s7icky
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 01:01:53 AM |
|
Not trying to talk smack sp_ but i run 4 x 980ti... and really have never seen any BIG improvements in hashrates. Dont get me wrong i love ur work. but constantly asking for moonies and saying something is a whatever increase and no one really ever seeing it? Kinda bullshit if you ask me.
How much is a BIG improvement? Ummm atleast what he says?
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 01:13:30 AM |
|
Not trying to talk smack sp_ but i run 4 x 980ti... and really have never seen any BIG improvements in hashrates. Dont get me wrong i love ur work. but constantly asking for moonies and saying something is a whatever increase and no one really ever seeing it? Kinda bullshit if you ask me.
How much is a BIG improvement? Ummm atleast what he says? 5% ?
|
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 01:35:19 AM |
|
Unless someone is holding back the mature algos are probably optimal by now. Most of the improvements now are device specific tweaks. We'll probably have to wait for pascal and sm5.3 (and cuda 8?) for any major improvement opportunities in software. Hopefully profits will be higher by then.
|
|
|
|
Schleicher
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 01:44:18 AM |
|
Also should update the code with the cuda version number so it says cuda 7.5 when launched ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) not important though lol That is just a hardcoded string and does not reflect how ccminer was actually compiled. A more appropriate comment would be "optimized for cuda 7.5" unless a system variable is available to read the actual compile environment. Just replace this code in ccminer.cpp: #ifdef WIN32 printf("\tBuilt with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5\n\n"); #else printf("\tBuilt with the nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5\n\n"); #endif
with this: #ifdef _MSC_VER printf("Compiled with Visual C++ %d ", _MSC_VER / 100); #else #ifdef __clang__ printf("Compiled with Clang %s ", __clang_version__); #else #ifdef __GNUC__ printf("Compiled with GCC %d.%d ", __GNUC__, __GNUC_MINOR__); #else printf("Compiled with an unknown compiler "); #endif #endif #endif printf("using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit %d.%d\n\n", CUDART_VERSION / 1000, (CUDART_VERSION % 1000) / 10);
|
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 02:21:03 AM |
|
Also should update the code with the cuda version number so it says cuda 7.5 when launched ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) not important though lol That is just a hardcoded string and does not reflect how ccminer was actually compiled. A more appropriate comment would be "optimized for cuda 7.5" unless a system variable is available to read the actual compile environment. Just replace this code in ccminer.cpp: #ifdef WIN32 printf("\tBuilt with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5\n\n"); #else printf("\tBuilt with the nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5\n\n"); #endif
with this: #ifdef _MSC_VER printf("Compiled with Visual C++ %d ", _MSC_VER / 100); #else #ifdef __clang__ printf("Compiled with Clang %s ", __clang_version__); #else #ifdef __GNUC__ printf("Compiled with GCC %d.%d ", __GNUC__, __GNUC_MINOR__); #else printf("Compiled with an unknown compiler "); #endif #endif #endif printf("using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit %d.%d\n\n", CUDART_VERSION / 1000, (CUDART_VERSION % 1000) / 10);
I knew there had to be one, I just couldn't find it.
|
|
|
|
Al_may
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 02:30:18 AM |
|
OK, I must have forgotten how to do this but
how would I start, in windows 7, a CMD or used in a CMD scrypt with an affinity of 4.
just trying to keep the work load off the first 2 for the OS I have looked it up in google but most had their heads in a dark place
|
|
|
|
Al_may
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 02:59:07 AM |
|
oh my, ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) I just updated from .74 on a windows 7 pro and I get this ccminer.exe is not a valid win 32 application
|
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 03:10:08 AM |
|
OK, I must have forgotten how to do this but
how would I start, in windows 7, a CMD or used in a CMD scrypt with an affinity of 4.
just trying to keep the work load off the first 2 for the OS I have looked it up in google but most had their heads in a dark place
I'm not sure why you're asking but the --cpu-affinity can be set in ccminer. If you want to do it in Windows it's something like: start <program> /affinity <n> I don't think you have anything to worry about with the cpu load of ccminer, but a cpu miner...
|
|
|
|
Lenore
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 03:14:23 AM |
|
oh my, ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) I just updated from .74 on a windows 7 pro and I get this ccminer.exe is not a valid win 32 application Have you tried combatability mode. You can pick what OP version u want it to try to run in. You on a 32 or 64 bit system or do you have a 32 bit os with a 64 bit system?
|
|
|
|
Al_may
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 03:15:40 AM |
|
oh my, ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) I just updated from .74 on a windows 7 pro and I get this ccminer.exe is not a valid win 32 application well i had to update my 7-zip. all is fine now
|
|
|
|
Al_may
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 03:27:09 AM |
|
yep 76 is a 50% slow down for neo scrypt from 586 to 234 and quark is up 1.04 % from 17206 to 17972 time to run two folders
|
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 03:37:29 AM Last edit: December 12, 2015, 03:53:21 AM by joblo |
|
yep 76 is a 50% slow down for neo scrypt from 586 to 234 and quark is up 1.04 % from 17206 to 17972 time to run two folders
Has anyone compiled r76 for sm5.2 using cuda 6.5 (windows or linux to do a direct comparison with cuda 7.5? I could only do it with 750ti's on Linux and there was virtually no difference. Edit: however, they were both slower than 1.5.74-cuda6.5. The numbers (gpu0/gpu1) both EVGA 750ti SC no OC. 1.5.74(6.5) 1.5.76(6.5) 1.5.76(7.5) x11 3090/3145 2985/3050 2980/3045 quark 6360/6450 6335/6380 6340/6400 lyra2v2 4715/4755 4680/4715 4680/4715
What a pain getting this to display correctly, this ain't WYSIWYG.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 07:30:55 AM |
|
oh my, ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) I just updated from .74 on a windows 7 pro and I get this ccminer.exe is not a valid win 32 application Release 76 will not work with old drivers. you need to upgrade to the latest.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 07:32:32 AM |
|
yep 76 is a 50% slow down for neo scrypt from 586 to 234 and quark is up 1.04 % from 17206 to 17972 time to run two folders
Your math is wrong. from 17206 to 17972 is a 4,4519353713821% increase of the hashrate.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 07:32:58 AM |
|
tanx for the update sp ... cant wait to compile and see ...
I just released 76 with increased hashrate all over the place. But some of the algos are still slower than release 74. Quark has the most boost this time, and mostly on compute 5.2 devices. ok great ... then thats the first thing i will test when i get into the office tomorrow ... a miner will hash quark on your donation address ( donate-sp.granitecoin.com ) and see how it tests ... look out for the test on nicehash ( eu stratum ) ... tanx again mate ... i hope it compiles and works well on the new system ... #crysx Just tested quark release 76 on my 980ti g1 gigabyte windforce oc. 27.3 (+1,4MHASH) on the standard clocks(New WORLD RECORD)! Release 74 is only doing 25.9MHASH. On the EVGA SSC gtx 960. 11 MHASH on standard clocks. up 0.5 MHASH from release 74 is that stock clocks sp? ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 07:34:10 AM Last edit: December 12, 2015, 08:12:11 AM by sp_ |
|
Has anyone compiled r76 for sm5.2 using cuda 6.5 (windows or linux to do a direct comparison with cuda 7.5? I could only do it with 750ti's on Linux and there was virtually no difference. Edit: however, they were both slower than 1.5.74-cuda6.5.
This fork is now a cuda 7.5 fork. Upgrade to the latest drivers and compile with cuda 7.5 to get a boost in quark. (compute 5.2 devices) gtx 950, gtx 960, gtx 970, gtx 980, gtx 980ti...
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 07:35:01 AM |
|
is that stock clocks sp? ... #crysx
Yes.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 07:39:40 AM |
|
How much is a BIG improvement?
Ummm atleast what he says? 5% ? Here is the checklist to reach the optimal speed: 1. Latest drivers 2. Windows x86 3. Compile for cuda 7.5 (or use my binary) I get a 5% boost on my testrigs on compute 5.2 devices in the quark algo. If you do this: 1. Linux 2. 64bit build 3. cuda 6.5 You get a 0% boost in the quark algo.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 07:40:37 AM |
|
yep 76 is a 50% slow down for neo scrypt from 586 to 234 and quark is up 1.04 % from 17206 to 17972 time to run two folders
Has anyone compiled r76 for sm5.2 using cuda 6.5 (windows or linux to do a direct comparison with cuda 7.5? I could only do it with 750ti's on Linux and there was virtually no difference. Edit: however, they were both slower than 1.5.74-cuda6.5. The numbers (gpu0/gpu1) both EVGA 750ti SC no OC. 1.5.74(6.5) 1.5.76(6.5) 1.5.76(7.5) x11 3090/3145 2985/3050 2980/3045 quark 6360/6450 6335/6380 6340/6400 lyra2v2 4715/4755 4680/4715 4680/4715
What a pain getting this to display correctly, this ain't WYSIWYG. im compiling the the latest as we speak ... i was well enough to drive - so im here in the office at the moment ... the only thing i can give a comparison rate to is quark ( from 74 - 76 ) on c7.5 ... that doesnt exactly hep what you are asking - but it may be of interest to you regarding the last compiles i had with fedora ... btw - i have upgraded to fedora23x64 on the test machine - and compiling with c7.5 and ccminer-spmod76 ... it is this test machine i will be placing to mine for sp as a donation ... so if all is well - it should be a nice gain - unless fedora / cuda is broken in this version ... if not - im looking forward to some gains ... and sp - expect some hashrate on the donation link for you ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 12, 2015, 07:45:40 AM |
|
How much is a BIG improvement?
Ummm atleast what he says? 5% ? Here is the checklist to reach the optimal speed: 1. Latest drivers 2. Windows x86 3. Compile for cuda 7.5 (or use my binary) I get a 5% boost on my testrigs on compute 5.2 devices in the quark algo. If you do this: 1. Linux 2. 64bit build 3. cuda 6.5 You get a 0% boost in the quark algo. though linux build will show in a few minutes as to what it does compiled in f23x64c75 ( ie - fedora 23 x64 cuda 7.5 - im shorthanding from now on ) ... at least on my end anyway ... as you know - my systems seem to go the complete opposite of what most people were getting ... look out for the hashrate to show on you link ... https://www.nicehash.com/?p=miners&addr=1CTiNJyoUmbdMRACtteRWXhGqtSETYd6Vd&a=12&l=0 ... ill do the test on quark as that is a good comparison from the previous v74 ( that was compiled in f22x64c75 ) ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
|