Bitcoin Forum
April 20, 2019, 09:33:25 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 [2270] 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 ... 2460 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)  (Read 3228364 times)
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 2942



View Profile
April 12, 2016, 04:20:50 PM
 #45381

That stuttering retard "...so...so...so release the kraken muahahaha..." Homero doesn't have the balls to stand in front of the court eh. Reminds me of the "debate" with the litecoin guy from tough bravado to sniveling cowering coward "..well let's do it in writing instead.."  Roll Eyes

His lawyers might try to shield him but I'm pretty sure the SEC can call him as a witness if they need to. So at the very least he would have to learn to say "I plead the 5th", although this being a civil case there are limits to that too.
1555752805
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555752805

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555752805
Reply with quote  #2

1555752805
Report to moderator
1555752805
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555752805

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555752805
Reply with quote  #2

1555752805
Report to moderator
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 1045


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2016, 07:13:44 PM
 #45382

Stu should wear an apron while naked underneath to court, bring out his inner pedo

This eth dump is almost as good as the paycorn dump

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
CryptoBuds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:01:37 AM
 #45383

So Mr Coins states almost a year ago that the SEC is going to "approve" Paycoin and now he is telling those drones to sell, sell, sell. XPY was a scam all along. When are these idiots gonna stop losing money from his ignorant words? He's a fucking idiot. Now shilling for ION. IONs and Atoms that produce "electrons" that electrify your stakers. How is that not almost exactly like Homero ran the hashlets? This is a carbon fucking copy of the XPY/GAW bullshit just under a different name.

                      ▄█████▄
                      ███████
                      ███████▓▄
                     ▄█▓▀     ▀█▓▄
                    ▄█▓▀        ▀█▓▄
                   ▄█▓▀           ███████▄
               ▄██████   ██████▄   ████████ 
              ████████   ███████   ▀█████▀             
              ▀███████   ███████
                  ▀█▓▄    █▓   █▓
                     ▀█▓▄ █▓     █▓▄█████▄
             ▄██████    ██████▄  █████████
            ████████    ███████    ██████▀
            ▀███████    ▀█████▀ ▄█▓▀
                   ▀█▓▄        ▄█▓▀
                      ████████▓▀
                      ████████
                      ▀██████▀

                                                           
           ▄██▄▄               ▄▄▄▄                  ███   
        ▄██▀  ▀██▄         ▄▄████████   ██████       ███   
     ▄██▀        ▀██      ▄██       ███ ███  ███     ███   
     ███                 ▄██            ███   ███    ███   
     ███                ▄██             ███     ███  ███   
     ███                ███             ███       ██████   
     ███████████████    ██████████████  ███                 
customcontract.network

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 2942



View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:33:05 AM
 #45384

So Mr Coins states almost a year ago that the SEC is going to "approve" Paycoin and now he is telling those drones to sell, sell, sell. XPY was a scam all along. When are these idiots gonna stop losing money from his ignorant words? He's a fucking idiot. Now shilling for ION. IONs and Atoms that produce "electrons" that electrify your stakers. How is that not almost exactly like Homero ran the hashlets? This is a carbon fucking copy of the XPY/GAW bullshit just under a different name.

Think of it as following a tried & tested business plan, nothing wrong with that Smiley

Although I'm pretty sure they are going to fail miserably with their expected ~$0.5 million ICO. There is at most a 100 of hardcore believers left, probably less then 50 actually, mostly broke and unlikely to bring $10k+ each. Unless they try to advertise this shit outside of hashtalk - now that would be fun to watch.
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1017


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 07:33:45 AM
 #45385

Stu should wear an apron while naked underneath to court, bring out his inner pedo

This eth dump is almost as good as the paycorn dump

https://twitter.com/cryptsy/status/719773151098327040?lang=en

Your pal Mr Coins just can't get a break. I think he's Mr Coinless now. He's been ass raped by homero, carmelo and now big vern. Must be getting loose back there Smiley. I mean this figuratively as in he lost coins ass raped... not ass raped ass raped incase he can't tell the difference.
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1017


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 07:35:41 AM
 #45386

So Mr Coins states almost a year ago that the SEC is going to "approve" Paycoin and now he is telling those drones to sell, sell, sell. XPY was a scam all along. When are these idiots gonna stop losing money from his ignorant words? He's a fucking idiot. Now shilling for ION. IONs and Atoms that produce "electrons" that electrify your stakers. How is that not almost exactly like Homero ran the hashlets? This is a carbon fucking copy of the XPY/GAW bullshit just under a different name.

Think of it as following a tried & tested business plan, nothing wrong with that Smiley

Although I'm pretty sure they are going to fail miserably with their expected ~$0.5 million ICO. There is at most a 100 of hardcore believers left, probably less then 50 actually, mostly broke and unlikely to bring $10k+ each. Unless they try to advertise this shit outside of hashtalk - now that would be fun to watch.

Since xpy only ended up at cryptsy can you imagine how many are even poorer now? I mean they can't even withdraw their btc to get electrified ion stakers or whatever red rocket ship shit they are selling Smiley.

Adam Matlack is probably talking to god now about where vern is going to go for cheating him out of his flocks money.
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 1045


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2016, 07:48:32 AM
 #45387

Do not fudd matlack or you will not be delivered! Tithe him at 100%¡

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
Acguy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 13, 2016, 08:11:14 AM
 #45388

A summary of what happened last year would be nice.

           ▄██▄
         ▄██████▄
       ▄███▀  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀ ▄██▄ ▀███▄
   ▄███▀ ▄██▀▀██▄ ▀███▄
 ▄███▀ ▄██▀    ▀▀▀  ▀███▄
██████████████████████
 ▀███▄  ▄▄▄    ▄██▀ ▄███▀
   ▀███▄ ▀██▄▄██▀ ▄███▀
     ▀███▄ ▀██▀ ▄███▀
       ▀███▄  ▄███▀
         ▀██████▀
           ▀██▀
███
███
  █
███
    █
█ 
█ 
█ 

███
  █
███
███
███
███
  █
███
    █
█ 
█ 
█ 

███
  █
███
███
           ▄██▄
         ▄██████▄
       ▄███▀  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀ ▄██▄ ▀███▄
   ▄███▀ ▄██▀▀██▄ ▀███▄
 ▄███▀ ▄██▀    ▀▀▀  ▀███▄
██████████████████████████
 ▀███▄  ▄▄▄    ▄██▀ ▄███▀
   ▀███▄ ▀██▄▄██▀ ▄███▀
     ▀███▄ ▀██▀ ▄███▀
       ▀███▄  ▄███▀
         ▀██████▀
           ▀██▀
ANN Thread     WhitePaper
Facebook     Telegram     Twitter
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███
███
  █
███
    █
█ 
█ 
█ 

███
  █
███
███
Unacceptable
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001



View Profile
April 13, 2016, 09:43:41 AM
 #45389

A summary of what happened last year would be nice.

Read every 5th page going backwards,you'll catch up in about 30 minutes  Wink

"If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole."  -Raylan Givens
Got GOXXED ?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KiqRpPiJAU&feature=youtu.be
"An ASIC being late is perfectly normal, predictable, and legal..."Hashfast & BFL slogan Smiley
bubbaj
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 101


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 10:16:45 AM
 #45390

Damn I have stayed away for about a month and see nothing has really happened, for the SEC case to be sealed I think that Uncle Stu and his buddies at Cantor may have more to do with this than most know.

As for the rest of it let those last few survivors have there last few BTC stolen. Who really cares, and for those whom want to see Josh in a jail cell be prepared to wait years as this is a civil suit so just financial penalties and as we have seen from Big Vern, BTC is easy to hide as it just sits in a wallet until eventually in years to come and everyone has forgotten it moves.

maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:24:09 PM
 #45391

hahaha mrfuckingcoins, what a sleazeball. reminds me of a nugget I can across yesterday and how homero slimed his way out of it. just trying to figger out how to print an entire email thread. After the wall street journal piece, from that author michael


Quote

Subject: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:00:52 +0000
From: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
To: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>



Josh, I’m really quite stunned by the comments that have poured into the
story. It is elephant in the room that demands a follow-up story. We are
now compelled to address the charges that GAW is a fraudulent operation.

I had seen claims that GAW was a scam on Reddit and elsewhere, but I see
such claims throughout the mining and altcoin industries, legitimate or
otherwise -- it is, as you say, germane to the bitcoin community. So
didn’t deep much deeper. I now regret that, and if you were aware of
those charges against you I think it would have behooved you to have
gotten ahead of such claims by laying them all out in the first place
and then providing irrefutable proof to shoot them down. Now, we’re both
doing repair work.

I did follow-up with some of your business associates and looked into
your past dealings, checked out the hashcoin white paper, and felt
confident that you had a big operation underway. But now with these
overwhelming responses (from a group that might well be just disgruntled
traders), I need to do a significant amount more work, specifically
related to proof of the mining operation, its size and the capacity to
consistently pay out ROI based on actual mined coins, as well as into
the handling of the hashtalk.org forum.

So I’ll need your cooperation in responding to some of these charges
and to the various questions that I’ll have as follow-ups. (I’ll get
back to you with those shortly.) You can see this as a chance to put to
bed once and for all these serious allegations against you.

Regards,

Michael

Michael Casey

Senior Columnist, Global Finance

The Wall Street Journal

212-416-2209 (o)

914-409-8733 (m)

michael.casey@wsj.com <mailto:michael.casey@wsj.com>

Twitter: @mikejcasey
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:27:41 PM
 #45392

GODDAMN TROLLS AGAIN HOMERO!  Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


Quote
Subject: Re: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:41:34 -0500
From: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
To: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>, Stuart Fraser
<SFRASER@cantor.com>, Daniel Kelley <dan@geniusesatwork.com>



There are no charges, but the opinions of the same people over and over.

As I told you on the phone, it's the same few dozen people doing this
over and over again. Additionally, we confirmed a while back that the
majority have been hired by competitors. That's that happens in this
industry when you take customers from other companies.

Honestly, I am just as surprised by this email. The same way you mention
proof, every troll that makes these allegations has none. It's the same
story over and over.

"I think gaw is doing bad things" "what's your proof" "well there is
none, I just think that are"

To add to that, we recently broke 200k customers. If 1% of our customers
did not like us, it would be 4 times the amount of complainers we have.
These guys are just loud.

I am happy to answer any questions you have.




hahaha mrfuckingcoins, what a sleazeball. reminds me of a nugget I can across yesterday and how homero slimed his way out of it. just trying to figger out how to print an entire email thread. After the wall street journal piece, from that author michael


Quote

Subject: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:00:52 +0000
From: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
To: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>



Josh, I’m really quite stunned by the comments that have poured into the
story. It is elephant in the room that demands a follow-up story. We are
now compelled to address the charges that GAW is a fraudulent operation.

I had seen claims that GAW was a scam on Reddit and elsewhere, but I see
such claims throughout the mining and altcoin industries, legitimate or
otherwise -- it is, as you say, germane to the bitcoin community. So
didn’t deep much deeper. I now regret that, and if you were aware of
those charges against you I think it would have behooved you to have
gotten ahead of such claims by laying them all out in the first place
and then providing irrefutable proof to shoot them down. Now, we’re both
doing repair work.

I did follow-up with some of your business associates and looked into
your past dealings, checked out the hashcoin white paper, and felt
confident that you had a big operation underway. But now with these
overwhelming responses (from a group that might well be just disgruntled
traders), I need to do a significant amount more work, specifically
related to proof of the mining operation, its size and the capacity to
consistently pay out ROI based on actual mined coins, as well as into
the handling of the hashtalk.org forum.

So I’ll need your cooperation in responding to some of these charges
and to the various questions that I’ll have as follow-ups. (I’ll get
back to you with those shortly.) You can see this as a chance to put to
bed once and for all these serious allegations against you.

Regards,

Michael

Michael Casey

Senior Columnist, Global Finance

The Wall Street Journal

212-416-2209 (o)

914-409-8733 (m)

michael.casey@wsj.com <mailto:michael.casey@wsj.com>

Twitter: @mikejcasey

maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:29:53 PM
 #45393

Quote
Subject: RE: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:06:59 +0000
From: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
To: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>, Stuart Fraser
<SFRASER@cantor.com>, Daniel Kelley <dan@geniusesatwork.com>



OK folks, so I need responses in general to the allegations that you’re
by now well aware of. And to the extent to which there is more solid
proof, rather than simply a denial, that will be better. It will make it
seem less like you’re being evasive and giving fodder to your critics
who say it’s a scam.

I’m not a position either way on behalf of any of these criticisms. And
it seems to me that part of the problem is that the bitcoin community is
full of some very passionate and inherently mistrusting people. They are
also going to be especially suspicious of any operation that is
perceived to be centralized, run by a for-profit corporation, even
though, as you argue, that may be the only approach that will bring
cryptocurrency into the mainstream. But with the barrage of comments
attached to my article and the emails I received, it is now impossible
for us to not at least write about the claims against you.

Before we met I’d seen such claims on Reddit and thought it as part of
the usual trolling that occurs within bitcoin land and typical of all
the loosely defined “pump and dump” allegations that are leveled at
pretty much every altcoin or the claims of fraud place on all mining
service providers. Also, I did some due diligence on you guys and you
were very helpful and constructive in that regard, including the
interview with Stuart. That was a constructive approach and it gave me
confidence. So, I felt that although I can’t back up your numbers you
clearly have a solid track record and sound business associates, so I
was happy to run with the article.

Sadly, though – rightly or wrongly -- the response to it changes the
calculus, both for me and for you. (The fact that you’d broadcast that
there would be a story in WSJ and then openly discussed how and when it
might run didn’t help, by the way. It puts me in an awkward position.
Word to wise: don’t do that again with us or any other news
organization. It can only make life difficult for you.) I now need to do
a follow-up to acknowledge that these concerns exist. We want to get
this out today.

So, here are the questions, most of which I’m sure you’ve encountered
before.

1.The big one: That this is a Ponzi scheme. What can you provide to show
that there are actual coins being mined and payments being made from
them? Are there mining addresses you can reveal that show significant
bitcoin mining activity to match the claim that you account for 50% of
new online mining capacity? (Or 90% of Litcoin?)

2.What’s the breakdown for that 50% claim? Over what time frame? Is that
for BTC only or BTC , Litcoin etc.

3.Are there other details that you can provide to verify the size of
your Mississippi operation? An address that allows us to search it on
Google Earth and street view, for eg.. (Also any very recent photos of
the inside of the plant and mining rig racks.)?

4.Why Mississippi? How do you maintain a low-cost operation in a state
that averages max temperatures year-round of about 75 degrees?

5.I take it that some of the payments on a hashlet that a customer
receives comes from trading revenues and some from a pool of assets that
Gaw mines, in addition to direct mining revenue. Can you break out those
flows for me? Is there an average across all clients?

6.And if, as various observers say, it’s extremely difficult for someone
to break even on any cloud mining contract given the struggle to keep up
with rising difficulty, low prices, etc., then isn’t it the case that
eventually there will be a pool of misfortunate hashlet traders left
holding the bag? How do explain that there are perpetual gains to be had
from owning and trading hashlets over time? How do you keep the supply
of hashing power up?

7.Related to that prior question: A static cloud mining contract is a
depreciating asset by definition, so long as the BTC price is flat or
falling. How is a hashlet different from that? How can I claim that it
has upside value? Is this because of the capacity to “amp it?” But if
so, isn’t the cost of doing so going to rolled into the price as well?

8.Most importantly, if trading and/or investments in a pool of assets is
part of the business model, is it regulated by the SEC? Do your lawyers
believe it doesn’t need to be? Are you seeking regulation? Where does
that stand?

9.Critics have described the hashpoint program for pre-ordering
hashcoin/paycoin as a scheme to cover for the fact that payouts on
hashlets started to decline early in the fall as difficulty rates rose.
What’s your answer to that?

10. In general, there’s a view that all cloud mining needs to be far
more transparent. That fund flows could and should be provably posted on
a blockchain-based system. What do you say to that?

11.Critics say the Hashtalk forum is aggressively moderated, with
dissenters barred and their comments removed. What’s your response to
that? The same critics also say that you pay supporters. Response?

Thanks for your prompt response.

Best wishes,

Michael

Michael Casey

Senior Columnist, Global Finance

The Wall Street Journal

212-416-2209 (o)

914-409-8733 (m)

michael.casey@wsj.com <mailto:michael.casey@wsj.com>

Twitter: @mikejcasey
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:38:03 PM
 #45394

 Roll Eyes


Quote
Subject: Re: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:39:26 -0500
From: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
To: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>, Stuart Fraser
<SFRASER@cantor.com>, Daniel Kelley <dan@geniusesatwork.com>



See you on the call.

In the mean time. My tech guys gave me this for you. Note: This is
confidential, and should not be share with anyone else. This is just one
of our mining addresses.
*
*
*We have signed it for you as conformation!*

https://blockchain.info/address/18Yrkm5cRqT1MiqwAUBDcN64hWb1pLutsW

GAW Miners Security team has signed the following message:
"11-26-2014 GAW Miners/WSJ" using the cryptographic private key for this
address. The message hash is:
"IC7XJZ9Ymp1RwnIpFVpCvv9bl5tYqXifPa0rrpG0RrtmCRbRDvranFVxtWMu3rW8RVwxJMLkuxFKNey bR/4plbk="
To cryptographically verify ownership of this address there are
several online services. BrainWallet.github.io
<http://brainwallet.github.io/> is a trusted open source platform which
provides a method of verifying messages.
https://brainwallet.github.io/#verify

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
11-26-2014 GAW Miners/WSJ
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
18Yrkm5cRqT1MiqwAUBDcN64hWb1pLutsW
IC7XJZ9Ymp1RwnIpFVpCvv9bl5tYqXifPa0rrpG0RrtmCRbRDvranFVxtWMu3rW8RVwxJMLkuxFKNey bR/4plbk=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE——


*As you can see, with just one of our addresses, and we have moved over
26k Bitcoins in just the last few months. This is 9.5 millions dollars
at todays pricing.*
*
*
Also, here is Bitmain confirming a recent order of 5 petahash. around 4
million.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=827552.msg9378239#msg9378239

Finally, I have also attached the address of our main data center (and
the lease)

*All of this is highly confidential information and should not be shared
to anyone.*



*Josh Garza*
*CEO- *GAW Corp


And the super secret lease:

https://www.scribd.com/doc/308364991/nsmail








Quote
Subject: RE: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:06:59 +0000
From: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
To: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>, Stuart Fraser
<SFRASER@cantor.com>, Daniel Kelley <dan@geniusesatwork.com>



OK folks, so I need responses in general to the allegations that you’re
by now well aware of. And to the extent to which there is more solid
proof, rather than simply a denial, that will be better. It will make it
seem less like you’re being evasive and giving fodder to your critics
who say it’s a scam.

I’m not a position either way on behalf of any of these criticisms. And
it seems to me that part of the problem is that the bitcoin community is
full of some very passionate and inherently mistrusting people. They are
also going to be especially suspicious of any operation that is
perceived to be centralized, run by a for-profit corporation, even
though, as you argue, that may be the only approach that will bring
cryptocurrency into the mainstream. But with the barrage of comments
attached to my article and the emails I received, it is now impossible
for us to not at least write about the claims against you.

Before we met I’d seen such claims on Reddit and thought it as part of
the usual trolling that occurs within bitcoin land and typical of all
the loosely defined “pump and dump” allegations that are leveled at
pretty much every altcoin or the claims of fraud place on all mining
service providers. Also, I did some due diligence on you guys and you
were very helpful and constructive in that regard, including the
interview with Stuart. That was a constructive approach and it gave me
confidence. So, I felt that although I can’t back up your numbers you
clearly have a solid track record and sound business associates, so I
was happy to run with the article.

Sadly, though – rightly or wrongly -- the response to it changes the
calculus, both for me and for you. (The fact that you’d broadcast that
there would be a story in WSJ and then openly discussed how and when it
might run didn’t help, by the way. It puts me in an awkward position.
Word to wise: don’t do that again with us or any other news
organization. It can only make life difficult for you.) I now need to do
a follow-up to acknowledge that these concerns exist. We want to get
this out today.

So, here are the questions, most of which I’m sure you’ve encountered
before.

1.The big one: That this is a Ponzi scheme. What can you provide to show
that there are actual coins being mined and payments being made from
them? Are there mining addresses you can reveal that show significant
bitcoin mining activity to match the claim that you account for 50% of
new online mining capacity? (Or 90% of Litcoin?)

2.What’s the breakdown for that 50% claim? Over what time frame? Is that
for BTC only or BTC , Litcoin etc.

3.Are there other details that you can provide to verify the size of
your Mississippi operation? An address that allows us to search it on
Google Earth and street view, for eg.. (Also any very recent photos of
the inside of the plant and mining rig racks.)?

4.Why Mississippi? How do you maintain a low-cost operation in a state
that averages max temperatures year-round of about 75 degrees?

5.I take it that some of the payments on a hashlet that a customer
receives comes from trading revenues and some from a pool of assets that
Gaw mines, in addition to direct mining revenue. Can you break out those
flows for me? Is there an average across all clients?

6.And if, as various observers say, it’s extremely difficult for someone
to break even on any cloud mining contract given the struggle to keep up
with rising difficulty, low prices, etc., then isn’t it the case that
eventually there will be a pool of misfortunate hashlet traders left
holding the bag? How do explain that there are perpetual gains to be had
from owning and trading hashlets over time? How do you keep the supply
of hashing power up?

7.Related to that prior question: A static cloud mining contract is a
depreciating asset by definition, so long as the BTC price is flat or
falling. How is a hashlet different from that? How can I claim that it
has upside value? Is this because of the capacity to “amp it?” But if
so, isn’t the cost of doing so going to rolled into the price as well?

8.Most importantly, if trading and/or investments in a pool of assets is
part of the business model, is it regulated by the SEC? Do your lawyers
believe it doesn’t need to be? Are you seeking regulation? Where does
that stand?

9.Critics have described the hashpoint program for pre-ordering
hashcoin/paycoin as a scheme to cover for the fact that payouts on
hashlets started to decline early in the fall as difficulty rates rose.
What’s your answer to that?

10. In general, there’s a view that all cloud mining needs to be far
more transparent. That fund flows could and should be provably posted on
a blockchain-based system. What do you say to that?

11.Critics say the Hashtalk forum is aggressively moderated, with
dissenters barred and their comments removed. What’s your response to
that? The same critics also say that you pay supporters. Response?

Thanks for your prompt response.

Best wishes,

Michael

Michael Casey

Senior Columnist, Global Finance

The Wall Street Journal

212-416-2209 (o)

914-409-8733 (m)

michael.casey@wsj.com <mailto:michael.casey@wsj.com>

Twitter: @mikejcasey
cryptodevil
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1099


Thread-puller extraordinaire


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:46:39 PM
 #45395


That's odd. The 'Basic Lease Information' page shows a monthly rent in figures of $46,000.00 but the contract states, in words, "Forty Six Hundred Dollars" per month.




WARNING!!! Check your forum URLs carefully and avoid links to phishing sites like 'thebitcointalk' 'bitcointalk.to' and 'BitcointaLLk'
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:47:06 PM
 #45396

Someone want to remind ole Michael about all of this: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com> ?

The biggest troll of them all the SEC seems to think it is so... Wink

Quote

RE: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 18:06:59 +0000
From: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
To: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>, Stuart Fraser
<SFRASER@cantor.com>, Daniel Kelley <dan@geniusesatwork.com>


So, here are the questions, most of which I’m sure you’ve encountered
before.

1.The big one: That this is a Ponzi scheme. What can you provide to show
that there are actual coins being mined and payments being made from
them?
Are there mining addresses you can reveal that show significant
bitcoin mining activity to match the claim that you account for 50% of
new online mining capacity? (Or 90% of Litcoin?)

cryptodevil
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1680
Merit: 1099


Thread-puller extraordinaire


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:51:05 PM
 #45397


Quote
Subject: Re: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:39:26 -0500
From: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
To: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>, Stuart Fraser
<SFRASER@cantor.com>, Daniel Kelley <dan@geniusesatwork.com>



See you on the call.

In the mean time. My tech guys gave me this for you. Note: This is
confidential, and should not be share with anyone else. This is just one
of our mining addresses.
*
*
*We have signed it for you as conformation!*

https://blockchain.info/address/18Yrkm5cRqT1MiqwAUBDcN64hWb1pLutsW


Umm, Joshie, a 'mining address' is supposed to show newly minted coins from the blocks you are mining. Anyone managed to find any in that address?


WARNING!!! Check your forum URLs carefully and avoid links to phishing sites like 'thebitcointalk' 'bitcointalk.to' and 'BitcointaLLk'
Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 13, 2016, 01:35:29 PM
 #45398


Quote
Subject: Re: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:39:26 -0500
From: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
To: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>, Stuart Fraser
<SFRASER@cantor.com>, Daniel Kelley <dan@geniusesatwork.com>



See you on the call.

In the mean time. My tech guys gave me this for you. Note: This is
confidential, and should not be share with anyone else. This is just one
of our mining addresses.
*
*
*We have signed it for you as conformation!*

https://blockchain.info/address/18Yrkm5cRqT1MiqwAUBDcN64hWb1pLutsW


Umm, Joshie, a 'mining address' is supposed to show newly minted coins from the blocks you are mining. Anyone managed to find any in that address?



No. And there was no response from GAW or WSJ when that was pointed out immediately.

That's some really great journalism from Casey over there. Get down on your knees and write a puff piece. Don't question any of the absurd claims the guy is making. Get trashed for doing a shitty job. Go back to the guy who just used you angry because they didn't voluntarily throw themselves under the bus. Ask a bunch of questions you should have asked earlier at once so there's no way for you to follow up. Take one piece of horseshit info from the answers, don't vet it at all, publish it to make it seem like you aren't a goon. Never mention it again.
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 2942



View Profile
April 13, 2016, 02:56:11 PM
 #45399


Quote
Subject: Re: We need to do a follow-up on these allegations of fraud.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:39:26 -0500
From: Josh Garza <josh@btc.com>
To: Casey, Michael J <Michael.Casey@wsj.com>
CC: mjlindenberger@gmail.com <mjlindenberger@gmail.com>, Stuart Fraser
<SFRASER@cantor.com>, Daniel Kelley <dan@geniusesatwork.com>



See you on the call.

In the mean time. My tech guys gave me this for you. Note: This is
confidential, and should not be share with anyone else. This is just one
of our mining addresses.
*
*
*We have signed it for you as conformation!*

https://blockchain.info/address/18Yrkm5cRqT1MiqwAUBDcN64hWb1pLutsW


Umm, Joshie, a 'mining address' is supposed to show newly minted coins from the blocks you are mining. Anyone managed to find any in that address?



No. And there was no response from GAW or WSJ when that was pointed out immediately.

That's some really great journalism from Casey over there. Get down on your knees and write a puff piece. Don't question any of the absurd claims the guy is making. Get trashed for doing a shitty job. Go back to the guy who just used you angry because they didn't voluntarily throw themselves under the bus. Ask a bunch of questions you should have asked earlier at once so there's no way for you to follow up. Take one piece of horseshit info from the answers, don't vet it at all, publish it to make it seem like you aren't a goon. Never mention it again.

I sent a few polite e-mails to Mr. Casey and that other WSJ guy after it became blindingly obvious to everyone what Garza did (around this time last year, then when the SEC questioned Carlos, etc) trying to get their take on the events. Never got a response or acknowledgement of any sort. Basically the WSJ blog is a pay-to-play rag, there is no journalistic integrity or journalistic anything. I doubt there is any in the WSJ proper either but I digress.
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 916
Merit: 1058


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 07:51:20 PM
 #45400

Quote
utility Set Deadlines/Hearings  Tue 4:07 PM 
Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/26/2016. (Gutierrez, Y.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initial_conference#Rule_26_conference

Quote
According to the FRCP, the plaintiff must initiate a conference between the parties to plan for the discovery process after the complaint was served to the defendants.[1] The parties must confer as soon as practicable after the complaint was served to the defendants — and in any event at least 21 days before a scheduling conference is to be held or a scheduling order is due under Rule 16(b). The parties should attempt to agree on the proposed discovery plan, and submit it to the court within 14 days after the conference
Pages: « 1 ... 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 [2270] 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 ... 2460 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!