chrysophylax
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
January 15, 2016, 11:18:40 PM |
|
If you guys can improve x11 or Ethereum that'd be worth some coin. Please consider targeting the big algos.
Hm. As you wish. It's not nice to play with a young boys heart.  Spread is also a good one worth targeting right now. Spread? I hadn't thought about that, but I probably could do something with that... To give you and ideal of how hot it is...... I've been mining it on 1 750ti for about 5 months and have gotten ~0.6 btc @ today's pricing ive been mining spreadcoin since it first started - then stopped for a long while due to the laborious changeover of miners and reboots involved with thefarm whenever i needed to mine it ... btc is NOT always the driving factor here - and i admit - it is a nice project ... i have been with it from the beginning ... but unless the kernel will be incorporated into a universal miner ... there will ALWAYS be a limited fraction of the worlds miners mining this coin ... i know - im one of them ... and used to be one of the larger of the farms ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
January 16, 2016, 04:07:36 AM |
|
If you guys can improve x11 or Ethereum that'd be worth some coin. Please consider targeting the big algos.
Hm. As you wish. It's not nice to play with a young boys heart. Spread is also a good one worth targeting right now. Spread? I hadn't thought about that, but I probably could do something with that... To give you and ideal of how hot it is...... I've been mining it on 1 750ti for about 5 months and have gotten ~0.6 btc @ today's pricing ive been mining spreadcoin since it first started - then stopped for a long while due to the laborious changeover of miners and reboots involved with thefarm whenever i needed to mine it ... btc is NOT always the driving factor here - and i admit - it is a nice project ... i have been with it from the beginning ... but unless the kernel will be incorporated into a universal miner ... there will ALWAYS be a limited fraction of the worlds miners mining this coin ... i know - im one of them ... and used to be one of the larger of the farms ... #crysx Spread crapped itself for awhile and occasionally really huge miners hop on it that adds like 25% network hash and tanks the income from it. Ethereum is more stable if you have large hashrate. |
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
|
January 16, 2016, 04:38:04 AM |
|
Wolf0 was coding miners for nvidia back when maxwell came out.
Some of that inline PTX is mine, in the various ccminer forks... I had 5x750Ti. Did you ever do any CPU miners? I merged three CPU miners, see my thread for details, and if you ever did any significant work on CPU mining I could add you the long credits. Release is impending by the way. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0 |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 16, 2016, 05:12:37 AM |
|
If you guys can improve x11 or Ethereum that'd be worth some coin. Please consider targeting the big algos.
Hm. As you wish. It's not nice to play with a young boys heart. Spread is also a good one worth targeting right now. Spread? I hadn't thought about that, but I probably could do something with that... To give you and ideal of how hot it is...... I've been mining it on 1 750ti for about 5 months and have gotten ~0.6 btc @ today's pricing ive been mining spreadcoin since it first started - then stopped for a long while due to the laborious changeover of miners and reboots involved with thefarm whenever i needed to mine it ... btc is NOT always the driving factor here - and i admit - it is a nice project ... i have been with it from the beginning ... but unless the kernel will be incorporated into a universal miner ... there will ALWAYS be a limited fraction of the worlds miners mining this coin ... i know - im one of them ... and used to be one of the larger of the farms ... #crysx Spread crapped itself for awhile and occasionally really huge miners hop on it that adds like 25% network hash and tanks the income from it. Ethereum is more stable if you have large hashrate. i cant seem to get the ethereum miner compiled ... which is the reason i havent tested mining with it - let alone mined with it ... ive also been focussing on the development of granite - and helping out a few other coins also - so i havent really too hard at eth ... it seems more trouble than its worth - but the eth / btc value seems quite good ... may have a look again soon ... i have no idea what hashrate thefarm can pull with hashimoto though - so i dunno if its a large sum or not ... #crysx |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 16, 2016, 05:13:54 AM |
|
Wolf0 was coding miners for nvidia back when maxwell came out.
Some of that inline PTX is mine, in the various ccminer forks... I had 5x750Ti. Did you ever do any CPU miners? I merged three CPU miners, see my thread for details, and if you ever did any significant work on CPU mining I could add you the long credits. Release is impending by the way. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1326803.0im heading to the office now joblo - a few personal issue out the way - i can focus a little on the work now ... so will be compiling / testing in the next few hours ... tanx ... #crysx |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 16, 2016, 05:48:19 PM |
|
SP-mod private version 2 is soon ready. Here are som stats:
(faster than version private 1)
qubit:
gtx 970: +2.2% 12070 / 11810 (+260khash) +4.7% 12370 / 11810
gtx 960: +2.6% 7900 / 7730 (+170khash)
gtx 750ti:+2.5% 4860 / 4740 (+120khash)
x11
750ti: 3090/3045 +1.42% (+55KHASH)
970: 8130/7950 +2.22% (+180KHASH)
960: 5170/5119 +1% (+51KHASH)
x13
750ti: 2426/2400 +1.08% (+26KHASH)
970: 6550/6400 +2.3% (+150KHASH)
960: 4096/4080 +0.4% (+16KHASH)
x15
750ti: 2084/2060 +1.17% (+24KHASH)
970: 5645/5520 +2.22% (+75KHASH)
960: 3540 /3525 +0.42% (+15KHASH)
lyra2v2
750ti: 4630/4610 +0.43% (+20khash)
960,970 slower than private #1
I have sendt release 2 to the supporters.. If you want to support my code, please donate 0.1BTC to recieve the private mod. release 1 sp-mod private (bether than release 78): X11 is up 30khash (750ti) (+1%) x13 is up 100khash(750ti) (+4.3%) x15 is up 66Khash(750ti) (+3.3%) quark is up 200khash(750ti) (+3.2%) lyra2v2 is up 250khash(750ti)(+6%) release 2 sp-mod private (bether than sp-mod private 1): x11: +1.42% (+55KHASH(750ti)) x13: +1.08% (+26KHASH(750ti)) x15: +1.17% (+24KHASH(750ti)) lyra2v2: +0.43% (+20khash(750ti)) qubit:+2.5% (+120khash(750ti)) |
|
|
|
|
GKar
|
|
January 16, 2016, 06:44:15 PM |
|
If you guys can improve x11 or Ethereum that'd be worth some coin. Please consider targeting the big algos.
Hm. As you wish. It's not nice to play with a young boys heart. Spread is also a good one worth targeting right now. Spread? I hadn't thought about that, but I probably could do something with that... To give you and ideal of how hot it is...... I've been mining it on 1 750ti for about 5 months and have gotten ~0.6 btc @ today's pricing ive been mining spreadcoin since it first started - then stopped for a long while due to the laborious changeover of miners and reboots involved with thefarm whenever i needed to mine it ... btc is NOT always the driving factor here - and i admit - it is a nice project ... i have been with it from the beginning ... but unless the kernel will be incorporated into a universal miner ... there will ALWAYS be a limited fraction of the worlds miners mining this coin ... i know - im one of them ... and used to be one of the larger of the farms ... #crysx Spread crapped itself for awhile and occasionally really huge miners hop on it that adds like 25% network hash and tanks the income from it. Ethereum is more stable if you have large hashrate. I've had problems with Ethereum. The only wallet I could find was a contract type. The pools I've used when they would send out my coin, it would not get into my wallet. If I mined directly to an exchange, I'd get the coin. |
|
|
|
|
|
GKar
|
|
January 16, 2016, 06:51:52 PM |
|
Sp
sent ya a pm to get your donation addy as the site don't like addy's posted in forums
|
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 16, 2016, 08:05:31 PM |
|
Pm sendt
|
|
|
|
|
Grim
|
|
January 16, 2016, 08:30:41 PM |
|
Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.
why not do a pledge with escrow? eg. 5 BTC for x11 if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ... |
|
|
|
|
|
Grim
|
|
January 16, 2016, 09:22:28 PM |
|
Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.
why not do a pledge with escrow? eg. 5 BTC for x11 if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ... I prefer not to promise something I dont have yet - especially because people are going to ask what the hashrate is going to be, and the answer is "fuck if I know" until I've done it. therefore escrow ... |
|
|
|
|
|
AliMan
|
|
January 16, 2016, 09:28:30 PM |
|
Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.
why not do a pledge with escrow? eg. 5 BTC for x11 if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ... I prefer not to promise something I dont have yet - especially because people are going to ask what the hashrate is going to be, and the answer is "fuck if I know" until I've done it. therefore escrow ... Bro, are you high? |
|
|
|
|
Grim
|
|
January 16, 2016, 09:43:20 PM |
|
Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.
why not do a pledge with escrow? eg. 5 BTC for x11 if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ... I prefer not to promise something I dont have yet - especially because people are going to ask what the hashrate is going to be, and the answer is "fuck if I know" until I've done it. therefore escrow ... Bro, are you high? you are not? |
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 17, 2016, 12:09:12 AM |
|
SP-mod private version 2 is soon ready. Here are som stats:
(faster than version private 1)
qubit:
gtx 970: +2.2% 12070 / 11810 (+260khash) +4.7% 12370 / 11810
gtx 960: +2.6% 7900 / 7730 (+170khash)
gtx 750ti:+2.5% 4860 / 4740 (+120khash)
x11
750ti: 3090/3045 +1.42% (+55KHASH)
970: 8130/7950 +2.22% (+180KHASH)
960: 5170/5119 +1% (+51KHASH)
x13
750ti: 2426/2400 +1.08% (+26KHASH)
970: 6550/6400 +2.3% (+150KHASH)
960: 4096/4080 +0.4% (+16KHASH)
x15
750ti: 2084/2060 +1.17% (+24KHASH)
970: 5645/5520 +2.22% (+75KHASH)
960: 3540 /3525 +0.42% (+15KHASH)
lyra2v2
750ti: 4630/4610 +0.43% (+20khash)
960,970 slower than private #1
I have sendt release 2 to the supporters.. If you want to support my code, please donate 0.1BTC to recieve the private mod. release 1 sp-mod private (bether than release 78): X11 is up 30khash (750ti) (+1%) x13 is up 100khash(750ti) (+4.3%) x15 is up 66Khash(750ti) (+3.3%) quark is up 200khash(750ti) (+3.2%) lyra2v2 is up 250khash(750ti)(+6%) release 2 sp-mod private (bether than sp-mod private 1): x11: +1.42% (+55KHASH(750ti)) x13: +1.08% (+26KHASH(750ti)) x15: +1.17% (+24KHASH(750ti)) lyra2v2: +0.43% (+20khash(750ti)) qubit:+2.5% (+120khash(750ti)) Nobody want a boost in x11? |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 17, 2016, 12:19:32 AM |
|
Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.
why not do a pledge with escrow? eg. 5 BTC for x11 if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ... I prefer not to promise something I dont have yet - especially because people are going to ask what the hashrate is going to be, and the answer is "fuck if I know" until I've done it. therefore escrow ... How does this help? People don't want to donate for a technique, they want to donate for a miner that gets x amount of hashes per second. wolf - do the job - and get paid ... thats always been the way ... and its the safest way ... especially if you are going to start to code again with cuda ... you have ( at least ) my backing - and would be well paid for a big boost ... #crysx #crysx |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 17, 2016, 12:23:29 AM |
|
SP-mod private version 2 is soon ready. Here are som stats:
(faster than version private 1)
qubit:
gtx 970: +2.2% 12070 / 11810 (+260khash) +4.7% 12370 / 11810
gtx 960: +2.6% 7900 / 7730 (+170khash)
gtx 750ti:+2.5% 4860 / 4740 (+120khash)
x11
750ti: 3090/3045 +1.42% (+55KHASH)
970: 8130/7950 +2.22% (+180KHASH)
960: 5170/5119 +1% (+51KHASH)
x13
750ti: 2426/2400 +1.08% (+26KHASH)
970: 6550/6400 +2.3% (+150KHASH)
960: 4096/4080 +0.4% (+16KHASH)
x15
750ti: 2084/2060 +1.17% (+24KHASH)
970: 5645/5520 +2.22% (+75KHASH)
960: 3540 /3525 +0.42% (+15KHASH)
lyra2v2
750ti: 4630/4610 +0.43% (+20khash)
960,970 slower than private #1
I have sendt release 2 to the supporters.. If you want to support my code, please donate 0.1BTC to recieve the private mod. release 1 sp-mod private (bether than release 78): X11 is up 30khash (750ti) (+1%) x13 is up 100khash(750ti) (+4.3%) x15 is up 66Khash(750ti) (+3.3%) quark is up 200khash(750ti) (+3.2%) lyra2v2 is up 250khash(750ti)(+6%) release 2 sp-mod private (bether than sp-mod private 1): x11: +1.42% (+55KHASH(750ti)) x13: +1.08% (+26KHASH(750ti)) x15: +1.17% (+24KHASH(750ti)) lyra2v2: +0.43% (+20khash(750ti)) qubit:+2.5% (+120khash(750ti)) Nobody want a boost in x11? i do sp - and am willing to put thefarm forward for it ... i DONT want windows - that will not work with me ... over the last week - i have been recouping and redeciding on ALL of what i have done ( and need to do ) - in and out of thefarm - and its is never going to be a windows system ... i am placing a few miners together over the next month - and will have a pool of funds that will be assigned SPECIFICALLY for inhouse updates ... and linux ONLY ... so if you have some good increases in x11 - im willing to look at it - and also willing to make a deal over it ... and did i mention im NOT interested in windows? ...  ... #crysx |
|
|
|
|
Grim
|
|
January 17, 2016, 12:35:27 AM |
|
Nobody want a boost in x11?
if you can translate the boost to spreadx11 or is the sha256 part too much of a bottleneck to see any gains? |
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 17, 2016, 12:42:20 AM |
|
Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.
why not do a pledge with escrow? eg. 5 BTC for x11 if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ... I prefer not to promise something I dont have yet - especially because people are going to ask what the hashrate is going to be, and the answer is "fuck if I know" until I've done it. therefore escrow ... How does this help? People don't want to donate for a technique, they want to donate for a miner that gets x amount of hashes per second. wolf - do the job - and get paid ... thats always been the way ... and its the safest way ... especially if you are going to start to code again with cuda ... you have ( at least ) my backing - and would be well paid for a big boost ... #crysx #crysx LOL, you just proved my point. you have ( at least ) my backing - and would be well paid for a big boost ...
exactly ... that was the reason i posted ... proving the point that no escrow would be needed - and the work really should already be done and proven for it to be paid - and paid well ... hence the pledge that djm34 is undertaking currently ... he has already set the work into play - proven the results for neoscrypt - and is willing to release for a limited number of btc for payment ... and 2.5btc is a good sum also ... backing the point that i agree with ... is all im doing ... and when i stated that you have my backing ( at least ) - i meant that im probably not the only one that would back this sort of procedure ... but i cant speak on behalf of the community - im assuming that im not the only one ...  ... #crysx |
|
|
|
Eliovp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1293
Huh?
|
|
January 17, 2016, 01:29:40 AM |
|
Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.
why not do a pledge with escrow? eg. 5 BTC for x11 if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ... I prefer not to promise something I dont have yet - especially because people are going to ask what the hashrate is going to be, and the answer is "fuck if I know" until I've done it. therefore escrow ... How does this help? People don't want to donate for a technique, they want to donate for a miner that gets x amount of hashes per second. wolf - do the job - and get paid ... thats always been the way ... and its the safest way ... especially if you are going to start to code again with cuda ... you have ( at least ) my backing - and would be well paid for a big boost ... #crysx #crysx LOL, you just proved my point. you have ( at least ) my backing - and would be well paid for a big boost ...
True, people pay for modifications. Not for "soon to become modifications". I can imagine that most of the devs just don't start modding things they know that will take some serious time.. Anyhow, you've got my backing back over at the AMD side  , but that's no news right there  |
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
January 17, 2016, 01:54:40 AM |
|
Look, I'd actually like to improve Spread (as well as X11 itself) for Nvidia, but that means I have to go over 5,375 lines of AMD GCN assembly by paw (yes, I just checked) and understand it perfectly in order to not only write it in OpenCL, but then port it to CUDA. You can't imagine what a pain in the ass this is.
why not do a pledge with escrow? eg. 5 BTC for x11 if 5BTCs are reached you start doing your magic ... I prefer not to promise something I dont have yet - especially because people are going to ask what the hashrate is going to be, and the answer is "fuck if I know" until I've done it. therefore escrow ... How does this help? People don't want to donate for a technique, they want to donate for a miner that gets x amount of hashes per second. wolf - do the job - and get paid ... thats always been the way ... and its the safest way ... especially if you are going to start to code again with cuda ... you have ( at least ) my backing - and would be well paid for a big boost ... #crysx #crysx LOL, you just proved my point. you have ( at least ) my backing - and would be well paid for a big boost ...
exactly ... that was the reason i posted ... proving the point that no escrow would be needed - and the work really should already be done and proven for it to be paid - and paid well ... hence the pledge that djm34 is undertaking currently ... he has already set the work into play - proven the results for neoscrypt - and is willing to release for a limited number of btc for payment ... and 2.5btc is a good sum also ... backing the point that i agree with ... is all im doing ... and when i stated that you have my backing ( at least ) - i meant that im probably not the only one that would back this sort of procedure ... but i cant speak on behalf of the community - im assuming that im not the only one ... ... #crysx technically this isn't the way I work...  (but in that case the code as been written long ago for my own sake), usually for standard work it is 50% in advance 50% at delivery. It is okay to ask a dev to work on something, but expecting him to work until it reach something satisfactory for you isn't (it is for at least 30% of the reason why I didn't finish working on the monero miner... no reason that only us take all the risk and lose all our time... even r&d get financed in real world... no matter how useful it becomes at the end of day...) |
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|
