CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[Amph]

Even in europe there are companies claiming to sell electricity for 0.06 / KWh.
Truth is if you divide the total bill cost by the number of KWh, you get much more than that.
I hope everybody did this calculation at least one time before mining hard.

that is only for industrial purpose not residential, residential is always higher, the only way for you is to go like chinese and make your farm near dam or something, but it require a heavy investment

zclassic is not too far from etheruem now, there is still profit and it consume less, i still prefer to mine it over thereum due to not need to overclock my memory too much

You mean far behind? You have to have really expensive power for it to be close. I'm making $2.3 per 1070 at 32hash before power.

$2.3 mean that you pay basically zero electricity, sure i have not zero electricity, at leats by looking at whattomine, it say around $2 with a single 1070

As I've mentioned multiple times, $.1 KWH. That's AVERAGE for the US. That's not low and it's not high. Equihash is now making $1.47 pure revenue. That's why no one includes electricity costs, because it's different for everyone. You ALWAYS include electricity, regardless of your ridiculously high costs that most people don't have because they're operating close to the AVERAGE.

if you have 0.1, then it's still no where near $2.3 per card more like $1.6-1.7

[bensam1231]

I managed to get 90sol/s on the gtx 1070 so far

Ready for ZCash sp-mod #1?

LLLOOOOOOOLLLLL



I also managed to get the same thing. Just pick up and collect for windows.

All I see there under releases is .3a, which is 30sol on a 1070 unless they vastly improved 1070 speeds 23 days ago.


Edit: Oh you already changed your post to remove the githubs.

[Neosaan]

I can sell the finished assembly welcome to PM)

[Amph]

why selling it with only 90 sol which can be achieved by zawawa porting to windows and open source?

[sp_]

I am not selling. I will push it to 100 or more.

[bensam1231]

zclassic is not too far from etheruem now, there is still profit and it consume less, i still prefer to mine it over thereum due to not need to overclock my memory too much

You mean far behind? You have to have really expensive power for it to be close. I'm making $2.3 per 1070 at 32hash before power.

$2.3 mean that you pay basically zero electricity, sure i have not zero electricity, at leats by looking at whattomine, it say around $2 with a single 1070

As I've mentioned multiple times, $.1 KWH. That's AVERAGE for the US. That's not low and it's not high. Equihash is now making $1.47 pure revenue. That's why no one includes electricity costs, because it's different for everyone. You ALWAYS include electricity, regardless of your ridiculously high costs that most people don't have because they're operating close to the AVERAGE.

if you have 0.1, then it's still no where near $2.3 per card more like $1.6-1.7

$1.8 that's at 200w... which isn't correct either as I overestimate for energy costs. Good thing Equihash doesn't use any energy, otherwise it wouldn't be at a $1.47 in REVENUE.

You guys are your energy. You can't even calculate that right and assume everyone has the same energy cost as you (regardless of how far away you are to the average).

why selling it with only 90 sol which can be achieved by zawawa porting to windows and open source?

Why do you always add a extra 10% to hashrates other people aren't getting? I've never gotten 90sol off of SA5. Back when I was getting 70 you were quoting 80 as well. Unless you're running at like 2200core clock, which is not achievable for almost everyone (including yourself) you're not getting those rates. You've done that since Lbry. Is this just a ego thing where you have to be better then everyone even though we're using the same miners and the same hardware, generally the same clocks too? Others in the thread are also getting what I am as well.

Maybe this is why your revenue calculations are always so fucked up.


BTW the githubs Neosaan removed was:
https://github.com/tpruvot/nheqminer
https://github.com/KlausT/nheqminer

Those are no secret. Even with those binaries, still earning less then Ethereum, especially Ethereum dual mining.

[Amph]

what are you talking about i'm at 86 sol(average is 85, peak 90), up to 510 sol for 6 x 1070, you are only talking bullshit(my ego lol) as usual instead of showing proof like this



so shut up next time please you are only making yourself ridiculous by claiming that other make their stuff up

also no overclock here i'm at 55%, -502 mem and 0 core

before you take another unnecessary note....the unstability of the hashrate is due to the porting, it was even mentioned in the thread

[sp_]

I get +10-20% on the 750ti as well compared to eqm_v1.0.0b (nicehash)

[bensam1231]

what are you talking about i'm at 86 sol(average is 85, peak 90), up to 510 sol for 6 x 1070, you are only talking bullshit(my ego lol) as usual instead of showing proof like this



so shut up next time please you are only making yourself ridiculous by claiming that other make their stuff up

also no overclock here i'm at 55%, -502 mem and 0 core

before you take another unnecessary note....the unstability of the hashrate is due to the porting, it was even mentioned in the thread

Remember the last time I asked you for proof when asking for your hashrates on Whattomine and you simply avoided the question every single time.

So quoting absolute maximum hashrates whenever they pop up is your MO then? This little friend called a average is calling.



That's awwaawawav6 and similar results across all my rigs, generally around 75-80 with a OC. Others in the thread are also getting similar results.

[Amph]

i don't know why the other are getting less but my average is that, other users are getting my hashrate or higher, i think it has to do as usual with the model of the gpu or drivers/SO or something else

the strange thing is that if i oc i don't get any more hash but instead i get less...weird

peak is actually 516, but very unstable

[bensam1231]

i don't know why the other are getting less but my average is that, other users are getting my hashrate or higher, i think it has to do as usual with the model of the gpu or drivers/SO or something else

the strange thing is that if i oc i don't get any more hash but instead i get less...weird

peak is actually 516, but very unstable

Thats neat, you also have more expensive power and get more hashrate then others too, maybe your data isn't representative of what others are going to get... So making recommendations off your data points to others might not be a good idea, as they aren't going to get the same results? Power or hashrate.

[Lucky - Luciano]

yes, but after I push it to 100

Give it to us, we try to push it to 100 .I promise that I would thoroughly tested .

[sp_]

I've pushed it to 92sol/s now with optimal clocks.(gtx 1070 g1 gaming)

[Amph]

yeah meanwhile a 470 is doing 135 on clymore or optiminer, i'm really thinking to sell those 1070 and get those cheap 470

[Psynthax]

yeah meanwhile a 470 is doing 135 on clymore or optiminer, i'm really thinking to sell those 1070 and get those cheap 470

Yeah I am thinking the same.. In the process of selling 1070 now.. dont know what to get.. 470s or 480s

[ioglnx]

yeah meanwhile a 470 is doing 135 on clymore or optiminer, i'm really thinking to sell those 1070 and get those cheap 470

Sold 5 GTx1080 and 2 GTx1070 and ordered 10 480 Powercolor 480 RED Dragon two of them doing currently 340H/s ..insane.

[Amph]

yeah meanwhile a 470 is doing 135 on clymore or optiminer, i'm really thinking to sell those 1070 and get those cheap 470

Sold 5 GTx1080 and 2 GTx1070 and ordered 10 480 Powercolor 480 RED Dragon two of them doing currently 340H/s ..insane.

based on those hashrate the 1070 should perform 200 sol at least, 50% is missed in optimization

[ioglnx]

yeah meanwhile a 470 is doing 135 on clymore or optiminer, i'm really thinking to sell those 1070 and get those cheap 470

Sold 5 GTx1080 and 2 GTx1070 and ordered 10 480 Powercolor 480 RED Dragon two of them doing currently 340H/s ..insane.

based on those hashrate the 1070 should perform 200 sol at least, 50% is missed in optimization

Theory at all but every minute we wait for that to happen..we lose money. So I decided to go the hard ware and drop all cards despite one 1080 for my 3D Vision v2 and G-Sync mon.
But for mining i'm out with nvidia. Its a pity pascal was very promising.

[vaulter]

yeah meanwhile a 470 is doing 135 on clymore or optiminer, i'm really thinking to sell those 1070 and get those cheap 470

Sold 5 GTx1080 and 2 GTx1070 and ordered 10 480 Powercolor 480 RED Dragon two of them doing currently 340H/s ..insane.

based on those hashrate the 1070 should perform 200 sol at least, 50% is missed in optimization

It might be 155 as its 256bit memory interface both for 1070 and 480..

[reb0rn21]

yeah meanwhile a 470 is doing 135 on clymore or optiminer, i'm really thinking to sell those 1070 and get those cheap 470

Sold 5 GTx1080 and 2 GTx1070 and ordered 10 480 Powercolor 480 RED Dragon two of them doing currently 340H/s ..insane.

based on those hashrate the 1070 should perform 200 sol at least, 50% is missed in optimization

It might be 155 as its 256bit memory interface both for 1070 and 480..

GTX 1070 memory can clock more and mem controller is more efficient, also with claymore 6 rx 480 to get 150sol/s need clock of 1300Mhz at which point it use 170w, so GPU also might be limiting factor

with same optimization I am expecting 30% more from 1070 over RX 480