Bitcoin Forum
April 29, 2017, 09:43:34 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Open Source XPM (Primecoin) GPU Miner & Pool xpmforall.org  (Read 45622 times)
abrgeza
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
December 05, 2015, 10:09:58 AM
 #141

Does anyone use Fury, Fury X or Nano card?
How much CPD we can get from those cards?

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1493459014
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493459014

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493459014
Reply with quote  #2

1493459014
Report to moderator
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


View Profile
December 05, 2015, 10:25:20 AM
 #142

Does anyone use Fury, Fury X or Nano card?
How much CPD we can get from those cards?



I tried R9 Nano via this miner ~ 9.5 - 10 CPD.

With Claymore it doesn't mine, tried different Opencls. I thinks it's because he abandoned his project and don't update his miner anymore
merc84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742


View Profile
December 07, 2015, 08:58:50 AM
 #143

Does anyone use Fury, Fury X or Nano card?
How much CPD we can get from those cards?



I tried R9 Nano via this miner ~ 9.5 - 10 CPD.

With Claymore it doesn't mine, tried different Opencls. I thinks it's because he abandoned his project and don't update his miner anymore
Thats one very expensive card for 280x performance heh.
ego2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
December 08, 2015, 08:53:38 AM
 #144

Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


View Profile
December 09, 2015, 02:39:27 PM
 #145

Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v
ego2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
December 11, 2015, 06:21:03 AM
 #146

Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v

Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484


View Profile
December 11, 2015, 08:03:41 AM
 #147

Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v

Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?

I don't have R7. And my results was obtained with Claymore miner.
gollumist
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57


View Profile
December 11, 2015, 08:14:39 AM
 #148

Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v

Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?

I don't have R7. And my results was obtained with Claymore miner.
Hi - Yes it is supported.
I mine with such card R7 260X and it gave me about 3,4 CPD
ego2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
December 11, 2015, 09:20:46 AM
 #149

Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v

Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?

I don't have R7. And my results was obtained with Claymore miner.

Hi - Yes it is supported.
I mine with such card R7 260X and it gave me about 3,4 CPD

gollumist, qqqq, thank you for your answers!
hmm.. 3.4 CPD is very small. I thought that it would be the same as hd7850 (4.7 CPD).

gollumist
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57


View Profile
December 11, 2015, 09:28:42 AM
 #150



gollumist, qqqq, thank you for your answers!
hmm.. 3.4 CPD is very small. I thought that it would be the same as hd7850 (4.7 CPD).



Yes it is small - normally R7 260X is 1/3 of R9 280X. I try it for a lot of algorithms X11, X13, Eterum and gives around 1/3.  Only for quark gives a little bit more than 1/3 of R9 280X
ego2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
December 11, 2015, 09:50:50 AM
 #151

Yes it is small - normally R7 260X is 1/3 of R9 280X. I try it for a lot of algorithms X11, X13, Eterum and gives around 1/3.  Only for quark gives a little bit more than 1/3 of R9 280X

I am trying to compare the characteristics of some cards, but do not understand what is crucial. Core frequency? At the moment I only understood that the frequency of memory and amount of memory are not very important.
funtakus
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36


View Profile
December 28, 2015, 01:48:48 PM
 #152

why not pay to 12/27/2015?  AQxUY5wZsUsnVveuSugFdr4tLPkwzmBNNT
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854



View Profile
January 12, 2016, 06:32:31 AM
 #153

Hello!
I'm mining on HD 7850 (it's about 4.7 CPD).
Anyone tried to use new analog of this card - R7 260X (or another R7 series, there are no R7 in "GPUs supportes" at the first message of this topic).

Maybe you mean R9 270 which is analog 7850 i guess

R9 270 ~ 5,4 CPD (950/1400) Downvolted to 1,0v

Hello, qqqq!
I mean exactly R7. Is it supported with this miner?

I don't have R7. And my results was obtained with Claymore miner.

Hi - Yes it is supported.
I mine with such card R7 260X and it gave me about 3,4 CPD

gollumist, qqqq, thank you for your answers!
hmm.. 3.4 CPD is very small. I thought that it would be the same as hd7850 (4.7 CPD).



The 260X is effectively a 7790 (Bonaire core) with 892SP and only a 128bit bus.

OTOH, the 265 is a what amounts to a 7830, or R9 270LE.  It is a Pitcairn class chip with a 256bit bus and 1024SP.  Frankly put, the 265 has no business being labeled as a R7 class chip and/or in 26x nomenclature. 

If you think back to the 5xxx series, the 265 is pretty much the 5830 where your R7 260/260X chips are the 5750/5770 and your R9 270/270Xs are the 5850/5870.

So, your results are inline with expectations given the 265's bump in hardware resources over the 260X.
salex8216
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182

★YoBit.Net★ 200+ Coins Exchange & Dice


View Profile
February 10, 2016, 07:32:19 PM
 #154

Asus R9 290x mine 13.5 CPD why?
GPU 1050
MEM 1350
powertune+50

GPU 1000
MEM 1250 give me 12-12.5 CPD
powertune+50

Data:
miner 9.4.1
win 8 cat 14.4 (amd-catalyst-14.4-64bit-win8.1-win8-win7-whql-aug)

conf
Quote
...
onCrash = "0";
cpuload = "1";
target = "10";
sieveSize = "420";
weaveDepth = "40960";
width = "20";
devices =        ["1", "1", "1", "1", "1"];
sieveprimorial = ["13", "13", "13", "13", "13"];
sievePerRound = ["5", "5", "5", "5", "5"];
...

Any advice?

p.s. memory elpida
and MSI afterburn show GPU load like (100%-96%-100%) -----------_---------


panda0229
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16


View Profile
March 09, 2016, 03:37:35 AM
 #155

Did anyone had block transfer from 3/6?
I can't get any XPM now.
ego2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
March 14, 2016, 06:24:46 AM
 #156

Hello, dear xpm-miners!
Anybody can share with experience of using R9 380, 380x? What CPD can be expected?
Thank you!
PrismRevolution
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
March 14, 2016, 11:52:58 AM
 #157

Nice one, thanks for sharing and building this! I'm going to try it now!
abrgeza
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
March 23, 2016, 06:51:05 PM
 #158

Hello, dear xpm-miners!
Anybody can share with experience of using R9 380, 380x? What CPD can be expected?
Thank you!

R9 380 (GPU 1000MHz, mem 1500MHz) 6 cpd

ego2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6


View Profile
March 24, 2016, 12:46:50 PM
 #159

Hello, dear xpm-miners!
Anybody can share with experience of using R9 380, 380x? What CPD can be expected?
Thank you!
R9 380 (GPU 1000MHz, mem 1500MHz) 6 cpd
abrgeza, thank you so much for your answer!
abrgeza
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12


View Profile
March 28, 2016, 09:23:03 AM
 #160

Yes it is small - normally R7 260X is 1/3 of R9 280X. I try it for a lot of algorithms X11, X13, Eterum and gives around 1/3.  Only for quark gives a little bit more than 1/3 of R9 280X

I am trying to compare the characteristics of some cards, but do not understand what is crucial. Core frequency? At the moment I only understood that the frequency of memory and amount of memory are not very important.

Core frequency and FP64 is very important. As you can see on this http://www.anandtech.com/show/9387/amd-radeon-300-series/2
R9 380 is similar to R9 280 except it has weaker FP64. R9 380 has 1/16FP64 and R9 280 has 1/4FP64.
R9 380 is obviously slower for mining XPM but it is good for ETH.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!