Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 05:44:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: FPGA development board "Lancelot" - accept bitsteam developer's orders.  (Read 101825 times)
Energizer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 273
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 13, 2012, 11:31:29 AM
 #221

Is the 550 MH/s bitstream compatible with Icarus?
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714239884
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714239884

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714239884
Reply with quote  #2

1714239884
Report to moderator
wildemagic
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 13, 2012, 08:01:56 PM
 #222

Is the 550 MH/s bitstream compatible with Icarus?

Im going to go out on a limb here and say a big NO.

550MH/s on icarus would require a 275 on what was a 190 clock device.  Ngzhang already said that 200mhz was not recommended.

Unless there is some other wigery going on that increases hashrate efficiency greatly without clock increases.

kind regards

.,-._|\     Offgrid 1.7kW Solar and 3G wireless internet powering my mining rig.
/ .Oz. \
\_,--.x/     [219.5btc of successful trades total] with : rastapool, miernik, flatronw & OneFixt
       o
ngzhang (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 592
Merit: 501


We will stand and fight.


View Profile
July 14, 2012, 05:03:22 AM
 #223

Is the 550 MH/s bitstream compatible with Icarus?

Im going to go out on a limb here and say a big NO.

550MH/s on icarus would require a 275 on what was a 190 clock device.  Ngzhang already said that 200mhz was not recommended.

Unless there is some other wigery going on that increases hashrate efficiency greatly without clock increases.

kind regards

The answer is a big YES.
But only for MY Icarus customers.  Grin
wildemagic
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 14, 2012, 07:53:49 AM
 #224

But only for MY Icarus customers.  Grin

Are icarus users that didnt buy directly from you excluded? If so, thats a pity.

The answer is a big YES.

I probably should have specified in my previous post that Its doubtful that the bitstream will do 550MH/s on icarus, not that it wouldnt work on icarus (which you have already confirmed that it would)

kind regards

.,-._|\     Offgrid 1.7kW Solar and 3G wireless internet powering my mining rig.
/ .Oz. \
\_,--.x/     [219.5btc of successful trades total] with : rastapool, miernik, flatronw & OneFixt
       o
tucenaber
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 337
Merit: 252


View Profile
July 14, 2012, 11:51:55 AM
 #225

The answer is a big YES.
But only for MY Icarus customers.  Grin

What does this mean? Who are the customers that are not yours? I'm confused. I was part of the last "group order" and that was handled by Xiangfu by your choice. I really hope you consider me your customer Wink
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
July 14, 2012, 12:11:26 PM
 #226

At a guess? - the other boards using (or trying to use) the Icarus bitstream? Smiley

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
ngzhang (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 592
Merit: 501


We will stand and fight.


View Profile
July 14, 2012, 02:46:00 PM
 #227

At a guess? - the other boards using (or trying to use) the Icarus bitstream? Smiley

smart  Smiley
Energizer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 273
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 14, 2012, 07:17:13 PM
 #228

So when will the new bitstream be available for Icarus?
tidus_13
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 100



View Profile
July 15, 2012, 01:05:33 AM
 #229

At a guess? - the other boards using (or trying to use) the Icarus bitstream? Smiley

smart  Smiley


like yohan´s Quad XC6SLX150 ... so it means that only will work for Icarus board...Nice!
Beaflag VonRathburg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 472
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 20, 2012, 01:41:46 AM
 #230

7/17 has come and passed. I'm interested to hear about the first production run.

Trance104
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 206
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 20, 2012, 07:18:17 PM
 #231

I'd be interested in purchasing one if/when these are ready.
Raize
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1419
Merit: 1015


View Profile
July 25, 2012, 03:38:18 PM
 #232

Update? ngzhang?
wildemagic
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 25, 2012, 03:47:28 PM
 #233

Update? ngzhang?

From his profile :

Last Active: 23-07-2012, 22:07:55
Last  Post: 15-07-2012, 00:46:00

on: 12-07-2012, 17:40:47 :

will have a final bitsteam update next week(i hope). and completely change the architecture.
please wait for that before do any optimization effort.


Its only been 14 days since that announcement, I think we can hold off on the ropes and pitchforks for a bit <grins>

kind regards

.,-._|\     Offgrid 1.7kW Solar and 3G wireless internet powering my mining rig.
/ .Oz. \
\_,--.x/     [219.5btc of successful trades total] with : rastapool, miernik, flatronw & OneFixt
       o
Raize
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1419
Merit: 1015


View Profile
July 25, 2012, 04:12:39 PM
Last edit: July 25, 2012, 05:27:51 PM by Raize
 #234

No pitchforks here, I'm not upset! Just excited and interested in hearing how everything turned out. This has an application for present Icarus boards if I'm understanding what he's saying about the bitstream correctly.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4466
Merit: 1800


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
July 26, 2012, 09:49:36 AM
 #235

Update? ngzhang?

From his profile :

Last Active: 23-07-2012, 22:07:55
Last  Post: 15-07-2012, 00:46:00

on: 12-07-2012, 17:40:47 :

will have a final bitsteam update next week(i hope). and completely change the architecture.
please wait for that before do any optimization effort.


Its only been 14 days since that announcement, I think we can hold off on the ropes and pitchforks for a bit <grins>

kind regards
... and no one has given him any money yet either ...
So certainly no reason to be impatient ...

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
ngzhang (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 592
Merit: 501


We will stand and fight.


View Profile
July 26, 2012, 01:33:03 PM
 #236

Update? ngzhang?

From his profile :

Last Active: 23-07-2012, 22:07:55
Last  Post: 15-07-2012, 00:46:00

on: 12-07-2012, 17:40:47 :

will have a final bitsteam update next week(i hope). and completely change the architecture.
please wait for that before do any optimization effort.


Its only been 14 days since that announcement, I think we can hold off on the ropes and pitchforks for a bit <grins>

kind regards
... and no one has given him any money yet either ...
So certainly no reason to be impatient ...

yeah, so i don't like  to withdraw any pre-order money to give me any more pressure when i focus on doing something.

these days:
still very busy at multiple works. 70% is school work, and i put all my spare time on lancelot project. to 3~4:00AM everyday.

i work together with the software guys, now the new bitsteam is doing the optimization work. we must push it to 500-550MH/s.

hardware is ready 5 days ago.

a reason of delay is one of the software guy go to USA, we only have another 1 people to do the work. (not including me) a good news is he will come back at 2/8, but we want to release the bitsteam earlier.

apologize for any misbehavior about didn't replay the PMs or mails.

PS:

accept bitsteam developer orders form now.
Raize
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1419
Merit: 1015


View Profile
July 26, 2012, 02:35:38 PM
 #237

Don't worry, we're just interested in keeping updated. Thanks for letting us know what is going on. Hopefully when your guy gets back from the US you'll be set! I'm glad you're not taking preorders till you are ready.
Dexter770221
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1029
Merit: 1000


View Profile
July 26, 2012, 04:21:45 PM
 #238

PS:

accept bitsteam developer orders form now.

So, I may order DEV KIT now? Do I need to email to you?

Under development Modular UPGRADEABLE Miner (MUM). Looking for investors.
Changing one PCB with screwdriver and you have brand new miner in hand... Plug&Play, scalable from one module to thousands.
mrb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1027


View Profile WWW
July 27, 2012, 03:45:10 AM
 #239

these days:
still very busy at multiple works. 70% is school work, and i put all my spare time on lancelot project. to 3~4:00AM everyday.

i work together with the software guys, now the new bitsteam is doing the optimization work. we must push it to 500-550MH/s.

hardware is ready 5 days ago.

At 250-275 Mh/s per FPGA, I presume you designed it using the "sea-of-tiny hashers" model, like bitfury did. If that's the case, good work! I wonder why not more people try to implement this obviously superior implementation (/me looks at the Cairnsmore1 devs...)
2112
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1065



View Profile
July 27, 2012, 07:24:42 PM
 #240

I wonder why not more people try to implement this obviously superior implementation (/me looks at the Cairnsmore1 devs...)
It appears to trigger slow convergence in the place and route phases. The unrolled implementation has the similar problem, but less bad.

It seems like the heuristics in the global optimization phases can't find an usable gradient which could be used to guide the optimizer. So it kind of wanders in a fog over the terrain consisting of small hills and shallow valleys.

Please comment, critique, criticize or ridicule BIP 2112: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=54382.0
Long-term mining prognosis: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=91101.0
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 [12] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!