JUST to correct some fud in this post and the poster should of picked up on it when they posted the other thread and a few other pools
EDIT: semaster has updated his comparison thread of p2pool vs Eligius vs BTCGuild. The thread is located here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=416933.0. According to his tests, p2pool is in the lead paying:
p2pool - BTC16.9718 VS btcguild (PPLNS) - BTC16.0933 VS Eligius BTC15.8041
Using his 6 S1s @ 1080GH/s total, expected earnings for that timeframe (2/1 - 10/30) are: 18.0886BTC. So, none of his tested pools have met expectations. However, p2Pool still wins here at 93.83% of expectations.
JUST A CORRECTION TO THE ABOVE STATEMENT BAN IN FACT THE HIGHER PAYING POOL.....
now to explain it lol
take that eligius number that is a PPS pool like BAN but the difference is BAN is paying a bonus 10 percent on top of the normal 100 percent paying PPS now factor that in to the eligius numbers
10 percent of a not 100 percent paying PPS pool (due to the share shelving that eligus does) is 15.8041 x 0.1 = 1.58041
So when you add that 10 percent extra in BAN has paid out 17.38451 so cough cough you want to correct your statement re p2 and ban.... AS it in fact it the other way around... AS BAN ALSO DOES NOT SHELF SHARES AS eligus does so that gap even higher when you factor in the shelf shares that eligus does
SOME simple math of the eligius PPS numbers show quite clear what the BAN payout would of been for the same time frame Smiley PS they also merge mine now so that gap is further when the merge mining factored in again a PPS payout Smiley
Also something else that caught my eye is this part of the pool test results here
So, none of his tested pools have met expectations. However, p2Pool still wins here at 93.83% of expectations. You can add another 6 percent to the number above of 17.38451 as BAN is paying out at 100 percent of a expected rigs earn day in and out before the 10 percent bonus is factored in a simple 24 hour test would show this clear as days that the BAN PPS is basically right on the money with a rig expected earn via the stats on the homepage and what any bitcoin calculator splits out as the expected earn -/+ 1-2 percent to allow for a avg hash ... <<<< this comes back to the Eligius mod PPS system not paying a true 100 percent PPS due to the share shelving on their PPS so you would have to also look at the percent difference there as well of what the expected earn would of been on the rigs in question and also add that difference in to make up for the difference in the 2 different pps payouts .... so that 6 percent could well be 10-15 percent have not sit there and done the numbers to find how much more BAN is paying vs eligius on the PPS front with out factoring in the bonus
NOW to the second lot of fud here Smiley
Miners and dates, with hash rate and expected earnings
7/20 - 7/30, 2xS1 @ 400GH/s. Expected: 0.1121BTC
7/20 - 11/26 1xS3 @ 440GH/s. Expected: 1.0367BTC
7/20 - 11/26 1xS3 @ 420GH/s. Expected: 0.9896BTC
7/20 - 8/1 1xSP10 @ 1.35TH/s. Expected: 0.4509BTC
8/1 - 11/26 3xS3 @ 1.32TH/s. Expected: 2.6692BTC
8/9 - 11/26 3xS3 @ 1.32TH/s. Expected: 2.3875BTC
Expected total earnings from mining: 7.646BTC
Actual mined BTC: 8.61186032BTC
Difference: 0.96586032BTC
P2Pool has beaten expectations for the time period that BAN has been in existence by 12.6%. In other words, p2pool has paid 112.63% of expected earnings.
YOU MAY WANT TO SIT THERE AND ALSO FACTOR IN THE 10 percent bonus on the expected total earnings from mining: 7.646BTC THAT BAN PAYS which brings BAN UP TO 8.4106 btc and then factor in the NMC blocks they have hit in this time Smiley YOU will more than likely find ban even out does P2 pool in this set of numbers as well Smiley or comes very close... it NOT 12.6 percent as claimed above as the poster forgot to factor in the bonus payments on top of the PPS and the nmc blocks.... It more likely they are on par or BAN has it nose in front just earning wise on this second set of data....
As I replied in my thread, there is no FUD. Do you even know what that means, by the way? Well, that's a bit off topic, so let's get back on track. First, Eligius and their payout system has nothing to do with anything regarding p2pool, or the proof I've provided. Second, I never claimed p2pool beat BAN by 12.6% as you erroneously wrote. I stated that p2pool paid 112.63% of expectations vs BAN's claims of 110% of expectations over the lifetime of BAN. That's 2.63%. I also provided proof and stated that during the explicit test timeframe of 10/20 - 10/27 mentioned in the OP p2pool paid 174.86% of expectations, which against BAN's 110% is a 64.86% difference in favor of p2pool. Finally, I didn't include any merged coins because I wanted to do a strict BTC to BTC comparison. If you insist on including those coins, then know that I will also include IXC, I0C, DVC, FSC, HUC because those are all merge mined by p2pool. P2Pool also includes the ability to donate to miners, which I could also include since I received donations during this timeframe. All of this would only serve to increase my numbers, yet I did not include them.
