Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 07:00:24 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 [1647] 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 ... 2248 »
  Print  
Author Topic: KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2437 blocks  (Read 5350864 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (50 posts by 3+ users deleted.)
kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4536
Merit: 1847


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 11:10:36 AM
 #32921

Having network problems yet again with the SG node.
Miners on the SG node will have failed over to their backup node a couple of times by now ... still not resolved.
Seems to be OK again now (hasn't dropped anything for about 20 minutes)
Not sure what's up with Singapore ... has been quite unreliable over the past 30 hours.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
Vertflyer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 12:16:42 PM
 #32922

How amazing would his be? Is there a downside I haven’t considered?

https://www.chinamoneynetwork.com/2018/01/05/beijing-considers-policies-potentially-ban-bitcoin-mining-china
rifleman74
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 21

4 s9's 2 821's


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 03:24:16 PM
 #32923

Turn'em up to 11 folks.

BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK !

Why not make 10 the highest?

These go to 11

Someone got it...haha
rifleman74
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 21

4 s9's 2 821's


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 03:25:46 PM
 #32924


Miners will just move outside China...not sure if they'd fine as cheap of electricity so the possibility of pools shrinking would be nice to see.
overcon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 393
Merit: 250


911 IT Admin. I keep 911 up so you get help ASAP!


View Profile WWW
January 06, 2018, 04:16:04 PM
 #32925

It's time for another block!


Donate BTC to: 1PXBBTLqXQnT9qAyWsc51XGj2GUt4WW57x
MEARK
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 04:37:17 PM
 #32926


It must be the dreaded "Y2K18 curse"... still looking for our first block of the new year!!
wavelengthsf
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 118


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 05:41:51 PM
 #32927

Being on the wrong side of variance sucks - in poker tournaments and especially in Bitcoin mining!

Let's go block!
Waztim
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 15


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 06:11:54 PM
 #32928

Lets do this, Come On Block, two orders of Chicken Wings were sacrificed to the cause!! Mine On!!
rifleman74
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 21

4 s9's 2 821's


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 08:32:15 PM
 #32929

a couple of racks of ribs will be sacrificed in the name of this upcoming block.  CRACK IT AND MINE IT!
pattim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 08:52:51 PM
Last edit: January 06, 2018, 10:44:03 PM by pattim
 #32930

Hi All - has anyone else noticed that the last couple of payouts for kano PPLNS do not seem to be confirming in Bitcoin Core v0.14.0 (64-bit)?  
This seems a little odd.

This is what I'm seeing for the last 2 payouts, in BC Core:
Status: 0/unconfirmed, in memory pool...  
Date: 12/31/17 18:34
From: unknown
...


Normally I would see something like this (from three payouts ago...):
Status: 1166 confirmations
Date: 12/30/17 08:02
From: unknown
...


EDIT:  This was answered on IRC.
cryptotore
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 324
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 06, 2018, 09:14:12 PM
 #32931


I wonder if that wouldn't make coins value drop. If it does, it is bad for everyone.

Sure their electrical grid would sure appreciate it.

Meanwhile we got these Norwegian dudes claiming to be hosting 50% of Chinas hashrate sometime in 2018.
https://www.kryptovault.no/
http://www.cryptotech.no/

kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4536
Merit: 1847


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 10:43:46 PM
 #32932

Anyone?   Huh Huh Huh

(The status on the pool itself for these two is "Matured.")

Hi All - has anyone else noticed that the last couple of payouts for kano PPLNS do not seem to be confirming in Bitcoin Core v0.14.0 (64-bit)?  
This seems a little odd.

This is what I'm seeing for the last 2 payouts, in BC Core:
Status: 0/unconfirmed, in memory pool...  
Date: 12/31/17 18:34
From: unknown
...


Normally I would see something like this (from three payouts ago...):
Status: 1166 confirmations
Date: 12/30/17 08:02
From: unknown
...

Yep they're unconfirmed.

That how bitcoin works.
You send out a transaction, then some time after that, they get confirmed.

Since our payout transaction pays over 1000 people, it's a pretty big transaction.
As it says on the Help->Payouts page, they will be confirmed in the next block we find.
or
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg27320657#msg27320657

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
pattim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 11:39:07 PM
 #32933

I just calculated, based on the global hashrate, that bitcoin mining uses between 0.1% (if all miners are S9's) and 1% (if a mix of newer and older hashers are in use) of all the electric energy generated by mankind.  That much energy would run some respectably-sized factories (or cities).  Maybe China wants to keep power directed toward industry?

Also, Jørgen Randers mentioned in 2014 that Norway owns something like 10% of all the stocks in the world (he says, "filthy-rich Norwegians").  That's what they did with their share of the North Sea Oil earnings.  It sort of makes sense that a couple of Norwegians would acquire so much mining hardware...


I wonder if that wouldn't make coins value drop. If it does, it is bad for everyone.

Sure their electrical grid would sure appreciate it.

Meanwhile we got these Norwegian dudes claiming to be hosting 50% of Chinas hashrate sometime in 2018.
https://www.kryptovault.no/
http://www.cryptotech.no/
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3668
Merit: 2604


Evil beware: We have waffles!


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 01:57:02 AM
 #32934

And to hopefully squash further speculation on this, reality check:
https://www.coindesk.com/report-pboc-quashes-rumor-it-would-shutter-chinas-bitcoin-mines/

Just as with the 'China bans exchanges' rumor last year some fool got hold of a piece of information, extrapolated its meaning to fit their biases or agenda, and then posted their speculation to that bane of civilized discussion and reason - Social Media. From there what started as a mild cough exploded into plague...

- For bitcoin to succeed the community must police itself -    My info useful? Donations welcome!  3NtFuzyWREGoDHWeMczeJzxFZpiLAFJXYr
 -Sole remaining active Primary developer of cgminer, Kano's repo is here
-Support Sidehacks miner development. Donations to:   1BURGERAXHH6Yi6LRybRJK7ybEm5m5HwTr
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 3995



View Profile
January 07, 2018, 02:07:55 AM
 #32935

I just calculated, based on the global hashrate, that bitcoin mining uses between 0.1% (if all miners are S9's) and 1% (if a mix of newer and older hashers are in use) of all the electric energy generated by mankind.  

maybe recheck your math?

I get the number for all electricity of 20.9 PWh (20.9X10^15)
hash rate is 16000000 Th/s, which is the equivalent of 1.185 mil S9 (boy, it's a lot).
That many S9 consume about 1.54Gwh (1.54X10^9)
1.54/20900000 [PW converted to Gw]=0.73X10^10-7

so, mining currently consumes less than 1/10000000 of all earth electricity or 0.00001%.
If being generous and assume that 50% comes from less productive macines, then 0.00002%
pattim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 02:23:40 AM
Last edit: January 07, 2018, 03:11:45 AM by pattim
 #32936

Well, I've been checking it - it's only an order-of-magnitude estimate - but I think this is right - can you spot me?

(in round numbers) The hash rate of the bitcoin network is around 14,000,000 terahashes per second.  

An S9 does about 14 terahashes per second and uses about 1,400 Watts of power.  (ignoring less efficient miners)

So that means the bitcoin network is using the hashing equivalent of about 1,000,000 of the S9 antminers. (assumes most-efficient case?)

So a million S9's use 1,400 million Watts of power, or 1.4 GigaWatts of power.  

The annual energy use for bitcoin is therefore (1.4 GigaWatts) * (8760 hours in a year) = 12,264 GigaWatt-hours or ~12 TeraWatt-hr of energy.

The total annual electric energy generated by humanity is about 24,000 TeraWatt-hours.  (wikipedia)

Thus bitcoin uses 0.05% of all electrical energy generated if only the most efficient miners are used.  
Allowing for inefficient miners, we'll say 0.1% - 1% of all electricity generated.  (to nearest order of magnitude)

I just calculated, based on the global hashrate, that bitcoin mining uses between 0.1% (if all miners are S9's) and 1% (if a mix of newer and older hashers are in use) of all the electric energy generated by mankind.  

maybe recheck your math?

I get the number for all electricity of 20.9 PWh (20.9X10^15)
hash rate is 16000000 Th/s, which is the equivalent of 1.185 mil S9 (boy, it's a lot).
That many S9 consume about 1.54Gwh (1.54X10^9)
1.54/20900000 [PW converted to Gw]=0.73X10^10-7

so, mining currently consumes less than 1/10000000 of all earth electricity or 0.00001%.
If being generous and assume that 50% comes from less productive macines, then 0.00002%
Vertflyer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 43
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 03:08:53 AM
 #32937

Does ckpoolmonitor or any of the monitors email you when a block is found? I really want to stop polling the Kano site every 20 minutes to an hour. Is there any mechanism to push notify when blocks are found?
kano (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4536
Merit: 1847


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 03:31:35 AM
 #32938

Does ckpoolmonitor or any of the monitors email you when a block is found? I really want to stop polling the Kano site every 20 minutes to an hour. Is there any mechanism to push notify when blocks are found?
Well sending an email isn't much use for a phone app Smiley They alert you about blocks.
But the web one that Zach runs I think does.

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
Rapidgator
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 509
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 07, 2018, 04:52:48 AM
 #32939



In your experience, does the reward make up for the long wait before a block is found? I currently average 0.002918071 per day with Slushpool with only one S9.

Yes, absolutely. I switched from Slush to Kano and I definitely see the difference. Slush is a fine pool, nothing wrong with it, but the fee is higher than Kano (2% vs .9% when he has it). The pool is much smaller, so the variance is higher, but the payouts are great when they come.

Thanks a bunch wavelengthsf. I'll give it a try for about a week or two and see how it goes. Hopefully great!! Smiley

same here !
i will update and pls do the same as soon as you get rewarded
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 3995



View Profile
January 07, 2018, 05:35:19 AM
 #32940


So a million S9's use 1,400 million Watts of power, or 1.4 GigaWatts of power.  


The total annual electric energy generated by humanity is about 24,000 TeraWatt-hours.  (wikipedia)


Final improved calc (I also made a mistake in original calc)

1.4 Gwh for miners
2.31 TWh (2310 Gwh) continuous average for Earth
see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_energy_consumption
1.4/2310=0.0006 or 0.06%
maybe if you count less efficient miners, the real number is 50% higher (although I doubt it because old miners like S7produce 3-4 times less than S9) to 0.1%

0.1% is max, with 0.07-0.075% being more realistic.

However, banks consume at least five times more energy:
https://www.bitsonline.com/bitcoin-vs-banks-uses-energy/
Pages: « 1 ... 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 [1647] 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 ... 2248 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!