|
|
|
KC6TTR
|
 |
December 22, 2014, 02:31:16 AM |
|
Hi All!
I see it was just another day in the delusional world of Mt.GAW's CEO (or who/whatever else he is pretending to be today).
Some have enquired to where I have been lately. In summary, I have been very busy getting ready for the CES 2015 show in Vegas and spending time with the family for the Holidays, but I am still here and supporting those who can see through the GAW/Zen lies and hype. Keep it going!
Scott-
|
|
|
|
|
|
KC6TTR
|
|
December 22, 2014, 02:34:38 AM |
|
XPY = Overhyped “Pipedream™” |
|
|
|
|
jfabritz
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 141
Merit: 100
Cryptocoin Dabbler
|
|
December 22, 2014, 02:41:47 AM |
|
Whenever this new wallet comes out (assuming they actually figure it out), someone will have to do a diff to see what the hell they changed. I'm sure whatever it is, it'll be a terrible hack. I just wonder if it's possible that they can fuck things up so much they just say we need to start over lol. I bet their multiple coin development teams and entire companies they bought/hired/made up can reconcile the blockchain manually  They should have had the wallet and the POW/POS draw down planned and tested thoroughly before they let the coin go live. I mean, isn't the test net there so they can run it through the paces before releasing it? Or run some freaking simulations for goodness sake! Use that 5 PH of SHA-256 hash they bought from Bitmain to abuse it. For all we know, maybe they did, but their test plan didn't account for these little issues. For a $100+ million valued product that is essentially a payment processing network, you cannot have these kinds of issues. Imagine if Visa rolled out a software change that caused the network to go down for 24 hours. It would be complete and utter anarchy! |
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 22, 2014, 02:42:24 AM |
|
BREAKING: Paycoin TOO Innovative
Unfortunately, Intel could not handle Paycoin. The latest Xeons could not process the Hybridflex, Orion, or Prime controllers upon final testing. AMD, ARM and Nvidia were also not viable.
This means we have had to temporarily suspend paycoin pending a new 128 bit processor. CNN has stated they have never seen anything so innovative.
We are in meeting with IBM to develop these new processors. Once in production, our members will have the first chance to purchase these new innovative processors.
In addition, Microsoft is not innovative enough and has refused to support 128 bit so a massive team of 100,000,000 developers have been commissioned to begin development of GawOS.
Rest assured, your paycoin will be kept safely in cashtakers until we find hardware and software compatible with Paycoin. Cashtakers are still available for sale with bitcoin and fiat.
Paycoin will be worth $20 in paybase once this is completed in 100 years. Bitcoin is not viable.
|
|
|
|
seedtrue
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 963
Merit: 1002
|
|
December 22, 2014, 02:42:53 AM |
|
Sweet!!!!! They bought a whole recruiting firm.   |
|
|
|
|
interstellar
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
December 22, 2014, 02:51:16 AM |
|
I love how this is gonna push back the paybase release. As if they needed a really good excuse to do that. |
|
|
|
|
interstellar
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
December 22, 2014, 02:55:47 AM |
|
Whenever this new wallet comes out (assuming they actually figure it out), someone will have to do a diff to see what the hell they changed. I'm sure whatever it is, it'll be a terrible hack. I just wonder if it's possible that they can fuck things up so much they just say we need to start over lol. I bet their multiple coin development teams and entire companies they bought/hired/made up can reconcile the blockchain manually They should have had the wallet and the POW/POS draw down planned and tested thoroughly before they let the coin go live. I mean, isn't the test net there so they can run it through the paces before releasing it? Or run some freaking simulations for goodness sake! Use that 5 PH of SHA-256 hash they bought from Bitmain to abuse it. For all we know, maybe they did, but their test plan didn't account for these little issues. For a $100+ million valued product that is essentially a payment processing network, you cannot have these kinds of issues. Imagine if Visa rolled out a software change that caused the network to go down for 24 hours. It would be complete and utter anarchy! I see it now when the entire financial infrastructure of the world is underpinned by paycoin.... [suddenly the network goes down for 24 hours for the umpteenth time] Hey, looks like the power went down at Garza's mom's house again! Better call the WTO and tell them they'll need to release a new wallet to the general population! |
|
|
|
|
T0urist
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
December 22, 2014, 02:56:37 AM |
|
BREAKING: Paycoin TOO Innovative
Unfortunately, Intel could not handle Paycoin. The latest Xeons could not process the Hybridflex, Orion, or Prime controllers upon final testing. AMD, ARM and Nvidia were also not viable.
This means we have had to temporarily suspend paycoin pending a new 128 bit processor. CNN has stated they have never seen anything so innovative.
We are in meeting with IBM to develop these new processors. Once in production, our members will have the first chance to purchase these new innovative processors.
In addition, Microsoft is not innovative enough and has refused to support 128 bit so a massive team of 100,000,000 developers have been commissioned to begin development of GawOS.
Rest assured, your paycoin will be kept safely in cashtakers until we find hardware and software compatible with Paycoin. Cashtakers are still available for sale with bitcoin and fiat.
Paycoin will be worth $20 in paybase once this is completed in 100 years. Bitcoin is not viable.
The amusing thing is if GAW CEO Posted that on hashtalk... they'd all believe it and stand up clapping him. |
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 22, 2014, 02:57:38 AM |
|
Geez this guy is a compulsive liar. Hidden setting lol. And still illiterate "This are the official ones. The auto ones are not in there." |
|
|
|
interstellar
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
December 22, 2014, 02:58:38 AM |
|
BREAKING: Paycoin TOO Innovative
Unfortunately, Intel could not handle Paycoin. The latest Xeons could not process the Hybridflex, Orion, or Prime controllers upon final testing. AMD, ARM and Nvidia were also not viable.
This means we have had to temporarily suspend paycoin pending a new 128 bit processor. CNN has stated they have never seen anything so innovative.
We are in meeting with IBM to develop these new processors. Once in production, our members will have the first chance to purchase these new innovative processors.
In addition, Microsoft is not innovative enough and has refused to support 128 bit so a massive team of 100,000,000 developers have been commissioned to begin development of GawOS.
Rest assured, your paycoin will be kept safely in cashtakers until we find hardware and software compatible with Paycoin. Cashtakers are still available for sale with bitcoin and fiat.
Paycoin will be worth $20 in paybase once this is completed in 100 years. Bitcoin is not viable.
Dollar killer! So exited!! |
|
|
|
|
|
chunkyjunkie
|
|
December 22, 2014, 03:03:49 AM |
|
Hmm new to this thread can someone summarize all the proof about the accusations I see about GAW. thanks in advance.
I skimmed all the posts and it was mostly Y repeating Z's comment and belief that GAW is a ponzi, or scam for the logical extrapolation that most coins before xpy were scams or ponzi.
If anyone is so inclined to post a reply with links or proof beyond some blog report or personal experience that they of course have no screenshots, emails etc for I would be grateful.
I think a list of all the proof would be more helpful then X,Y or Z posts filled with saving the day comments with no substance.
Waiting... and thank you.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 22, 2014, 03:03:54 AM |
|
Watch out guys with Joshs leaked password, their github will be compromised and a virus released.
I keep my .04 paycoin is a safe virtual machine! paycoin.exe never touches anything thats worth something!
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 22, 2014, 03:04:54 AM |
|
Hmm new to this thread can someone summarize all the proof about the accusations I see about GAW. thanks in advance.
I skimmed all the posts and it was mostly Y repeating Z's comment and belief that GAW is a ponzi, or scam for the logical extrapolation that most coins before xpy were scams or ponzi.
If anyone is so inclined to post a reply with links or proof beyond some blog report or personal experience that they of course have no screenshots, emails etc for I would be grateful.
I think a list of all the proof would be more helpful then X,Y or Z posts filled with saving the day comments with no substance.
Waiting... and thank you.
That's your problem. Believe homero will give you $20 or not. We don't care if after 444 pages you want to invest. |
|
|
|
interstellar
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
December 22, 2014, 03:09:05 AM |
|
Hmm new to this thread can someone summarize all the proof about the accusations I see about GAW. thanks in advance.
I skimmed all the posts and it was mostly Y repeating Z's comment and belief that GAW is a ponzi, or scam for the logical extrapolation that most coins before xpy were scams or ponzi.
If anyone is so inclined to post a reply with links or proof beyond some blog report or personal experience that they of course have no screenshots, emails etc for I would be grateful.
I think a list of all the proof would be more helpful then X,Y or Z posts filled with saving the day comments with no substance.
Waiting... and thank you.
Hey man thanks for you joining us. If we had absolute proof of a ponzi we would already have called the SEC. You are welcome to help us find the truth together though! |
|
|
|
|
|
chunkyjunkie
|
|
December 22, 2014, 03:10:20 AM |
|
Hmm new to this thread can someone summarize all the proof about the accusations I see about GAW. thanks in advance.
I skimmed all the posts and it was mostly Y repeating Z's comment and belief that GAW is a ponzi, or scam for the logical extrapolation that most coins before xpy were scams or ponzi.
If anyone is so inclined to post a reply with links or proof beyond some blog report or personal experience that they of course have no screenshots, emails etc for I would be grateful.
I think a list of all the proof would be more helpful then X,Y or Z posts filled with saving the day comments with no substance.
Waiting... and thank you.
That's your problem. Believe homero will give you $20 or not. We don't care if after 444 pages you want to invest. I think you misunderstand. I am looking for any proof to be listed and put in one place for people who might not to wade through 444 posts. Or are you saying of those 444 posts many have proof and facts? If so I will go start taking a closer look! From my quick skimming I saw mostly X agreeing with Y that it had to be a ponzi or scam, well just because! |
|
|
|
|
doogsan
|
|
December 22, 2014, 03:10:31 AM |
|
Hmm new to this thread can someone summarize all the proof about the accusations I see about GAW. thanks in advance.
I skimmed all the posts and it was mostly Y repeating Z's comment and belief that GAW is a ponzi, or scam for the logical extrapolation that most coins before xpy were scams or ponzi.
If anyone is so inclined to post a reply with links or proof beyond some blog report or personal experience that they of course have no screenshots, emails etc for I would be grateful.
I think a list of all the proof would be more helpful then X,Y or Z posts filled with saving the day comments with no substance.
Waiting... and thank you.
That's your problem. Believe homero will give you $20 or not. We don't care if after 444 pages you want to invest. Read the fucking thread |
|
|
|
|
ikeboy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
December 22, 2014, 03:10:43 AM |
|
Concidering he not registered with the FINCEN yet it may be longer then that.
If this is true than this is outrageous.....It is completely unethical to both claim legal and regulatory superiority over other bitcoin businesses and at the same time not be properly registered before launching an the IPO. This may very well be another excuse given to further delay withdrawals, my guess is they won't need to use this excuse as they can selectively choose who to speed through the verification process in 3-4 days based upon how much XPY that is owned or if the person is likely to dump the coins or not. WOW someone just ask where the MSB information is out right https://hashtalk.org/topic/24461/can-we-see-the-registration-as-msb/5I saw the claim here so decided to ask them. Look on the bright side we cant ban you here <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<upvote>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on that one Um ... I got this email: https://i.imgur.com/QYVThIh.pngh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
December 22, 2014, 03:13:17 AM |
|
Hmm new to this thread can someone summarize all the proof about the accusations I see about GAW. thanks in advance.
I skimmed all the posts and it was mostly Y repeating Z's comment and belief that GAW is a ponzi, or scam for the logical extrapolation that most coins before xpy were scams or ponzi.
If anyone is so inclined to post a reply with links or proof beyond some blog report or personal experience that they of course have no screenshots, emails etc for I would be grateful.
I think a list of all the proof would be more helpful then X,Y or Z posts filled with saving the day comments with no substance.
Waiting... and thank you.
That's your problem. Believe homero will give you $20 or not. We don't care if after 444 pages you want to invest. I think you misunderstand. I am looking for any proof to be listed and put in one place for people who might not to wade through 444 posts. Or are you saying of those 444 posts many have proof and facts? If so I will go start taking a closer look! From my quick skimming I saw mostly X agreeing with Y that it had to be a ponzi or scam, well just because! You seem to be a shill though https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=199685.msg9873690#msg9873690 |
|
|
|
|
