CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[reb0rn21]

@
bensam1231

Shame I had one MSI gaming x 1070, runing it 90% powerlimit and 2000Mhz clock it just shut down my pc, looks like too VRM dies...
And i have bunch of Gainward cards working no problems at all

Still waiting on RMA, duno what to tell them, I hope in new revision they fixed the problem, prolly bad parts, because Gaming X had 8pin+6pin in robust VRM

[thesmokingman]

Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX1070 *6(8pin)
drivers: 372.54
ccminer1.8.0 ~1544M(~257M) temp:59C power:1140W via NVIDIA-SMI (nvidia-smi -ac 4004,1999 & nvidia-smi -pl 190 / Core +150)
SP-MOD#3 ~1800M(~300M) temp:59C power:1090W via NVIDIA-SMI (nvidia-smi -ac 4004,1999 & nvidia-smi -pl 190 / Core +150)

~15% increase

ccminer1.8.1 crashes my system using the same command used below for ccminer 1.8.0 and SP-MOD#3

Command used to achieve the above rates:

ccminer1.8.0 - ccminer-x64.exe -t 6 -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.pool.mn:8878 -u XXXX -p XXXX --show-diff --cpu-priority 4
SP-MOD#3 - ccminer.exe -t 6 -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.pool.mn:8878 -u XXXX -p XXXX --show-diff --cpu-priority 4

[rednoW]

Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX1070 *6(8pin)
drivers: 372.54
ccminer1.8.0 ~1544M(~257M) temp:59C power:1140W via NVIDIA-SMI (nvidia-smi -ac 4004,1999 & nvidia-smi -pl 190)
SP-MOD#3 ~1800M(~300M) temp:59C power:1090W via NVIDIA-SMI (nvidia-smi -ac 4004,1999 & nvidia-smi -pl 190)

~15% increase

ccminer1.8.1 crashes my system using the same command used below for ccminer 1.8.0 and SP-MOD#3

Command used to achieve the above rates:

ccminer1.8.0 - ccminer-x64.exe -t 6 -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.pool.mn:8878 -u XXXX -p XXXX --show-diff --cpu-priority 4
SP-MOD#3 - ccminer.exe -t 6 -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.pool.mn:8878 -u XXXX -p XXXX --show-diff --cpu-priority 4

Not good, one 1070 can do 310mhs easily with 150watt only

[Namsbreh]

@
bensam1231

Shame I had one MSI gaming x 1070, runing it 90% powerlimit and 2000Mhz clock it just shut down my pc, looks like too VRM dies...
And i have bunch of Gainward cards working no problems at all

Still waiting on RMA, duno what to tell them, I hope in new revision they fixed the problem, prolly bad parts, because Gaming X had 8pin+6pin in robust VRM

I had one of these MSI 1070's Gaming  do exactly the same.  It has been replaced, no questions.

[bensam1231]

It's all models of the MSI cards. I have gaming, gaming 8g, gaming z 8g. They all have the same problem. It's disgusting as the card is supposed to be pretty robust.

They've been mining mainly Lbry and there are some algos that will use even more power, such as dual mining and neos.

If you're interested, take a smell around the VRMs / Power plug. You can smell the burnt silicon if you aren't around when it dies. I literally saw it eject blue magic smoke out of the side of the card when one died though.

[ltc_bilic]

It's all models of the MSI cards. I have gaming, gaming 8g, gaming z 8g. They all have the same problem. It's disgusting as the card is supposed to be pretty robust.

They've been mining mainly Lbry and there are some algos that will use even more power, such as dual mining and neos.

If you're interested, take a smell around the VRMs / Power plug. You can smell the burnt silicon if you aren't around when it dies. I literally saw it eject blue magic smoke out of the side of the card when one died though.

Yeah, these days it's hard to find a vendor which won't make a mistake. I'm sticking to EVGA and Gigabyte, because of their longer warranty.

[thesmokingman]

Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX1070 *6(8pin)
drivers: 372.54
ccminer1.8.0 ~1544M(~257M) temp:59C power:1140W via NVIDIA-SMI (nvidia-smi -ac 4004,1999 & nvidia-smi -pl 190)
SP-MOD#3 ~1800M(~300M) temp:59C power:1090W via NVIDIA-SMI (nvidia-smi -ac 4004,1999 & nvidia-smi -pl 190)

~15% increase

ccminer1.8.1 crashes my system using the same command used below for ccminer 1.8.0 and SP-MOD#3

Command used to achieve the above rates:

ccminer1.8.0 - ccminer-x64.exe -t 6 -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.pool.mn:8878 -u XXXX -p XXXX --show-diff --cpu-priority 4
SP-MOD#3 - ccminer.exe -t 6 -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.pool.mn:8878 -u XXXX -p XXXX --show-diff --cpu-priority 4

Not good, one 1070 can do 310mhs easily with 150watt only

Depends on the 1070 as not all were made equal   My Samsung memory G1s are doing 304~306 My Micron memory G1s are doing 295~297

Plus this is my first time using ccminer/nvidia cards and I'm still learning the command interface and nvidia-smi. I'm sure once I play around with a few of the settings like -i intensity and -pl 150 I can achieve 310 with the Samsung memory cards and 300+ with the Micron memory cards @ 150w.

Thanks for your input though  

[Xdragon]

I'm sure once I play around with a few of the settings like -i intensity and -pl 150 I can achieve 310 with the Samsung memory cards and 300+ with the Micron memory cards @ 150w.

What does -pl stands for?

[go6ooo1212]

I'm sure once I play around with a few of the settings like -i intensity and -pl 150 I can achieve 310 with the Samsung memory cards and 300+ with the Micron memory cards @ 150w.

What does -pl stands for?

This param sets the power limit...

[Epsylon3]

ccminer (mine) handle --plimit on all platforms, but windows x86 value is in percent (like afterburner)

[giagge]

ccminer (mine) handle --plimit on all platforms, but windows x86 value is in percent (like afterburner)

In afterburner i have 50% for minimum value , i try set --plimit 45 on .bat ( windows 10 x64 ) but PL in ccminer set automatically on 50% ? .

[Nikolaj]

"Does any one of you experience a weird stratum reonnection with sp- 's latest v #3 LBRY kernel?"

Courtesy of scryptr 

On miningrigrentals it's almost a constant (!!!!) "donation" ! This fee miner it's a pain, this isn't the way to go.

@sp: 2 emails and a public notification. I am awaiting a response. thanks !

[go6ooo1212]

do someone of you experience weird stratum reconnection with the latest sp lbry 3 kernel?

On miningrigrentals it's almost a constant (!!!!) "donation" ! This fee miner it's a pain, this isn't the way to go.

@sp: 2 emails and a public notification. I am awaiting a response. thanks !

Hello , mate. Sorry , but I didn't understand what exactly do you mean

[scryptr]

do someone of you experience weird stratum reconnection with the latest sp lbry 3 kernel?

On miningrigrentals it's almost a constant (!!!!) "donation" ! This fee miner it's a pain, this isn't the way to go.

@sp: 2 emails and a public notification. I am awaiting a response. thanks !

Hello , mate. Sorry , but I didn't understand what exactly do you mean

POSSIBLE TRANSLATION--

"Does any one of you experience a weird stratum reonnection with sp- 's latest v #3 LBRY kernel?"

My best guess is that this release is not performing to Nikolaj's expectations.        --scryptr

[Nikolaj]

"Does any one of you experience a weird stratum reonnection with sp- 's latest v #3 LBRY kernel?"

Courtesy of scryptr  

On miningrigrentals it's almost a constant (!!!!) "donation" ! This fee miner it's a pain, this isn't the way to go.

@sp: 2 emails and a public notification. I am awaiting a response. thanks !

@ go6ooo1212
have you ever tried to point this release to Miningrigrentals? This kernel behaves weirdly, it constantly show a stratum reconnection, and given the fact that sp forces you to "donate" to him the first 4 minutes, you're donating with a 100% rate. In all honesty I've necer seen something like this from a fee-kernel, and I'm a bit worried.

@scryptr
hehe, thanks for your correct interpretation. Just edited the post with your phrase.

It's not that I'm expecting more, it's that I am expecting to mine for myself at 96.7% rate and 3.3% to sp, not 100% to him. Give it a try.

I've sent him an email some days ago regarding this issue and other things, still no response.

[bensam1231]

Guessing Nik bought it from Scrypt... He isn't responding because you didn't buy it from him.

CCminer has a bug with MRR, you have to use the dynamic port it tries to reconnect to as it doesn't tolerate stratum redirection for some reason. Epsylons version has this bug as well.

Still saying SP you should lower fee to 2% and it should be a free release.

[reb0rn21]

Gigabyte G1 Gaming GTX1070 *6(8pin)
drivers: 372.54
ccminer1.8.0 ~1544M(~257M) temp:59C power:1140W via NVIDIA-SMI (nvidia-smi -ac 4004,1999 & nvidia-smi -pl 190 / Core +150)
SP-MOD#3 ~1800M(~300M) temp:59C power:1090W via NVIDIA-SMI (nvidia-smi -ac 4004,1999 & nvidia-smi -pl 190 / Core +150)

~15% increase

ccminer1.8.1 crashes my system using the same command used below for ccminer 1.8.0 and SP-MOD#3

Command used to achieve the above rates:

ccminer1.8.0 - ccminer-x64.exe -t 6 -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.pool.mn:8878 -u XXXX -p XXXX --show-diff --cpu-priority 4
SP-MOD#3 - ccminer.exe -t 6 -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://lbry.pool.mn:8878 -u XXXX -p XXXX --show-diff --cpu-priority 4

I use almost the same speed with my rigs but with 22% less power usage and same speed, is it you bad config I don`t know

With SP mod if you got 300mhs with 1090w usage that is gr8, but you ccminer 1.8 results are just terrible

[scryptr]

Guessing Nik bought it from Scrypt... He isn't responding because you didn't buy it from him.

CCminer has a bug with MRR, you have to use the dynamic port it tries to reconnect to as it doesn't tolerate stratum redirection for some reason. Epsylons version has this bug as well.

Still saying SP you should lower fee to 2% and it should be a free release.

HAVE NOT TRIED SP_ #3--

I don't have a copy to sell.  If what Nikolaj says is true, at least the way I read it, sp_ 's #3 is not behaving as expected with MiningRigRentals.  Actually, someone renting hash through a fee  based miner is probably getting skinned 2 times.  I like NiceHash because it is so easy, but as I did more math, I appreciate a pool like Epsylon3's more and more.  Never hooked-up to MiningRigRentals.  Don't have a real opinion there.

As for the basic "WTF IS GOING ON HERE?", I take it that the miner restarts the fee cycle with each reconnect, and never mines for Nikolaj.  Just guessing.

As much as I've supported sp_ with 0.1 BTC in the past, it used to mean $20-$25.  The upfront fee is too steep for me just now.       --scryptr

[go6ooo1212]

I haven't tryed it to MRR either , and I can't say much in that case.

[sp_]

Did version #2 work bether with MRR? 2 minute donation instead of 4.