hoze
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
July 13, 2015, 08:23:20 AM |
|
eXtremal Any news about otimization for NVIDIA ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Legionnaire
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
July 21, 2015, 05:00:01 PM |
|
Hi all, I dig http://xpmforall.org/, address for payments made from his wallet, a miner digs, but there is still no statistics (2 hours)
|
|
|
|
ZeDRoYMaN
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
July 22, 2015, 07:12:39 AM |
|
eXtremal I have trouble to mine on xpmclminer. Tried 9.4.1 and 10 beta + my addess (local and market). W7 x64, driver 14.6 Xpmclminer default + + my addess working with 1 or 5 GPU but not "Share accepted" to rig with 3,6 GPU (7850,270). I need change any parameters in config.txt or .... ? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
qaz6767
|
|
July 22, 2015, 11:53:22 AM |
|
eXtremal I have trouble to mine on xpmclminer. Tried 9.4.1 and 10 beta + my addess (local and market). W7 x64, driver 14.6 Xpmclminer default + + my addess working with 1 or 5 GPU but not "Share accepted" to rig with 3,6 GPU (7850,270). I need change any parameters in config.txt or .... ? Thanks!
check the computer name.
|
|
|
|
ZeDRoYMaN
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
July 22, 2015, 05:11:10 PM |
|
check the computer name.
thanks! it worked
|
|
|
|
Hix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1971
Merit: 1036
|
|
July 24, 2015, 06:33:59 AM |
|
eXtremal Any news about otimization for NVIDIA ?
same question
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
|
July 24, 2015, 06:42:11 AM |
|
eXtremal Any news about otimization for NVIDIA ?
same question with opencl it is very hard (nearly impossible) to reach top performance on nvidia. Better ask for cuda primecoin miner )))
|
|
|
|
hoze
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
July 26, 2015, 07:52:58 PM |
|
eXtremal Any news about otimization for NVIDIA ?
same question with opencl it is very hard (nearly impossible) to reach top performance on nvidia. Better ask for cuda primecoin miner ))) ...ok...someone with cuda primecoin miner ??
|
|
|
|
panda0229
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
July 29, 2015, 01:08:18 AM |
|
found platform[0] name = 'NVIDIA CUDA' Found 6 devices Using device 0 as GPU 0 Using device 1 as GPU 1 Using device 2 as GPU 2 Using device 3 as GPU 3 Using device 4 as GPU 4 Using device 5 as GPU 5 Compiling ... Source: 236814 bytes binsize = 1585831 bytes OpenCL error: -30 at /HDD/build/projects/xpmclient/xpmclient/xpmclient.cpp:1027
Post more information - OS, GPUs, driver version, your config.txt (if it was changed). So how to solve this problem? I also meet this error message. OS: win8.1
|
|
|
|
hoze
Member
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
August 01, 2015, 10:09:29 AM |
|
found platform[0] name = 'NVIDIA CUDA' Found 6 devices Using device 0 as GPU 0 Using device 1 as GPU 1 Using device 2 as GPU 2 Using device 3 as GPU 3 Using device 4 as GPU 4 Using device 5 as GPU 5 Compiling ... Source: 236814 bytes binsize = 1585831 bytes OpenCL error: -30 at /HDD/build/projects/xpmclient/xpmclient/xpmclient.cpp:1027
Post more information - OS, GPUs, driver version, your config.txt (if it was changed). So how to solve this problem? I also meet this error message. OS: win8.1 Did you change something in config.txt ? What driver version you use ?
|
|
|
|
panda0229
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
September 06, 2015, 07:31:29 AM |
|
Does xpmclient can control over 10 GPUs on 1 system? this utility would crash if assign over 10 GPUs, is this a openCL limitation or can be fix by xpmclient next ver?
|
|
|
|
modulix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
September 09, 2015, 02:33:10 PM |
|
Hi, I was trying for a long time to make work this GPU miner on my laptop (Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M) without success, and today it works ! # ./xpmclient -b madPrimeMiner-v1.1 ClientName = 'modulix' ClientID = 1962103082 InstanceID = 2241023174 Address = 'AG7ofBFDfjoPNWvYapLUj2DL4KXDMSyNJA' found platform[0] name = 'NVIDIA CUDA' Found 1 devices Using device 0 as GPU 0 GeForce GTX 765M; 4 compute units square 320 bits: 315.070ms (425.993M ops/sec) square 320 bits: 323.220ms (415.252M ops/sec) multiply 320 bits: 244.722ms (548.450M ops/sec) square 352 bits: 363.831ms (368.901M ops/sec) multiply 352 bits: 297.200ms (451.607M ops/sec) Fermat tests 320 bits: 229.570ms (0.571M ops/sec) Fermat tests 352 bits: 276.810ms (0.474M ops/sec)
*** hashmod benchmark *** MHash per second: 37.204 Hash per iteration: 37.266 (0.000444 %) Average hash multiplier size: 30.620
*** sieve (check) benchmark *** * [OK] found candidates by CPU: 5431 by GPU: 5435 * [OK] invalid candidates: 0 * [OK] CPU/GPU candidates difference: 0
*** sieve (performance) benchmark *** * scan speed: 2.303 G * iteration time: 239.022ms * candidates per second: 30096.465 * candidates per iteration: 7193.70 (3017.97 320bit, 4175.73 352bit) * 320bit/352bit ratio: 0.723/1
Unfortunately, i needed to hack the xpmclient.cpp file to remove the test after the line 1251 about incompatible configuration : config_t config = miner->getConfig(); /* if (config.TARGET != clKernelTarget || config.PCOUNT != clKernelPCount || config.STRIPES != clKernelStripes || config.WIDTH != clKernelWidth || config.WINDOWSIZE_ != clKernelWindowSize) { printf("Existing OpenCL kernel (kernel.bin) incompatible with configuration\n"); printf("Please remove kernel.bin file and restart miner\n"); exit(1); } */
I don't know exactly what is bad in this test, but after i tried to put in config.txt file same values as found in gpu/config.cl without success, i tried to remove the test and... now, it's ok ;-) The values i have in my config.txt : server = "xpmforall.org"; port = "6666"; address="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"; name="modulix"; cpuload="1"; platform="nvidia"; target="10"; weaveDepth="40960"; sieveSize="420"; width="20"; windowSize="4096"; devices=["1", "0", "0", "0"];
I hope that this post could enhance this great project !
|
|
|
|
eXtremal (OP)
|
|
September 13, 2015, 08:12:03 AM |
|
Does xpmclient can control over 10 GPUs on 1 system? this utility would crash if assign over 10 GPUs, is this a openCL limitation or can be fix by xpmclient next ver?
10GPUs? 5xHD7990 or what? It's not OpenCL limitation.. may be bug in xpmclient. I don't have access to rig with so much GPUs, can't test that. Unfortunately, i needed to hack the xpmclient.cpp file to remove the test after the line 1251 about incompatible configuration :
Do you try remove kernel.bin and recompile kernel ?
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
November 11, 2015, 07:15:33 AM |
|
Last few days i noticed that XPM blockchain perhaps was forked. I may be mistaken but as i mine solo i got a different heights in my wallet of blocks than yours pool has and according https://coinplorer.com/XPM it's also different.
|
|
|
|
eXtremal (OP)
|
|
November 12, 2015, 02:53:45 PM |
|
Last few days i noticed that XPM blockchain perhaps was forked. I may be mistaken but as i mine solo i got a different heights in my wallet of blocks than yours pool has and according https://coinplorer.com/XPM it's also different. Coinplorer sometimes stops synchronization up to 2-3 days, it's better to check standalone primecoin-qt wallet.
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
November 12, 2015, 06:14:26 PM |
|
Last few days i noticed that XPM blockchain perhaps was forked. I may be mistaken but as i mine solo i got a different heights in my wallet of blocks than yours pool has and according https://coinplorer.com/XPM it's also different. Coinplorer sometimes stops synchronization up to 2-3 days, it's better to check standalone primecoin-qt wallet. Right now i see that yours (pool) height of blocks and my wallet are the same. But this 2-3 days it was not.
|
|
|
|
abrgeza
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 2
|
|
December 05, 2015, 10:09:58 AM |
|
Does anyone use Fury, Fury X or Nano card? How much CPD we can get from those cards?
|
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
December 05, 2015, 10:25:20 AM |
|
Does anyone use Fury, Fury X or Nano card? How much CPD we can get from those cards?
I tried R9 Nano via this miner ~ 9.5 - 10 CPD. With Claymore it doesn't mine, tried different Opencls. I thinks it's because he abandoned his project and don't update his miner anymore
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
December 07, 2015, 08:58:50 AM |
|
Does anyone use Fury, Fury X or Nano card? How much CPD we can get from those cards?
I tried R9 Nano via this miner ~ 9.5 - 10 CPD. With Claymore it doesn't mine, tried different Opencls. I thinks it's because he abandoned his project and don't update his miner anymore Thats one very expensive card for 280x performance heh.
|
|
|
|
ego2
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
December 08, 2015, 08:53:38 AM |
|
Hello! I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD). Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).
|
|
|
|
|