yslyung
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
|
|
December 10, 2015, 12:53:30 AM |
|
... but if later further down the road of the to-do lists/development, it'll be nice if you can assign several/different username & payout add's under 1 registered account.
Well the account has a 'username' so yeah having multiple 'usernames' ... I'm not exactly sure why. But multiple payout addresses is already part of ckdb, as I mentioned before if you need that It's a switch I set on the account saying how many addresses you are allowed, default for everyone is only one address. Obviously I don't give that option to everyone, I don't want miners dividing up their reward to multiple addresses unless they are sizeable. Each address increases the size of the payout transaction, so yeah don't want tiny accounts paying out to lots of addresses. One is enough for most accounts. Big accounts I'll enable it on request. cool by request. have few dc's that's why. easier management. but no issues for me, i'll just open 1 account for each of them.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 10, 2015, 05:39:57 AM |
|
Payout 387465 sent (about 3 and half hours ago) a08b13bacfb73b9d2bd9160cf31055bd67a22397373740b7e39d317fc6086869 and (just) confirmed
|
|
|
|
Prelude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 10, 2015, 06:08:59 AM |
|
Anyone know why canaan has such wild hashrate swings? Seems to oscillate between 550-1100TH/s pretty constantly.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
|
December 10, 2015, 06:12:46 AM |
|
Anyone know why canaan has such wild hashrate swings? Seems to oscillate between 550-1100TH/s pretty constantly.
They're behind the great firewall of china and this pool isn't. Also they're constantly testing new hardware (avalon6).
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
omega015
|
|
December 10, 2015, 06:19:33 AM |
|
Anyone know why canaan has such wild hashrate swings? Seems to oscillate between 550-1100TH/s pretty constantly.
I did wonder that too. I noticed the number of workers is so erratic, but guess this is explained by the Avalon testing. Canaan I'll be happy to test some for you luckyant also seems to have some odd pattern. he/she/they come and go randomly and seem to have a good amount of hashing available.
|
|
|
|
yslyung
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
|
|
December 10, 2015, 06:22:34 AM |
|
it's block time ! where is it ? STOP going to other pools. come here.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 10, 2015, 06:52:44 AM |
|
Payout 387505 sent 0f5653d45a9f0aeaec3f81b53f478807030ab01de6ff81fb6170d7c2e388a0fe and confirmed already -- I'm gonna do a ckpool restart in about half an hour. This one should actually reduce the overall pool stales by a bit so definitely worth doing. Now that the pool has grown, a restart will mean more people failing over than before, but still a lot of miners should just see a reconnect in cgminer and not failover. Yeah you'll notice the higher invalid % numbers in the top left probably mostly due to the GFW miners getting them - but this change should help that a bit also. Normally we're down around 1/4 of the current value, so normally quite a bit better, so we'll see if this change helps with the GFW miners.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:06:57 AM |
|
it's block time ! where is it ? STOP going to other pools. come here.
Just arrived Well done frozencat with ~8TH!
|
|
|
|
omega015
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:11:36 AM |
|
I had a nice fillet steak so I am hoping this gets us a 3rd block within 24hours (before 09:16) ....who will accept the challenge?.... Looks like frozencat took up the challenge well done with that block (7.6THs)
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:20:23 AM |
|
ckpool restart coming up in 5 minutes - as mentioned above.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4242
Merit: 8508
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:23:52 AM |
|
THIS IS NOT A COMPLAINT! I have a Question about transactions you accept for your blocks made time on this transaction is 06:14:27 https://blockchain.info/tx/3989f4a2d7cdbcd146e5b9df949c514fd5920e66e9486d4c18bf1681ab7ba3b7I paid a fee of 0.0001 I know the Chinese pools skip over my transactions, but both your pool and slush skipped this transaction. Is it simply that 0.0001 was too small a fee? If so please let me know. 9 blocks have skipped me I thought 0.0001 was good enough of a fee. 387625 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 07:09:18 F2Pool 0000000000000000028f3f689c218f0d6a6be85e5c4d0ea5b7930640df6f56bb 387624 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 07:02:47 Kano CKPool 0000000000000000014dc7993059f10191f346504e002bd9bf42a56d23a9ac17387623 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:59:35 AntPool 000000000000000000516d33c0a08cf8f4851e0c67ad06fd7184f7504091d2b2 387622 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:42:38 F2Pool 00000000000000000904f1c661f914420bc5825f2206c79a3f99ebe7c3c4329f 387621 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:42:25 Slush 0000000000000000066a459829deafbac2a2446dba5befc83961a72f479d8eee387620 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:40:44 F2Pool 000000000000000002bca989506ae7e047572b38963d5b4b15707f2e8e2d5b91 387619 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:27:39 F2Pool 000000000000000000a3b301b87b07ee952707d30396a0fa116fa0b01cca1f4e 387618 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:13:22 F2Pool 0000000000000000036fff03d002b8789541350f993df4dc09a1de672a4b7be4 387617 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:09:47 F2Pool 0000000000000000099b095a982f5987017885e033d1c3b39296b8b552b696e9
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:25:51 AM |
|
ckpool restart coming up in 5 minutes - as mentioned above.
Done.
|
|
|
|
yslyung
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1002
Mine Mine Mine
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:28:15 AM |
|
it's block time ! where is it ? STOP going to other pools. come here.
Just arrived Well done frozencat with ~8TH! ahhhh my chant worked ! let's grab few more ! yeah noticed the restart, numbers are all over the place. should be back shortly i guess. well done block finder !
|
|
|
|
xZork
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:37:38 AM |
|
THIS IS NOT A COMPLAINT! I have a Question about transactions you accept for your blocks made time on this transaction is 06:14:27 https://blockchain.info/tx/3989f4a2d7cdbcd146e5b9df949c514fd5920e66e9486d4c18bf1681ab7ba3b7I paid a fee of 0.0001 I know the Chinese pools skip over my transactions, but both your pool and slush skipped this transaction. Is it simply that 0.0001 was too small a fee? If so please let me know. 9 blocks have skipped me I thought 0.0001 was good enough of a fee. 387625 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 07:09:18 F2Pool 0000000000000000028f3f689c218f0d6a6be85e5c4d0ea5b7930640df6f56bb 387624 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 07:02:47 Kano CKPool 0000000000000000014dc7993059f10191f346504e002bd9bf42a56d23a9ac17387623 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:59:35 AntPool 000000000000000000516d33c0a08cf8f4851e0c67ad06fd7184f7504091d2b2 387622 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:42:38 F2Pool 00000000000000000904f1c661f914420bc5825f2206c79a3f99ebe7c3c4329f 387621 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:42:25 Slush 0000000000000000066a459829deafbac2a2446dba5befc83961a72f479d8eee387620 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:40:44 F2Pool 000000000000000002bca989506ae7e047572b38963d5b4b15707f2e8e2d5b91 387619 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:27:39 F2Pool 000000000000000000a3b301b87b07ee952707d30396a0fa116fa0b01cca1f4e 387618 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:13:22 F2Pool 0000000000000000036fff03d002b8789541350f993df4dc09a1de672a4b7be4 387617 (Main Chain) 2015-12-10 06:09:47 F2Pool 0000000000000000099b095a982f5987017885e033d1c3b39296b8b552b696e9 While I am very interested in seeing this answered as I have had funds "floating" for many, many hours before. If it was an important transaction I would always use a fee of .001 for anything that broke .X if it was more than .3 I would use a fee of .0025 and I haven't have any problems. I know this isn't helpful...
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:43:14 AM |
|
Look at that blockchain link. You have an unconfirmed input.
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
December 10, 2015, 07:43:46 AM |
|
Arggghh... missing out big time... my electrical wiring job is not completed yet and 20TH offline!
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
omega015
|
|
December 10, 2015, 08:18:19 AM |
|
Like I said not a complaint.
I am efforting to understand why it is delayed.
I was sending 0.15 btc to coinbase and I have noticed my old 2000 + transaction address has this happen with larger fees like
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004 Yet if coinbase sends me coins and pays .00005 or .00006 it clears
I was under the impression kano and ck took lower fees .
I wondered how low and I also wonder is the age of my address an issue
Kano mentioned an unconfirmed input. (I think) This means that this is holding up your payment, as the funds your sending are not fully confirmed yet. On blockchain.info if you click "Show scripts & coinbase" you will see all the inputs that make up your funds. 1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje (0.01107425 BTC - Output) 1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje (0.03240756 BTC - Output) 1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje (0.09681783 BTC - Output) 1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje ( U) (0.01013389 BTC - Output) You will see the bottom one is the unconfirmed funds, once this is confirmed then your transaction should go through. Hopefully I understood this correctly and if not, someone please correct me. EDIT: That unconfirmed input appears to be from a zero fee transaction ( https://blockchain.info/tx-index/115453055/1)
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
December 10, 2015, 08:46:39 AM |
|
philip I deleted your post, you seem to want to repeat post really big posts I answered it at the top also.
|
|
|
|
macbook-air
|
|
December 10, 2015, 09:18:12 AM |
|
“The Chinese pools” is not one pool. The policy difference between AntPool and us may be as big (or as small) as that between Kano and us. Your transaction was ignored because it did not pay enough fee. But you can always send another transaction with a RBF-compatible client (include “Bitcoin” XT) as we have FSS-RBF activated.
|
|
|
|
e46btc
|
|
December 10, 2015, 09:21:10 AM |
|
..Your transaction was ignored because it did not pay enough fee.. What is 'enough fee' at f2pool? Just for info.
|
|
|
|
|