[BitAffNet] How we're the #1 Bitcoin Mining Pool In The World (or so we thought)

[.....Really?]

Am I the only one with a last payout from a week ago?
stil a 1% bonus on my account tho....

You are not the only one. It has been about a week here also.

But.....but.....it can't be true:

I think our users enjoy the consistency and predictability of our payouts...

Funniest s0br quote ever?  No, there's loads more.

Don't worry, I'm sure that Mr Transparency will post detailed info about why his stolen mining hardware is still failing to pay all you mugs poor souls any month now........it's only been a few months since his last post, give him a chance 

[ensano]

It's so funny to keep reading all these posts of people freaking out and calling scam every 2 seconds then you see a post of someone advertising 0.1W/gh for 7BTC and they get 1k preorders

[swoop_ds]

How many days of not finding a block is considered bad luck? I think it's been three days now?

[jonnybravo0311]

How many days of not finding a block is considered bad luck? I think it's been three days now?

Any time it takes more than the expected number of shares to solve a block, it's bad luck.  Until the next difficulty change, that is 41,272,873,894 shares.

[ThePhwner]

Now then.........

Minersource is falsely claiming that we have not shipped ordered merchandise while in fact they have stolen $1050000 from us through fraud.

Here is complete list and dates of what we've shipped:
 
23/05/2014 1 x Prospero X-1 (100Ghash/second) Hosting: 5 days (FREE)
20/06/2014 117 x ATX To DC Power Adapter
20/06/2014 5 x Prospero X-1 (100Ghash/second)
04/07/2014 100 x PSU (100 x USA cable)
08/07/2014 50 x X-1(Without PSU/ Cable)
15/07/2014 100 x X-1 , 200 x X-1 PSU
17/07/2014 1608 x Minions for BAS3957, BAS1293, BAS1953 , BAS1997, BAS2408, BAS2915, BAS1015, BAS1064 8 x Minersource X3 #MSX38 14 x Minersource X1
19/07/2014 1 x X-3 (1T) #MSX30.5
26/07/2014 50 x X-1, with PSU, without cable
01/08/2014 1 x X-3 ( two cases), with PSU, cables
06/08/2014 30 x X-1 with PSU
18/08/2014 72 x X-1 ( without PSU, without cable) (one pallet) , 144 x X-1 ( without PSU, without cable) (two pallets)
17/09/2014 60 X1 With PSU no cable, 40 X1 Without PSU and Cable
25/09/2014 40 X PSU X-1
29/09/2014 32 X-3 4 Pallets
30/09/2014 34 X-3 4 Pallets
22/10/2014 15 X-3 PSU replacement
11/11/2014 137 X-3
 
The last package has been obtained through defrauding our customer support department. The stolen merchandise is with Bitcoin Affiliate Network in Las Vegas, Nevada. They are aware that the merchandise is stolen yet they ignore communications with us. We are in discussion with the Police.
Fedex tracking number: 806214740987 https://www.fedex.com/apps/fedextrack/?tracknumbers=806214740987&language=en&cntry_code=us
Total shipment weight: 8, 487.8 lbs / 3, 850 kgs

Complete list of tracking numbers:

UPS H9469374599
UPS H9450551164
UPS 1ZT6T450E140305549
DHL 89 2820 7024
DHL 9452660641
DHL 9452651924
DHL 7544715802
DHL 5246818334
DHL 3085703810
DHL 5763361203
DHL 15 3323 3575
DHL 15 8356 5852
DHL 15 8357 6094
DHL 4503870825
DHL 7517677506
DHL 2288799203
DHL 2485267934
DHL 3347472940
FEDEX 806214740987

Why does it not surprise me that BAN (BitcoinAffiliateNetwork) are involved in this?

I opened a scam accusation against them ages ago about their phony "giveaway" of miners to fake user accounts many months ago:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=782765.0

After a barrage of insults from s0br/ThePhwner & their multiple aliases, s0br locked the BAN pool thread after deleting evidence & went AWOL from the scam thread & this forum for about 2 months - before popping up again with another BAN pool thread with claims of transparency, bonuses, regular payouts etc, etc, - all of which has proven to be false again.

BTW, guess who advertised BAN on his "trustworthiness guide" thread knowing that they were confirmed scammers?  Yup, our good friend poop-dawg........

Come on s0br/ThePhwner & all your fake alises - bring it on. Tell me I was wrong 

STAY AWAY FROM THIS SCAMMING THIEVING LYING POOL!!!

As long as you're verifying facts, its been well known that I resigned from BAN some time ago. Shut the fuck up already.

[ThePhwner]

  Well Black Arrow delivered the gear more then a little bit late the date is 2014 Oct.
It was due a lot sooner. So if they never got paid for it fuck Black Arrow.
I will reveal that I lost about 500 of 1800 paid to minersource for black arrow gear in a DzCoop group buy the gear was due in Feb Not Oct.  I have 0 sympathy for Black Arrow.

    Back to BAN I stopped mining here due to very slow payments. I am now  paid up to date.
I would support BAN if I knew they would pay on time.  I also would feel if they really stole from Black Arrow and that helped me to recover the money I lost to Black Arrow cool.  The problem is BAN has been too slow to pay.
   I have 14th and if mine for 1 week I earn a coin with that. I do not want to lose a coin to BAN due to lack of payments.

You want me to believe Black Arrow?

Normally, no. This checks out though, follow the link supplied by them - here's the delivery confirmation, signed for by J Kerrigan - & I know who that person is 

Not to mention this troll douche's "investigation" is one-sided as always. Whatever happened between BA and Minersource is between two real shitheads that deserve each other. I can vouch for that fact that BAN paid Minersource for these units.

[.....Really?]

LULZ - look who's back, the faker himself........

I can vouch for that fact that BAN paid Minersource for these units.

Go on then. Do what s0br has consistently failed to do & what I have consistently done - post documented proof.

What is it that's one-sided about posting documented evidence exactly? It beats your fake pictures you have a habit of uploading......

As long as you're verifying facts, its been well known that I resigned from BAN some time ago.

So what? Does that mean you are innocent all of a sudden? Why are you even posting for s0br if you don't work for him anyway - guilt? How's about s0br posting for himself for a change? After all, he's got some explaining to do, & you're not in a position to do so. Go hide back in your hole - faker.

[ThePhwner]

LULZ - look who's back, the faker himself........

I can vouch for that fact that BAN paid Minersource for these units.

Go on then. Do what s0br has consistently failed to do & what I have consistently done - post documented proof.

What is it that's one-sided about posting documented evidence exactly? It beats your fake pictures you have a habit of uploading......

As long as you're verifying facts, its been well known that I resigned from BAN some time ago.

So what? Does that mean you are innocent all of a sudden? Why are you even posting for s0br if you don't work for him anyway - guilt? How's about s0br posting for himself for a change? After all, he's got some explaining to do, & you're not in a position to do so. Go hide back in your hole - faker.

On the condition that you'll choke on a bag of rotten cocks...

Just because I don't work for him doesn't mean he isn't a decent guy and that you're not full of shit. Something like 10 pounds of shit in a 5 pound sack. Feel free to convert to kilograms if you're into that sort of thing. We're all still waiting on your forensic analysis of those faked pictures. And "Really" who the fuck is still butthurt over an S3?

Nice thing about the Internet, you don't actually control it like you do the voices in your head, the unicorns you draw on your Etch-A-Sketch, or the amt of vaseline you use for the 10x daily ritual... and people can post as they please. And I'll continue to do so while I watch you dig for "the truth" in the most ineffective and comical way possible.

So please, go on to explain how I am "Really" just s0br in disguise. If both of your hands are free...

[SunnyIgor]

I think my pending payout just went down, because of the difficulty increase.
I stopped mining here because the payouts just takes to long.
It has been over a week now, and now it has decreased in value.

[.....Really?]

I stopped mining here because the payouts just takes to long.
It has been over a week now, and now it has decreased in value.

Yup, that's how it goes here I'm afraid. Thank you for your mining donation to s0brs scam pool. Which ever pool you decide to go to, be sure to do a little research first to make sure you don't get screwed over again by other scammers.

LULZ - look who's back, the faker himself........

I can vouch for that fact that BAN paid Minersource for these units.

Go on then. Do what s0br has consistently failed to do & what I have consistently done - post documented proof.

What is it that's one-sided about posting documented evidence exactly? It beats your fake pictures you have a habit of uploading......

As long as you're verifying facts, its been well known that I resigned from BAN some time ago.

So what? Does that mean you are innocent all of a sudden? Why are you even posting for s0br if you don't work for him anyway - guilt? How's about s0br posting for himself for a change? After all, he's got some explaining to do, & you're not in a position to do so. Go hide back in your hole - faker.

Swear, swear, rant, swear etc, etc, blah blah........

Thank you for clarifying that you can't produce the documented proof requested. Again.

Your diuretic mish-mash clearly demonstrates to every BAN miner getting shafted by s0br that your "vouch" is worthless.

[cncguru]

Pending payouts were just REDUCED as if we have been mining at the new higher difficulty since last payouts

Which looks like outright theft to me

[.....Really?]

Which looks like outright theft to me

It is & it has been since day one I'm afraid.........

[tlhIlwI]

Pending payouts were just REDUCED as if we have been mining at the new higher difficulty since last payouts

Which looks like outright theft to me

I just checked mine and it is down as well!  No payment for over a week and now 7.71% of it is gone!  I may as well have been mining a 4% PPS pool-- I would have come out ahead.

[jonnybravo0311]

If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding.  Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change.  Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?

How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.

[IYFTech]

Oh dear - are the wheels finally falling off s0br's little scam wagon?........

[tlhIlwI]

If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding.  Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change.  Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?

How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.

Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate.  Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time).  This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.

[jonnybravo0311]

If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding.  Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change.  Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?

How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.

Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate.  Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time).  This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.

Hahaha... oh that's just pathetic.  I'm not laughing at you, so please don't take my laughter that way.  I'm laughing because of the exceptionally poorly implemented payout logic code that doesn't bother to handle network difficulty adjustments.  Looks like somebody forgot to QA their code...

[tlhIlwI]

If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding.  Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change.  Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?

How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.

Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate.  Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time).  This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.

Hahaha... oh that's just pathetic.  I'm not laughing at you, so please don't take my laughter that way.  I'm laughing because of the exceptionally poorly implemented payout logic code that doesn't bother to handle network difficulty adjustments.  Looks like somebody forgot to QA their code...

No offence taken.  I agree completely and am looking for a new pool now.  From my perspective it looks like BAN is 5 blocks behind and has been selecting who to pay out to (the small balances) for a week now fully knowing that larger balances were going to end up into the higher difficulty.

[IYFTech]

If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding.  Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change.  Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?

How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.

Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate.  Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time).  This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.

Hahaha... oh that's just pathetic.  I'm not laughing at you, so please don't take my laughter that way.  I'm laughing because of the exceptionally poorly implemented payout logic code that doesn't bother to handle network difficulty adjustments.  Looks like somebody forgot to QA their code...

OR, s0br is adjusting the payouts manually in line with the diff change in the vain hope that his miners won't notice - & if they do, put it down to diff change & say nothing.......

[jonnybravo0311]

If this pool has handled payouts like this since the beginning, that's just plain old sloppy coding.  Of course, the opposite of what's happening now should have happened during the last difficulty change.  Can anyone confirm if their pending payouts actually went up by 6.14% on 1/27?

How you can code a pool and not account for changes in share values due to network difficulty adjustments is rank amateurism.

Confirmed...
No payouts from 1/22 to 1/29, then payment on 1/29 at the 6.05724720410961E-010 rate.  Too bad I didn't have as many miners pointed to BAN at that time (I only had one miner pointed here part time).  This time though I'm looking at a much bigger loss.

Hahaha... oh that's just pathetic.  I'm not laughing at you, so please don't take my laughter that way.  I'm laughing because of the exceptionally poorly implemented payout logic code that doesn't bother to handle network difficulty adjustments.  Looks like somebody forgot to QA their code...

OR, s0br is adjusting the payouts manually in line with the diff change in the vain hope that his miners won't notice - & if they do, put it down to diff change & say nothing.......

LOL...

update miner_shares set share_value='0.00000000056236';
commit;

He would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for those meddling kids!