindMiner developer


View Profile WWW
January 11, 2018, 09:14:25 AM
 #3070

Hi,

Whats wrong with decred in 2.2.4?

ypsi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 158


The Wheel weaves as the Wheel wills


View Profile
January 11, 2018, 09:44:56 AM
 #3071

Needing some help on the massive hash difference i'm seeing between mining on Windows 10 (tpruvot 2.2.3) vs Simplemining OS (tpruvot 2.1).

Windows is hashing at almost double what SMOS is mining at.  Mining w/LBRY algo : Windows 10 @ 500Mh vs SMOS @ 250-300Mh.

OC is the same on both OS's.  Would the difference in tpruvot versions cause such a drastic difference in hash?   

Script used on both : ccminer-x64 -q -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.suprnova.cc:6256 -u  -p
Did you try to use the 2.1 version on the Windows computer to compare if it gives the same slow speed as on SMOS?
Or can you upgrade the ccminer version on SMOS to 2.2.3 or 2.2.4?

--ypsi

Epsylon3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1075


ccminer/cpuminer developer


View Profile WWW
January 11, 2018, 03:37:41 PM
 #3072

Hi,

Whats wrong with decred in 2.2.4?



nicehash use an unique special protocol for DCR and require their miner

BTC: 1FhDPLPpw18X4srecguG3MxJYe4a1JsZnd - My Projects: ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp - Forum threads : ccminer - cpuminer-multi - yiimp
monaxdk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 11, 2018, 09:30:51 PM
 #3073

Hashrate of card number #7 is always below average. I only see this with skein.
Replaced riser, PCI position...... to no evail

Maybe you have a monitor or a display port-vga converter connected to this card?
In this case, it will be slower than the rest
ShowMeCoins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 11, 2018, 10:09:16 PM
 #3074

Hashrate of card number #7 is always below average. I only see this with skein.
Replaced riser, PCI position...... to no evail

Maybe you have a monitor or a display port-vga converter connected to this card?
In this case, it will be slower than the rest
It's (linux) headless

░░░█▀▀▀█░█▀▀▀█░█░░░░░░▄▀▄░░█▀▀▀█░█░█▀▀▀█░░░█▀  FAIRLY DISTRIBUTED & DECENTRALIZED NATURE OF CRYPTOCURRENCY      ▀█▀  Telegram  ▀█
░░░▀▀█▄▄░█░░░█░█░░░▄░█▄▄▄█░█░▄▀░░█░▀▀█▄▄░░░       SOLARIS XLR▬▬▬▬▬ LAUNCHED 17 MARCH ▬▬▬▬▬SOLARIS XLR                   Slack     
░░░█▄▄▄█░░▀▄▄█░░▀▄▄█░█░░░█░█░░▀▄░█░█▄▄▄█░░░█▄ ASIC RESISTANT, Xevan (LESS ENERGY/STRONGER SECURITY) GPU MINING ▄█▄    Twitter   ▄█
matmator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 459
Merit: 250

bou !


View Profile
January 11, 2018, 10:38:41 PM
 #3075

hello

 sorry if I ask a stupid question,

but where do we put the worker name in ccminer? I have the 2.2.4 ccminer but in the readme I see no info on the worker.

go to the moon !!
bigbenjo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 12, 2018, 03:23:20 PM
 #3076

Hi, is possible for ccminer to save a full log file?? Best is if i can set my prefered filename and directory.
I see no information in readme file.

i need a full log file for fine tuning and multi-gpu overclock.

Is possible to autostop miner when gpu crash ?

Thank you.
scryptr
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
January 12, 2018, 04:56:22 PM
 #3077

hello

 sorry if I ask a stupid question,

but where do we put the worker name in ccminer? I have the 2.2.4 ccminer but in the readme I see no info on the worker.

IT DEPENDS ON THE POOL--

The worker name is placed according to pool-specific format.  It could be as follows:

  a) "-u USERNAME.WORKER"

  b) "-u WALLET.WORKER", or "-u WALLET/WORKER"

  c) "-u WALLET, -p WORKER,c=BTC,d=128"

where in example "c" the format works with YIIMP-style pools, and specifies coin and difficulty.  You'll need to consult pool documentation or the example files included within the CCminer archive for more variations.       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT
          DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
matmator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 459
Merit: 250

bou !


View Profile
January 12, 2018, 10:08:17 PM
 #3078

thx , its work Smiley

go to the moon !!
OmgMazai
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 13, 2018, 05:58:13 AM
 #3079

Hi all,

mb noob question, but how use failover pool in ccminer?
sir_blacks
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 13, 2018, 09:07:52 AM
 #3080

Hello @Epsylon3

I done some testing with CCminer 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.2.4 & i was get something interesting with equihash algoritm

GPU: Gigabyte Windforce 2 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB (Samsung)
Video Driver:  388.71
OS: Windows 7 Service Pack 1

Msi Afterburner 4.4.2
Power Limit:   72% (86W)
Core Clock:    +170
VRam Clock:    +450 (not relevant for this algorit)

- Ccminer it make GPU clock usage to be: 1900-1940 Mhz with Power: 85-86W what result in 258-260 Sol/s

- Excavator v.1.3.8.a 1830-1880 Mhz with Power: 85-86W what result in ~280 Sol/s

- DTMS 5.8 GPU clock it goo to: 1830-1880 Mhz with Power: 85-86W what result in ~300 Sol/s

Well now what i will like to get is to see CCminer running on ~1900 Mhz with 86W on +300 Sol/s!!! so a tune like that can be that done in a future update ? if yes it will be damn greats  Roll Eyes

cheers
Pages: « 1 ... 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 [154] 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!