Bitcoin Forum
April 14, 2024, 06:55:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 [2314] 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 ... 2458 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)  (Read 3376847 times)
clownius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 254


View Profile
September 08, 2016, 07:50:07 AM
 #46261

Poor Homero running out of stalling tactics?

1713077713
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713077713

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713077713
Reply with quote  #2

1713077713
Report to moderator
1713077713
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713077713

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713077713
Reply with quote  #2

1713077713
Report to moderator
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the first distributed timestamping system.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713077713
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713077713

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713077713
Reply with quote  #2

1713077713
Report to moderator
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8908


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
September 08, 2016, 11:59:23 AM
 #46262

In other news:  Props 2 @suchmoon for expressing your inner woman with your new avatar.

Someone called me a donkey as if it was an insult of some sort. It's not. Donkeys are adorable so I was wearing that avatar for a while.

Someone recently said I'm "girly" or something to that effect as if it was an insult of some sort. It's not. Guess where every "macho" came from.

Just please don't call me something abstract I can't find a picture for.

So the extension was denied but it still got extended to September 23? I'm pretty sure the original deadline was sooner than that but whatever.

Only a couple of weeks to go.

Basically the defendants did got already an extension. Another extension of time will not be granted except for "good cause" or only if the defendant demonstrates in writing he could not reasonably file a request in a timely manner due to extraordinary circumstances beyond its control (natural disaster or other catastrophe such as fire, etc...).

This log is basically a FINALE reminder that the defendants have to file an answer by September 23, 2016.

After reading it again it sounds like they can STILL file for another extension by Sep 23 if they present a reasonable cause as you're saying.

Quote
Thus, the parties' Rule 26(f) Report is due by September 23, 2016. D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(f). In the Report, the parties shall propose a filing deadline and briefing schedule for any renewed motion for class certification. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/6/2016. (Hillier, D.)
truckinusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 534
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 08, 2016, 10:03:50 PM
 #46263

So the extension was denied but it still got extended to September 23? I'm pretty sure the original deadline was sooner than that but whatever.

Only a couple of weeks to go.

This is getting to be SO good.  TY @Maildir for your excellent analysis.

I have said all along that Stu will throw Garbanzo under the bus.  He has no choice.  Homero still won't even see it coming, until the witnesses have hit the stand! Stu is lying to his wife, his colleagues, his lawyers and Homero.  That's what desperate people do.

Will GAWsuit keep its peeps up-to-date with a blog somewhere?  Would be fun to follow.

In other news:  Props 2 @suchmoon for expressing your inner woman with your new avatar.

Not knowing the true nature of the relationship between Homero and Uncle Stu leaves a lot of questions.  It will be interesting to find out what those answers are.  I wonder why some investigative journalist hasn't gone after their associates to find out what was really going on?

bitJob                       ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
                ▄▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄▄
        ▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
  ▄▄▄████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
  ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ▀██████████████████████████████████████▀  ██
          ▀▀██████████████████████████████████▀▀  ████
                                                 ▄████▄
                                                ▀▀████▀▀
IIII
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
September 08, 2016, 10:14:22 PM
 #46264

Suchmoon avatar

sirazimuth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3332
Merit: 3469


born once atheist


View Profile
September 08, 2016, 10:23:58 PM
 #46265

Suchmoon avatar

my sentiments exactly  Wink

Bitcoin...the future of all monetary transactions...and always will be
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1021


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 12:26:13 AM
 #46266

In other news:  Props 2 @suchmoon for expressing your inner woman with your new avatar.

Someone called me a donkey as if it was an insult of some sort. It's not. Donkeys are adorable so I was wearing that avatar for a while.

Someone recently said I'm "girly" or something to that effect as if it was an insult of some sort. It's not. Guess where every "macho" came from.

Just please don't call me something abstract I can't find a picture for.

So the extension was denied but it still got extended to September 23? I'm pretty sure the original deadline was sooner than that but whatever.

Only a couple of weeks to go.

Basically the defendants did got already an extension. Another extension of time will not be granted except for "good cause" or only if the defendant demonstrates in writing he could not reasonably file a request in a timely manner due to extraordinary circumstances beyond its control (natural disaster or other catastrophe such as fire, etc...).

This log is basically a FINALE reminder that the defendants have to file an answer by September 23, 2016.

After reading it again it sounds like they can STILL file for another extension by Sep 23 if they present a reasonable cause as you're saying.

Quote
Thus, the parties' Rule 26(f) Report is due by September 23, 2016. D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(f). In the Report, the parties shall propose a filing deadline and briefing schedule for any renewed motion for class certification. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/6/2016. (Hillier, D.)

didnt prince change his legal name to a symbol? which you basically cant pronounce. you could be prince'ss Smiley or the btctalk author formerly know as suchmoon
BitBanksy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 09, 2016, 12:28:42 AM
 #46267

Quote from: suchmoon

Just please don't call me something abstract I can't find a picture for.


If I may, your new avatar is awful... Don't take me wrong! I've nothing against the girl power movement... quite the contrary but it just doesn't fit you at all Wink Bring us back our so loved donkey please!!!


 
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8908


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2016, 02:17:57 AM
 #46268

Pink is the gawsomest color, no question about it.
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
September 09, 2016, 02:24:35 AM
 #46269

In other news:  Props 2 @suchmoon for expressing your inner woman with your new avatar.

Someone called me a donkey as if it was an insult of some sort. It's not. Donkeys are adorable so I was wearing that avatar for a while.

Someone recently said I'm "girly" or something to that effect as if it was an insult of some sort. It's not. Guess where every "macho" came from.

Just please don't call me something abstract I can't find a picture for.

So the extension was denied but it still got extended to September 23? I'm pretty sure the original deadline was sooner than that but whatever.

Only a couple of weeks to go.

Basically the defendants did got already an extension. Another extension of time will not be granted except for "good cause" or only if the defendant demonstrates in writing he could not reasonably file a request in a timely manner due to extraordinary circumstances beyond its control (natural disaster or other catastrophe such as fire, etc...).

This log is basically a FINALE reminder that the defendants have to file an answer by September 23, 2016.

After reading it again it sounds like they can STILL file for another extension by Sep 23 if they present a reasonable cause as you're saying.

Quote
Thus, the parties' Rule 26(f) Report is due by September 23, 2016. D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(f). In the Report, the parties shall propose a filing deadline and briefing schedule for any renewed motion for class certification. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/6/2016. (Hillier, D.)

didnt prince change his legal name to a symbol? which you basically cant pronounce. you could be prince'ss Smiley or the btctalk author formerly know as suchmoon


maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1060


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 12:18:44 PM
 #46270

Quote
Thursday, September 08, 2016

36 motion Extension of Time  Thu 12:45 PM
 
 MOTION for Extension of Time until September 27, 2016 (Unopposed) to file a responsive pleading by Stuart A. Fraser. (Fisher, Sean)

bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
September 09, 2016, 05:48:59 PM
 #46271

So they can just extend until they die

suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8908


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2016, 05:55:08 PM
 #46272

Quote
Thursday, September 08, 2016

36 motion Extension of Time  Thu 12:45 PM
 
 MOTION for Extension of Time until September 27, 2016 (Unopposed) to file a responsive pleading by Stuart A. Fraser. (Fisher, Sean)



Quote
Pursuant to Local Rule 7(b)(2) and (3), Defendant Stuart A. Fraser (“Defendant Fraser”)
in the above-referenced action moves, with the consent of Plaintiffs, for a fifteen (15) day
extension of time to file a responsive pleading.

An additional fifteen (15) days to prepare a responsive pleading is necessary for several
reasons. First, undersigned counsel was retained shortly before appearing in this action on
August 10, 2016, and the original responsive pleading deadline was August 12, 2016. Second,
due to the complexity of the Plaintiffs’ purported class action complaint, substantial time and
resources were required to investigate and evaluate the claims in Plaintiffs’ complaint and the
potential defenses thereto. Third, pre-arranged travel at the end of the summer and during the
Labor Day holiday weekend shortened the time available to prepare a responsive pleading.
Therefore, Defendant Fraser respectfully submits that a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ class
action complaint cannot reasonably be prepared within the allotted time, and that an additional
fifteen days is required to do so.

In support of this motion, undersigned counsel states that counsel for Defendant Fraser
has inquired of Plaintiffs’ counsel, who consented to the granting of this motion on the
conditions that Defendant Fraser consent to Plaintiffs’ request that their deadline to respond to
any motion to dismiss be November 4, 2016, and that Defendant Fraser agree to request that his
deadline to file any reply in further support of the motion to dismiss be November 22, 2016.
This is the second motion for extension of time that has been filed by Defendant Fraser.
Defendant Fraser further submits that the additional fifteen days requested herein to file a
responsive pleading would have no detrimental effect on the current schedule, about which his
counsel and Plaintiffs’ counsel are currently conferring. In addition, Defendant Fraser notes that
no other Defendant has yet responded to the Complaint, and the corporate entity Defendants
have not yet been served or appeared in the action.

For the above reasons, Defendant Fraser respectfully requests that the time to file a
responsive pleading be further extended fifteen (15) days until September 27, 2016.
maildir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1060


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 06:24:59 PM
 #46273

Quote
In addition, Defendant Fraser notes that no other Defendant has yet responded to the Complaint, and the corporate entity Defendants
have not yet been served or appeared in the action.

How impersonal. Cry

Not exactly a nice way to refer to your bum chum.  Cheesy
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8908


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2016, 06:37:13 PM
 #46274

Quote
In addition, Defendant Fraser notes that no other Defendant has yet responded to the Complaint, and the corporate entity Defendants
have not yet been served or appeared in the action.

How impersonal. Cry

Not exactly a nice way to refer to your bum chum.  Cheesy

Not to mention that the "corporate entity Defendants" are defunct and Defendant Fraser knows that very well, what with being a co-owner and all.
lithiumus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 09, 2016, 06:58:39 PM
 #46275

Not to mention that the "corporate entity Defendants" are defunct and Defendant Fraser knows that very well, what with being a co-owner and all.

So I'm no legal expert by any means...  but just because a company is NOW defunct does not mean that it wasn't fully operational and fully staffed at the time in which it operated during the time period this complaint refers to.  If you were part of that defunct organization should not mean that you are no longer responsible for participating in the alleged crimes at the time right?

I can't be party to crimes at an organization... move on to a new organization while the other is defunct and be free and clear just because it's "defunct" or no longer in operations or exists...  That makes no sense.  I submit that ANY and ALL previous persons associated with that NOW defunct organization be called out and required to defend against this and stand trial (so to speak).
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8908


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
September 09, 2016, 07:08:15 PM
 #46276

Not to mention that the "corporate entity Defendants" are defunct and Defendant Fraser knows that very well, what with being a co-owner and all.

So I'm no legal expert by any means...  but just because a company is NOW defunct does not mean that it wasn't fully operational and fully staffed at the time in which it operated during the time period this complaint refers to.  If you were part of that defunct organization should not mean that you are no longer responsible for participating in the alleged crimes at the time right?

I can't be party to crimes at an organization... move on to a new organization while the other is defunct and be free and clear just because it's "defunct" or no longer in operations or exists...  That makes no sense.  I submit that ANY and ALL previous persons associated with that NOW defunct organization be called out and required to defend against this and stand trial (so to speak).

This is not about that. Fraser is using the fact that the companies haven't been served as an excuse for the extension, which is ridiculous considering that the companies have already been served (via some mailbox in Delaware) by the SEC in another case and did not respond. Same thing will probably happen here so that service is just a useless waste of time and money. If they want to bring others into the lawsuit they will have to serve them individually.
lithiumus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 10, 2016, 01:44:20 AM
 #46277

This is not about that. Fraser is using the fact that the companies haven't been served as an excuse for the extension, which is ridiculous considering that the companies have already been served (via some mailbox in Delaware) by the SEC in another case and did not respond. Same thing will probably happen here so that service is just a useless waste of time and money. If they want to bring others into the lawsuit they will have to serve them individually.

Yes, you are right and I agree.  Just urks me that they have not sought out and served all the individuals who were officers and had "chief" titles... just got me thinking and I had to put thought down!
suchmoon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3640
Merit: 8908


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2016, 02:21:46 AM
 #46278

This is not about that. Fraser is using the fact that the companies haven't been served as an excuse for the extension, which is ridiculous considering that the companies have already been served (via some mailbox in Delaware) by the SEC in another case and did not respond. Same thing will probably happen here so that service is just a useless waste of time and money. If they want to bring others into the lawsuit they will have to serve them individually.

Yes, you are right and I agree.  Just urks me that they have not sought out and served all the individuals who were officers and had "chief" titles... just got me thinking and I had to put thought down!

Maybe these other individuals don't have assets and/or wouldn't be easy to tie to the case. Remember this is a civil case. Fraser is the big fish to fry here.

If criminal charges are brought at some point - that's another story.
truckinusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 534
Merit: 500



View Profile
September 10, 2016, 06:13:34 AM
 #46279

This is not about that. Fraser is using the fact that the companies haven't been served as an excuse for the extension, which is ridiculous considering that the companies have already been served (via some mailbox in Delaware) by the SEC in another case and did not respond. Same thing will probably happen here so that service is just a useless waste of time and money. If they want to bring others into the lawsuit they will have to serve them individually.

Yes, you are right and I agree.  Just urks me that they have not sought out and served all the individuals who were officers and had "chief" titles... just got me thinking and I had to put thought down!

Maybe these other individuals don't have assets and/or wouldn't be easy to tie to the case. Remember this is a civil case. Fraser is the big fish to fry here.

If criminal charges are brought at some point - that's another story.

What is Unlce Stu's approximate net worth?  I have never seen that posted anywhere.

bitJob                       ▄▄▄██████▄▄▄
                ▄▄▄▄██████████████████▄▄▄▄
        ▄▄▄▄██████████████████████████████████▄▄▄▄
  ▄▄▄████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
  ▀▀██████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀
      ▀▀█████████████████████████████████████████████
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ████████████████████████████████████████  ██
         ▀██████████████████████████████████████▀  ██
          ▀▀██████████████████████████████████▀▀  ████
                                                 ▄████▄
                                                ▀▀████▀▀
IIII
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2016, 06:36:22 AM
 #46280

This is not about that. Fraser is using the fact that the companies haven't been served as an excuse for the extension, which is ridiculous considering that the companies have already been served (via some mailbox in Delaware) by the SEC in another case and did not respond. Same thing will probably happen here so that service is just a useless waste of time and money. If they want to bring others into the lawsuit they will have to serve them individually.

Yes, you are right and I agree.  Just urks me that they have not sought out and served all the individuals who were officers and had "chief" titles... just got me thinking and I had to put thought down!

Maybe these other individuals don't have assets and/or wouldn't be easy to tie to the case. Remember this is a civil case. Fraser is the big fish to fry here.

If criminal charges are brought at some point - that's another story.

What is Unlce Stu's approximate net worth?  I have never seen that posted anywhere.

Probably hidden in a trust

Pages: « 1 ... 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 [2314] 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 ... 2458 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!