CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[tbearhere]

Could someone please tell me the hashrate for Lyra2RE...not Lyra2REv2.... for the 750ti. I can't get my bat file working on nicehash to check. I know nicehash is paying better for Lyra2REv2.....but just wanted to know Lyra2RE hashrate .
Thx

[sp_]

around 1-1,1MHASH per 750ti

[tbearhere]

around 1-1,1MHASH per 750ti

Thx sp
Do you have this implemented in r69 ? I would like to get it to work ..for a test.
What does the bat file look like?

[sp_]

around 1-1,1MHASH per 750ti

Thx sp
Do you have this implemented in r69 ? I would like to get it to work ..for a test.

yes. ccminer -a lyra2 --benchmark

[tbearhere]

around 1-1,1MHASH per 750ti

Thx sp
Do you have this implemented in r69 ? I would like to get it to work ..for a test.

yes. ccminer -a lyra2 --benchmark

Thx sp   I had Lyra2re  

EDIT: I wonder what launched to make Lyre2v2 to go up so much?

[rednoW]

Threads per block. You need to recompile for each time you change it, but a change of values will speedup alot. See my edited post above...

When you find the optimal values for your card, please post it and I will change it as the default setting..
The 750ti, and the 970 settings should be pretty good. (5-10% faster than DJM's version on the maxwell)
The other models probobly need a different launch config. I haven't done it yet because lyra2v2 hasn't been profitable.

And another thing....
My modded kernal is slower on linux and on older cards.

(compute 3.0/3.5 Might not work).

I put for "750" the same setting as for 750ti

tpb = 16;

And with -i 19 it takes 811mb of gpu memory, 14-18% mem controller load and 4440khs/s. Nice!

Will send some beers soon ))

upd: directly from cryptsy from my poor gtx750 ))) 0.02btc minus taxes ))) https://blockchain.info/de/tx/5e0374309f65e38dabff5cd6a12fb6ea91I4fdb90eda3calc752dde3cb76217b

[sp_]

Then there is monacoin.

Monacoin just hardforked from scrypt to Lyra2v2. Pretty big in Japan..

[rednoW]

Monacoin just hardforked from scrypt to Lyra2v2. Pretty big in Japan..

Ya-ya, Guano Apes - Big In Japan ))) nice song

[sp_]

Just checked a pool
https://pool.xau.jp/monacoin/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool

(edit)
Mona is very profitable but the diff is rising. (1.4BTC/GHASH when solomined) and 0.9 on the rental sites.

[serg_25]

Guys can you please provide config example for ccminer?
want to check how to use nicehash as primary and some other pool for backup, can't find such config example for ccminer.
Thanks.

[pallas]

Monacoin just hardforked from scrypt to Lyra2v2. Pretty big in Japan..

Ya-ya, Guano Apes - Big In Japan ))) nice song

no, it's Alphaville :-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_in_Japan_(Alphaville_song)

EDIT: you must be young!

[sp_]

Guys can you please provide config example for ccminer?
want to check how to use nicehash as primary and some other pool for backup, can't find such config example for ccminer.
Thanks.

You need external software to do this. Google "Miner Control"

[theotherme]

I'm not sure it matters how many ways to donate we have. Miners seem to be way better at complaining than donating.  I had my all of my GPUs pointed at broken soloing for nearly a week and have only received two donations (thanks again myagui and zTheWolfz!) since the fix went in.  That's despite there being at least a half dozen people on here complaining about the issue.  It really makes me wonder whether my time would be better spent fixing ccminer or teaming up with some of the kernel guys and doing something closed from scratch...

I did mention no one uses pool mining except for giant farms and they're unlikely to actually donate as they probably have their own devs they employ.

I also said that the miner would be better off with a miner fee split among developers or a company which could manage such things.

I will also, also point out the people who were complaining were mainly other devs.


Honestly I really don't understand this. It's like developers like putting themselves in the corner and then complaining about miners too. What's wrong with a mining fee? We've went over this multiple times. You could easily get paid for your work. You could even make it optional to test it out or a release candidate with miner improvements and a fee to see how it turns out.

It's already been done successfully with Claymore.

you sound like a broken record bensam...

Sorry crowdfunding wrecks private miners.

Nicehash lyrav2 currently paying     2.6896btc ..Dropped to 0.50

Up to 0.9296 now..


https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=miners&a=14&l=0

The top miner just switched from mining quark to lyra2v2 5,4 gigash all NVIDIA. I wonder if he is using the DJM-34 version or the sp-mod.

This farm is making 3.274 BTC a day on this adress..
Pretty good..
No donations to the developers.
If you release your faster lyra2v2 kernal djm34, he will upgrade and the profit will go away.

Massive hashrate...

equal to around 1300 750ti's @ 40watt (52,000 watt)

But I think this company has some older compute cards. So the power usage is probobly twice as much as the competition. And all the rigs are linux based.

Yeah, too bad there isn't a 2% miner fee attached to that... XD


Curiously why do so many devs hate the idea of a miner fee? I don't understand. No one has made a rational argument against it yet. Even Wolf (of all people) eventually agreed with me in this thread that it was a good idea. It supports the developers, it scales with hashing power, and it's something small miners can handle.

zzzzzzz again ?
shall we point you to the numerous answer many of us have already answered that question ?

Sure, in light of you not providing one. zzzz...


BTW the SP miner is still getting 10% less hash rate compared to DJM's original release. The power fluctuates a lot on the SP version compared to the DJM version.

there is a time feature to fix in sp... opt_scantime which is probably too small and cause latencies in gpu usage (already told about that... )

[sp_]

You can set the opt_scantime with the  '-s' switch. My default is 25. In the DJM34 version it is set to 60.

Does it help on the pool?

ccminer -s 60 -a lyra2v2 --benchmark.

[EclipseRog]

as "kh" in 69 versions and give gtx960 gtx950 to Quark and Lyra2REv2.

p.s. Why in the first post is not to make a sign for speed and do not update it as an update miner?

[sp_]

as "kh" in 69 versions and give gtx960 gtx950 to Quark and Lyra2REv2.
p.s. Why in the first post is not to make a sign for speed and do not update it as an update miner?

I use English as my second language but I am unable to understand what your question is.

The gtx960 can do around

quark: 10,5 MHASH
Lyra2REv2: ??

The gtx950 can do around

quark: 8,4 MHASH
Lyra2REv2: ??


The lyra hashrate is not tested on the 950 and the 960

[dominuspro]

Good job sp(and others) with .69
Those are my lyra2rev2 hashrates, all gpus overclocked:
The hashrate is very constant, the temperatures very low compared to quark.

[DragonSlayer]

Information purpose.  Speeds for Lyra2v2 using SP version around commit 1056.  All at stock mfg clocks.

EVGA FTW GTX960
6,150 kH/s

EVGA Hydro Copper GTX980
11,775 kH/s

[rednoW]

Monacoin just hardforked from scrypt to Lyra2v2. Pretty big in Japan..

Ya-ya, Guano Apes - Big In Japan ))) nice song

no, it's Alphaville :-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_in_Japan_(Alphaville_song)

EDIT: you must be young!

I knew that but I prefer guano apes style )))

[bathrobehero]

Monacoin just hardforked from scrypt to Lyra2v2. Pretty big in Japan..

Ya-ya, Guano Apes - Big In Japan ))) nice song

no, it's Alphaville :-)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_in_Japan_(Alphaville_song)

EDIT: you must be young!

I knew that but I prefer guano apes style )))

Lord of the boards comes to mind which I find amazing!