Bitcoin Forum
April 22, 2019, 01:42:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 [2282] 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 ... 2460 »
  Print  
Author Topic: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY xpy.io ION ionomy. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :)  (Read 3230703 times)
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1017


View Profile
April 21, 2016, 01:01:16 PM
 #45621


It may be, but it is also true. And of course a reasonable discussion is possible, but only after you admit that you actively participated in the XPY scam and now are actively participating in the ION scam. Until then, everything that comes from your mouth is either sh.i or diarrhea (including the part "I will only answer in another thread, on another forum, in another life, etc etc").

P.s. I'm willing to bet that you will spill more sh.t because the logic is correct and it's impossible to turn shit in anything else.

I can help a little, at the risk of repeating myself...

1) I actively participated in XPY as an investor. It turned out to be a scam. JG scammed me of ~300 BTC.
2) The other project (see other thread) I believe is not proven to be anything yet.
3) You lost your bet


Sh.t !

1) Everybody that had 1 XPY at one time had participated as an investor, but not everybody participated in promoting the scam, only a few pieces of sh.t.
2) The same logic you had when actively promoting the xpy scam, you are doing the same thing again (because you are a piece of sh.t).
3) The logic stand, proven once again to be correct.

As a BCT "HERO" I can only imagine you were awarded that status for successfully not losing your password and email for 2 years. Well done Cheesy

THIS is BS discussion which is worthless and a waste of time. No wonder this thread is 2,290 pages.


And most important, not losing any BTC's (not even satoshis) to scammers like yourself. I always see them from a mile away and expose them.

You were shilling for XPY with this exact same words and atitude: "THIS is BS discussion which is worthless and a waste of time". You are doing the exact same thing! Case proven.

Your flawed logic and poor memory have likely not averted a single person from investing in a scam. How you execute your discussion will impact who will listen to you, or who will take you seriously. Learn the difference between logic and opinion, facts and feelings, objectives and subjectives.

I have faced many people here, many who have been hurt in some way or another and many who are angry and still pissed (I know I am) however, the conversation with you has been the first time I am compelled to press the "Ignore" button. This is not a consideration I take lightly. I listen to angry people, I like to listen to everyone (you see, I learned a lesson) however, i'm finding it hard to justify conversing with you. I hope there is something you have to say which might be of some value, but I fear I might be disappointed.


Sure, then go ahead and ignore me. Same as you did with all the people that told you that XPY is a scam (you called them fudsters, BS, of no value, etc).. and it was sooo obvious!

You are doing the exact same thing all over again and I really don't think that you are so square. From here my conclusion that it is intentionaly and you are trully a piece of sh.t. Now press that ignore button already, you are exactly like hundrets before you, in a few days you will be gone.

I'll try not to press ignore, just in case you have something useful to say. I haven't given up hope yet.

I've never heard of you before, you never tried to save me from the XPY scam. So... using your logic... Is it YOUR fault I lost my BTC?


By all means, please go ahead. I don't spend to much time in a thread anyway. I am saying something very useful: ION is a scam with the same people (to be read pieces of sh.t) that were shilling for XPY, now shilling for it.

Your statement is based on a total lack of any evidence, information, or anything at all - this not going to save a single person. Your "gut feeling" is not enough. You can't save people by just asking people to "trust" you. Facts. Facts. Facts.

I believe scams CAN be averted. It means "thinking people" would achieve more by working TOGETHER. Calling each other names is kinda infantile.

Please. let us have learned something from the XPY experience. Together we can avoid this from happening again.

I'm available to talk facts. Also, this is the wrong thread for non GAW /XPY projects.

People talked facts at the time with GAW and you ignored them.. how do you respond to this. Some facts people raised at the time

1. No pool or individual new pool increased the hash rate needed on the claims garza made.

2. No proof was shown when requested of the actual hashing facility minus and after a lot of time a dark warehouse single row that clearly looking through showed no other rows (btw mordica knew this... he was on that xpy.io or dev or whatever shit that everyone on hashtalk followed after)

3. after requesting proof of amazon, target, etc garza reneged and the shillers i.e. you criticised accusers for garzas lack of proof without questioning him.

4. After all the requests of proof for the actual stories going out i.e. time, cnn, forbes etc we saw some shitty wall street journal paid advert etc. Even after these requests by people and none coming you all still said these publications take time.

Those were all facts and many more and you ignored them back then.... how would you respond to actual facts now? You come here trying to act reasonable yet want to forget your past placing all blame on garza... take some responsibility. I doubt with any such fact acqusations you'd even listen or consider. Correct me if im wrong. Seems the same old shit to me.
1555940531
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555940531

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555940531
Reply with quote  #2

1555940531
Report to moderator
1555940531
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555940531

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555940531
Reply with quote  #2

1555940531
Report to moderator
1555940531
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555940531

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555940531
Reply with quote  #2

1555940531
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1555940531
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555940531

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555940531
Reply with quote  #2

1555940531
Report to moderator
1555940531
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555940531

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555940531
Reply with quote  #2

1555940531
Report to moderator
1555940531
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555940531

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555940531
Reply with quote  #2

1555940531
Report to moderator
Mr-Coins
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 01:01:51 PM
 #45622

With any coin, especially one that has people attached from former projects that are known to have gone bad, proper and detailed research and due diligence is required.

We've all been in the " crypto space" for some time now to see and understand the key signifiers and obvious flags for scams.

from ICO, premines, huuuuge % returns in short timescales, stakers, power stakers et al and more. In the end many bear the same resemblance to former failures and in many cases are/were called out way in advance of their actual failure.

Accepting that these are NOT proper ways to go about coin development, especially now that the whole scene has matured beyond those "wild west" days (although not for the want of many people still trying!!) is a good start to questioning the technology and the people behind it.

Are they competent? Their record of success in Development terms. Former software that can be referred to as useful/valid/real/valuable.

Banging out generic websites, white label code and the like doesn't cut it anymore, there must be substance and to find that one has to dig deep and research and spend time else a fool and his money will soon be parted.

Worthwhile "Coins" are getting rarer as the financial world wakes up and other businesses understand the power of tokenisation and automation to boot. Some kid in a bedroom is now unlikely to be the maker of the next big "Asset" no matter how big the hype they offer.


THIS is reasonable discussion and these are all valid points.
Mr-Coins
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 01:08:32 PM
 #45623

People talked facts at the time with GAW and you ignored them.. how do you respond to this. Some facts people raised at the time

1. No pool or individual new pool increased the hash rate needed on the claims garza made.

2. No proof was shown when requested of the actual hashing facility minus and after a lot of time a dark warehouse single row that clearly looking through showed no other rows (btw mordica knew this... he was on that xpy.io or dev or whatever shit that everyone on hashtalk followed after)

3. after requesting proof of amazon, target, etc garza reneged and the shillers i.e. you criticised accusers for garzas lack of proof without questioning him.

4. After all the requests of proof for the actual stories going out i.e. time, cnn, forbes etc we saw some shitty wall street journal paid advert etc. Even after these requests by people and none coming you all still said these publications take time.

Those were all facts and many more and you ignored them back then.... how would you respond to actual facts now? You come here trying to act reasonable yet want to forget your past placing all blame on garza... take some responsibility. I doubt with any such fact acqusations you'd even listen or consider. Correct me if im wrong. Seems the same old shit to me.

I made a very bad investment and never even came here once to find what anyone was saying. So it's not that I ignored it, I didn't even look.

I was late to the GAW game, so I was taking much of my "advice" from existing long-time GAW investors. That was a huge mistake because of course they got scammed too.

Me being here right now is completely different to 18 months ago. I made not a single visit or comment here. This is how it's different now.
Mr-Coins
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 01:15:48 PM
Last edit: April 21, 2016, 01:31:14 PM by Mr-Coins
 #45624

@Mrcoins

HOLY FUCK you sent 300btc josh garzas way in paycoin... thats at the time around $105,000 USD. Didn't you consider that what people were saying might be true.. a google of paycoin and target would of shown no other news on sites. I sure hope you aren't married with kids etc as that endangered them. How did you explain that all to the family if so....

Yes I did. Luckily that same year I made quite a lot of BTC with other coins... DOGE, MOON, MINT, BOOM, BLACKCOIN etc (So I avoided a divorce lol)

But, yes, it was a lot of money. I trusted existing long-time GAW investors, but we all got scammed. The flaw in my reasoning was I didn't listen/look at all sides.

I walked away from crypto for a long time because of it.
Franz_Huber
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 21, 2016, 01:41:06 PM
 #45625




It's why i'm here! I swapped my useless XPY for ION. Is this round 2?

So i'm all ears to find out what people think the problems are and to help find and investigate issues first hand.

I'll tell you what the problem is:  ION is run by the same people who ran GAW, Paycoin and XPY.io after Garza was made the scapegoat. Who by the way are also the same people that set up the fake "gawsuit". But you know what, have fun playing World of Hash. ION will go to teh moon for sure.
Mr-Coins
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 02:01:17 PM
 #45626

I'll tell you what the problem is:  ION is run by the same people who ran GAW, Paycoin and XPY.io after Garza was made the scapegoat. Who by the way are also the same people that set up the fake "gawsuit". But you know what, have fun playing World of Hash. ION will go to teh moon for sure.

Garza is innocent? I've not head that one before.

World of Hash is just a game. It's not real lol
bitpop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 1045


https://keybase.io/bitpop


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 02:08:43 PM
 #45627

I too believe Homero is innocent

Reputation  |  PGP  |  DigitalOcean  |  TorGuard  |  Ethereum Classic
Bitcoin: 3DSh6AnmvBpDJFUz2mnLirMLmTMcFs9nDm
Bitmessage: BM-2cXN9j8NFT2n1FxDVQ6HQq4D4MZuuaBFyb
boki15
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 21, 2016, 02:54:29 PM
 #45628

I too believe Homero is innocent
Sure, we all do Smiley, we can't wait to see him to tell him this  Cool
ladrx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 21, 2016, 03:04:27 PM
 #45629

With any coin, especially one that has people attached from former projects that are known to have gone bad, proper and detailed research and due diligence is required.

We've all been in the " crypto space" for some time now to see and understand the key signifiers and obvious flags for scams.

from ICO, premines, huuuuge % returns in short timescales, stakers, power stakers et al and more. In the end many bear the same resemblance to former failures and in many cases are/were called out way in advance of their actual failure.

Accepting that these are NOT proper ways to go about coin development, especially now that the whole scene has matured beyond those "wild west" days (although not for the want of many people still trying!!) is a good start to questioning the technology and the people behind it.

Are they competent? Their record of success in Development terms. Former software that can be referred to as useful/valid/real/valuable.

Banging out generic websites, white label code and the like doesn't cut it anymore, there must be substance and to find that one has to dig deep and research and spend time else a fool and his money will soon be parted.

Worthwhile "Coins" are getting rarer as the financial world wakes up and other businesses understand the power of tokenisation and automation to boot. Some kid in a bedroom is now unlikely to be the maker of the next big "Asset" no matter how big the hype they offer.


THIS is reasonable discussion and these are all valid points.


"THIS is reasonable discussion and these are all valid points."

You sure do like to say that a lot.

Adam Matlack 1/5/2014: "Not but 30 seconds later, the Holy Spirit slapped me upside the head and said "what are you thinkin'? What are you doin'?" It was an emphatic "NO". And I got - just guilt started to cover me"
favdesu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 06:02:46 PM
 #45630

I too believe Homero is innocent

it's all thanks to the troll fudders!

Franz_Huber
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 21, 2016, 09:10:16 PM
 #45631

I'll tell you what the problem is:  ION is run by the same people who ran GAW, Paycoin and XPY.io after Garza was made the scapegoat. Who by the way are also the same people that set up the fake "gawsuit". But you know what, have fun playing World of Hash. ION will go to teh moon for sure.

Garza is innocent? I've not head that one before.

World of Hash is just a game. It's not real lol

Where did I say "Garza is innocent"? Nowhere. I said he was made a scapegoat. You need to work on your reading comprehension.
Garza is a con man - and he does not have the slightest idea how blockchain based cryptocurrencies work. That's why he became partners with people who badly copied the Peercoin sourcecode for him. The only thing Garza knows about besides creating scams is how to write marketing drivel. And thus from the badly written Peercoin clone called Paycoin, Garza created a fairy tale of the totally innovative Paycoin with Wal-Mart and Amazon adoption. As the scam progressed, Garza's friends took all XPY from him and booted him. There is no honor among thieves. They blamed him for the whole scam why they kept dumping their paycoins on you while they pretended to save you bagholders by setting up awesome websites and groups such as "Team Paycoin", XPY.io and all that other garbage. They even created a fake lawsuit - all this while blaming Garza for everything, and you fell for it. You could have read about all that here months ago. (And these are the people who you buy your ION from. Have fun.)
BitNow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


- Crypto Asset Marketplace -


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 10:13:06 PM
 #45632

R.I.P. XPY


             ▐█████▄
            ▐█████████        ▄▄▄
            ▐████  ▐█████   ▀▀▀  █▌
            ▐███  ▐███████      ▐█▌
            ▐██▌   ▀█████▀     ▐█▀
       ▂▄▄▐██▌     ▀▀▀      ▐█▌
    ▐██████████████▄▄▄▄▄     ▄█▌
  ▐███       ▐███▀▀█████▄▄▄ ▐██
   ▐█▌        ▐███    ▀▀▀███████▄▄▄
    ▀▀▀        ▐███        ▐██▀█████▄▄
                ▐███      ▐██▌    ▀▀███▄▄
                 ▐███    ▐██▌  ▄▄▄▄▄  ███▄
         ▄████▄   ▐██▌  ▐███  ▐███████████
       ▐████████▌  ▐██▌▐██▌   ▐████████▀▀
        ▀██████▀    ▐████▀     ▀████▀
         ▐███▀     ▄█▐███
        ▐███▀   ▄████▌▀███
        ▐██████████▀    ▐█▌    █
         ▀████▀▀         ▐█▌  ██
                           ▀▀▀▀





























DPOS Financial Ecosystem
[[[[[Hybrid-decentralized exchange]]]]]














▶  FACEBOOK
▶  TWITTER
▶  TELEGRAM
▶  BITCOINTALK
▶  BLOG
▶  FORUM
▶  WHITEPAPER
▶  GITTER
▶  GITHUB
▶  SLACK
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 2963



View Profile
April 21, 2016, 10:29:41 PM
 #45633

Just a quick note. ION is semi-ontopic here, I'll update the title soon-ish to get rid of Carmelo and put ionomy in it. I think it's fine to discuss how ION relates to Garza's "legacy" and all that. For a more in-depth discussion on ION whitepaper and all the awesome innovations (LOL) please visit their official thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633
BitNow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000


- Crypto Asset Marketplace -


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 10:36:05 PM
 #45634

Just a quick note. ION is semi-ontopic here, I'll update the title soon-ish to get rid of Carmelo and put ionomy in it. I think it's fine to discuss how ION relates to Garza's "legacy" and all that. For a more in-depth discussion on ION whitepaper and all the awesome innovations (LOL) please visit their official thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1443633

How this is related to XPY?


Best regards.


             ▐█████▄
            ▐█████████        ▄▄▄
            ▐████  ▐█████   ▀▀▀  █▌
            ▐███  ▐███████      ▐█▌
            ▐██▌   ▀█████▀     ▐█▀
       ▂▄▄▐██▌     ▀▀▀      ▐█▌
    ▐██████████████▄▄▄▄▄     ▄█▌
  ▐███       ▐███▀▀█████▄▄▄ ▐██
   ▐█▌        ▐███    ▀▀▀███████▄▄▄
    ▀▀▀        ▐███        ▐██▀█████▄▄
                ▐███      ▐██▌    ▀▀███▄▄
                 ▐███    ▐██▌  ▄▄▄▄▄  ███▄
         ▄████▄   ▐██▌  ▐███  ▐███████████
       ▐████████▌  ▐██▌▐██▌   ▐████████▀▀
        ▀██████▀    ▐████▀     ▀████▀
         ▐███▀     ▄█▐███
        ▐███▀   ▄████▌▀███
        ▐██████████▀    ▐█▌    █
         ▀████▀▀         ▐█▌  ██
                           ▀▀▀▀





























DPOS Financial Ecosystem
[[[[[Hybrid-decentralized exchange]]]]]














▶  FACEBOOK
▶  TWITTER
▶  TELEGRAM
▶  BITCOINTALK
▶  BLOG
▶  FORUM
▶  WHITEPAPER
▶  GITTER
▶  GITHUB
▶  SLACK
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1017


View Profile
April 21, 2016, 10:59:43 PM
 #45635

People talked facts at the time with GAW and you ignored them.. how do you respond to this. Some facts people raised at the time

1. No pool or individual new pool increased the hash rate needed on the claims garza made.

2. No proof was shown when requested of the actual hashing facility minus and after a lot of time a dark warehouse single row that clearly looking through showed no other rows (btw mordica knew this... he was on that xpy.io or dev or whatever shit that everyone on hashtalk followed after)

3. after requesting proof of amazon, target, etc garza reneged and the shillers i.e. you criticised accusers for garzas lack of proof without questioning him.

4. After all the requests of proof for the actual stories going out i.e. time, cnn, forbes etc we saw some shitty wall street journal paid advert etc. Even after these requests by people and none coming you all still said these publications take time.

Those were all facts and many more and you ignored them back then.... how would you respond to actual facts now? You come here trying to act reasonable yet want to forget your past placing all blame on garza... take some responsibility. I doubt with any such fact acqusations you'd even listen or consider. Correct me if im wrong. Seems the same old shit to me.

I made a very bad investment and never even came here once to find what anyone was saying. So it's not that I ignored it, I didn't even look.

I was late to the GAW game, so I was taking much of my "advice" from existing long-time GAW investors. That was a huge mistake because of course they got scammed too.

Me being here right now is completely different to 18 months ago. I made not a single visit or comment here. This is how it's different now.

People posted that stuff on hashtalk... they were called fudders there everyone on that forum including you saw it. Also the shadow bans and shit and josh's constant o this is a glitch that is a glitch. remember when his emails came out and people still weren't believing? Calling them fake etc
CryptoBuds
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 21, 2016, 11:33:08 PM
 #45636

People talked facts at the time with GAW and you ignored them.. how do you respond to this. Some facts people raised at the time

1. No pool or individual new pool increased the hash rate needed on the claims garza made.

2. No proof was shown when requested of the actual hashing facility minus and after a lot of time a dark warehouse single row that clearly looking through showed no other rows (btw mordica knew this... he was on that xpy.io or dev or whatever shit that everyone on hashtalk followed after)

3. after requesting proof of amazon, target, etc garza reneged and the shillers i.e. you criticised accusers for garzas lack of proof without questioning him.

4. After all the requests of proof for the actual stories going out i.e. time, cnn, forbes etc we saw some shitty wall street journal paid advert etc. Even after these requests by people and none coming you all still said these publications take time.

Those were all facts and many more and you ignored them back then.... how would you respond to actual facts now? You come here trying to act reasonable yet want to forget your past placing all blame on garza... take some responsibility. I doubt with any such fact acqusations you'd even listen or consider. Correct me if im wrong. Seems the same old shit to me.

I made a very bad investment and never even came here once to find what anyone was saying. So it's not that I ignored it, I didn't even look.

I was late to the GAW game, so I was taking much of my "advice" from existing long-time GAW investors. That was a huge mistake because of course they got scammed too.

Me being here right now is completely different to 18 months ago. I made not a single visit or comment here. This is how it's different now.

People posted that stuff on hashtalk... they were called fudders there everyone on that forum including you saw it. Also the shadow bans and shit and josh's constant o this is a glitch that is a glitch. remember when his emails came out and people still weren't believing? Calling them fake etc

It started a whole argument and BitcoinBoner said it was possible to hack SHA-256 with a normal computer in just a few days. People even came up with ideas how that (encrypted/verified) header/email could be faked. It was hilarious. Garza even admitted that that Google group was made public on accident and people STILL thought it was fake! ION is going to be a coin with the same 100 or so people that enjoy riding a long con. You could hand them a dollar bill, tell them it's a dollar bill and they wouldn't believe you that it's a one dollar bill. Even though it is physically in their hand. That sorta mental this bunch is.

                      ▄█████▄
                      ███████
                      ███████▓▄
                     ▄█▓▀     ▀█▓▄
                    ▄█▓▀        ▀█▓▄
                   ▄█▓▀           ███████▄
               ▄██████   ██████▄   ████████ 
              ████████   ███████   ▀█████▀             
              ▀███████   ███████
                  ▀█▓▄    █▓   █▓
                     ▀█▓▄ █▓     █▓▄█████▄
             ▄██████    ██████▄  █████████
            ████████    ███████    ██████▀
            ▀███████    ▀█████▀ ▄█▓▀
                   ▀█▓▄        ▄█▓▀
                      ████████▓▀
                      ████████
                      ▀██████▀

                                                           
           ▄██▄▄               ▄▄▄▄                  ███   
        ▄██▀  ▀██▄         ▄▄████████   ██████       ███   
     ▄██▀        ▀██      ▄██       ███ ███  ███     ███   
     ███                 ▄██            ███   ███    ███   
     ███                ▄██             ███     ███  ███   
     ███                ███             ███       ██████   
     ███████████████    ██████████████  ███                 
customcontract.network

Phildo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000



View Profile
April 21, 2016, 11:35:10 PM
 #45637

People talked facts at the time with GAW and you ignored them.. how do you respond to this. Some facts people raised at the time

1. No pool or individual new pool increased the hash rate needed on the claims garza made.

2. No proof was shown when requested of the actual hashing facility minus and after a lot of time a dark warehouse single row that clearly looking through showed no other rows (btw mordica knew this... he was on that xpy.io or dev or whatever shit that everyone on hashtalk followed after)

3. after requesting proof of amazon, target, etc garza reneged and the shillers i.e. you criticised accusers for garzas lack of proof without questioning him.

4. After all the requests of proof for the actual stories going out i.e. time, cnn, forbes etc we saw some shitty wall street journal paid advert etc. Even after these requests by people and none coming you all still said these publications take time.

Those were all facts and many more and you ignored them back then.... how would you respond to actual facts now? You come here trying to act reasonable yet want to forget your past placing all blame on garza... take some responsibility. I doubt with any such fact acqusations you'd even listen or consider. Correct me if im wrong. Seems the same old shit to me.

I made a very bad investment and never even came here once to find what anyone was saying. So it's not that I ignored it, I didn't even look.

I was late to the GAW game, so I was taking much of my "advice" from existing long-time GAW investors. That was a huge mistake because of course they got scammed too.

Me being here right now is completely different to 18 months ago. I made not a single visit or comment here. This is how it's different now.

People posted that stuff on hashtalk... they were called fudders there everyone on that forum including you saw it. Also the shadow bans and shit and josh's constant o this is a glitch that is a glitch. remember when his emails came out and people still weren't believing? Calling them fake etc

It started a whole argument and BitcoinBoner said it was possible to hack SHA-256 with a normal computer in just a few days. People even came up with ideas how that (encrypted/verified) header/email could be faked. It was hilarious. Garza even admitted that that Google group was made public on accident and people STILL thought it was fake! ION is going to be a coin with the same 100 or so people that enjoy riding a long con. You could hand them a dollar bill, tell them it's a dollar bill and they wouldn't believe you that it's a one dollar bill. Even though it is physically in their hand. That sorta mental this bunch is.

Of course they don't know what a dollar bill looks like, did you see what they thought a $20 bill looked like? Imagine the confusion if they tried to hand out $20 bills now with the changing picture.
o0o0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1316
Merit: 1017


View Profile
April 22, 2016, 04:02:08 AM
 #45638

People talked facts at the time with GAW and you ignored them.. how do you respond to this. Some facts people raised at the time

1. No pool or individual new pool increased the hash rate needed on the claims garza made.

2. No proof was shown when requested of the actual hashing facility minus and after a lot of time a dark warehouse single row that clearly looking through showed no other rows (btw mordica knew this... he was on that xpy.io or dev or whatever shit that everyone on hashtalk followed after)

3. after requesting proof of amazon, target, etc garza reneged and the shillers i.e. you criticised accusers for garzas lack of proof without questioning him.

4. After all the requests of proof for the actual stories going out i.e. time, cnn, forbes etc we saw some shitty wall street journal paid advert etc. Even after these requests by people and none coming you all still said these publications take time.

Those were all facts and many more and you ignored them back then.... how would you respond to actual facts now? You come here trying to act reasonable yet want to forget your past placing all blame on garza... take some responsibility. I doubt with any such fact acqusations you'd even listen or consider. Correct me if im wrong. Seems the same old shit to me.

I made a very bad investment and never even came here once to find what anyone was saying. So it's not that I ignored it, I didn't even look.

I was late to the GAW game, so I was taking much of my "advice" from existing long-time GAW investors. That was a huge mistake because of course they got scammed too.

Me being here right now is completely different to 18 months ago. I made not a single visit or comment here. This is how it's different now.

People posted that stuff on hashtalk... they were called fudders there everyone on that forum including you saw it. Also the shadow bans and shit and josh's constant o this is a glitch that is a glitch. remember when his emails came out and people still weren't believing? Calling them fake etc

It started a whole argument and BitcoinBoner said it was possible to hack SHA-256 with a normal computer in just a few days. People even came up with ideas how that (encrypted/verified) header/email could be faked. It was hilarious. Garza even admitted that that Google group was made public on accident and people STILL thought it was fake! ION is going to be a coin with the same 100 or so people that enjoy riding a long con. You could hand them a dollar bill, tell them it's a dollar bill and they wouldn't believe you that it's a one dollar bill. Even though it is physically in their hand. That sorta mental this bunch is.

Of course they don't know what a dollar bill looks like, did you see what they thought a $20 bill looked like? Imagine the confusion if they tried to hand out $20 bills now with the changing picture.

Sure they do... its the one with josh garzas face on it in the middle isn't it?

Hey remember that time paycoin was so technologically advanced that even josh didn't know what the fuck it did or how it worked? How he posted up on hashtalk nobody has guessed or come close to the entire paycoin ecosystem and he offered a btc reward to who explained it the best. Was amusing that it wasn't a red flag to people ... take their money then ask them to guess what it does so you can take the best ideas and say yeah you guessed it even though josh had no fucking clue.

Remember how paycoin was so innovative and way faster than all other coins but no code changes were done it was a fork and just a block time change.

Once this is all over we'll have to have a rememberance day where we have a drink and tell all the fun old stupid stories about the time josh garza thought he was intelligent. Man i bet unclue stu, josh's mum and pretty much everyone whos ever met him feels embarrassed to be scammed by someone who was so obvious that it wasn't funny.
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 2963



View Profile
April 22, 2016, 04:50:25 AM
 #45639

As a BCT "HERO" I can only imagine you were awarded that status for successfully not losing your password and email for 2 years. Well done Cheesy

THIS is BS discussion which is worthless and a waste of time. No wonder this thread is 2,290 pages.

A word of advice if I may. If you want a reasonable discussion - be reasonable. Ad hominem is not reasonable. Tone complaints don't make any sense at all, especially in this thread.

Your flawed logic and poor memory have likely not averted a single person from investing in a scam. How you execute your discussion will impact who will listen to you, or who will take you seriously. Learn the difference between logic and opinion, facts and feelings, objectives and subjectives.

Looks like you're trying to have it both ways again. How about we go back to your "SEC approval" and other statements. Were they made with the intention of having them taken seriously or were you knowingly spouting rubbish? Also logic vs opinion - when you were defending your shilling just recently you tried to paint it as an opinion but you repeatedly used the word "logic" in that same "SEC approval" thread. So it was all serious facts and logic back then and became feelings and opinions later?

The fact (and not a feeling) is this: you were faced with proof showing that Garza is up to no good but you shilled for him like he was the genius he pretended to be. Malicious or ignorant, that behavior certainly puts your current shilling for ION in the same category. You're faced with facts, such as the lack of proof that the "team" is even capable of things they promise, a multi-milllion USD ICO with no escrow, etc.

But this time you know it's going to be cool because you know Adam is a nice guy? Was Homero a nice guy too? Was he being arrested or wanted by the FBI when you gave him your money and encouraged others to do so with your "logic"? Was his address and phone number publicly known? Actually Garza still hasn't been arrested so perhaps he's not a scammer. Those e-mails were fake and Paybase blog said the SEC can go fuck themselves.

For me, I look at the external facts. He has not been arrested, he is not wanted by the FBI, Garza has not claimed he was an accomplice, he is completely transparent in his home address and cellphone number, and some 16 months has passed for law enforcement agencies to do their enquiries. So I have no reason to believe he was acting with Garza (who incidentally scammed anyone and everyone, unconditionally including his friends, his co-workers, his investors - hence why he is a wanted man).

Any claims that Matlack scammed people are just claims but in reality, the actions of the authorities and lack of any evidence to the contrary are compelling enough for me. Besides, for many months with XPY I have seen him in action and he seems like a really nice, honest guy. (This is NOT investment advice!)

You're like a drunk driver weaving across the autobahn. With some luck you might be able to get home without hurting yourself or anyone else but to an outside observer you look like someone who shouldn't be drinking or driving or both.

By the way Garza hasn't been criminally charged and even the civil suit hasn't really started yet so I wouldn't be so sure his accomplices are going to emerge unscathed from this.
Mr-Coins
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
April 22, 2016, 06:20:40 AM
 #45640

As a BCT "HERO" I can only imagine you were awarded that status for successfully not losing your password and email for 2 years. Well done Cheesy

THIS is BS discussion which is worthless and a waste of time. No wonder this thread is 2,290 pages.

A word of advice if I may. If you want a reasonable discussion - be reasonable. Ad hominem is not reasonable. Tone complaints don't make any sense at all, especially in this thread.


For a moment I started to lose my composure. I will make use of the ignore button in future rather than get drawn in to time wasting.

Advice gratefully accepted.
Pages: « 1 ... 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 [2282] 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 ... 2460 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!